?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷ - Page 17
Register

User Tag List

Page 17 of 59 FirstFirst ... 7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 27 ... LastLast
Results 801 to 850 of 2921
  1. ISO #801

  2. ISO #802

  3. ISO #803

  4. ISO #804

  5. ISO #805

  6. ISO #806

  7. ISO #807

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Hey peter View Post
    I think I would have liked someone agreeing with a Bungalow lynch possibility if it were not Harold. Harold is becoming a better lynch quickly. Mucho deflection.

    -vote S-FM Harold
    in a lot of capacities yes

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Harold View Post
    I actually dont know where I stand at this moment on anyone. I need to do some rereading and go through what lynches provide the most information here and make note of what benefits who
    post #671

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Harold View Post
    well fuck, im getting there. so impatient peoples... i have like 700 posts to go through.
    my vote will go on the lynch i find will give the most beneficial information. and i will highlight why.
    post #797

    . . .

    id like to see what he says first, but that contingency is time sensitive

    i dont think smiley has done enough to move my vote off him yet either

    and of course there is the chaos of eod itself

  8. ISO #808

  9. ISO #809

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    in a lot of capacities yes



    post #671



    post #797

    . . .

    id like to see what he says first, but that contingency is time sensitive

    i dont think smiley has done enough to move my vote off him yet either

    and of course there is the chaos of eod itself
    I may have asked you this before I can't remember lol but why do you town read masterpiece?

  10. ISO #810

  11. ISO #811

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM bungalow View Post
    mostly because there are two people in this game that, after a reread, could easily be a team.
    and I think their thoughts do not match their actions.
    If after a re-read you only came up with two people that could potential be paired and not more I think you need to work on your reading skills lol

  12. ISO #812

  13. ISO #813

  14. ISO #814

  15. ISO #815

  16. ISO #816

  17. ISO #817

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    I may have asked you this before I can't remember lol but why do you town read masterpiece?
    i dont believe you have. this was my stance on him from my post yesterday

    @S-FM Masterpiece*[65]: to be floundering around so much at 65 posts, i think the only thing that stopped you from being lynched earlier was a lack of activity tbh and you still might fight your way to the end of that rope. i asked you as a town member to put your eggs in the right basket and to give more answers than questions but you just insist that youre better at d2. you are not towntelling at all, you just come off as derpy or confused. fix it or you die tomorrow probably.
    fwiw: hes only posted once since, it was an unvote.

    as you can tell i certainly dont read masterpiece as a town member but i am more suspicious of players like smiley.

    if masterpiece wants to use having bad d1s as a crutch, fine i wont judge for now.

    there are enough votes in the game to lynch him without me and im focused on other interactions.

    he plays better tomorrow or he dies

  18. ISO #818

  19. ISO #819

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    i dont believe you have. this was my stance on him from my post yesterday



    fwiw: hes only posted once since, it was an unvote.

    as you can tell i certainly dont read masterpiece as a town member but i am more suspicious of players like smiley.

    if masterpiece wants to use having bad d1s as a crutch, fine i wont judge for now.

    there are enough votes in the game to lynch him without me and im focused on other interactions.

    he plays better tomorrow or he dies
    Oh I must be mixing you up with someone else, i thought it was you, I kn ow sadface town reads him, which I explained already was weak asf, but I thought there was someone else who felt strongly that masterpiece was town

  20. ISO #820

  21. ISO #821

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    I explained a world somewhere where sadface calling us TVT over like nothing was scummy asf, my conclusions there were if masterpiece was infact town then sadface TMI'D us as town and he's scum it was not natural feeling from sadface.

    That being said I'd still lynch either of them don't really care either way, sadface has been contributing more so I feel if he's wolfy as all hell on day 1, he'll be even wolfier on day 2 lol

  22. ISO #822

  23. ISO #823

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    i really dont like you saying this tbh

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    If after a re-read you only came up with two people that could potential be paired and not more I think you need to work on your reading skills lol
    ill ignore that it implies you know the number of scum who might be working together

    . . .

    you asked him the right question, why

    then you miss your opportunity to ask him, who

    and for the sake of a weak insult

    noting thats uncharacteristic of you, but ill leave it at that

  24. ISO #824

  25. ISO #825

  26. ISO #826

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    i really dont like you saying this tbh



    ill ignore that it implies you know the number of scum who might be working together

    . . .

    you asked him the right question, why

    then you miss your opportunity to ask him, who

    and for the sake of a weak insult

    noting thats uncharacteristic of you, but ill leave it at that
    If I wanted to know "who" i'd have asked him so I didn't miss a question at all.

    Yeah I guess I am pretty sure based on how many players there are in the game it's probally a 3 person scumteam, i'm pretty confident about that yeah and that's how i've been interpreting this game right from the start, so I understand how you can pick up on that.

    And yeah I threw a jab at him, I wanted him to react to it not you lol.

    If I wanted to

  27. ISO #827

  28. ISO #828

  29. ISO #829

  30. ISO #830

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Oh I must be mixing you up with someone else, i thought it was you, I kn ow sadface town reads him, which I explained already was weak asf, but I thought there was someone else who felt strongly that masterpiece was town
    That was probably me then

  31. ISO #831

  32. ISO #832

  33. ISO #833

  34. ISO #834

  35. ISO #835

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Was it? You just gave me a "meta " reason I think, How are you "Meta" reading people in an anon game?
    basically you can meta read if you think you figured out the person whos actually playing specific names. but you cant rely on that because you can always fake a meta.

  36. ISO #836

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM bungalow View Post
    You’ve been moved up on my townread along with JFK and screams. I still townread Yolk rn but not as much as I did back then. And I don’t trust swag rn, I don’t want him gone but I’m keeping him on absorb leash
    You can place me in your scum reads if you want, the more people that scum read me publicly in the thread, the longer I'll probably stay alive in the night tbh lol

  37. ISO #837

  38. ISO #838

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Masterpiece View Post
    basically you can meta read if you think you figured out the person whos actually playing specific names. but you cant rely on that because you can always fake a meta.
    i'm pretty sure that goes against the spirit of the game and is considered angle shooting.

  39. ISO #839

  40. ISO #840

  41. ISO #841

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    i'm pretty sure that goes against the spirit of the game and is considered angle shooting.
    well im not doing it im just saying it as a possibility. and thats what could be happening. thats how some are meta reading. in a completely anon game

  42. ISO #842

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Was it? You just gave me a "meta " reason I think, How are you "Meta" reading people in an anon game?
    The same way I metaread random people I've never played with before. I put them in a drawer and compare them to players having performed the same play in a different game. I strongly believe that's better than just going off of zero on an anon acc anyway.

  43. ISO #843

  44. ISO #844

  45. ISO #845

  46. ISO #846

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM swag98 View Post
    The same way I metaread random people I've never played with before. I put them in a drawer and compare them to players having performed the same play in a different game. I strongly believe that's better than just going off of zero on an anon acc anyway.
    interesting take.

  47. ISO #847

  48. ISO #848

  49. ISO #849

  50. ISO #850

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •