February 13th, 2019, 05:33 PM
Replay is attached. If that isn't sufficient, I'm sure other replays from when I have reported people would work.
Replay is attached. If that isn't sufficient, I'm sure other replays from when I have reported people would work.
January 24th, 2019, 07:41 PM
Me :laugh:
Me
July 25th, 2018, 05:43 PM
4? That's rookie numbers. You need to pump that shit up. I, myself, make at [B]least [/B]two accounts a day.
[video=youtube;nk3JenrsXpU]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nk3JenrsXpU[/video]
4? That's rookie numbers. You need to pump that shit up. I, myself, make at least two accounts a day.
July 10th, 2018, 04:13 PM
[QUOTE=Apocist;748665][url]https://v.ht/B28v[/url][/QUOTE]
I wouldn't click this link in a million years unless I were wearing a condom.
Originally Posted by
Apocist
I wouldn't click this link in a million years unless I were wearing a condom.
June 26th, 2018, 07:35 PM
Damn. On a better note, you have my respect for that profile pic. Just saw violet evergarden last week. So good....
July 4th has a special coming out!
Damn. On a better note, you have my respect for that profile pic. Just saw violet evergarden last week. So good....
July 4th has a special coming out!
June 23rd, 2018, 12:27 PM
[QUOTE=yzb25;745877]tfw everyone's accepted the economy's going to tank and everyone's just resigned themselves to leeching off the dying corpse XD[/QUOTE]
Considering how much Trump is trying to push tariffs on literally everybody? I didn't think it would happen until the 200 billion tariff announcement.
Luckily I'll have the income to dump into stocks on the rebound, but Trump is literally fucking everyone (but his base won't give a shit).
And it's not like 1 person can stop the market from tanking. If you fight the market, you'll get wrecked. Not like I'm pulling my investments, but I'm just not going to dump into it now.
That being said, I still did make some recent investments. But, I plan to hold onto them for years - recession or not. I see great growth potential in them.
Originally Posted by
yzb25
tfw everyone's accepted the economy's going to tank and everyone's just resigned themselves to leeching off the dying corpse XD
Considering how much Trump is trying to push tariffs on literally everybody? I didn't think it would happen until the 200 billion tariff announcement.
Luckily I'll have the income to dump into stocks on the rebound, but Trump is literally fucking everyone (but his base won't give a shit).
And it's not like 1 person can stop the market from tanking. If you fight the market, you'll get wrecked. Not like I'm pulling my investments, but I'm just not going to dump into it now.
That being said, I still did make some recent investments. But, I plan to hold onto them for years - recession or not. I see great growth potential in them.
June 22nd, 2018, 07:35 PM
[QUOTE=Warshieldman321;745291]See my birthday is in less than 10 days and i want to start buying stocks young. This is impeccable timing. Any advice for a noob on this shit?[/QUOTE]
Do it via a Roth IRA. Max out your annual contribution if you can.
The economy is set to tank in 1-2 years, so it is rather difficult to invest well right now. Growth stocks should be your aim though.
Originally Posted by
Warshieldman321
See my birthday is in less than 10 days and i want to start buying stocks young. This is impeccable timing. Any advice for a noob on this shit?
Do it via a Roth IRA. Max out your annual contribution if you can.
The economy is set to tank in 1-2 years, so it is rather difficult to invest well right now. Growth stocks should be your aim though.
June 20th, 2018, 04:55 PM
[QUOTE=aamirus;744913]Without doing much research it’s easy to make 5-10% per week generally, but every once in awhile you make a mistake and lose 50%+ so I would recommend taking the time to make better bets[/QUOTE]
Definitely. It's idiotic to just jump on every bandwagon. Some win, some lose.
Some people even take loans to invest.
If you can't afford to lose it all, then don't invest any of it.
Originally Posted by
aamirus
Without doing much research it’s easy to make 5-10% per week generally, but every once in awhile you make a mistake and lose 50%+ so I would recommend taking the time to make better bets
Definitely. It's idiotic to just jump on every bandwagon. Some win, some lose.
Some people even take loans to invest.
If you can't afford to lose it all, then don't invest any of it.
June 18th, 2018, 04:04 PM
What are these fucking returns man. Just go out there and plop a fat stack on a stock and get 10% by the end of next week.
This shit is retarded.
Amazon alone went up from 1k to like 1.7k in 1 year. That is a 70% return. I don't like trump, but praise trump for the corporate tax rate. Invest in some pussy ass bonds and get 3-4%? Naw.
Go out and make some dough before we get a bear market, people.
Literally at a 9.5% return in the last 5 days.
What are these fucking returns man. Just go out there and plop a fat stack on a stock and get 10% by the end of next week.
