are... are you okay?
o k xD
STOP INTOXICATING YOURSELF WITH LENTIL SOUP, MIZERY!
really? I missed this entirely, then. So I'm not just going crazy lmao.
Martin, you can't reject me like this. I like your pocket, and don't want to go out. You can't simply break the mind communion from the post I jumped in your pocket over. You can't. YOU CAN'T!
Where is Helz
Oh right
I often forget stuff like that
I think the question is simpler
whether someone thinks they should claim or not
enforcing mass claim irrespective of individual circumstances probably is not going to break the game given the setups "nonstandard" theme
But when it comes to reading a person, knowing when they claimed, what they claimed, and etc can be beneficial or detrimental to their case in conjunction with the town wincon.
So, like, you should figure out if you wanna claim or not. Not whether the whole game should claim or not.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Catching up now.
I do see what you are looking at there. I will also say that reading people off what their not doing has served me poorly in the past. Her being low effort and apathetic about the game certainly could be an indicator that she does not have a town win condition but it also could be as she says that she never intended to dive deeply into the game.
Normally policy lynch pressure could be applied but with 2 more days of obligated lynches I am not sure if there is much we can do.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
HELZ LOOK AT THE PINGS FIRST PLEASE
Praise the Lord!
Im still not quite getting the line of thought that Huo could be an evil teacher.
Spoiler : Evil Teacher Role Card :
Looking at that I see no way for such an ability to be investigative and find a mafia. Finding a neutral would make sense if night immune but Cape is either Mafia Flower Child (extreemly likely) or has one on his team that provided lynch immunity. Either I am misunderstanding something or you are.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
There are a number of roles which are mechanically confirmable. The risk I see would be that you claiming could push others to claim and would narrow down the pool evils are shooting into to hit our protective.
For what its worth I suspect the N1 no kill was somewhere between a Fancy Lady, Tough Guy or Night Watchmen. Really hoping its a Fancy Lady. Would be a nice setup balance mechanically and very useful given the gamestate.
I trust your judgement. If you feel its worthwhile or if you have one of those totally confirmable roles narrowing down that PoE does good things for the distant day where we can lynch. I would suggest considering the benefits of narrowing down the PoE while we are unable to lynch though.
It was a town slip D1. They had a total misunderstanding of some mechanical function and were openly pushing in a way that could easily be considered scummy. My logic is that if they were Mafia they would be much more likely to be aware of how the mechanic worked as well as mindful of how they portrayed themselves. It felt like genuine ignorance and a lack of hyper self-awareness.
I specifically assumed 'not mafia' on them but leave the door open to if they could be neutral. Not trying to just hand them a pass but that was one of my only 2 substantial alignment takes from D1 with the other being DM is very likely town trying to cram his will down everyones throat.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Not to mention MM, I shared basically the same/similar thought that they did.
It means they are town.
It is rare to share the same thought as a wolf let alone rare a wolf would push on both their teammates let alone like never in the way Lily did it.
I would say that 2 town dead for potentially 1 scum is a rough trade. 7 town and 5 non-town means 2 for 1 trades put is in the negative. Its also an issue of the shot not being certain to kill a scum. If we lost 3 townies in 1 play that could easily cost us the game.
I will say that I believe your claim with the way you went about it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
I can ask host Helz but you can target me and I think I should be fine.
Yeah it’s probably best to target me.
You can target me Helz, we should be fine.
My voice ain’t leaving this game till it’s over.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
This did occur to me as well. (When I say this I mean absolutely no offense when I say this) but my WIFOM read on Oliver puts this well outside of his play level. I would be very impressed if anyone made such a deep play but I think its much more likely that Oliver is town given his progression on the issue. He seemed very excited and eager to get an answer for me on the subject to the point he ended up claiming and presenting the plan prior to me responding which feels genuine.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
For what its worth I was the same for a long time with Mafia. It was not that I was drunk all the time, it was just the thing I liked to do while drinking so often while I was playing I was also drinking.
