S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III - Page 22
Register

User Tag List

Page 22 of 48 FirstFirst ... 12 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 32 ... LastLast
Results 1,051 to 1,100 of 2399
  1. ISO #1051

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    and why no one answered my question

    having similar roles in SC2 ( i mean things beside citizen ) is normal?

    anyway Knowing two kidnappers will be vanila in case of a lynch makes it sensible so I'm going with the assumption that both refered kidnappers (Elephant and the other one mentioned) are townish -

    In case someone is kidnapped by two, will they have 2 night chats - one with each kidnapper? how that works

  2. ISO #1052

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    and why no one answered my question

    having similar roles in SC2 ( i mean things beside citizen ) is normal?

    anyway Knowing two kidnappers will be vanila in case of a lynch makes it sensible so I'm going with the assumption that both refered kidnappers (Elephant and the other one mentioned) are townish -

    In case someone is kidnapped by two, will they have 2 night chats - one with each kidnapper? how that works
    If you mean in SC2 Arcade: Yes, absolutely normal.

    If you mean in Sc2mafia forum: No, it's kinda uncommon.

    If you mean in Mafia Wars: Last game we had 3 drug dealers so... yeah.


    Thank you Anonymous Donor

  3. ISO #1053

  4. ISO #1054

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Elephant View Post
    Frozen Angel, you can't say you weren't okay with not allowing Cancer to claim, and then go ahead and vote anyways. The fact is, Cancer could have easily been Godfather/Consig, and you were perfectly okay with lynching them because of "reasons" that aren't terribly strong.
    Frozen Angel did this day 1 as well. I questioned her about GETs troll vote on me which they liked, then didn't like, then said was progressive and wouldn't really take a clear stance on it. She is very wishy washy.

  5. ISO #1055

  6. ISO #1056

  7. ISO #1057

  8. ISO #1058

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    FA-Re-read ika's post. He never said Cancer was lying about their meta. It is bugging the crap out of me that you keep using that as a reason for your vote today when you gave several others at the actual time of your vote for not putting a vote down and then later did. The parts about you being careful/cautious/emotionless actually came from ika. He's working all day but if you want to talk to him later, I highly encourage the two of you to interact more.

    ~SW

  9. ISO #1059

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Elephant View Post
    Frozen Angel, you can't say you weren't okay with not allowing Cancer to claim, and then go ahead and vote anyways. The fact is, Cancer could have easily been Godfather/Consig, and you were perfectly okay with lynching them because of "reasons" that aren't terribly strong.
    Why not? that's exactly what I did. and that was your test - to see if you will hammer or jail them to ask for claim. I wasn't perfectly ok with lynching them, I decided to lynch them anyway - and I just explained my whole thought process twice so if you have any questions regarding that you better ask for spescifics.

  10. ISO #1060

  11. ISO #1061

  12. ISO #1062

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Cancer View Post
    I thought it was very out of character for Frozen Angel to call me mentally sick

    Now that I'm sure she's scum I forgive her for it.
    I asked if you scum or mentally sick and there was a third option that you were town with a reason like what you responded with, The reads you published later had no consistancy with what have been claimed

    and SW Ika didn't need to say the words. he said it wasn't typical tool they used that he is aware of and he pointed out exactly to my concern about them - that they didn't make any read evaluation after claiming such a thing. I'm not using that as my reason - that was the thing that made me even consider cancer as a vote for EOD.

    I'm not careful nor coutious and definitly not emotionless. I'm just refuting the built case on me with explining my logic is fluently simple detail to understand. putting that aside I felt voting cancer was right - eventhough I had multiple concerns about it (having concerns about wagon time of build is not townreading) I felt its right to go with it.

    and I highly encourage Ika and everyone else to interact with me as much as they can.

