It's hard to not know that the setup is about pirates when Unknown said YAAAAR and 10000 references to pirates in the opening post. However, I didn't read the title.
It's hard to not know that the setup is about pirates when Unknown said YAAAAR and 10000 references to pirates in the opening post. However, I didn't read the title.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
I TAKE YOU SERIOUSLY MESK.
Give us your thoughts, give us your thoughts, GIVE US YOUR THOUGHTS.
excitement.gif
The game will probably be ded from now until the halfway mark anyway, so it makes no difference.
Dude, now you're saying you didn't even read the title... Dafaq...
YOU HAVE TO CLICK THE TITLE TO GET TO THE SIGNUP PAGE. YOU HAVE TO CLICK THE TITLE TO GET TO THE FORUM PAGE.
"Ohh but Unknown's compelling pirate puns just draw you in! I couldn't help but read those!"
Fack off!
I refuse to let you insult your own intelligence. You knew the goddamn title of this game.
Furthermore, if you read Unknown's opening post, you'd know there are 10 players and 3 of them are maf. If there was a nightkill, the game would enter LYLO after one mislynch. Town would have to get like 3/4 lynches right to win.
It is so fucking implausible you didn't know this setup was nightless that if we entertain the possibility you didn't we're basically willing to accept any dogshit you feed us.
Have you got any thoughts on players, scumbag Gyrlander?
Hmm. I'm starting to town read you. You are doing things, opposite as if you were scum.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
You shouldn't need to interact with them to have any thoughts on them. It's not like you're waiting on some special question to ask them, after all. When you roll town, you naturally have thoughts and feelings on different posts beyond "ooh let me point out the logical fallacy there! Yay townpoints!". You can't even share your base, instinct thoughts though.
Honestly, it looks like you're stalling giving real reads until peak time so you can talk to your scumbuddies about what associations you need to plant. Weak.
Whatever your life situation, you have the time to have this conversation but you can't even provide a few lines of thought on a few interesting players. Instead, you resign yourself to some shoddy kissass and more self-victimizing.
The Gyrlander-is-town-hypothesis just has so many holes right now. At least try to put up a fight. At this rate the d1 lynch will be locked in before the halfway mark >.<
I'm actually going for a walk now. If you've got the free time to talk, now is the moment to use it for reads.
I said the audios thing because It is fast, while talking on the mobile is slow is fuck.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
@Whad Wow I'm underperforming? My heart...
I think it's an amateur way to distance oneself from the Mafia. Most people think before they speak in Mafia, so it is funny to see someone post something with possible underlying meaning so early into the game. Reminds me of something that Mafia would do in the Sc2 Mod to try to hide.
However, the fact that the game is nightless changes my opinion. If he was aware enough about this game state to trying to use some WIFOM on d1 to hide as Mafia, then you would think he would be aware enough regarding not having a NK. That fact cancels out the logic you are using. I also don't see how it's an "alibi" for him to say he forgot there was no nightkill, maybe i'm just nitpicking semantics here, though.
Regarding Orpz, he seems like he is busy or not caring too much about day one and is throwing around votes to whatever train shows a resemblance of logic behind it. I'd be more alarmed of this if it keeps up past the weekend, and he continues to sheep throughout the game.
I don't think much of Gyrlander's posts. He is lacking any actual substance, which I don't find different from other times I've seen him play.
I'm not going to give much substance when most of these 3 pages are fluff and all the time I have been online was on mobile. However, I'll stop giving excuses as It is getting a bit boring and will try yo explain yzb everything and if he still doesnt believe me, I won't café.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
I find it interesting that Whad's only read on me is "underperforming", but that was somehow enough for her to place a vote on me. Literally has stated nothing game related that should lead her vote to be on me, yet it is there. Seems like it was just an attempt to join a larger train. It's ironic because I have been more productive and contributed more than Whad, yet you don't see Whad seppukuing herself in the corner over it.
I also find it interesting how she spaced out her read list.
Also, to dissect it:
Lol SuperJack as a Town Read? He has done nothing, and is voting me because I have "too much information on day 1" when I copy & pasted an article from Wikipedia, that he still hasn't addressed lol.
