S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

[Frinckles]

Removing my vote from ceko since they claimed.

Still do not understand why secondpassing is singling me out constantly and PAYING NO ATTENTION to anyone else.

What gives? Surely they aren't that stupid of an executioner. Or am I doing the assuming intelligence thing again?

-unvote

I don't think executioner works like that here.

[Sen]

Doesnt Mean They Cant Be The 2 Random Red Slots

No, but they would be opposing factions (ie; Cultist and Occultist). Extremely unlikely, but in any case, no two scum can be on the same team right now.

[secondpassing]

Removing my vote from ceko since they claimed.

Still do not understand why secondpassing is singling me out constantly and PAYING NO ATTENTION to anyone else.

What gives? Surely they aren't that stupid of an executioner. Or am I doing the assuming intelligence thing again?

-unvote

I place my vote on the person I believe to be of the highest probability to be scum. I'm not thoroughly convinced that someone else is a better vote than you.
Rarely, as an exception, I will vote the host in order to protest the state of the game.

[Light_Yagami]

No, but they would be opposing factions (ie; Cultist and Occultist). Extremely unlikely, but in any case, no two scum can be on the same team right now.

Ah I Mis-Understood That.

[SuperJack]

I'll claim if someone can types my name in all caps.

[Sen]

SUPERJACk

[Renegade]

I place my vote on the person I believe to be of the highest probability to be scum. I'm not thoroughly convinced that someone else is a better vote than you.
Rarely, as an exception, I will vote the host in order to protest the state of the game.

Well, if your mind is apparently already made up that I am scum, why aren't trying to find other scum then? You seem solely focused on a single person, and even if it wasn't me I would say it is irrational and suspicious.

[yzb25]

I don't wanna stay up until 4:30am again. If you've got any questions to ask ask now cuz I'm probably gonna retire in like 20 mins

[yzb25]

At the very least, we have things to mull over lol.

[Ganelon]

I just noticed that Cultists aren't spawnable, so whoever was pushing the cult buddies hypothesis, it simply cannot be.

yeah scum teams on d1 are literally impossible.

[Sen]

Well, if your mind is apparently already made up that I am scum, why aren't trying to find other scum then? You seem solely focused on a single person, and even if it wasn't me I would say it is irrational and suspicious.

What is suspicious about tunneling?

[Sen]

I don't wanna stay up until 4:30am again. If you've got any questions to ask ask now cuz I'm probably gonna retire in like 20 mins

Care to elaborate on your case on Frinckles?

[SuperJack]

SUPERJACk

I see what you did

[yzb25]

Care to elaborate on your case on Frinckles?

My case on Frinckles is kind of dead. His role is very confirmable unless we're worried he's a cultmaster and he's gonna use his cronies to vouch for him. But even that can only go so far.

[Light_Yagami]

Im Bored BBL I Guess.. This Was Pretty Uneventful...

[yzb25]

I forgot I was still voting him actually

-unvote

[Sen]

I see what you did

I tried my best!

My case on Frinckles is kind of dead. His role is very confirmable unless we're worried he's a cultmaster and he's gonna use his cronies to vouch for him. But even that can only go so far.

Then, pretending that the game was about to end and you'd have to place a vote before going to bed, who would you vote right now and why?

[Sen]

Then, pretending that the day was about to end and you'd have to place a vote before going to bed, who would you vote right now and why?

..

[secondpassing]

Well, if your mind is apparently already made up that I am scum, why aren't trying to find other scum then? You seem solely focused on a single person, and even if it wasn't me I would say it is irrational and suspicious.

Have I been focused on a single person? I might be. Let's say I'm wrong, as I am wrong sometimes.
You're not actually trying to convince anyone of anything, so therefore I am not convinced.

[secondpassing]

..

You're still voting BananaCucho after a claim. You waiting for a L-1 situation for a "realler" claim?
We already got a lot of claims today, I'm down to vote a certain few people or to policy.

[yzb25]

I tried my best!



Then, pretending that the game was about to end and you'd have to place a vote before going to bed, who would you vote right now and why?

Honestly? Not a clue. It's a toss up between lynching in the pool of people who already claimed (and risk lynching a critical TPR) and lynching outside of that pool (and probably create more claims in the process)

In the case of the former, I'd probably go for BC. He just seems like the weakest link for obvious reasons, in spite of what I've said in his defense. Lynching a sheriff claim is too risky right now imo and lynching Varcron doesn't sit right with me.

