November 13th, 2017, 02:13 PM
[URL="https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showthread.php/34524-S-FM-Achievements-Program?highlight=orpz+achievements"]https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showthread.php/34524-S-FM-Achievements-Program?highlight=orpz+achievements[/URL]
https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showth...z+achievements
November 12th, 2017, 03:38 PM
[QUOTE=Nawa;702042]If agent finds sk day2 and no one ccs him, he should wait for lynch like a stupid?[/QUOTE]
Pretty much. Even if SK counterclaims the Agent he is likely to get hanged.
Also, SK is not night immune while the mafia have one auto-vest. It really feels like the SK is underpowered.
e: I think giving the SK the ability to frame someone as SK (similar to what the mafia can do) would make the setup more balanced.
Originally Posted by
Nawa
If agent finds sk day2 and no one ccs him, he should wait for lynch like a stupid?
Pretty much. Even if SK counterclaims the Agent he is likely to get hanged.
Also, SK is not night immune while the mafia have one auto-vest. It really feels like the SK is underpowered.
e: I think giving the SK the ability to frame someone as SK (similar to what the mafia can do) would make the setup more balanced.
December 27th, 2016, 10:05 AM
How are ties decided?
How are ties decided?
December 24th, 2016, 06:51 PM
What type of game is this? Vanilla?
If so, and if game starts on day 1, I would recommend adding two Townies for balance purposes.
What type of game is this? Vanilla?
If so, and if game starts on day 1, I would recommend adding two Townies for balance purposes.
December 24th, 2016, 11:41 AM
Concretely, Cryptonic, what will be implemented?
Concretely, Cryptonic, what will be implemented?
December 21st, 2016, 05:13 PM
December 21st, 2016, 09:57 AM
[QUOTE=Cryptonic;663237]I could have both Governments still, and just not reveal either of the players. No one knows who had the vote until end of the day (and even then they might not know, if multiple people vote same person).[/QUOTE]
Not sure if this is a good idea, but how about the one with the vote in autocracy is revealed and the one with the vote in monarchy is kept secret?
Originally Posted by
Cryptonic
I could have both Governments still, and just not reveal either of the players. No one knows who had the vote until end of the day (and even then they might not know, if multiple people vote same person).
Not sure if this is a good idea, but how about the one with the vote in autocracy is revealed and the one with the vote in monarchy is kept secret?
December 21st, 2016, 07:52 AM
Other than Monarchy and Autocracy, do players know which government is in place (In non-LYLO situations)?
Also, Autocracy and Monarchy are the same with the exception that Monarchy town-confirms one player. I would remove one of the two from the possible govt types.
[QUOTE=Cryptonic;662948]I'll pick someone who is willing to keep up with the game to make the choice on who to kill. This would be based on whatever - trying to help the game restore balance (killing Town if Town is getting good lynches), or killing someone who is being an asshole, or maybe they would follow the majority of votes. They are the God in this Theocracy.[/QUOTE]
Sounds good!
Other than Monarchy and Autocracy, do players know which government is in place (In non-LYLO situations)?
Also, Autocracy and Monarchy are the same with the exception that Monarchy town-confirms one player. I would remove one of the two from the possible govt types.
Originally Posted by
Cryptonic
I'll pick someone who is willing to keep up with the game to make the choice on who to kill. This would be based on whatever - trying to help the game restore balance (killing Town if Town is getting good lynches), or killing someone who is being an asshole, or maybe they would follow the majority of votes. They are the God in this Theocracy.
Sounds good!
December 20th, 2016, 06:20 PM
[QUOTE=DarknessB;663091]I thought you left the site though? You seemed to be very clear about that in the other thread regarding shitposting, site issues, and whatnot?[/QUOTE]
I just don't intend on playing games over here. I do still follow the new threads, setups, (most) games, and memes. :)
And I think you're confusing me with someone else in regards to shitposting -- I have no problem with it. I actually encourage it.
Originally Posted by
DarknessB
I thought you left the site though? You seemed to be very clear about that in the other thread regarding shitposting, site issues, and whatnot?
I just don't intend on playing games over here. I do still follow the new threads, setups, (most) games, and memes.
And I think you're confusing me with someone else in regards to shitposting -- I have no problem with it. I actually encourage it.
December 20th, 2016, 06:12 PM
[QUOTE=Mesk514;663061]Hey [MENTION=27959]Never Unlucky[/MENTION], is it your new thing to just not play here but follow every game that Calix is in?[/QUOTE]
Huh. I read almost every game here regardless of who's in it.
Originally Posted by
Mesk514
Hey
@
Never Unlucky
, is it your new thing to just not play here but follow every game that Calix is in?
Huh. I read almost every game here regardless of who's in it.
December 20th, 2016, 06:09 PM
[QUOTE=secondpassing;663051]We had four power roles though. We had so many opportunities to catch scum just with night actions.