Iced_Monopoly is not enough info? He literally has posted the most substance all game, and actually interacted with Whad the most. If anything, Iced should be her strongest read.
Mesk's read is based on never communicating with Mesk, but it's her #1 Town Read. Wat?
Then, in her read of yzb, she states she agrees that Mesk is playing anti-town? So, someone you think is Anti-Town is your #1 Town Read? LOL Where did you pull this list out of?
I would also think @Whad would try to interact with me if she truly thought I was scum. Not just ignore me completely, then vote me without ever talking to me.
@yzb25 Last Explanation
When I said the post about the "if I was Mafia you would die tonight" I was completely unaware of the setup being nightless. It was a pretty basic comment about the desire to murder someone when you actually can't because you're town.
Then, after you said that the setup was nightless I thought it would be funny and amazing if I told that I actually said that saying that as I couldn't kill you because the setup is Nightless, it also means that I'm not mafia. However, you started to comment more about it and I decided to say that it was... well... not planned at all.
After that, you said that it was impossible for me to not know the setup is Nightless because it is on the title. Well, I didn't read it. It is a quite long title and I just click the link, switch to my current Sc2 Mafia Arcade game and wait for it to load. I don't have to read the title ALL the time. The setup is also 2 months old (I mean in sign-ups) and the mechanics are hyper basic, so I didn't feel the need to re-read it. (AS IT IS FUCKING VANILLA).
I'm amazed by how much we have talked about something SO tiny and stupid. I don't know if it was a waste of time or a way for you to analyse me. I hope it was the second. However, I hope your vote isn't based on this but another thing.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
Now that you have commented it I have realised that the post reminds me a lot of scum Whad. I remember him giving pretty wrong and stupid reads when he was scum. Here Mesk & SJ as mayor townreads is pretty stupid and doesn't have any explanation. I can understand him putting Iced in the null list because it doesn't matter if he has talked a lot... sometimes you just don't get info from the current posts that the player has made / you have detected scum & town things in their posts, so you decide to have it as null because they both counteract themselves.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
Thoughts on players:
Mesk514: Can't say a lot. She is playing like usual... claiming Cit D1 and then proceed to shitpost for the rest of the time. I can say a lot about me being worried of her receiving scum role because Unknown decided to do some shit but it would be the same as in other games... so I'll just say that "Time will tell us whether this player is scum or not".
Orpz: Another player that has said basically 0. Voted Mesk, then said that he hated SJ. After that proceeded to vote me having as reasoning a post that I wrote long ago and he probably ignored but when Yzb started to seriously talk about it he used it??? Suspicious... 0,1 scum points for you!
Iced_Monopoly: I like his posts and continous push / talking with Whad. I like the things he says, although I don't know how he's as scum so I can't tell if he says the same things. However, 0,1 town points for you!
Titus: Who? He has said things but nothing that called my attention. Could be scum trying to hide.
Whad: I like the fact that Whad has talked with Iced Monopoly in a confident and relaxed way which I like. He seems to be giving substantiated arguments. Still, there were some things that bugged me and I don't like his reads post. I have him as null.
MattZed: Afk. Hope when he comes he acts like in Death Note.
Yzb25: My strongest reason of town-reading yzb is that when he's scum, he often lurks to death and says things which... well... doesn't make much sense / give information. I also like his posts and the fact that he's picky on things.
SuperJack: Heh... most D1s he doesn't do shit and that's the case here. I expect him to say things this day / tomorrow. Can't really get anything from him.
Cryptonic: Hum... Crypt may be the hardest person to read here, so I'll try to do my best.
Something which I liked but I don't know if I could categorize is that he posted this and I was thinking absolutely the same:
It is true that Iced_Monopoly has been hard town-reading Mesk and has shared it with people and kind of defended her. Crypt has made posts about this, which ultimately doesn't mean much because I feel like he would have talked about it regardless his alignment. He seems to comment on things that he seems as townish / scummish (is that it?) with a understandable proportion, so I can't do better than just slightly town read him.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
tbh I'm reading Gyrlander more as VI than scum at the moment.
You haven't been productive, cryptonic. I didn't bother to go into detail about your trolling and wikipedia copy pasta, but I consider that under the umbrella of underperforming.
