Search Results - SC2 Mafia
Register

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Auwt

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Search: Search took 0.02 seconds.

  1. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857
  2. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Well what could I say, except congrats to the one who bussed Varcron?
  3. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    I don't give a crap anymore.
    I'm going to follow my scumlist order then.
    At least until ceko opens his mind...
    -vote PQRnHack


    PQR apparently succeeded in converting ceko...
    Sigh.
  4. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Nothing further, your honor.
    Yeah...
    For sure...
  5. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    This is insane.
  6. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Anyway good night.
  7. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    so my conclusion is Auwt's post was aimed at Ceko (what a shocker). Auwt already knows that neither I nor Frinckles accept it lol
    The only posts I am directly aiming at ceko are the ones where I quote him or the following ones until I quote someone else.
    I just find it odd you are able to lock someone as town, because I cannot "95%" lock someone right there apart from Ceko.
  8. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Ah yes, the classic of "answering" a question with a question.


    OK, tell me which "possible team" I failed to suggest. It was actually your buddy Varcron that committed this crime, but not I.
    And @theoneceko should know by now that it's a 2v2 (hard lines) and of course we will vote the same person as LTC teammates. but if you dont like that, I can vote you, Auwt, instead
    Here it is :

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    I am LTC and we win together, along with Frinckles.
    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    If @Awut means the team of Frinckles+PQR, that is exactly the fake scum pairing mafia want Ceko to believe. Both Frinkles and I know that it cannot be possible, but Ceko does not know. But why would we, LTCs, ever "suggest: such a false pairing? get outtta here
    If it such a false pairing why would Frinckles even state the Auwt+Frinckles team that is probably the least possible between all the other, but skipping PQR+Frinckles :

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    So now we need to figure out some teams <3 you auwt but im using your name for each to make it neater.


    Auwt+Me bus of the year can be tossed out the window. Nobody is buying that.


    Auwt+Varcron does make sense; the two almost exclusively never interacted before Blink's death. Auwt and Varcron slots had been averse to figuring out the last two Mafia if either had a town POV until PQR finally decided to play ball.


    Auwt+PQR makes little sense (as in, not a lot of sense), they had a hammer on Varcron last night -- the game would be over and I would just concede because that's just hammer blitz shenanigans.. Then again, maybe that's what this setup was made for since two people have a day chat? idk
  9. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    @theoneceko my scenario post proves important. Notice how Auwt is trying to swap it from scenario 1 to scenario 2 (where he offers up Varcron to earn cred).

    I don't even get Auwt's "t makes way more sense than actually seeing how PQR reacted with Frinckles, locking him as LTC, both forgetting to consider the PQR/Frinckles team, and so on."

    How can an informed LTC "forget" an impossible combination? Get outta here lol
    Informed LTC?
    Impossible combination?
  10. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    bruh, varcon is last in ur poe
    Yeah I would certainly put Varcron in first place whereas, there is this Oberon shaky unconsistent slot alongside both PQR locking Frinckles town skipping possible bussing, and each one of them forgetting to mention a possible team. And to add even more, both voting the same person right now ?

    I would totally put a semi-afk slot first over the two others.....
  11. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    well, i'm pretty sure scum!auwt would not bus his partner.

    so a varc and auwt team looks plausible
    And "our" plan would be to send Varcron to an exilee island to make sure there is no answer from him, and I could solo the game, right?
    It makes way more sense than actually seeing how PQR reacted with Frinckles, locking him as LTC, both forgetting to consider the PQR/Frinckles team, and so on.
    It hurts to read such things.
  12. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    I have no idea if Varcron is scum or town, in addition we haven't seen him around lately.
    I have no idea if PQR is scum or town, but his way of siding with Frinckles is weird.
    I believe Frinckles is one of the two scums.

    That's where I'm currently at.
  13. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Auwt ur okay with lynching varcon right?
    I don't f care anymore at this point.
    Vote and I follow, or the opposite way around.

    Yet, the preferable lynch order would in my opinion be Frinckles/Oberon > PQR > Varcron
  14. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Load of BS. I know Varcron is not team with Frinckles based on votes. So remaining options Auwt+Frinckles or Auwt+Varcron. What a genius statement, guess why I said Auwt is the safest lynch?
    Oh so I would have expected a self-person to just remove the pairing where this self-person is present.
    But you are making a step further by adding this?
    You must have a knowledge I don't or will you claim this is just a gambit/gut ?
  15. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Frinckles and I are both LTC's (90% is what I said, barring the wild case of Frinckles+Varcron team, which is frankly lower than the 10% so I should revise that to like 95). What are you trying to say here? Maybe you are slow on catching up on the setup, but Frinckles and I are two LTCs and Ceko is Sheriff.
    To make you understand that giving an almost full town credibility to someone other than ceko in this exact case, cannot be considered pro-town at all.
    You are either scum or hard gambling right there.

