S-FM 210: Give or Take - Page 17
Register

User Tag List

Page 17 of 35 FirstFirst ... 7 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 27 ... LastLast
Results 801 to 850 of 1710
  1. ISO #801

  2. ISO #802

  3. ISO #803

  4. ISO #804

  5. ISO #805

  6. ISO #806

  7. ISO #807

  8. ISO #808

  9. ISO #809

  10. ISO #810

  11. ISO #811

  12. ISO #812

  13. ISO #813

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Your random defense of YZ and then voting of me when I highlighted his scum play? Your initial post saying how you shouldnt be lynched because you are experienced yet all you seem to do is troll? Your fake claim or Idk wtf you were doing when u were saying u were gnna peek MZ you are just scummy as fuck.

  14. ISO #814

  15. ISO #815

  16. ISO #816

  17. ISO #817

  18. ISO #818

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Let me try a little more level-headed approach

    My response was very emotional, please let me explain myself.

    (1)I'm shocked that you agree with the player pushing back against the person scumreading you -- really, no kidding!(2) Scum are just as motivated to get rid of those who suspect them, especially when that player wasn't particularly active / vocal and had promised to be more so today.

    Response: (1) is NAI. Naturally I agree with people who disagree with scumreads on me lol. In regards to (2), I just explained the dangers of reading the scumkill.

    Why I'm pissed: In this exchange, DB proposed a chain of reasoning (reading the scumkill), I dismantled the base of the chain (scum wants you to read scumkill, scum very hard to read), and then DB continued to extend the chain anyway (scum wants to kill people who will scumread them) It's like he completely ignored what I said.

    "Yes, it's possible they did that. Doesn't explain the rest of your d1 behavior though -- excessive policy lynch analysis, IIOA in lieu of opinions at EOD, suddenly changing your vote to lynch NU at EOD and saying that I convinced you when there was no progression to suggest that. "

    Response: I've already given explanations. As I said with max patronization earlier, you now should counter the explanations, not ignore them.

    Why I'm pissed: This is unbeatable. No matter how much I repeat explanations, you can say "you haven't" in that oh-so-convincing fashion and everyone will trust you. Again, I'm being ignored.

    "Reads evolve and you take additional happenings in the game into account, such as your YOLO lynch of your supposed Townread, NU. When you get more data (i.e. NU's flip), you should go back and review what's happened in the game from that vantage point."

    Response: If my PL is relevant again due to the NU mislynch, you should explain specifically how it links to the mislynch of NU and my vote. You haven't explained the link.

    Why I'm pissed: Wtf? The first time he brought this up, he just said "yzb was focused on PLs". How am I supposed to know he had some hidden reasoning that linked it to the NU mislynch?! He's literally moved the playing field mid-debate when called out on his contradiction. And he's done it so naturally noone will notice.

    "We're early in Day 2. I've given a theory as to what I think is going on -- you're free to posit your own. You literally have one vote on you and you're jumping into the OMFG I'M GETTING LYNCHED level defense. If anything, you're the one who is writing a giant tome to discredit all of my play right now instead of defending your own. That's a classic scumplay -- not focused on your own play, but trying to discredit your accuser. You're also giving yourself a lot of credit as the "one player" who didn't agree with the lynch. How about SP or Mesk for that matter?"

    Response: Sorry for not having a theory ready just after my scumread got torn apart. Anyway, about half of the "tome" is a defense. And I've made numerous references to the townish things I've done. Also, my emotional response to your one vote is now being explained. It is a big deal. Also, I didn't say I'm the "one player" who disagreed with the NU lynch, I said I'm the "one player" who proactively spent ages trying to talk down the players in the NU lynch. Also, the sum of all the posts about me you've made today is a bit shorter than my "tome", but pulling apart bullshit takes longer than saying it.

    I'm pissed because I wrote reasons I feel you're acting scummy and defenses of my townplay, but they've all been ignored. I'm pissed because I feel like he's doing the above with almost everything I say, and I'm pissed because he's going to fucking get away with it because this argument is going to get half-read and people will place votes on me out of instinct.

    "Yeah, you were too busy posting summaries for the two AFK players -- that's exactly my point. You didn't share your thoughts, perhaps because you were afraid of slipping or saying something that you didn't intend. It's very easy and safe to post summaries that I doubt Banana and Ginger are even going to read. Funny how you didn't point out this view (that NU needed to be lynched) until 5 minutes before EOD. Before that, you were almost hoping that some lurker like Eggy would come and hammer NU -- you directly said that yourself."

    Response: As I've already said, by that point, I had shared my scumread (and voted on them), tried to implore others into looking into why I scumread them, tried to placate the train on my townread to BC and Titus, and written why I townread NU (and sent it to you). As I've already said, continuing to do that was pointless given the vote count. I'm sorry for not explaining my change of mind. Everyone else had explained the reasons. I assumed it was reasonable to believe I changed my mind. I didn't think I'd be scumread for hammering for the reasons nearly everyone else currently present posted and persuaded me with.

