April 30th, 2016, 07:56 PM
[QUOTE=Saik0Shinigami;589751]Uhhh this doesn't make sense to me... It clearly says that "you will [B]NOT[/B] be notified" So how are they told if it fails?[/QUOTE]
I misquoted wrong post... Whatever. Your first purple line.
"Target one player at night, roleblocking them.
You will not be notified if the roleblock is unsuccessful."
Says NOT notified. So please tell me how "Since you have never told us that you received feedback saying your roleblock failed." happens?
Originally Posted by
Saik0Shinigami
Uhhh this doesn't make sense to me... It clearly says that "you will NOT be notified" So how are they told if it fails?
I misquoted wrong post... Whatever. Your first purple line.
"Target one player at night, roleblocking them.
You will not be notified if the roleblock is unsuccessful."
Says NOT notified. So please tell me how "Since you have never told us that you received feedback saying your roleblock failed." happens?
April 30th, 2016, 07:54 PM
[QUOTE=SuperJack;589728]DarknessB cannot be Sephiroth or Cloud Strife.
Since you have never told us that you received feedback saying your roleblock failed.
Which leaves two slots for DarknessB to be [COLOR="#FF0000"]Red Scum[/COLOR].
And since one of them slots is own by Banana.
There is only 1 left for DarknessB. So you are claiming that DarknessB is Banana's scum buddy.[/QUOTE]
Uhhh this doesn't make sense to me... It clearly says that "you will [B]NOT[/B] be notified" So how are they told if it fails?
Originally Posted by
SuperJack
DarknessB cannot be Sephiroth or Cloud Strife.
Since you have never told us that you received feedback saying your roleblock failed.
Which leaves two slots for DarknessB to be Red Scum.
And since one of them slots is own by Banana.
There is only 1 left for DarknessB. So you are claiming that DarknessB is Banana's scum buddy.
Uhhh this doesn't make sense to me... It clearly says that "you will NOT be notified" So how are they told if it fails?
April 30th, 2016, 03:55 PM
[unvote][/unvote]
The fuck is happening. I need a xanax.
-unvote
The fuck is happening. I need a xanax.
April 30th, 2016, 11:37 AM
[QUOTE=SuperJack;589385]Don't forget the mz v be a yesterday. Everyone seems to have forgotten it.[/QUOTE]
I've posted 3-4 times about it, looking for other peoples feelings about it.
Originally Posted by
SuperJack
Don't forget the mz v be a yesterday. Everyone seems to have forgotten it.
I've posted 3-4 times about it, looking for other peoples feelings about it.
April 30th, 2016, 11:18 AM
[QUOTE=SuperJack;589374]My case started from "he was on all 3 town trains, like banana was. along with seeing pisskop being unnoticed.
And Yeh. The hole pisskop has dug is just shows he is scum.[/QUOTE]
Can I assume then that you will be investigating him tonight so we can do proper lynch tomorrow? Considering your read on banana this seems like the best course of action. Assuming you are truly Tseng/Cop.
Btw, I'm waiting on Banana to show up before I will start to entertain the fact that you are Cop, just to disclose. Since we can't verify your claim until you die there's nothing to prove your claim other than lack of claims from another 'cop'.
Originally Posted by
SuperJack
My case started from "he was on all 3 town trains, like banana was. along with seeing pisskop being unnoticed.
And Yeh. The hole pisskop has dug is just shows he is scum.
Can I assume then that you will be investigating him tonight so we can do proper lynch tomorrow? Considering your read on banana this seems like the best course of action. Assuming you are truly Tseng/Cop.
Btw, I'm waiting on Banana to show up before I will start to entertain the fact that you are Cop, just to disclose. Since we can't verify your claim until you die there's nothing to prove your claim other than lack of claims from another 'cop'.
April 30th, 2016, 10:38 AM
[QUOTE=Saik0Shinigami;589351][vote]BananCucho[/vote]
I'll come back to you later PissKop[/QUOTE]
[vote]BananaCucho[/vote]
apparently I can't spell
Originally Posted by
Saik0Shinigami
-vote BananCucho
I'll come back to you later PissKop
-vote BananaCucho
apparently I can't spell
April 30th, 2016, 10:37 AM
[vote]BananCucho[/vote]
I'll come back to you later PissKop
-vote BananCucho
I'll come back to you later PissKop
April 30th, 2016, 10:34 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589342]Did I say that? Or did I say that people are ignoring it? In my origianl case on Dark, did I mention his posts were weak/noncentent?