    Spoiler : + :


    Especially in a lylo situation.....


  16. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Zero shits given to mafia trying to discredit me. I already know that I need to find nothing. It's for Ceko, not me.
    I mean you use question mark and a "Tell me" formula so uh.
  17. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    I'm freaking out because I know how to win the game and you do not (and I *KNOW* that you do not - this is the scenario #1 we're in). Frinckles is also being doubtful which I dont like, but like I said, Auwt is the safest lynch for sure. But I am 90% sure Frinckles is our other LTC here.
    So we are going from :

    I am LTC and we win together, along with Frinckles.


    to :

    But I am 90% sure Frinckles is our other LTC here.
  18. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Yeah, out of control for you because Ceko is waking up to reality.
    Tell me which "two" and which "one" of them is potentially bussing? There has been zero bussing between me and Frinckles, I will not vote my LTC twin and I will not bus him. I know the solve.
    Quote Originally Posted by Auwt View Post
    Is it Varcron + PQR ? This is the one which might be the least likely. I haven't seen any scum!PQR in previous games though, so don't mark my word still.
    Is it Frinckles + Varcron ? This one is already making more sense, as I seeing Frinckles leading the train would ultimately lead to Varcron's death + someone between PQR and me tomorrow (likely me in this case).
    Is it Frinckles + PQR ? This one is also making sense, and I'm not erasing this option at all especially considering the voting pattern from this day.
    Are you going to find it by yourself ?
    I was not talking about a bussing between you and Frinckles though.
  19. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    so here's a thought experiment:


    Player A and Player B are in a thunderdome but we already know player B loses. We find out later that player B is town.

    I tried getting player B to not lose but it doesn't work.

    Now I'm given the task to divine of 3 people (with a 66% chance of success) which two are scum.

    *Question: What are the odds that Player A is scum?
    Spoiler : Answer :
    Pretty fucking high.


    So now we need to figure out some teams <3 you auwt but im using your name for each to make it neater.

    Auwt+Me bus of the year can be tossed out the window. Nobody is buying that.

    Auwt+Varcron does make sense; the two almost exclusively never interacted before Blink's death. Auwt and Varcron slots had been averse to figuring out the last two Mafia if either had a town POV until PQR finally decided to play ball.

    Auwt+PQR makes little sense (as in, not a lot of sense), they had a hammer on Varcron last night -- the game would be over and I would just concede because that's just hammer blitz shenanigans.. Then again, maybe that's what this setup was made for since two people have a day chat? idk

    If it wasn't apparent, Auwt is Player A in the top thought experiment.
    Quote Originally Posted by Auwt View Post
    Looks like a team might be lacking in there.
    Guess which.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    Oh no no, you're absolutely correct. It'd be really unfair for me not to dispel a PQR/Frinckles scum team for you; In fact I had just started to but got caught up. (See my above post about my slots reads being consistent.)

    I'll elaborate further, hold on.
    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    @theoneceko you are reading into words too much, I guess that's what FM is about. But I am generally not emotional and much of what I said or did, esp. D1 is NAI. Now I am getting slightly emotional because I have the solve and I KNOW that you do not. But what the hell can I do to help you out here? I asked you earlier, if you view any of my comments or actions as sus, please list that out and I know I will be able to answer/defend because I am LTC and we win together, along with Frinckles. Somehow I have to convince you that Auwt+Varcron are the mafia team.


    Why do I suddenly feel they are slipping or at least forgetting the possibility that one of the two is just bussing.
    This is getting out of control.
  20. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    so here's a thought experiment:


    Player A and Player B are in a thunderdome but we already know player B loses. We find out later that player B is town.

    I tried getting player B to not lose but it doesn't work.

    Now I'm given the task to divine of 3 people (with a 66% chance of success) which two are scum.

    *Question: What are the odds that Player A is scum?
    Spoiler : Answer :
    Pretty fucking high.


    So now we need to figure out some teams <3 you auwt but im using your name for each to make it neater.

    Auwt+Me bus of the year can be tossed out the window. Nobody is buying that.