  13. ISO #1063

  14. ISO #1064

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    I asked if you scum or mentally sick and there was a third option that you were town with a reason like what you responded with, The reads you published later had no consistancy with what have been claimed

    and SW Ika didn't need to say the words. he said it wasn't typical tool they used that he is aware of and he pointed out exactly to my concern about them - that they didn't make any read evaluation after claiming such a thing. I'm not using that as my reason - that was the thing that made me even consider cancer as a vote for EOD.

    I'm not careful nor coutious and definitly not emotionless. I'm just refuting the built case on me with explining my logic is fluently simple detail to understand. putting that aside I felt voting cancer was right - eventhough I had multiple concerns about it (having concerns about wagon time of build is not townreading) I felt its right to go with it.

    and I highly encourage Ika and everyone else to interact with me as much as they can.
    So you were being anti town then, willing to turbo lynch an unclaimed slot. Cool.

    You're still scum though.

  15. ISO #1065

  16. ISO #1066

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Elephant View Post
    So, you are willing to miss lynch a possible Godfather simply because you were completing a test that doesn't even confirm us as Town?
    what are you talking about?

    are you reading anything I say?

    and no I had a scumread on cancer. and I'm not willing to mislynch anyone , I will vote my scumreads - and I won't endorse a day 1 no lynch in any manner - it was eaither your kidnap or cancer lynch at that point and I was ok with eaither at that point.

    and Cancer I really hate that to happen, but yes. if thats on my scumread and when someone I trust their sense confirms my concern and when there is no other info to go on , yes I'm pretty much ok with lynching you - even if your unclaimed - though that will be bad and its better to let you claim and in this scenario there was a way for you to claim if elephant was town. so it would be highly informative.

    and no I'm not.

    pedit : OK SJ are you trying to throw shade on me here? cause saying shits like that is too easy. I'm 100% honest and 200% consistent in all my points and everything is out there to evaluate.

  17. ISO #1067

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    what are you talking about?

    are you reading anything I say?

    and no I had a scumread on cancer. and I'm not willing to mislynch anyone , I will vote my scumreads - and I won't endorse a day 1 no lynch in any manner - it was eaither your kidnap or cancer lynch at that point and I was ok with eaither at that point.

    and Cancer I really hate that to happen, but yes. if thats on my scumread and when someone I trust their sense confirms my concern and when there is no other info to go on , yes I'm pretty much ok with lynching you - even if your unclaimed - though that will be bad and its better to let you claim and in this scenario there was a way for you to claim if elephant was town. so it would be highly informative.

    and no I'm not.

    pedit : OK SJ are you trying to throw shade on me here? cause saying shits like that is too easy. I'm 100% honest and 200% consistent in all my points and everything is out there to evaluate.
    But you didn't let your scum-read claim, and your scum-read could have been the Godfather, but you did not let them claim and instead decided to test us. This test doesn't even confirm us as Town unless you have some odd logic that I don't get.

    I'm not lying, my issue is you don't seem to understand that you made a mistake.

  18. ISO #1068

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    what are you talking about?

    are you reading anything I say?

    and no I had a scumread on cancer. and I'm not willing to mislynch anyone , I will vote my scumreads - and I won't endorse a day 1 no lynch in any manner - it was eaither your kidnap or cancer lynch at that point and I was ok with eaither at that point.

    and Cancer I really hate that to happen, but yes. if thats on my scumread and when someone I trust their sense confirms my concern and when there is no other info to go on , yes I'm pretty much ok with lynching you - even if your unclaimed - though that will be bad and its better to let you claim and in this scenario there was a way for you to claim if elephant was town. so it would be highly informative.

    and no I'm not.

    pedit : OK SJ are you trying to throw shade on me here? cause saying shits like that is too easy. I'm 100% honest and 200% consistent in all my points and everything is out there to evaluate.
    You're doing a lot of appeasing there.

  19. ISO #1069

  20. ISO #1070

  21. ISO #1071

  22. ISO #1072

  23. ISO #1073

  24. ISO #1074

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Elephant View Post
    But you didn't let your scum-read claim, and your scum-read could have been the Godfather, but you did not let them claim and instead decided to test us. This test doesn't even confirm us as Town unless you have some odd logic that I don't get.