    Why I'm pissed: Explanation ignored, explanation ignored, explanation ignored.

    "I heard the explanation, I just don't accept it."
    "You've explained this, but you haven't explained everything else."
    "You haven't explained many things"
    "You continually refuse to explain yourself and bounce attention on to me."

    GET THE FUCK OUT OF MY HEAD AND STOP FUCKING IGNORING ME

    Debating DarknessB when he goes into this mode is like debating the world's most intelligent creationist - it doesn't matter if you're in the right - they're superior to you, and superiority determines the winner.

    Anyway, I wanted to explain my emotional response. Sorry for being intimate. Sorry if I lose town the game because of my childish complexes heh.

  19. ISO #819

  20. ISO #820

  21. ISO #821

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Well, I find myself in a tough situation...

    Do I take the side of the mentor that made me the person I am today, or my high school fuck

    uh

    well

    tbh I think I'm taking Eggys side on this one

    -vote BananaCucho
    Quote Originally Posted by AnassRhamur View Post
    Please don't post in the punished players section if you're not involved. Consider this a warning from Thugnificent. You got one Thug ticket. Collect 3 more of those and i'll have to issue a Thug Infraction. Collect 3 Thug Infractions and you get 1 Thug Misdemeanor Charge.

    Spoiler : :
    Citizen, Agent, Citizen, Vigilante, Citizen, Godfather, Citizen, Citizen, Voter, Elder, Mafioso, BackUpSleuth, Escort, Mafioso, Detective, Citizen, Citizen, Tailor, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, TheJoker, Citizen, LadyGaga, Mafioso, Winston Wolfe, Detective, Citizen, Citizen, Masquerader

  22. ISO #822

  23. ISO #823

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Can someone tell me (best if it was Titus herself) why the Titus train dissipated yesterday? How is she town now?

    Titus, can you pick out a post where you were "bleeding town emotion"? I don't see any.

    Though she saw that Never Unlucky saw her as town, she never unvoted him. That's rather opportunistic.

    Her play has continued to be reactive. Calling posts against her as shade by Never Unlucky.

  24. ISO #824

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by secondpassing View Post
    Can someone tell me (best if it was Titus herself) why the Titus train dissipated yesterday? How is she town now?

    Titus, can you pick out a post where you were "bleeding town emotion"? I don't see any.

    Though she saw that Never Unlucky saw her as town, she never unvoted him. That's rather opportunistic.

    Her play has continued to be reactive. Calling posts against her as shade by Never Unlucky.
    It may be that Titus might be sum but the early ling rush on her makes me think not. That shit started with MZ'd poor host meta vote and people piled on. No thanks, not voting Titus today either.
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho

  25. ISO #825

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by MiniZed View Post
    If that's the reason you are scum-reading me, because of my emotion, you won't like the end result.
    This is vaguely linked with another post, but just treat this question as by itself:

    Context- Never Unlucky and you talked, and you replied with something like "not wanting to play as your [poopy] playstyle"
    If you aren't trying to play the same as Black Flag Nightless, what are you planning/doing to change your playstyle this game?

    ::

    Serpate question:
    What would you like to convince me of?

  26. ISO #826

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    The word choice in his insults. You don't run around calling your scumreads dumb. By insulting my play as dub rather than scummy, it indicates a townread. No one calls their scumreadthe townbeard.
    So did you kill him for that?

    *double hands up troll face here* Ugh sc2mafia why you so sloww.

  27. ISO #827

  28. ISO #828

  29. ISO #829

  30. ISO #830

  31. ISO #831

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by DarknessB View Post
    The scummy part is the sudden flip-flop on account of "Darkness convinced me". When did I do that exactly? Yzb was adamantly saying he woudn't vote for NU, and suddenly, when he was faced with a no lynch, he flips his vote onto him. Also, did you read the 4-5 other reasons I have a questionable read on him?

    1. Sudden change of vote without explanation.
    2. Overuse of IIOA (summaries)
    3. Overuse of general Mafia strategy (policy lynch debate)
    4. MZ (Town) scumread him, as the one noteable read he emphasized.
    5. Was being a bit too friendly to me during d1 (new reason)
    I gotta be honest, this still feels oppourtunistic to me, and I'll explain why.

    Yzb25 is legit the NU to Calix. I'm not sure if he's madly in love with you, but it's fairly evident he looks up to you. For the EOD comment, I don't see why him voting is a bad thing. You were talking a lot about how no Lynches leaves us nothing, and I know that point was reinforced but you could also tell he voted NU because he was arrogant and lashing out. It's pretty obvious with what he wrote.

