Iced, I mean this in the most straight up way, but I think people can imagine the counter arguments to your posts themselves at this point because your blows are just hitting lower and lower. You've made your point a thousand different ways and you're just clogging the thread at this point. I don't want to indulge in repeating the same counter arguments to avoid giving people more to read. You're essentially propagandizing at this point.
Spoiler : Reason#1 :
Spoiler : Reason#2 :
Spoiler : Reason #3 :
@yzb25 here it is. incase you missed it.
Going to sleep, parking my vote on SuperJack because of my intend to lynch.
-vote SuperJack
Also mesk I know that you are really serious about SJ but it isn't him...
Just read all of the texts SJ replied...
Ok. I am not unvoting SJ, but now I am scum reading Iced a lot. He is defending SJ too much. Two reasons possible: he wants no lynches this early OR he doesn't want to lose a goon buddy. The second choice seems rather correct.
Gonna take 5/10 mins to wake myself up and recuperate. Brb.
LOL
This is coming from the same person who said its fine if the hammer isn't met because the person with the most votes is lynched.
To then place a vote on someone he is not reading as scum because a lynch needs to happen.
I am seriously down for either Stealth or RLVG at this point because of the way they are both handling my wagon.
Says the guy who has literally played the entire game in a hypocritical and contradictory way, with little to no substance in anything hes posted.
As for the above, you put three people together in a scum pool because they were the only 3 on that were posting, and claiming that its scummy to defend anyone that you percieve to be scum. The only way to make it clear to everyone that your arguements are contrived is to refute them wherever they appear.
Actively discouraging people to talk in chat is also scum like behaviour. Nothing says scum lile "im not talking to you anymore" or "please stop talking". Conversation is good. You are a bad egg.
Monopoly of the Iced variety
Tbh
-vote RLVG
He shouldn't have voted... IT ISNT SJ WAKE UP GUYS GEEZ...
Ok... I am done. If you want to lynch SJ? Go ahead then cry like a baby that we lose a citizen...
RVLG shouldn't have voted
Will watch anime see ya guys i really am done for today
@Marshmallow Marshall
Please explain how you read me as scum.
What makes me scummy?
Can someone else ask Mallow for me?
Actually I will just go off to watch anime i sleep like 4-5 am lmao
That was sarcasm. He literally said that he wouldn't vote sj anytime soon because of plurality. And then said he'd unvote if hybrid did. Is anyone in this game actually capable of maintaining a consistent stand point?
New super serious totally legit not at all a joke conspiracy - everyone is scum. Game set match.
I remember why i stopped signing for games.
Monopoly of the Iced variety
First of all, I didn't skip 100 posts. I read fast, that's all.
Why did I vote you?
First: You are trying to stop people from lynching. We need one lynch to see who actually defended a Citizen and who wanted to hammer him for no real reason. You are experienced, so I assume that you know this.
Second: You are being defended by some players for no reason. I mean here Iced_Monopoly.
Third: Your vote on RLVG. I do not town read him, but I do not see any reason to lynch him. Zero reasons.
Okay, I'm back. Does anyone actually respect Hybrid's defense of SJ? Does anyone actually want me to go through it?
Excluding Iced and SJ =P.
Honestly, I'm feeling really burnt out right now.
How am I stopping people from lynching? Whoever has the most votes gets lynched, so lynching is impossible to stop.
I'm being defended by players, Like iced, because I'm being vote by players, like you, that voted me without explaining why.
RLVG said "SJ isnt scum, but we should lynch him. But if you unvote him we wont lynch him"
RLVG then goes and votes me afterwards because "A lynch must happen"
Although RLVG said "Lynches cant be stopped, its whoever gets the most votes so I dont need to place my vote"
Basically, RLVG is saying im Town, saying I shouldnt be lynched, but then voting to lynch me.
That is what scum do.
1st point - self preservation. Why would anyome of any alignment ever want to be lynched. Of course sj would defend himself against an sj lynch.
2nd point, i mean i dont even know how i need to repeat nyself a third time. But its obvious that my defebse of sj has a reason. Ive stated ot so many times.
3rd point, at this point im not even sure youre reading the game, so im not even going to address this.
Most importantly though, is the fact that you openly admit sj is a citizen?? "We need one lynch to see who actually defended a citizen". So youre either straight up claiming to be scum, or youre admitting that you believe hes cit, but youre still willing to lynch him anyways, which is counter productive to town. Either way you are scum.
I am slowly believing in my everyoneisscumtheory
Monopoly of the Iced variety
#205 #207 #217 #227
^^^Those posts remain to be the most damning SJ interaction. I'm sure most people in the Pro-lynch-SJ-camp would approve of it as probably the most wholesome presentation of our argument.
@yzb25 quit playing the im not talking to you card. You only hurt town by doing that. RLVG and MM both have made comments about believing/knowing SJ to be town, but still voting him. How can you possibly be okay still being on that train, and why are you paying 0 attention to those comments by those players? Are you even trying this game? Fucking laziest scum on the planet.
Monopoly of the Iced variety
When the hell did I say SJ was Town?
WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU SAYING THAT?!!