Used to joke with frog about how playing mafia while drinking is playing mafia on hard mode. Tougher to analyze and to avoid slipping.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
okay so
if Mr Magician
Helz
Oliver
Martin
and (apparently) Lilypetal
baddies are
Cape (obvious)
Scumbot
Marshmallow
Mizery
Bwc
luka
am I missing something?
luka town most likely
scumbot bwc neuts
mizery MM scum
or w/e
So something we have not really discussed is the Varcron issue. We have a very powerful neutral with a win condition that fits ours. I believe its more likely that they are against Mafia than against Neutral and we can help feed them information to our advantage.
One potential could be simply to not lynch Cape and leave him for the Ghost to eliminate while we hunt down his friends. If he is paying attention he should know 5 peoples roles leaving a pretty small pool outside of Cape to manipulate. This will functionally be a role block as well as a potential to eliminate a scum opening up an additional lynch for the town. While it leverages on if I am correct that he is anti-mafia as opposed to anti-neutral for the cape part its functionally the same if I am wrong in its other respects.
I am curious to hear what you guys think about this.
Also- @Dark Magician I would think carefully about the other thing you are pondering although your half committed now.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Im not confident on Lily but yes. I do believe we have a lot of scum in a very small PoE. Its an interesting situation because we have such limited ability to eliminate them and basically have to hope for more cross kills between the factions for a chance to win.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
To be clear the problem I am looking at is our lack of ability to kill identified scum. We are crippled in our lynch ability by both a Bounty Hunter and Evil Flower Child and we do not have much kill utility. With our vengeful outed I am worried that we basically have no chance if we go Cape today, and Me tomorrow
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Well its why I am considering that we may need to not lynch Cape today and instead lynch within our PoE and leave Cape for Varcron to handle. Gives us potentially an additional scum while mitigating the chance of the Ghost hurting a townie. Our best world would be if we hit the Bounty Hunter.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Essentially the problem with having such a strong town block is our night wifom is fucked in a 2-3 kpn situation without lynch control if that makes sense..
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
why do we have to vote-off Helz
more specifically
why do we need to kill the bounty hunter?
Originally Posted by our wincon
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
assuming we don't make too many mistakes I think its possible for town to win before bounty hunter does
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Random points I have not mentioned.
I noted Mizery trying to open up the PoE by pushing Huo as potential Evil Teacher. Still not tracking on their reasoning behind that but the potential intention is of note.
Martin's claim is very well seeded. Will have to WIFOM if that was done intentionally as a high level play to fake confirm down the road or if its legit but his play has been pro-town.
Were essentially at 7v5. Likely shifts to something like 5v4 with a cape lynch. If we lynch off Cape and Oliver vengeful targets Cape an evil teacher could go for a double (or triple) elimination. As much as I dislike coaching scum heres how that could play-
Teacher targets someone in the PoE. Very high chances of non town (even easier for them given they are in that PoE) as well as Oliver. Oliver vengeful targets Cape with the result of 2 scum and 1 town eliminated.
This is very good for the evil teachers win con as they need that Mafia block broken up and its a pretty nice thing for the town as well.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Well it would put us under the gun for a time line and further cripple our vote ability if the game goes on. Thats some risks..
Potential for the Ghost to mess with that ability which is cool but I am really afraid of our lack of ability to eliminate players as a town. Like.. I have not been in this situation in a mafia game before where we reliably know exactly who needs to die but are hindered in our ability to make it happen on a D3.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Also
@oliverz144
I am almost as confident that DM is town as I am that Huo is for what its worth. Just noticed your vote was on them.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
I....think I get what's concerning you.
I think I have to sit down and math this all out a bit, because I'm considering a factor that I was oblivious to up till a few hours ago. I have a meeting in about an hour I gotta prepare for, but after that I'll be back to work on that.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"
Really want to get my thoughts out on this before EoD because on face-value I think deciding whether we vote off Helz is probably going to significantly affect the course of this game. Also I might not even be here d4 lol.
A.K.A "That One Idiot"