The problem with shitposting

[Cryptonic]

I'd suggest something like a d1 majority replace vote, but all that would accomplish would be destroying d1 communication. It would become solely about that vote if someone is being inactive/an asshole. Nothing would be accomplished d1.

[Sino]

I'd suggest something like a d1 majority replace vote, but all that would accomplish would be destroying d1 communication. It would become solely about that vote if someone is being inactive/an asshole. Nothing would be accomplished d1.

That's why i was suggesting for the staff to PM the shitposters about it, solve the issue out of a game.

[BananaCucho]

I'd suggest something like a d1 majority replace vote, but all that would accomplish would be destroying d1 communication. It would become solely about that vote if someone is being inactive/an asshole. Nothing would be accomplished d1.

What we need is a community consensus of what is expected in mafia and if you cross that line you'll be punished for it.

You're signing a game with 0 intention to play? The community is going to lynch you day 1. With that sort of threat hanging over every day 1 but not necessarily always enforced (if everyone is playing its not needed) I think could go a long way.

The only problem is if people start making it something its not. You can't punish poor play for example. If a newbie like Arrow was in Spirits is just lost you need to give him help, tips on how to improve, etc. His name was being thrown around for PL for "not contributing enough" when he was just lost.

It must be solely used for players who sign to troll or socialize or whatever but never actually play.

The list of players that do this is actually very small. On average most players try to game solve or scumhunt or town hunt or slip hunt or interact with people or reaction test or do whatever they think is best to sort things and try to win. Its a very small population of players that bring the game quality down IMO.

[Sino]

What we need is a community consensus of what is expected in mafia and if you cross that line you'll be punished for it.

You're signing a game with 0 intention to play? The community is going to lynch you day 1. With that sort of threat hanging over every day 1 but not necessarily always enforced (if everyone is playing its not needed) I think could go a long way.

The only problem is if people start making it something its not. You can't punish poor play for example. If a newbie like Arrow was in Spirits is just lost you need to give him help, tips on how to improve, etc. His name was being thrown around for PL for "not contributing enough" when he was just lost.

It must be solely used for players who sign to troll or socialize or whatever but never actually play.

The list of players that do this is actually very small. On average most players try to game solve or scumhunt or town hunt or slip hunt or interact with people or reaction test or do whatever they think is best to sort things and try to win. Its a very small population of players that bring the game quality down IMO.

I couldn't agree more.