    1.) I can't speak for him, but as I said I don't think he found NU cooperative given his post. Whether what you said actually convinced him or if he was just pissed off I don't find it that scummy. Why did you guilt someone into voting if you were just going to lash out on him?

    2.) that feels more of a personality thing. I don't see why it's bad or why it's scummy so I might need more clarification.

    3.) why would scum need to be open about this? I fail to see why they would do this either.

    4.) Yes, it was very obvious they both scum-read each other. My issue is how quickly you came to make a case against yzb and how you failed to consider a framing possibility.

    5.) Out of game reference, but before the sign ups even started he asked you for his autograph. I don't know how this comes as a surprise or why you suddenly bring it up now.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    I have bias towards MiniZed ^.^
    Suggesting MiniZed and I could be scumbuddies because MiniZed hasn't "attacked" me is reaching at best.

  32. ISO #832

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    theres 10 of us left
    7 are town

    there's no one in this game so far that has striked me as solid town

    on that note, i really thought MattZed was a potential scum but he wasn't so for that I'm kinda baffled to say the least

    honestly right now I think MiniZed and Banana are scum

    Banana's role claim seemed more like a ploy to draw out reaction

    MiniZed seemed to be defending Banana

    quotes to come

    must read some more stuff
    I'm not sure what makes you think we are scum, have you even seen our interactions outside of Banana's claim?

    I'm sorry if we don't reach the same conclusion, but I compare Banana's actions similar to Ducks town antics. It's not a good reference, but my point stands that there was no reason for scum to do that even without reading the setup.

  33. ISO #833

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    Anyway



    Are you now caught up? We need to question you so you're not policy lynched for having shit taste in 2d girls.
    Darkness is right. Try to actually interact other then saying "are you caught up yet" it feels like a low key way to encourage teammates to talk.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    I have bias towards MiniZed ^.^
    Suggesting MiniZed and I could be scumbuddies because MiniZed hasn't "attacked" me is reaching at best.

  34. ISO #834

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by Eggy View Post
    -vote yzb25
    there is no way in hell this man is not scum
    You sheeped points from Darkness to stick it on yzb25. I'll ask you a question though.

    Nobody town-read MattZed as far as I'm sure. Unless the Vig killed Matt, which I don't really know if they would have, what would yzb25 gain from Matt's death?
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    I have bias towards MiniZed ^.^
    Suggesting MiniZed and I could be scumbuddies because MiniZed hasn't "attacked" me is reaching at best.

  35. ISO #835

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    Well, I find myself in a tough situation...

    Do I take the side of the mentor that made me the person I am today, or my high school fuck

    uh

    well

    tbh I think I'm taking Eggys side on this one

    -vote BananaCucho
    You make everything so dramatic for whatever reason.

    Eggy's argument is yzb is scum and being defended by Banana. Eggy voted yzb. If you believe Eggy why aren't you voting against yzb because the only reason he finds banana scummy (that was mentioned aside from the claim) is because she defended yzb.

    I don't get why the play so do scummy to you.

  36. ISO #836

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by secondpassing View Post
    This is vaguely linked with another post, but just treat this question as by itself:

    Context- Never Unlucky and you talked, and you replied with something like "not wanting to play as your [poopy] playstyle"
    If you aren't trying to play the same as Black Flag Nightless, what are you planning/doing to change your playstyle this game?

    ::

    Serpate question:
    What would you like to convince me of?
    My play goal was for me to play better. Starting from the beginning, I've been trying to be more productive with my time by asking questions to help me with my reads. I know that's I've used a lot of pre-flip associations in the past, so as a more mental note I've been using that less. Laziness was a big factor in my past plays, even though I had IRL issues I was too big on it. I've been doing better at that hopefully.

    What was the point of these two questions? (Why did you ask them?) it feels weird and I don't get what it does in this current situation.

    "Convince" is not the right word. Unless you are implying I'm scum, I'm trying to improve my town play this game so I guess I'm proving that??
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    I have bias towards MiniZed ^.^
    Suggesting MiniZed and I could be scumbuddies because MiniZed hasn't "attacked" me is reaching at best.

  37. ISO #837

  38. ISO #838

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by MiniZed View Post
    My play goal was for me to play better. Starting from the beginning, I've been trying to be more productive with my time by asking questions to help me with my reads. I know that's I've used a lot of pre-flip associations in the past, so as a more mental note I've been using that less. Laziness was a big factor in my past plays, even though I had IRL issues I was too big on it. I've been doing better at that hopefully.

    What was the point of these two questions? (Why did you ask them?) it feels weird and I don't get what it does in this current situation.