    I'm not lying, my issue is you don't seem to understand that you made a mistake.
    When did I say I was trying to confirm you as town? and I myself said that its bad that there is no time for them to claim before this wagon goes forward. how is that doing anything with any part of my logic

    and stop your nonsense one word advertising bullcrap SJ and instead of "apeasing" to every other player in game - answer the question I asked you multiple times.

    and Gyrlander what about me tsrated to look scummy?

    and when did I say I trust Ika so much? I trusted his sense that detected the same concern I had about you yesterday. I trsuted my own sense - and the fact he told me my concern in my face is why I was ok with sheeping empathy there.

    and I said you are pretending your tunneling me to dodge the questions I asked or your trying to make this conversation all about me making everyone paranoid about me and just throwing a "I still scum read FA" or "your still scum FA" time to time to nudge the rest of the town conscious here. and yes you are doing that Cancer and I'm not sure if its scum or town you atm.

  25. ISO #1075

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    what are you talking about?

    are you reading anything I say?

    and no I had a scumread on cancer. and I'm not willing to mislynch anyone , I will vote my scumreads - and I won't endorse a day 1 no lynch in any manner - it was eaither your kidnap or cancer lynch at that point and I was ok with eaither at that point.

    and Cancer I really hate that to happen, but yes. if thats on my scumread and when someone I trust their sense confirms my concern and when there is no other info to go on , yes I'm pretty much ok with lynching you - even if your unclaimed - though that will be bad and its better to let you claim and in this scenario there was a way for you to claim if elephant was town. so it would be highly informative.

    and no I'm not.

    pedit : OK SJ are you trying to throw shade on me here? cause saying shits like that is too easy. I'm 100% honest and 200% consistent in all my points and everything is out there to evaluate.
    This post feels scummy to me. Your way if defending as if we're inferior could be catalogued as "Over Defensive"


    Thank you Anonymous Donor

  26. ISO #1076

  27. ISO #1077

  28. ISO #1078

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Basically two things are my undoing : that I am reactionary as fuck , and I can't ignore anything. Thats a part of my mental issues - and one of the things that i was being held in an sylum for 3 years ago. not trying to bring my life to dodge a wagon. just scumread my personality and evaluate my play ...

    Fire , Ika , anyone who knows me a bit can confirm this.

    and this is not a self meta against the case represented on me. its a self meta explaining why I'm angry that this day is all about me atm when the only person who is (or at least was) scum reading me was cancer. I ask the rest of you to not scumread me based on defensiveness or talking too much about me and explain your concerns instead of jumping in the middle of this mud.

    anyway, Lucas is sleep; so I'm more concentrated in this right now. Cancer I will get back to you with the things I didn't like about your day 1 and how I developed my scum lean on you in next post in the mean time you have all the space to explain the questions I asked and you dodged.

    pedit : yeah I noticed someone will bring this up sooner or later ...

  29. ISO #1079

  30. ISO #1080

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    Basically two things are my undoing : that I am reactionary as fuck , and I can't ignore anything. Thats a part of my mental issues - and one of the things that i was being held in an sylum for 3 years ago. not trying to bring my life to dodge a wagon. just scumread my personality and evaluate my play ...