In the case of the latter... Gosh... Probably SJ... I don't fully buy BC's defense of him...

Thankfully I do have time to think about it, regardless :P

[Gyrlander]

I dunno who else to vote so I'll keep mine on Banana for being the representation of chaos. Thank you.

We got 4 claims, most likely 2 of them are lunatic and that's if no one is lying.

Good

j
o
b. Get
c
u
l
t
e
d

[Varcron]

I dunno who else to vote so I'll keep mine on Banana for being the representation of chaos. Thank you.

We got 4 claims, most likely 2 of them are lunatic and that's if no one is lying.

Good

j
o
b. Get
c
u
l
t
e
d

We'll find out if we're lunatic tonight based on feedback if I understand the setup correctly.

[Gyrlander]

We'll find out if we're lunatic tonight based on feedback if I understand the setup correctly.

And what the hell does that accomplish.

[Varcron]

And what the hell does that accomplish.

It means we'll know our proper roles by D2-D3 so long as we arn't lunatic.

[BananaCucho]

Honestly? Not a clue. It's a toss up between lynching in the pool of people who already claimed (and risk lynching a critical TPR) and lynching outside of that pool (and probably create more claims in the process)

In the case of the former, I'd probably go for BC. He just seems like the weakest link for obvious reasons, in spite of what I've said in his defense. Lynching a sheriff claim is too risky right now imo and lynching Varcron doesn't sit right with me.

In the case of the latter... Gosh... Probably SJ... I don't fully buy BC's defense of him...

Thankfully I do have time to think about it, regardless :P

My name isnt BC >

[yzb25]

Have I been focused on a single person? I might be. Let's say I'm wrong, as I am wrong sometimes.
You're not actually trying to convince anyone of anything, so therefore I am not convinced.

As far as I'm aware, your scumread is still based on those interactions at the very start that felt wrong, and a lack of contribution that has satisfied you since. Has he now exhibited other cases of what you exposited about at the start or done other things you find scummy?

[yzb25]

My name isnt BC >

I'll say one last thing about BC. His play makes no fucking sense if he actually received a doctor rolecard, but if he did I don't knock him because he did at least liven the game up lol.

[Renegade]

As far as I'm aware, your scumread is still based on those interactions at the very start that felt wrong, and a lack of contribution that has satisfied you since. Has he now exhibited other cases of what you exposited about at the start or done other things you find scummy?

A single shit post gets singled out amongst PAGES of SHITPOSTS from others. Regardless I hope people don't put much stock into what second passing has to say. Something strange going on there.

[Varcron]

A single shit post gets singled out amongst PAGES of SHITPOSTS from others. Regardless I hope people don't put much stock into what second passing has to say. Something strange going on there.

Not as goofy as how you're speaking right now

In all honestly, you've been acting differently this game in comparison to what I remember as ren last game.

[yzb25]

anyway, nn

[Sen]

You're still voting BananaCucho after a claim. You waiting for a L-1 situation for a "realler" claim?
We already got a lot of claims today, I'm down to vote a certain few people or to policy.

I'm voting him because of what I explained earlier in 748; buddying with active players mixed with a bunch of fluff, then followed by picking on low hanging fruits.

I'm not really giving any weight to claims; anyone can claim anything on this setup on D1, plus even if they were true, half of them are probably lunatics. I'm not giving any importance to D1 claims. I'm voting for a lynch due to his anti-town behaviour, not expecting or caring about a L-1 claim.

[Varcron]

I'm voting him because of what I explained earlier in 748; buddying with active players mixed with a bunch of fluff, then followed by picking on low hanging fruits.

I'm not really giving any weight to claims; anyone can claim anything on this setup on D1, plus even if they were true, half of them are probably lunatics. I'm not giving any importance to D1 claims. I'm voting for a lynch due to his anti-town behaviour, not expecting or caring about a L-1 claim.

I'm keeping my vote on Banana for this reason

In my opinion I think that 30-40% of us could be lunatics, so roles at this point are basically null in void.

[Renegade]

Not as goofy as how you're speaking right now

In all honestly, you've been acting differently this game in comparison to what I remember as ren last game.

And so what is your conclusion then?

[Varcron]

And so what is your conclusion then?

I don't know yet; I'm going to watch and see but I don't like the vibes from you currently.

[Renegade]

I don't know yet; I'm going to watch and see but I don't like the vibes from you currently.