This shit is retarded.
Amazon alone went up from 1k to like 1.7k in 1 year. That is a 70% return. I don't like trump, but praise trump for the corporate tax rate. Invest in some pussy ass bonds and get 3-4%? Naw.
Go out and make some dough before we get a bear market, people.
Literally at a 9.5% return in the last 5 days.
June 13th, 2018, 08:18 PM
I can be as active as you want me to be, baby :love:
I can be as active as you want me to be, baby
June 13th, 2018, 04:37 PM
Nothing like pulling up to a urinal and then your manager pulls up seconds later (in a case with 2 urinals).
Real men talk to each other while urinating I have found.
Perhaps even MORE real men talk to each other while shitting, though I have not encountered such beings in quite a time.
Nothing like pulling up to a urinal and then your manager pulls up seconds later (in a case with 2 urinals).
Real men talk to each other while urinating I have found.
Perhaps even MORE real men talk to each other while shitting, though I have not encountered such beings in quite a time.
June 10th, 2018, 07:59 PM
[QUOTE=yzb25;743574]I just doubt banks would have such an inefficient process where they literally have a number of notes equivalent to the total amount of cash in the economy.[/QUOTE]
Banks are only required to store an amount that is set by the Federal Reserve. This is why the term "run on the bank" exists whereby everyone tries to withdraw money at the same time. The banks cannot possibly meet such a demand, and then the banks have no more money - yet your account value still exists.
We used to use a thing called the gold standard, then later the silver standard around 100-150 years ago where all money had to have its value in gold/silver stored somewhere. Now it's all just digital.
Originally Posted by
yzb25
I just doubt banks would have such an inefficient process where they literally have a number of notes equivalent to the total amount of cash in the economy.
Banks are only required to store an amount that is set by the Federal Reserve. This is why the term "run on the bank" exists whereby everyone tries to withdraw money at the same time. The banks cannot possibly meet such a demand, and then the banks have no more money - yet your account value still exists.
We used to use a thing called the gold standard, then later the silver standard around 100-150 years ago where all money had to have its value in gold/silver stored somewhere. Now it's all just digital.
June 10th, 2018, 09:33 AM
[QUOTE=yzb25;743500]Yh, as a statistics boi I'm sure you know damn well how to repeat dem experiments until you get a result which happens to fall into dat 95% certainty margin XD. I was imagining an ad that showed an old lady taking out cash notes covered in CG green while a troubled narrator reads out "tru statistiks".
Goddamn reality always ruining the fun.
OMG that's exactly what I was thinking. I also imagined a Halifax funded buzzfeed video where they ask attractive waitresses how they react when they receive "dirty money" XDDDD.
p;edit your last point about the poor people gives me an idea tho. If we allowed "designer brand notes" i.e. we allowed supreme to make notes that may be another way of making this feasible. Any production costs would be offset by the unreasonable extortionate price these designer brands would charge, and vain people would get a kick out of keeping it in their wallet pp;edit or showing off in a fancy store/restaurant[/QUOTE]
While I majored in statistics, I'm actually working full-time as an Actuary :p
I'd never have gone into statistical research x.x Also, as an aside, "statistical significance is neither necessary nor sufficient for determining the scientific or practical significance of a set of observations. This view was affirmed unanimously by the U.S. Supreme Court," ([url]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877414/[/url])
Statistical significance is a sham as it is so easily manipulated. (Edit: Unless everything is done ethically).
Originally Posted by
yzb25
Yh, as a statistics boi I'm sure you know damn well how to repeat dem experiments until you get a result which happens to fall into dat 95% certainty margin XD. I was imagining an ad that showed an old lady taking out cash notes covered in CG green while a troubled narrator reads out "tru statistiks".
Goddamn reality always ruining the fun.
OMG that's exactly what I was thinking. I also imagined a Halifax funded buzzfeed video where they ask attractive waitresses how they react when they receive "dirty money" XDDDD.
p;edit your last point about the poor people gives me an idea tho. If we allowed "designer brand notes" i.e. we allowed supreme to make notes that may be another way of making this feasible. Any production costs would be offset by the unreasonable extortionate price these designer brands would charge, and vain people would get a kick out of keeping it in their wallet pp;edit or showing off in a fancy store/restaurant
While I majored in statistics, I'm actually working full-time as an Actuary
I'd never have gone into statistical research x.x Also, as an aside, "statistical significance is neither necessary nor sufficient for determining the scientific or practical significance of a set of observations. This view was affirmed unanimously by the U.S. Supreme Court," (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4877414/)
Statistical significance is a sham as it is so easily manipulated. (Edit: Unless everything is done ethically).