    "Convince" is not the right word. Unless you are implying I'm scum, I'm trying to improve my town play this game so I guess I'm proving that??
    I don't actually know what you've produced from asking questions. What did you learn? Are you continuing to use that to incorporate into your playstyle? How has it worked out for you?
    Were you surprised by Never Unlucky's flip?

    "I'm emotional" is what I got from your self-claim(?) Correct me if I'm wrong. Though you are "emotional" I can't read what emotion you're trying to convey to me-- which may be because I'm not too in touch with emotions right now. How are you feeling? What are you fearing/what could go wrong?

    I think convince is the right word. I'm asking what view do you have that is different than mine, and that you need to convince me of.
    There is but one truth-- I am town, and three are scum. If we do not find the answer, then I am dead.
    What would you like to convince me of?

  39. ISO #839

  40. ISO #840

  41. ISO #841

  42. ISO #842

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Mesk (Me) = Citizen
    MattZed = Citizen
    Never Unlucky = Citizen

    Eggy = Citizen/Scum - leaning more Citizen
    YZB - potential scum
    Banana - potenital scum
    SecondPassing - potential scum
    Titus
    Darkness
    Unknown
    GameFreak, should probably be replaced by now I have this slot as Null
    Gingerape

    at this moment honestly, I'm just dying for YZB, Banana Or SecondPassing to die. all three of those deaths to me are definitely telling.
    I feel like a MattZed kill was just random one. Even I personally would have gone on to today tunneling MattZed, so I don't see why he needed to die.

    Unless of course someone thought he was a TPR.
    Quote Originally Posted by AnassRhamur View Post
    Please don't post in the punished players section if you're not involved. Consider this a warning from Thugnificent. You got one Thug ticket. Collect 3 more of those and i'll have to issue a Thug Infraction. Collect 3 Thug Infractions and you get 1 Thug Misdemeanor Charge.

    Spoiler : :
    Citizen, Agent, Citizen, Vigilante, Citizen, Godfather, Citizen, Citizen, Voter, Elder, Mafioso, BackUpSleuth, Escort, Mafioso, Detective, Citizen, Citizen, Tailor, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, TheJoker, Citizen, LadyGaga, Mafioso, Winston Wolfe, Detective, Citizen, Citizen, Masquerader

  43. ISO #843

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    Mesk (Me) = Citizen
    MattZed = Citizen
    Never Unlucky = Citizen

    Eggy = Citizen/Scum - leaning more Citizen
    YZB - potential scum
    Banana - potenital scum
    SecondPassing - potential scum
    Titus
    Darkness
    Unknown
    GameFreak, should probably be replaced by now I have this slot as Null
    Gingerape

    at this moment honestly, I'm just dying for YZB, Banana Or SecondPassing to die. all three of those deaths to me are definitely telling.
    I feel like a MattZed kill was just random one. Even I personally would have gone on to today tunneling MattZed, so I don't see why he needed to die.

    Unless of course someone thought he was a TPR.
    No no, Titus is my teammate, not sp, smh
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho

  44. ISO #844

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho View Post
    No no, Titus is my teammate, not sp, smh
    I'm too mentally incapable of figuring out what this means....
    Quote Originally Posted by AnassRhamur View Post
    Please don't post in the punished players section if you're not involved. Consider this a warning from Thugnificent. You got one Thug ticket. Collect 3 more of those and i'll have to issue a Thug Infraction. Collect 3 Thug Infractions and you get 1 Thug Misdemeanor Charge.

    Spoiler : :
    Citizen, Agent, Citizen, Vigilante, Citizen, Godfather, Citizen, Citizen, Voter, Elder, Mafioso, BackUpSleuth, Escort, Mafioso, Detective, Citizen, Citizen, Tailor, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, Citizen, TheJoker, Citizen, LadyGaga, Mafioso, Winston Wolfe, Detective, Citizen, Citizen, Masquerader

  45. ISO #845

  46. ISO #846

  47. ISO #847

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by MiniZed View Post
    You make everything so dramatic for whatever reason.

    Eggy's argument is yzb is scum and being defended by Banana. Eggy voted yzb. If you believe Eggy why aren't you voting against yzb because the only reason he finds banana scummy (that was mentioned aside from the claim) is because she defended yzb.

    I don't get why the play so do scummy to you.
    What I had banana in my scum pile from her first post lol

  48. ISO #848

    Re: S-FM 210: Give or Take

    Quote Originally Posted by MiniZed View Post
    You sheeped points from Darkness to stick it on yzb25. I'll ask you a question though.

    Nobody town-read MattZed as far as I'm sure. Unless the Vig killed Matt, which I don't really know if they would have, what would yzb25 gain from Matt's death?
    I dont think any scum had anything to gain from mattzeds death and thts y I think vigi killed him. Pretty sure banana just claimed that she killed him lol

  49. ISO #849

  50. ISO #850

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •