Well I can say one thing Subway is not cult I know that. I will share my feed back since no one else will.
@everyone"
Can I get some game theories on Taco Bells Mason chat?
@Taco Bell what are your thoughts on the idea that we have Gladiator mechanics going on? RP setup to pit certain people against eachother
I wasn't planning on hard pushing this yet, but I was looking for a reaction answer from Chipotle to get his intentions... I guess that will only work now after we get the answer and only if I was right in saying there can be only 1 cit.
Unsure if you are covering up something for Chip or just genuinely concerned that my intentions were not pro-town by pushing unknown logic.
@Dominoes how is that reading going?
My understanding of how he described it is that there is no mason chat, just that they are masons and know each others RP names and know each other to be town. Congrats to him for not knowing how to use that info and telling everyone both names, now Taco can't find him. If this is true then whoever this Charles Stanworth is, he is 10x smarter than taco for not outting himself. I'm sure Charles will speak up in defense of Taco if it's needed or we'll narrow it down to the last person to claim his RP name which I'm sure scum will do faster than town will. At least Scum can't kill Charles without confirming Tacos claim, I'm sure Charles' last wills will contain more info on the matter (hint hint Charles, get your last will in order if you haven't already).
I have seen games with masons without a chat. So it is possible.
My understanding of how he described it is that there is no mason chat, just that they are masons and know each others RP names and know each other to be town. Congrats to him for not knowing how to use that info and telling everyone both names, now Taco can't find him. If this is true then whoever this Charles Stanworth is, he is 10x smarter than taco for not outting himself. I'm sure Charles will speak up in defense of Taco if it's needed or we'll narrow it down to the last person to claim his RP name which I'm sure scum will do faster than town will. At least Scum can't kill Charles without confirming Tacos claim, I'm sure Charles' last wills will contain more info on the matter (hint hint Charles, get your last will in order if you haven't already).
I have seen games with masons without a chat. So it is possible.
That and I am physically exhausted, staying up late last night catching up on day 1 got me little sleep. Hope to be in better shape in the latter half of the day when I can keep up with what is going on.
Bah, I'm going to bed. Will catch up again tomorrow.
Getting back to the game, it's very, very late for me at the moment, but I will read a bit more.
This post strikes me as very towny. It's literally pure solviness and logic. I know I'm flip-flopping horribly about my husband... but I'll choose to trust him. May his infinite wisdom guide us all.... or fuck us over lol.
This makes sense. I don't want to be annoying, but are you sure that there's absolutely nothing about a family curse, about wolves or something similar? Or are you just literally a lost guy whose heart aches, without any other information? Because a lot of people have info on you apparently, yet you claim not to have any.
I agree. @Chipotle , would you mind to remind us what your roleplay is, what you are doing on here specifically, and what your reads are and why, both roleplay- and mafiareading- wise? You're on my suspects list atm.
This feels like my scum play. Literally. From your perspective, if I consider you as town, it's basically "They're already discussing, why would I add anything?". Not even a comment, a read on a post, a different take.... That's lazy as hell. I could buy it, but what makes me not do it is that you're taking time to make a long and strong defense and refutation of KFC's case against you.
From scum PoV, however, 1 is a shut-off sentence, 2 is an agreement which also shuts up (and stops discussion, which isn't that towny...), and 3 is basically "I don't want to talk about the thread, just throw votes, it shows reactions!". Ignoring roleplay, ignoring interactions and shutting off attacks is very anti-town. To type that stuff out, you do have time. You say you're reaction hunting; yet you ignore nearly everything that gives reactions and other info.
TL;DR: You're my 2nd highest scumread, the first one being Popeyes because of food.
I don’t have any way to refute the food claim.
I own the catering company, this supplying the food, and am here for a good time.
No actions at night.
That’s all I have RP wise :/
^^^^^^^
Side note: I have a scum lean on KFC, but he's definetly not in a scum team with Chipotle. Why scum lean? Because he's stating facts, yes, but those are already there. Mostly game theory. His scumreads are about game theory; he ain't committing into anything that could possibly be refuted, he is cautious.
This also goes in the same way of that: he doesn't want to tell more about his roleplay than "I'm here to enjoy myself and have a good time!". That's just too simple; his rolecard really should contain more info than that, he's retaining information.
I do see it, and if you were paying more attention, you'd say that I already brought that up, that Starbucks was kept alive, but wanted to take out an inactive instead. It's indeed scummy. @Starbucks just for future reference: if you don't reveal ALL of your info, or at least to a satisfying extent, I am voting you and leading a train on you.
Btw, Taco. You need to be more consistent with your reads and thoughts, because you're really hard to follow. It's annoying. A good way to improve your play is to be understood clearly.
Starbucks did say that he had the option. I could see him claiming to NOT do that but lying. Course that heavily detracts from the town read I have on him.
It is also likely that scum could have been holding off on voting their teammate seeing as the train on him wasn’t the best detailed as for why he was being trained.
The counter wagon on Wendy’s offering a sort of smokescreen to hide the fact they didn’t want to vote Starbucks. There is a strong case for that
@Starbucks
You didn’t reveal the information until it became relevant and you had already showed that you were Working food.
And you just revealed that you had three options, now being relevant again.
Yes, a case which has already been made by myself as soon as Wendy's was lynched, in my last will. It's also one of the main reasons for which I scumread Starbucks. I'm not 100% sold on it though.
Also, about my post about revealing your info: I meant tomorrow, not immediatly. I like how the chat is going atm, it's productive.
Ok, I've read everything. So far Dominos sounds okay, nothing strong on him but he looks towny, although there's nothing actually alignment indicative.
Now, I'm going off for the night, I still have to eat and it was already very late when I came on here. Have fun