June 10th, 2018, 08:20 AM
[QUOTE=yzb25;743486]Going to seriously entertain this idea.
There would certainly be a demand for that sort of business, especially if some sort of advertisement campaign was shoved down people's throats about how dirty notes spread "nu swine flu" or some other hip paper-based disease.
Sadly however noone's going to go specifically shopping for clean notes from a supermarket, unless they're really OCD. But I suppose the bank could probably run such a business with ease, and a button could be added to credit card machines which prints "unused" notes. In fact, they could make "clean notes" the default setting and force you to click extra buttons with a warning message if you specifically pursue "dirty" notes.
^^In that situation, I can imagine a lot of people paranoid about their health (particularly the elderly) going along with it "just to be safe, anyway". In the same way people arbitrarily prefer mineral water "just in case all those ads ARE true", even though a google search tells you 30% of mineral water sold in the UK comes from the tap.
It would be cheap, too. As long as the bank ensures the paper "feels" new, it doesn't even actually have to be new. If we've just made up the standards for what constitutes a "clean note" we can make it whatever we want, in the same way there's no legal definition of what "mineral water" needs to be.
Sadly, I think this brilliant idea has come 30 years too late though. The internet will bite back and humiliate such a business and may even make it "uncool" to get such a note. If this idea predated the internet and predated the time where credit cards were prevalent EVERYWHERE (and contactless, which literally makes a card payment quicker than cash anyway) this could have been a good idea.[/QUOTE]
Your bank idea is why I was moving towards an online model. However, your thoughts about the elderly and other exploitative people, who could be reached by a bank but not necessarily by the internet, actually make it possible. All you have to do is fund a scientist's research into the effects of germs/money (not very ethical). It would be pretty simple.
But, even if it were possible, it would take an immense amount of capital to set up this sort of operation. In that case, it might be better for an individual to simply invest it.
What a shame too. I could have seen a future where having dirty money is a stigma. Poor people around the nation could have taken pride in their clean money - though they had little - as a way to pretend their status were higher.
Originally Posted by
yzb25
Going to seriously entertain this idea.
There would certainly be a demand for that sort of business, especially if some sort of advertisement campaign was shoved down people's throats about how dirty notes spread "nu swine flu" or some other hip paper-based disease.
Sadly however noone's going to go specifically shopping for clean notes from a supermarket, unless they're really OCD. But I suppose the bank could probably run such a business with ease, and a button could be added to credit card machines which prints "unused" notes. In fact, they could make "clean notes" the default setting and force you to click extra buttons with a warning message if you specifically pursue "dirty" notes.
^^In that situation, I can imagine a lot of people paranoid about their health (particularly the elderly) going along with it "just to be safe, anyway". In the same way people arbitrarily prefer mineral water "just in case all those ads ARE true", even though a google search tells you 30% of mineral water sold in the UK comes from the tap.
It would be cheap, too. As long as the bank ensures the paper "feels" new, it doesn't even actually have to be new. If we've just made up the standards for what constitutes a "clean note" we can make it whatever we want, in the same way there's no legal definition of what "mineral water" needs to be.
Sadly, I think this brilliant idea has come 30 years too late though. The internet will bite back and humiliate such a business and may even make it "uncool" to get such a note. If this idea predated the internet and predated the time where credit cards were prevalent EVERYWHERE (and contactless, which literally makes a card payment quicker than cash anyway) this could have been a good idea.
Your bank idea is why I was moving towards an online model. However, your thoughts about the elderly and other exploitative people, who could be reached by a bank but not necessarily by the internet, actually make it possible. All you have to do is fund a scientist's research into the effects of germs/money (not very ethical). It would be pretty simple.
But, even if it were possible, it would take an immense amount of capital to set up this sort of operation. In that case, it might be better for an individual to simply invest it.
What a shame too. I could have seen a future where having dirty money is a stigma. Poor people around the nation could have taken pride in their clean money - though they had little - as a way to pretend their status were higher.
April 29th, 2018, 05:50 PM
/reserve to be 5th in line
I only see 3 reserves, but I'd like to be fifth if at all possible.
/reserve to be 5th in line
I only see 3 reserves, but I'd like to be fifth if at all possible.
April 28th, 2018, 02:33 PM
[QUOTE=aamirus;734268]Dude, if 1/0 = 0, then 0 Times 0 = 1.
Let’s even go further than that. If 2/0 = 0 as well, then 0 Times 0 = 2.
Now 1=2.
Your definition sucks.
The limit as x approaches 0 of 1/x does not exist (as it is positive infinity from the right but negative infinity from the left). As a result 1/0 does not exist.[/QUOTE]
That explanation is exactly what I said.