    Auwt+Varcron does make sense; the two almost exclusively never interacted before Blink's death. Auwt and Varcron slots had been averse to figuring out the last two Mafia if either had a town POV until PQR finally decided to play ball.

    Auwt+PQR makes little sense (as in, not a lot of sense), they had a hammer on Varcron last night -- the game would be over and I would just concede because that's just hammer blitz shenanigans.. Then again, maybe that's what this setup was made for since two people have a day chat? idk

    If it wasn't apparent, Auwt is Player A in the top thought experiment.
    Looks like a team might be lacking in there.
    Guess which.
  21. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    it's sad how lag's strategy got completely shot to the ground.

    2 villagers and 2 mafia claimed sheriff, assuming lag-auwt is town (which i believe). however, one villager is dead (blink).

    wait, does what i just said even make sense?

    scum!lag would wisely not thunderdome, then hard-push for blink and oberon, who lag knows are both town and went against her "optimal strategy."

    easy win for scum!lag
    I can only agree with this post.
    It's saddening to see numerous of Sheriff claims when the game could have easily been almost solved D1.
  22. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    hmmmm

    frinckles + varc (frinckles bussing varc)
    frinckels + pqr (frinckles teaming with pq to lynch varc)

    are both possible though, now that u say it.

    however, u defending varc just makes u look like ur in a team with varc
    I'm not here to defend Varcron, I'm just saying out of the possible pairing, Frinckles is the one that would fit the most with each one of PQR or Varcron.
    If you add to it Oberon's behaviour, that IS the best possible lynch outta here.

    I am however not saying Varcron is green.
    Varcron and PQR are like unstable elements whereas Frinckles is a kind of certain one.
  23. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Auwt i assume u determined frinckles was scum on ur own. however, varcon's tunnel on frinckles makes no sense here, so don't let that sway you.

    anyways here's why i think frinckles is town:



    i think town!frinckles is more self-deprecating???

    im okay with lynching frinckles, because it's possible that scum!oberon was on town!lag's train, but i still think varcon is the lynch for today.

    my current poe is:

    varc -> pqr -> frinckles -> auwt
    I was not really willing to talk about the reasons that pushed someone to sub out.
    But I understand Lag's reason as explained there :

    Quote Originally Posted by Auwt View Post
    Ok I understand now why I am here.
    I'm not scum, and you aren't either ceko.

    That means there are 2 scums in the PQR/Frinckles/Varcron pool.

    Is it Varcron + PQR ? This is the one which might be the least likely. I haven't seen any scum!PQR in previous games though, so don't mark my word still.
    Is it Frinckles + Varcron ? This one is already making more sense, as I seeing Frinckles leading the train would ultimately lead to Varcron's death + someone between PQR and me tomorrow (likely me in this case).
    Is it Frinckles + PQR ? This one is also making sense, and I'm not erasing this option at all especially considering the voting pattern from this day.

    From my point of view Frinckles is the correct lynch today.
  24. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    @Auwt i assume u determined frinckles was scum on ur own. however, varcon's tunnel on frinckles makes no sense here, so don't let that sway you.

    anyways here's why i think frinckles is town:



    i think town!frinckles is more self-deprecating???

    im okay with lynching frinckles, because it's possible that scum!oberon was on town!lag's train, but i still think varcon is the lynch for today.

    my current poe is:

    varc -> pqr -> frinckles -> auwt
    Why would I be in last position if your best townread is Frinckles as previously stated ?
    If you are truly putting me as the last one, you should realize something is off regarding PQR and Frinckles both voting Varcron (even though PQR did change to me).
  25. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    -vote Varcron

    @PQRnHack u said varcron is a mafia member who voted you. you said the mafia team is lag-auwt + varcron. so u should have no problem voting varc.
    @Auwt you have to unvote right now. frinckles is my strongest townread
    Someone town reading/nai'ing what Oberon did, cannot have a town mindset.
    I don't know how you could ever town read Frinckles' slot.
  26. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    In before Frinckles and PQR are both Mafia.
  27. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Fine whatever, Frinckles should be sleeping anyway.

    -unvote
  28. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    hey @Auwt did you read the entire thread? i won't blame if you didn't.

    i trust lag, evry gam trst lag. so im writng u off as reee townie
    I have read 90% of the thread I believe.
  29. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    -vote Frinckles
  30. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Now to be honest I'm going to say, I have not much against you PQR.
    It's just as it is because you followed Frinckles who previously was Oberon.
    And that Oberon was not consistent at all regarding his read and his way of playing compared to other recent town games.