See, youre not looking for scum. Youre looking for an excuse to justify yourself.[/QUOTE]
You didn't mention ANYTHING. You even said this yourself. "Why I didnt type out a huge case on him is because its much more effective to let people make their own conclusions rather than make those..."
You didn't make a case at all. What you did was quote a bunch of shit. Write 2 relevant sentences, then speculated, then called for a vote. THEN YOU WAIVED AROUND A BULLSHIT MATERIA PLAY AND CHANGED YOUR STORY TWICE.
Originally Posted by
pisskop
Did I say that? Or did I say that people are ignoring it? In my origianl case on Dark, did I mention his posts were weak/noncentent?
See, youre not looking for scum. Youre looking for an excuse to justify yourself.
You didn't mention ANYTHING. You even said this yourself. "Why I didnt type out a huge case on him is because its much more effective to let people make their own conclusions rather than make those..."
You didn't make a case at all. What you did was quote a bunch of shit. Write 2 relevant sentences, then speculated, then called for a vote. THEN YOU WAIVED AROUND A BULLSHIT MATERIA PLAY AND CHANGED YOUR STORY TWICE.
April 30th, 2016, 10:28 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589339]Thats right. Theyre neglected while you wallow in this Illogic.
Still people ignore how terribly weak Dark has performed. Still I cannot get those who are the worst offenders to be brought forth.[/QUOTE]
So now your argument is vote darkness because he's performed weak?
Originally Posted by
pisskop
Thats right. Theyre neglected while you wallow in this Illogic.
Still people ignore how terribly weak Dark has performed. Still I cannot get those who are the worst offenders to be brought forth.
So now your argument is vote darkness because he's performed weak?
April 30th, 2016, 10:25 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589337]and still you neglect these reads then? methinks you talk more than chew[/QUOTE]
I haven't neglected. I'm telling you they're insubstantial.
Originally Posted by
pisskop
and still you neglect these reads then? methinks you talk more than chew
I haven't neglected. I'm telling you they're insubstantial.
April 30th, 2016, 10:21 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589325]
And yet through my continued efforts you are making them slowly.[/QUOTE]
No. If you think you've presented me new information you are naive. D1 I speculated MZ and DarknessB team shenanigans. I still suspect DarknessB. Nothing you've presented has been anything I've overlooked. On basis of merit, relationship data, and my own inferences, I have other people who are more likely than darknessB to be scum.
Originally Posted by
pisskop
And yet through my continued efforts you are making them slowly.
No. If you think you've presented me new information you are naive. D1 I speculated MZ and DarknessB team shenanigans. I still suspect DarknessB. Nothing you've presented has been anything I've overlooked. On basis of merit, relationship data, and my own inferences, I have other people who are more likely than darknessB to be scum.
April 30th, 2016, 10:07 AM
[QUOTE=BananaCucho;589315]This. The fight is stupid. Would rather see this get pressured
[Vote]powerofdeath[/vote][/QUOTE]
If that's your sentiment then cool. But this was written before it came out that he lied about materia and his supposed TPR
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
This. The fight is stupid. Would rather see this get pressured
-vote powerofdeath
If that's your sentiment then cool. But this was written before it came out that he lied about materia and his supposed TPR
April 30th, 2016, 10:06 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589300]saiko - holy crap the kid must have come from a site where everyone is honest henrys or something. Lives in a box and doesnt seem to know how to come out of it.[/QUOTE]
I come from a site where you need substantial evidence to make a case. There's virtually no reason to lie as a town. Maybe withhold information. But if you were so sure of your case for Darkness it shouldn't have required BS materia claim. Your claim doesn't even help your case. I've read your post on Darkness twice now since you've posted it twice and it's not compelling.
Here let me tell you every reason why your shit isn't compelling to me. In order from your list:
1) He was providing a narrative here that was appropriate for the time.
2) He isn't a mind reader and didn't know that someone else was willing to push to end. In the end he was attempting to give a Townie a chance(we know this after the fact)
3) The fuck is meatspace? Is this a term or something?