((

[BananaCucho]

I'm voting him because of what I explained earlier in 748; buddying with active players mixed with a bunch of fluff, then followed by picking on low hanging fruits.

I'm not really giving any weight to claims; anyone can claim anything on this setup on D1, plus even if they were true, half of them are probably lunatics. I'm not giving any importance to D1 claims. I'm voting for a lynch due to his anti-town behaviour, not expecting or caring about a L-1 claim.

I never thought I'd be the target of a policy lynch

[secondpassing]

As far as I'm aware, your scumread is still based on those interactions at the very start that felt wrong, and a lack of contribution that has satisfied you since. Has he now exhibited other cases of what you exposited about at the start or done other things you find scummy?

Yeah basically. My early scum reads are often better than my later ones, so I don't see anything wrong with just sticking to it until he's dead.
Should probably re-read what he's got. I remember a large change in posting style a while after I voted him that left me both suspicious and confused.

I realize that if he is town, my sustained vote on him is a distraction.
But if he is scum as I think he is, my sustained vote will put pressure on his brains.
Not knowing the outcome and knowing my own feelings toward his slot leaves my satisfied with my choice.
So I'm going to vote him until he dies.

[BananaCucho]

I'm keeping my vote on Banana for this reason

In my opinion I think that 30-40% of us could be lunatics, so roles at this point are basically null in void.

SO WHY RESIST MASS CLAIM

[BananaCucho]

If claims mean nothing we should mass claim RIGHT NOW

[Varcron]

If claims mean nothing we should mass claim RIGHT NOW

Why? Your logic is flawed.

[BananaCucho]

Why? Your logic is flawed.

>: (

[Renegade]

Yeah basically. My early scum reads are often better than my later ones, so I don't see anything wrong with just sticking to it until he's dead.
Should probably re-read what he's got. I remember a large change in posting style a while after I voted him that left me both suspicious and confused.

I realize that if he is town, my sustained vote on him is a distraction.
But if he is scum as I think he is, my sustained vote will put pressure on his brains.
Not knowing the outcome and knowing my own feelings toward his slot leaves my satisfied with my choice.
So I'm going to vote him until he dies.

Total fixation on a single player is at best a sign of a bad mafia player and at worst scummy as hell.

You are right, your obsession with me is a huge distraction, but go on.

[Renegade]

That kind of inflexibility in thinking and hanging on like a pit bull caused town to lose last game, and what, the past 6 apparently?

[Sen]

I never thought I'd be the target of a policy lynch

This isn't policy in any way. I find your behaviour to be the scummiest so far.

A policy lynch would be going for ceko due to inactivity or for Light due to the videos.

The early shitposting can be ignored as useless as it can be. You say the buddying is due to you wanting to go for a chiller playstyle, which is fair, yet it's only been targetted towards power and active players, so it's nor a generalized attitude, but a rather selective one. Then you spammed ceko for a claim, and your excuse was that he frustrated you on a different game.

None of this behaviour indicates that it's being moved by town goals in mind. It is chaotic and distracting at best, and anti-town at worst.

[Sen]

Total fixation on a single player is at best a sign of a bad mafia player and at worst scummy as hell.

Second time I'm asking. Why is tunneling scummy?

[Varcron]

Second time I'm asking. Why is tunneling scummy?

Tunneling screeches executioner to me personally.

[Renegade]

Second time I'm asking. Why is tunneling scummy?

I think it is because you close your mind to other possibilities, which as town is a huge liability, especially if you are wrong like secondplastic here.

[secondpassing]

Total fixation on a single player is at best a sign of a bad mafia player and at worst scummy as hell.

You are right, your obsession with me is a huge distraction, but go on.

I may be fixed on you but you're not fixed anywhere. If you're really town you need to fix your own problems.

Otherwise you can just go die.

[BananaCucho]

This isn't policy in any way. I find your behaviour to be the scummiest so far.

A policy lynch would be going for ceko due to inactivity or for Light due to the videos.

The early shitposting can be ignored as useless as it can be. You say the buddying is due to you wanting to go for a chiller playstyle, which is fair, yet it's only been targetted towards power and active players, so it's nor a generalized attitude, but a rather selective one. Then you spammed ceko for a claim, and your excuse was that he frustrated you on a different game.

None of this behaviour indicates that it's being moved by town goals in mind. It is chaotic and distracting at best, and anti-town at worst.

Well, thats just like, your opinion, man