    That's also why I am leaving the possibility that Varcron may eventually be scum and could have only one scum in his train (and so the other would be town).
    This was stated in #620.
    If this is true, then you would be the town over Frinckles.

    What I am however certain of, is that I won't vote the one voted by Frinckles/Oberon due to prior elements.
  31. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Let's see the evidence of me voting outside the thunderdome
    Where is your vote then if not on Ceko nor Blinkskater?
    I don't see it.
    Did you take part in this thunderdome?
    I don't see it.
    So you are outside of it.
  32. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    Oberon(now Frinckles) votes Lag
    Blink votes Lag
    Ceko votes Blink
    Lag votes Blink
    Varcron hammers Blink
    This is bs.
    Oberon was not the first to vote.
    Ceko/Lag casted their votes on blink way before, they just unvoted/revoted for like hours.
    Oberon came WAY LATER into the game, when the thunderdome was ALREADY a thing.

    I would have done exactly the same as Lag.
    Being put at L-1 over a thunderdome is pitifull.
  33. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    @Auwt, wanna vote Varcron?
    *Right now both Frinckles and you are voting Varcron.

    *Both Oberon and you voted out of the thunderdome between the two sheriff claims.

    *I have to assume ceko is the only Sheriff here.

    *I did not find any contradiction/consistency issues in Varcron's post whereas there has been in Oberon's ones.

    *I know I am not scum.

    So now that the situation is pretty clear,
    It leaves little to no other possiblility :

    Why would I vote Varcron when at least one if not two scums are in his wagon?
  34. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    I am now certain that this is why Blink got hammered, because your slot was at L-1.
    Wrong.
    Lag has been pushing blink long before being put up at L-1.
    Yesterday was Ceko vs Blink.
    Guess who was out of this pool trying to deflect knowing what blink would flip?
    Shall I recall you the votes ?
  35. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by LagAttack View Post
    Fucking at L-1 now myself. WHY AM I AT L-1 WHEN THERE'S LITERALLY A PERSON THAT HARD-CLAIMD SHERIFF JUST TO BACK OUT?
    Ok I understand now why I am here.
  36. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    Yeah PORNHack's Sheriff claim wasn't scummy he invalidated it in his first post. It's not the claim itself that's scummy. It's also not retracting that's scummy; it's the context. Claiming Sheriff as a joke, and then unclaiming a few minutes later is too pro-town. Which is why it's scummy. Scum do that to avoid pressure.
    Look how Oberon backed up PQR's claim :

    "It's not the claim itself that's scummy. It's also not retracting that's scummy; it's the context"

    "Claiming Sheriff as a joke, and then unclaiming a few minutes later is too pro-town."

    What's the deal of saying PQR is pro-town and Varcron is scummy for doing exactly the same??

    Both claimed Sheriff, both retracted, both said it was for the meme.

    Oberon's view on PQR : Town.
    Oberon's view on Varcron : Scum.
  37. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    @Oberon don't vote early, it's L-3 for all (and mafia have 2 votes)
    That's funny to read this, I have no idea why.
  38. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by theoneceko View Post
    Well in that case you might be mistaking in my opinion.
    Just have a look at this for instance :

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    -vote Varcron

    Claiming Sheriff and then unclaiming it is kinda wolfy. You standing by the reasons here?
    Quote Originally Posted by Auwt View Post
    Not that I'm defending Varcron, but claiming and retracting is a play you are familiar with.
    Consistency is lacking a bit there.
    Would you honestly see a town!Oberon claiming that RETRACTING A CLAIM IS SCUMMY ?
    That's seems to be way off.

    @theoneceko
  39. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Anyway before attempting anything crazy,
    I am going to head to dream land, and hopefully have a fresher mind tomorrow.
  40. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    How much do you like Occam's razor?

    I didn't vote for Blink and wanted your slot lynched while you were in a thunderdome with Blink.

    From the perspective of Varcron/PQRN both being town I would be bussing you in that scenario which we both know is untrue.

    Therefore, one or both of them is scum from our perspectives. Not only this, but if you and PQRN are teamed up all it would take is your two votes to hammer him if he's town. Obviously PQRN isn't online but that could change rather quickly. Doesn't have high impact on the game at the moment, but it's worth mentioning.

    Regardless, I don't see you teamed up with PQRN as I outlined to Ceko last page. I see you with Varcron here or Varcron with PQRN.