    Fire , Ika , anyone who knows me a bit can confirm this.

    and this is not a self meta against the case represented on me. its a self meta explaining why I'm angry that this day is all about me atm when the only person who is (or at least was) scum reading me was cancer. I ask the rest of you to not scumread me based on defensiveness or talking too much about me and explain your concerns instead of jumping in the middle of this mud.

    anyway, Lucas is sleep; so I'm more concentrated in this right now. Cancer I will get back to you with the things I didn't like about your day 1 and how I developed my scum lean on you in next post in the mean time you have all the space to explain the questions I asked and you dodged.

    pedit : yeah I noticed someone will bring this up sooner or later ...
    So now we were a scum lean only? Pretty careless letting a scum lean almost get quicklynched

  31. ISO #1081

  32. ISO #1082

  33. ISO #1083

  34. ISO #1084

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    that pedit was to gyrlander

    Quote Originally Posted by Cancer View Post
    I thought you were scum reading us? Now you're unsure? Since we're scum reading you?
    I had several not sold on scum reads day 1 and you were one of them. This blitz deadlines here won't let me do my processes completly to reach the state of being more sure - this is not the first time this happens to me here.

    so yes I'm not sure about you being scum, I was and still am scumreading you , and I'm trying to evaluate stuff based on new information and interactions

    and your not helping me to do so by reclaiming your scumread on me , dodging to respond to my points and advertising my wagon and forcing me to respond back about myself.

  35. ISO #1085

  36. ISO #1086

  37. ISO #1087

  38. ISO #1088

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    that pedit was to gyrlander



    I had several not sold on scum reads day 1 and you were one of them. This blitz deadlines here won't let me do my processes completly to reach the state of being more sure - this is not the first time this happens to me here.

    so yes I'm not sure about you being scum, I was and still am scumreading you , and I'm trying to evaluate stuff based on new information and interactions

    and your not helping me to do so by reclaiming your scumread on me , dodging to respond to my points and advertising my wagon and forcing me to respond back about myself.
    Just take a stance on something. Fence sitting is the most scummy thing in the world.

  39. ISO #1089

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Cancer View Post
    So now we were a scum lean only? Pretty careless letting a scum lean almost get quicklynched
    Its really not considering the only other option in my hand back then was to no lynch

    and I didn't quick lynch you. I actually gave two options possible and I declred my person in prison to elephant in case a no lynch and kidnap was prefered by others - when i wasn't around.

    and that was prefered.

    and I always said that I had a scumlean on you. I was doubtcasting on my read to make sure voting is the best option back there and I made a judgement call on my behalf. your not answering why that was scummy but others who made the same judgement call without reasoning are not scummy and your not responding back and elaborating anything in your discussion.

  40. ISO #1090

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    i dont feel strongly but i do tryst ika reads and im indicated to vote how much time remains?
    Here's where you said you trust ika's reads. I understand he gave you reasoning you agree'd with but it really weird to have no natural paranoia of our slot.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    First I didn't say you didn't try to stop ptb from being an asshole , I said you tried to poke the delima between emphaty and ptb and you did that. I asked you why and you said "I can analyze emotions better" that was satisfying answer for a while till the point you made a list full of null reads and no clue for you reading emotions. Ika confirmed none of you tow are people who are emotion pokers and reaction testers so that granted you an EOD1 vote from me. Don't call MS my homesite anymore. and yes I know better. In a reular mafia (time base the version I'm comfortable with) - we push people to L1 - let them claim - analyze the shit out of it and then get things done. In here though there isn't that time and the wagon on you wasn't shit. all my townreads were voting you - so yep I would lynch you -a person who had no train before EOD to get a lynch done with all my townreads. It was informative and it shaped in the best manner it could shapeso I was actually hoping it will end in your scumflip when I logged of - cause I was in a rush back then.

    and no. noone policy lynch in MS - just saying that as a fact - not trying to mean anything. are you saying the vote on me is policy? cause I made you two upset with my EOD vote?

