Let me go to sleep!
Your wording was ambigious so I'm willing to give you BOTD.
Anyway, your argument was that I was putting my scumbuddies in the "would not lynch" section, and somehow the other scum team too (which would be an achievement in itself). So now you seem to have changed your story to clutch at dem straws.
Unless you think I would make it even more obvious that I'm teamed (as you have suggested) with Marshmallow, that we also vote the same person too? I mean, I guess the concept isn't foreign, but my list would already a give away, in your mind, why tie us together further? What if something happened to me in this scenario?
I know we don't know each other, and self-meta is as good as you take someone's word, but I wouldn't fuck over myself and my team so easily as a wolf.
I've changed the order of your post, because these things contradict each other.By the "from the start of the game I've wanted to sheep someone", i meant you tried to lynch someone with too few proof.
You suspected people throughout all the day, but never voted anyone. This is scum play.
I haven't said I want to lynch a bunch of people and gone on smear campaigns without having the balls to vote. I've collected a fair bit of data and made my choice, the person I was voting for wasn't participating and I don't see their excuse as credible.
The list contained people I would lynch - mostly nulls who I didn't see why they would be Town. You still haven't got back to me on that point when I asked you if you could prove me wrong and why I should reconsider.
I also think it's funny, that me and were actually on the person you wanted lynched, and then you come in all threatened out of nowhere.
Erm... So trying to find out what a player is like to make a more informed decision on them is scummy?Your post reaction on my meta-hunting vote on Rachyl was to make me look scummy, which is obviously scum play.
Lawl. I'm not going to dignify that one.
Oh, so you're voting me because I said I would lynch you?You have said that all people you want to lynch are everyone else, means, you want to lynch someone who isn't on notlynchlist. Now you try to make it look like you meant something else/
Don't make people think you don't know some evils know eachother. You also probably didn't read the setup or your rolecard. If so, my vote is OMGUS vote.
You know that there are more townies, than evils. Yet you still put 8 ppl on your list, like if you were evil. That makes a good point.
Try harder.
And no, I made it very clear to you and even before you that these were nulls that I would lynch. Like I even said, I'm not even a fan of that practise, but when I've got nothing else and I don't see why they could be Town, I'd rather choose them than no lynch. No lynch spoils the day's efforts - might as well get some information out of the day to build from there.
And yes, I did read my role card and the set. I'm quite familiar of what it is and I have to do. I've also read that scum know each other, and while they can win with each other, they don't know who the other team are. It would be ridiculously unbalanced if Rapists and Others knew who the members of the other team were (we'd be in lylo today I think)
Again, try harder.