SC2 MAFIA 2.0 blinkstyle.

[Numbertwo]

we're at 5v3 so lynching town takes us to 4v3 going into the night and 3v3 when we wake up which means town loses so its MyLo i think

omegareeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee

i wonder if a no-lynch would be helpful in our situation to give our ''sheriff'' more time to make a useful night action? It would also give the bus driver a chance to confirm himself.

Then it's 4v3 tomorrow if the mafia kills.

[naz]

i wonder if a no-lynch would be helpful in our situation to give our ''sheriff'' more time to make a useful night action? It would also give the bus driver a chance to confirm himself.

Then it's 4v3 tomorrow if the mafia kills.

yeah, but we should be able to find a mafia today

[Auckmid]

You didn't answer my question about unknowns night actions. Is it just a coincidence that he hasn't been able to prove himself with them? or did you intentionally ignore that question?

This is a stupid question. BD doesn't leave feedback, so it is obviously going to be difficult for a BD to prove the existence of their role.

so you are saying that unknown can be a bus driver with bg and doctor dead?

The only argument I'm seeing here is "There are already 2 dead protective towns, do you really think there is a third?".

Who else is claiming town protective right now...?

i wonder if a no-lynch would be helpful in our situation to give our ''sheriff'' more time to make a useful night action? It would also give the bus driver a chance to confirm himself.

Then it's 4v3 tomorrow if the mafia kills.

So usually not lynching actually would be the correct move in this situation, but we would lose immediately if the mafia killing was a kidnapper. Since we don't know that mafia does not have a kidnapper, casually hinting towards no lynching is very suspicious.