    So, which one would you prefer we lynched? Varcron works in both worlds I see plausible, do you agree?
    The thing is that, if you truly are town, then the solve should be Varcron/PQR.
    But you are so eager to get a lynch that I'm starting doubting, especially considering Oberon's consistency throughout the different games he has played.

    Another possibility would also be PQR and you, or even darker, Varcron and you, since Varcron has not been insta-hammered yet.
    The fact that you voted someone to a L-2 shows you KNOW 100% what you are doing, but that's the kind of play I would see from a town!Frinckles or a scum!Frinckles.
  41. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    -vote Varcron

    Claiming Sheriff and then unclaiming it is kinda wolfy. You standing by the reasons here?
    Not that I'm defending Varcron, but claiming and retracting is a play you are familiar with.
    Consistency is lacking a bit there.
  42. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Oberon View Post
    Why do we have 3 sheriff claims?
    Lmao.
  43. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    So auwt it's Varcron and pqrn right?
    Atm I haven't seen any post from Oberon or you.

    The possible pairings that stand out are :

    Varcron/PQR
    PQR/Frinckles
    Frinckles/Varcron

    But that's only with the assumptions of having not seen any of your post AND that ceko is the uncced Sheriff right now.
  44. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    Yeah this is 100% right from Ceko

    I think lag overreacted by saying that it was only him that was getting shit thrown towards them, it was a group of us.

    Do I think the amount of shit thrown was out of desperation? I kind of do, and that's why I'm not ruling out voting blink, however I don't think turbo is the way to go in any scenario with Lazy

    IMO scum!blink I could see fake claiming sheriff and doing exactly what he did as a high risk-reward play.
    Probably still some kind of grudges from previous game. (Lag/blink)
  45. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by LagAttack View Post
    THE FUCKING OBJECTIVE WAY TO PLAY THIS SAVE:
    SHERIFF PUBLICALLY REVEALS

    IF NO ONE COUNTER CLAIMS, GREAT, SHERIFF LEADS TOWN.

    IF YOU GET TWO SHERIFF CLAIMS, EVEN BETTER, YOU LYNCH ONE SINCE THEY ARE SCUM AND THE OTHER IS REAL SHERIFF.

    THAT WHOLE STRATEGY DOESN'T WORK IF YOU LET ONE OF THE COUNTER CLAIMS OUT OF IT. THAT'S HOW YOU LET MAFIA WIN MORE OFTEN THAN TOWN - THAT'S WHY HELZ SAID IN THE SETUP THREAD THAT HE THINKS THE SAVE IS TOO SCUM FAVORED - BECAUSE PEOPLE GET COLD FEET AND LET SCUM GET AWAY WITH SHIT.


    But fuck me for wanting to stick to the optimal strategy, right? Apparently wanting to stick to the optimal strategy to win and pushing hard for the person I read to be far scummy in the thunderdome makes me scum.
    Tbh this is the way to solve this setup.
    I back up Lag's vote on blink, I would have totally voted blink if I had been here D1.
    And at the time I'm reading this post more than 3+ people claimed it.
    Supposingly either maf made an attempt or there are multiple trolling citizens.
  46. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by blinkskater View Post
    Lmao no you didn't even ask for my reasons for doing what i did, you just auto vote me and say i cant be town because im not sheriff. You are further outting yourself as scum here.
    I still don't see the point of doing that as a Citizen.
  47. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    No, quite frankly, I can't guess what you're hard claiming.

    If that's an attempt to divert the attention away from you after being moved to L-1 by some dumbass then that gives you scum credibility.
    Blink voted you before entering L-1.
    I don't think that was an attempt to divert the attention.
    Anyway with Ceko ccing and forcing the thunderdome, it would not have changed the outcome imo...
  48. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    My vote will stand on ceko. It makes no sense for a pro player to consider a universe with the 2 mafia both claiming Sheriff.
    Yup, I would not expect it either.
  49. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by PQRnHack View Post
    If I had to take an associative guess on a team right now it would be Ceko + Lag
    I don't know if my talk is worth something here.
    But atm I find Ceko as a misguided townie.
  50. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)

    Thread Author:OzyWho

    Post Author:Auwt

    Replies
    834
    Views
    34,857

    ►►Re: S-FM 328: Lazy (6P)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    Isn't that exactly what blink said a few posts back but with an uno reverso?
    ^ .
Results 1 to 50 of 57
Page 1 of 2 1 2