Just look at a graph people and understand it must be undefined.
Originally Posted by
aamirus
Dude, if 1/0 = 0, then 0 Times 0 = 1.
Let’s even go further than that. If 2/0 = 0 as well, then 0 Times 0 = 2.
Now 1=2.
Your definition sucks.
The limit as x approaches 0 of 1/x does not exist (as it is positive infinity from the right but negative infinity from the left). As a result 1/0 does not exist.
That explanation is exactly what I said.
Just look at a graph people and understand it must be undefined.
April 27th, 2018, 03:09 PM
I have a confession...
Firebringer didn't play mafia on this site in 2018 because I banned him from it. I told him that if he did, then I would unmod him.
I take full responsibility for him not meeting the requirements.
[vote]Firebringer[/vote]
[vote]Ban Fury[/vote]
I have a confession...
Firebringer didn't play mafia on this site in 2018 because I banned him from it. I told him that if he did, then I would unmod him.
I take full responsibility for him not meeting the requirements.
-vote Firebringer
-vote Ban Fury
April 26th, 2018, 03:01 PM
This belongs in circle jerk.
But also, tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
Image line 1 and 2 are wrong.
A far better explanation is to look at the function 1/x graphically or to numerically analyze the limits as you approach from either the positive or negative direction.
It's just undefined.
This belongs in circle jerk.
But also, tan(x) = sin(x)/cos(x)
Image line 1 and 2 are wrong.
A far better explanation is to look at the function 1/x graphically or to numerically analyze the limits as you approach from either the positive or negative direction.
It's just undefined.
April 25th, 2018, 05:18 PM
[QUOTE=SuperJack;732923]If I cant just say "Coffee, 2 sugars and milk" then I cant go there.[/QUOTE]
Yes, but at the same time getting home from work, and then going out to study for work exams seems pointless if you have to travel far. Can't be too picky. Of course, there is always starbucks....
Originally Posted by
SuperJack
If I cant just say "Coffee, 2 sugars and milk" then I cant go there.
Yes, but at the same time getting home from work, and then going out to study for work exams seems pointless if you have to travel far. Can't be too picky. Of course, there is always starbucks....
April 25th, 2018, 05:16 PM
[QUOTE=Marshmallow Marshall;732932]That's a scumslip though: you are admitting you aren't doing it and aren't productive.[/QUOTE]
Haha you got me :p
I'm still doing productive things, but not to the level that I'm happy with. I have fairly high standards, though.
I'm moving to a new place in downtown soon for a job, so I will start high productivity then :p
Originally Posted by
Marshmallow Marshall
That's a scumslip though: you are admitting you aren't doing it and aren't productive.
Haha you got me
I'm still doing productive things, but not to the level that I'm happy with. I have fairly high standards, though.
I'm moving to a new place in downtown soon for a job, so I will start high productivity then
April 25th, 2018, 10:53 AM
[vote]Firebringer[/vote]
even though he won't... I have to represent.
-vote Firebringer
even though he won't... I have to represent.
April 24th, 2018, 07:35 AM
[QUOTE=rumox;732750]I never understood it, figured it was freelance workers doing it for potential networking. I was born and raised in a fairly rural city so the major city quirks are entirely lost on me[/QUOTE]
Much in the same way that rural life is entirely incomprehensible to me, I guess.
Originally Posted by
rumox
I never understood it, figured it was freelance workers doing it for potential networking. I was born and raised in a fairly rural city so the major city quirks are entirely lost on me
Much in the same way that rural life is entirely incomprehensible to me, I guess.
April 23rd, 2018, 09:13 PM
Does anyone actually go to coffee shops to do work? I always see people with laptops doing work in them, but I wonder how effective it is.
Seems like dedicating a fixed amount of time to being somewhere could have productivity benefits.
Does anyone actually go to coffee shops to do work? I always see people with laptops doing work in them, but I wonder how effective it is.
Seems like dedicating a fixed amount of time to being somewhere could have productivity benefits.
April 23rd, 2018, 09:07 PM
A nice thing to do, but I always give it to the person who played the best.
Sounds like a cool guy, though.
A nice thing to do, but I always give it to the person who played the best.
Sounds like a cool guy, though.
April 22nd, 2018, 08:43 PM
[QUOTE=Scvmurderer;732605]u guys just gotta send me is all, i got this shit[/QUOTE]
Obv town Kappa
Originally Posted by
Scvmurderer
u guys just gotta send me is all, i got this shit
Obv town
April 22nd, 2018, 07:47 PM
If I wasn't going to be so busy, I'd go shit on them. Rip.
(flex)
If I wasn't going to be so busy, I'd go shit on them. Rip.
(flex)