    Yuki put you on L1 . fire voted you because he conceded. Please make it crstal clear what is your concern about my vote.
    I copied the whole thing to keep it in context but the highlighted is where you said ika's saying they are not emotion pokers (even though he didn't really say that) was the reason for your vote.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    I don't really have the motivation to read the whole interaction to see why I felt that way but I asked it from you and your slot answered me back with "because I/we can read emotions better" or something like that. I'm not scumreading you because you did or didn't trigger that fight, I'm scumreading you for what Ika claimed its a false meta - and because I didn't see any signs of you making any reads based on emotions later in your reads.
    Again, saying ika saying they don't play off emotions was your reasoning here. He never said it was a false meta. He said he didn't think so but wasn't sure, especially in the case of Banana.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    I'm not sure if your attempting to dodge the questions I asked - by pretending that your tunneled on me - or you just want others to notice you by repeating a nonsense advertisement before anyone else commenting on it.

    pedit : That was the question SW what the hell are you talking about. I asked if the selfmeta SJ presented to avoid discussion was true or not and Ika said its not and he pointed out to their null reads. that was exactly what I was looking for from Ika to proceed with that wagon. I was hesitant to vote them and unsure becasue the wagon started very late not because I was townreading them - casue claiming in this game matters a lot.

    and I waited a lot - to see if elephant will respond back to me - or jump on cancer or not - because that wouldn't make any sense becasue of their claim. I eventually voted because after making a list of pros and cons in my head , I decided to vote with my townreads.

    and you don't know me if your trying to read me based on how much I'm defending myself. I am the same reactionary Frozen Angel which I was before and I will defend myself from any - even shitty accusation - all the time.

    There is actually no other important matter to comment about atm - beside the fact cancer accused me of hypocrasy when the points they made are more applicaple to Yuki and Fire votes and though i don't scumread eaither for those naked voting, I don't understand why Cancer dodges answering about their main concern about my yesterday voting.
    OK, here you say it's because of ika's self meta comment but then elaborated on the reasoning behind it that you like but you didn't say that earlier. However, I do that too sometimes. I elaborate later on a scumread so I'm not gonna say this is terrible right now.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    I asked if you scum or mentally sick and there was a third option that you were town with a reason like what you responded with, The reads you published later had no consistancy with what have been claimed

    and SW Ika didn't need to say the words. he said it wasn't typical tool they used that he is aware of and he pointed out exactly to my concern about them - that they didn't make any read evaluation after claiming such a thing. I'm not using that as my reason - that was the thing that made me even consider cancer as a vote for EOD.

    I'm not careful nor coutious and definitly not emotionless. I'm just refuting the built case on me with explining my logic is fluently simple detail to understand. putting that aside I felt voting cancer was right - eventhough I had multiple concerns about it (having concerns about wagon time of build is not townreading) I felt its right to go with it.

    and I highly encourage Ika and everyone else to interact with me as much as they can.
    Well, but above you said the reason was ika said they are not emotion testers but here you are saying that's not the reason.

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    what are you talking about?

    are you reading anything I say?

    and no I had a scumread on cancer. and I'm not willing to mislynch anyone , I will vote my scumreads - and I won't endorse a day 1 no lynch in any manner - it was eaither your kidnap or cancer lynch at that point and I was ok with eaither at that point.

    and Cancer I really hate that to happen, but yes. if thats on my scumread and when someone I trust their sense confirms my concern and when there is no other info to go on , yes I'm pretty much ok with lynching you - even if your unclaimed - though that will be bad and its better to let you claim and in this scenario there was a way for you to claim if elephant was town. so it would be highly informative.

    and no I'm not.

    pedit : OK SJ are you trying to throw shade on me here? cause saying shits like that is too easy. I'm 100% honest and 200% consistent in all my points and everything is out there to evaluate.
    I haven't gone back to check but did you have a scumread on Cancer before ika and I gave our reasoning to you? I think you were nervous around this vote and are not consisten in your reasoning for it or your reasoning today for it and I'd like to know why.

    ~SW

  41. ISO #1091

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Cancer View Post
    Just take a stance on something. Fence sitting is the most scummy thing in the world.
    I'm not fence siting and my reads are transparent as fuck when I'm developing them - always. I never tunnel - and If I was tunneling before - that I've been accused for doing that again and again before - now I'm changing that attidue by not considering things scum indicative and doubtcasting myself. thats what I do to make my reads on place and that was what I've been doing regarding everyone in game till this point.