I like SuperJack for calling you out, and that slot's posts seem like they are from a town mindset. General attitude seems townie enough to get thrown in the town pile for now. Do you disagree with my read? If so, why?
Re, Iced_Monopoly, I don't have enough info on him since I logically find his posts super scummy but acknowledge that in games where we are both town, I scum read him since I guess we have different interpretations of the game state. So for Iced, all his posts that I have problems with are NAI.
When making my reads, it's not about what people say; rather if I can see it and their attitudes being scum or town motivated.
I am Hela, Odin's firstborn, commander of the legions of Asgard, the rightful heir to the throne and the Goddess of Death.
I don't think we were online at the same time? I often am only online while most players are asleep so it's hard to engage people who have completely different timezones than I do. Sounds like you're throwing shade at me or at least testing the waters to see if you can get away with throwing shade. Seems weird.
@Cryptonic What do you think of Iced_Monopoly, yzb, and Titus?
I am Hela, Odin's firstborn, commander of the legions of Asgard, the rightful heir to the throne and the Goddess of Death.
I am Hela, Odin's firstborn, commander of the legions of Asgard, the rightful heir to the throne and the Goddess of Death.
I am Hela, Odin's firstborn, commander of the legions of Asgard, the rightful heir to the throne and the Goddess of Death.
Titus hasn't done anything significant d1, but she offered me her vote so far. That is enough for me to leave her alone until I see a flip.
Yes, Iced is still deserving of pressure, but I also find you in the same slot on the scumtree as Iced: The Mesk-buddy. The more scummy you seem, the less scummy he seems.
Mesk: You suggest Mesk will be easier to solve in the future. Do you mind sharing how you plan to sort Mesk?
Orpz: FYI, Orpz posted that stuff about you before me.
Iced: Do you think Iced defending Mesk is AI? I don't think he "hard townreads" her, honestly.
Whad: Other than the readwall, do you have any other negatives on Whad? The "confident and relaxed tone" and the "subtantiated arguments" are strong reasons to townread Whad. I personally didn't find Whad's readwall offensive for page 8.
I'm Town reading Gyrlander specifically for this post:
https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showth...l=1#post673847
He is the only one who acknowledged that SuperJack joining on my train is bananas lol. I don't think a Mafia would point out the logical problems in a day 1 lynch like that.
Gyr tries to softclaim / radiate townyness in general - He tells anecdotes about receiving his town PM, he openly whines about "how boring the night-phase is", exc.. So, in regards to the awareness point, it doesn't take a lot of awareness to execute a strategy you use often. What set this soft apart from when he does it as town was that this time it looked really forced.
As I see it, there are two hypotheses 1: "Gyr was truly unaware the setup was nightkill-less." or 2: "Gyr was aware that the setup was nightkill-less, but unaware that trying to soft not knowing the setup would look forced in this context". 2 looks far more plausible.
In scenario 2 he isn't even necessarily scum. He could be town that thinks admitting 2 is true increases his chances of being mislynched, but 2 still seems more plausible.
Anyway, I was more interested to hear your response to this specifically. It was never my intention to directly discuss it with Gyr, which is why my initial post was addressed to you, not him.
Not really. But I'm not going to dig a trench and tunnel you all game over this. I'll continue to interact with you and watch your interactions, and see if I can find a reason to scumread you that appeals to the masses. If I can't, then maybe my scumread doesn't deserve attention in the first place.
Also, pointing out a logical contradiction like Gyr did is something you can do regardless of alignment. I don't like that people are townreading over it, but scumhunting theory is a discussion we can save for the postgame.
Also:
I didn't like this post.
Lol how am I being emotional? Please elaborate and show where I am being emotional lmao
If calling someone retarded for voting me because they didn't read my post = emotional, then yes I guess I am lol. But doesn't make you any less retarded. I'd go back, read the post you're voting me for, then read your response to my post, and then slap yourself in the face lol
@Whad
Can you try to explain how SuperJack called me out? You said you enjoy the way he called me out, so I would like you to explain in your words exactly what about his argument and his method that you enjoyed.
I'd like to see this from your POV and how you can see a non-read as a positive thing to give someone a Town read.