4) You didn't even comment on this one. It's your claim, do the fucking work
5) same as #4. This is a legitimate conclusion to make since that's all the data we had at the time. It was also the same conclusion I made since I originally wanted to vote PoD but was forced by Matt to join his train since he wanted to act so damn scummy. Just the same as your doing here. It's too fucking scummy.
Stop acting scum and people won't assume you are. Quack like a duck and people will assume you are one.
Yes I can agree that DarknessB's quotes there appear just a little flip-floppy in the way you presented them and suspicious, but not enough to pull my eyes away from my own list. On the other hand, lying about Materia and night actions and then soft-claiming a TPR when you got caught [B]does[/B] warrant me looking at you over my list.
Originally Posted by
pisskop
saiko - holy crap the kid must have come from a site where everyone is honest henrys or something. Lives in a box and doesnt seem to know how to come out of it.
I come from a site where you need substantial evidence to make a case. There's virtually no reason to lie as a town. Maybe withhold information. But if you were so sure of your case for Darkness it shouldn't have required BS materia claim. Your claim doesn't even help your case. I've read your post on Darkness twice now since you've posted it twice and it's not compelling.
Here let me tell you every reason why your shit isn't compelling to me. In order from your list:
1) He was providing a narrative here that was appropriate for the time.
2) He isn't a mind reader and didn't know that someone else was willing to push to end. In the end he was attempting to give a Townie a chance(we know this after the fact)
3) The fuck is meatspace? Is this a term or something?
4) You didn't even comment on this one. It's your claim, do the fucking work
5) same as #4. This is a legitimate conclusion to make since that's all the data we had at the time. It was also the same conclusion I made since I originally wanted to vote PoD but was forced by Matt to join his train since he wanted to act so damn scummy. Just the same as your doing here. It's too fucking scummy.
Stop acting scum and people won't assume you are. Quack like a duck and people will assume you are one.
Yes I can agree that DarknessB's quotes there appear just a little flip-floppy in the way you presented them and suspicious, but not enough to pull my eyes away from my own list. On the other hand, lying about Materia and night actions and then soft-claiming a TPR when you got caught does warrant me looking at you over my list.
April 30th, 2016, 09:39 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589278]Ive done [i]all[/i] of the heavy lifting today so far.
We have saiko who cant logic their way out of a paper bagand waffles around because its ruled by feelings, Gyro who even types my name wrong in votes, and Dark who is also ignoring my point about how he played yesterday.[/QUOTE]
I've given you my reasons for everything you brought up and you want to sit there a degrade and bullshit me when you've yet to counter a SINGLE point I've made with anything that actually makes any real sense. You're response have been 'figure it out' when you made the claim. Fuck that. you're the one making the damn claim, tell us why. Not 'figure out why I'm making this claim'.
Originally Posted by
pisskop
Ive done all of the heavy lifting today so far.
We have saiko who cant logic their way out of a paper bagand waffles around because its ruled by feelings, Gyro who even types my name wrong in votes, and Dark who is also ignoring my point about how he played yesterday.
I've given you my reasons for everything you brought up and you want to sit there a degrade and bullshit me when you've yet to counter a SINGLE point I've made with anything that actually makes any real sense. You're response have been 'figure it out' when you made the claim. Fuck that. you're the one making the damn claim, tell us why. Not 'figure out why I'm making this claim'.
April 30th, 2016, 09:19 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589262]Liek thats the part you cant really explain.
Why I outed hat I blocked Dark should be obvious enough.
Why I didnt out that I was PR should be even more obvious.
Why I am forced to claim now is that you suck at putting together the pieces.[/QUOTE]
1) No, it's not obvious
EVEN IF you had the materia and role blocked and no one else claimed. Gyrlander already blocked AIVION. You're Block doesn't shine any real suspicions on DarknessB... as a matter of fact all it does is make the block on AIVION garbage data.
2) Sure, can agree here. But why out anything with incomplete data?
3) You now have to out your 'role' because you suck at getting all the information together and piecing together a real case. Instead you now have to out your 'role' to make your case more substantial... except it's still lacking because we're still split on if DarknessB had a role to roleblock. My suspicions on DarknessB have waned a while ago. I found it more productive to go after PoD or look into AIVION. I'm still on the fence of DarknessB or Calix being the third Mafia at the moment. So you do not make a compelling case just based on 'I roleblocked him last night so he must be mafia'
Originally Posted by
pisskop
Liek thats the part you cant really explain.