  42. ISO #1092

  43. ISO #1093

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitaka Oni View Post
    Btw, why our (godfather claim RLVG) vote Cancer?
    And RLVG claim there are 2 kidnap ? There is no way (town) mafia should have this much (op) role right? It's like 2 vigilante and escort combined right?


    v)o.o)^
    A rare Yuki in ultimate form

    Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~

  44. ISO #1094

  45. ISO #1095

  46. ISO #1096

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    just adding to last post and this playstyle is nothing new. It's been a while that I'm trying to - not trust myself - and thet resulted to keep my games calmer - and make me more accurate in pushes.

    @SW I asked Cancer a question about what they were doing in the middle of your delimma and that ended up with SJ's claim that they read emotions better. I was scumreading that slot for not having a single read based on emotions or anything else and not pushing any shit for that - and I had a paranoia that banana if is teodete might be a little emotional himself but I don't recall SJ or even teo pushing someone based on emotions.

    Ika expressed the same concern I had (not the meta part - that they didn't develop any reads that he can recall , and he said he don't think thats their meta too, that was enough for me to trsut my own feelings and go with the vote (and Get wa there and dw was there) so i went with it.

    and I do townread you two based on what I feel about you that your uninformed and I don't get any vibes for scumminess from you, I liked your try for getting a lynch day 1 - though that might be biased based on my scumread on cancer - I liked the way you responded back to ptb. I am paranoid about you yes - as I am about most of my townreads most of the time but doubting you if it means scumreading you - no I'm not.

    and in all my posts even the one your mentioning I said or its not written in omplete manner - but I never claimed otherwise that Ika post made me feel better about what I had in my mind about cancer.

    I am overreactionary and defensive as fuck about anything against me - its not about the vote its like I can't explain myself to towns in you and the scums in you know or are doing this unintentionally - abusing the way I get when people push me - to make me look bad because I'm "overdefending" and I can't really ignore this convo to do what should I do to scumhunt - and no one else will be able to if this way of accusing me continues till I'm mislynched - cause I will defend myself more and my self explining posts will fill the game at this rate.

  47. ISO #1097

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    No. Only NL days. And the other game we had 3 Drug Dealers....
    Well.....it could be...well that's why Lucarino can pick a secondary role right?
    So it's a TPR war, not a (citizen) mafioso war...I see, that's make senses


    v)o.o)^
    A rare Yuki in ultimate form

    Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~

  48. ISO #1098

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Yukitaka Oni View Post
    And RLVG claim there are 2 kidnap ? There is no way (town) mafia should have this much (op) role right? It's like 2 vigilante and escort combined right?
    Thats two killing + blocking in case we sarefise one if we no lynch atm.

    we can actually - instead of lynching - come to a agreement to choose target for elephant and the annon kidnapper and let them do the kills instead of us. that will increase our chance for hitting scum or catching someone in lie as godfather is already claimed and kidnappers should know the identity of cons.

  49. ISO #1099

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    Quote Originally Posted by Frozen Angel View Post
    Thats two killing + blocking in case we sarefise one if we no lynch atm.

    we can actually - instead of lynching - come to a agreement to choose target for elephant and the annon kidnapper and let them do the kills instead of us. that will increase our chance for hitting scum or catching someone in lie as godfather is already claimed and kidnappers should know the identity of cons.
    Why not b)O.o)>?!?!? I totally agree with (let the jailor do the job)!


    v)o.o)^
    A rare Yuki in ultimate form

    Yukitaka Oni ~Tafkal Hit Squad Member~

  50. ISO #1100

    Re: S-FM 218: Mafia Wars III

    oh and I promised before that i will reread the part I questioned about cancer yesterday again with what banana said about their identities but I got occupied with this - whatever you wanna call it - and I couldn't

    I will check in again in 2 hours or something like that again. till know bye.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •