Search:

[QUOTE=Stealthbomber16;944872]I’m wondering how many of your shitposts I have missed because they look exactly like your other posts and your posts have so many words that I usually just skim them and nod in agreement.[/QUOTE]

Probably none. There is some cute takes in what I said there but I have only recently gotten pissed off enough about everything to tear at social norms within established structures when they do not seem to give a flying fuck about the individual.

Ask yourself what social structures justify the loss of freedom in exchange for interaction within society and you will at least have the question that matters.

Originally Posted by Stealthbomber16

I’m wondering how many of your shitposts I have missed because they look exactly like your other posts and your posts have so many words that I usually just skim them and nod in agreement.

Probably none. There is some cute takes in what I said there but I have only recently gotten pissed off enough about everything to tear at social norms within established structures when they do not seem to give a flying fuck about the individual.

Ask yourself what social structures justify the loss of freedom in exchange for interaction within society and you will at least have the question that matters.

I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.

I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.