Why I outed hat I blocked Dark should be obvious enough.
Why I didnt out that I was PR should be even more obvious.
Why I am forced to claim now is that you suck at putting together the pieces.
1) No, it's not obvious
EVEN IF you had the materia and role blocked and no one else claimed. Gyrlander already blocked AIVION. You're Block doesn't shine any real suspicions on DarknessB... as a matter of fact all it does is make the block on AIVION garbage data.
2) Sure, can agree here. But why out anything with incomplete data?
3) You now have to out your 'role' because you suck at getting all the information together and piecing together a real case. Instead you now have to out your 'role' to make your case more substantial... except it's still lacking because we're still split on if DarknessB had a role to roleblock. My suspicions on DarknessB have waned a while ago. I found it more productive to go after PoD or look into AIVION. I'm still on the fence of DarknessB or Calix being the third Mafia at the moment. So you do not make a compelling case just based on 'I roleblocked him last night so he must be mafia'
April 30th, 2016, 09:10 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589253]See, I never accused anyone of lying. Youre just being an eager beaver who isnt addressing the points raised against you.[/QUOTE]
It's not a valid point you raised when you base it off of a lie... which is that you materia'd which you didn't actually have. If you're looking to change your excuse now to 'I'm TPR blocker', that is now super shady. Why in the world do you think you would look good on so little information when half the damn players haven't posted yet and someone else was likely to get the second Materia and post about it?
Originally Posted by
pisskop
See, I never accused anyone of lying. Youre just being an eager beaver who isnt addressing the points raised against you.
It's not a valid point you raised when you base it off of a lie... which is that you materia'd which you didn't actually have. If you're looking to change your excuse now to 'I'm TPR blocker', that is now super shady. Why in the world do you think you would look good on so little information when half the damn players haven't posted yet and someone else was likely to get the second Materia and post about it?
April 30th, 2016, 09:07 AM
[QUOTE=pisskop;589250]Its apparent that you guys aren't exactly keen on softclaiming.
Im the roleblcoker.[/QUOTE]
Is this the meta on this site? Dig myself a hole so deep I have to claim a role in order to fix anything at all?!
Originally Posted by
pisskop
Its apparent that you guys aren't exactly keen on softclaiming.
Im the roleblcoker.
Is this the meta on this site? Dig myself a hole so deep I have to claim a role in order to fix anything at all?!
April 30th, 2016, 08:51 AM
[QUOTE=SuperJack;589243][Unvote][/unvote]
Still a lot to discuss.[/QUOTE]
The discussion now is simple... I doubt Gyrlander lied about his materia... especially after his plays yesterday. He's not going to go for bold things like that anymore especially since it doesn't help his case as superTPR.
So either PissKop is lying and trying to shift to DarknessB, or Headshrinker is lying and isn't shifting to anyone.
Which one looks more shady to you... I stand by my read that PissKop isn't Mafia. But I understand that I have a terrible habit of reading SK as town. This 'mistake' makes too much sense to me to fit SK motive. Somehow PissKop got himself to L-2 and realized nobody claimed second materia and thought he could use that to get the heat off himself. Which is really bold so early in the day.
I currently believe PissKop is SK.
Originally Posted by
SuperJack
-unvote
Still a lot to discuss.
The discussion now is simple... I doubt Gyrlander lied about his materia... especially after his plays yesterday. He's not going to go for bold things like that anymore especially since it doesn't help his case as superTPR.
So either PissKop is lying and trying to shift to DarknessB, or Headshrinker is lying and isn't shifting to anyone.
Which one looks more shady to you... I stand by my read that PissKop isn't Mafia. But I understand that I have a terrible habit of reading SK as town. This 'mistake' makes too much sense to me to fit SK motive. Somehow PissKop got himself to L-2 and realized nobody claimed second materia and thought he could use that to get the heat off himself. Which is really bold so early in the day.
I currently believe PissKop is SK.
April 30th, 2016, 08:40 AM
I firmly don't believe Pisskop is mafia. He doesn't align that way in my notes. This leaves SK slot.
I firmly don't believe Pisskop is mafia. He doesn't align that way in my notes. This leaves SK slot.