Also they lacked a night kill. I'm thinking it was town sided.[/QUOTE]
I think it was town-sided too. 4 PRS is too much -- 2 is more suitable imo.
I don't think the blackmailer was that bad of a role as Calix made it to be. If this setup is to be brought back later, I'd keep the BMer as it is.
[QUOTE=DarknessB;663052]Correct me if I'm wrong, but you didn't play in the game?[/QUOTE]
I spectated.
Originally Posted by
secondpassing
We had four power roles though. We had so many opportunities to catch scum just with night actions.
Also they lacked a night kill. I'm thinking it was town sided.
I think it was town-sided too. 4 PRS is too much -- 2 is more suitable imo.
I don't think the blackmailer was that bad of a role as Calix made it to be. If this setup is to be brought back later, I'd keep the BMer as it is.
Originally Posted by
DarknessB
Correct me if I'm wrong, but you didn't play in the game?
I spectated.
December 20th, 2016, 05:17 PM
I was pleasantly surprised by the activity in the first 6 hours of the game -- I think y'all combined 550 posts in that time interval? It gave me hopes for future games :)
Kudos to [MENTION=28243]Unknown1234[/MENTION], I think he has improved a lot all around since I last seen him play!
I was pleasantly surprised by the activity in the first 6 hours of the game -- I think y'all combined 550 posts in that time interval? It gave me hopes for future games
Kudos to
@Unknown1234
, I think he has improved a lot all around since I last seen him play!
December 20th, 2016, 05:13 PM
Good game everyone!
Good game everyone!
December 20th, 2016, 02:22 PM
December 20th, 2016, 11:42 AM
This looks like good fun. :)
How does Theocracy work? ie. how is the "Non-partisan non-player" chosen?
This looks like good fun.
How does Theocracy work? ie. how is the "Non-partisan non-player" chosen?
December 17th, 2016, 08:14 AM
[QUOTE][COLOR="#FFFFFF"][B]All accounts are anonymous FM accounts. If there are not enough signs, or reserves, the game may be resized as necessary.[/B][/COLOR][/QUOTE]
For how many players was this game designed?
All accounts are anonymous FM accounts. If there are not enough signs, or reserves, the game may be resized as necessary.
For how many players was this game designed?
December 17th, 2016, 08:08 AM
Shouldn't there be 10 /sign slots like in the setup thread?
Shouldn't there be 10 /sign slots like in the setup thread?
December 13th, 2016, 07:59 AM
Goodbye, PTB.
Know that we are all supporting you in whatever else you undertake and hope that you achieve these goals you've set for yourself. Good luck <3
Goodbye, PTB.
Know that we are all supporting you in whatever else you undertake and hope that you achieve these goals you've set for yourself. Good luck <3
December 10th, 2016, 09:44 PM
Hell yeah.
/mentor
Also willing to make a TBT account to lure Panda into this game. Someone's gotta do it.
Hell yeah.
/mentor
Also willing to make a TBT account to lure Panda into this game. Someone's gotta do it.
December 8th, 2016, 04:41 PM
[QUOTE=Calix;659179]Then do what I did and don't sign up for MZ setups. Is this concept really so hard?[/QUOTE]
Your doing that makes decent setups have terrible players :/
Originally Posted by
Calix
Then do what I did and don't sign up for MZ setups. Is this concept really so hard?
Your doing that makes decent setups have terrible players :/
December 8th, 2016, 04:09 PM
[QUOTE=Dino;659064]That's not a bad idea, but imo, the best thing would be to try both at the same time.
Usually hosts ask for a minimum of 5 posts a day, i also think, to avoid lurkers, that this cap should be raised to 20.[/QUOTE]
See -- I find this to be arbitrary as well as every player has a different way of posting. I know some players that post <20 times per day and still are among the most impactful players in the game due their posting structures, conciseness, and longer posts. I don't think such players enter the lurking category.
[spoiler=][URL="https://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/515718-newbie-student-mafia-xxiv?user=darthfoley"]Case in point[/URL][/spoiler]
Originally Posted by
Dino
That's not a bad idea, but imo, the best thing would be to try both at the same time.
Usually hosts ask for a minimum of 5 posts a day, i also think, to avoid lurkers, that this cap should be raised to 20.
See -- I find this to be arbitrary as well as every player has a different way of posting. I know some players that post <20 times per day and still are among the most impactful players in the game due their posting structures, conciseness, and longer posts. I don't think such players enter the lurking category.
December 8th, 2016, 04:01 PM
[QUOTE=DarknessB;659065]Any sort of a numerical cut-off is fraught with problems because undoubtedly, the host and player are going to get into a pissing match as to what constitutes a game-related or relevant post. If the idea to empower hosts to do something, they should just use their own judgment to decide whether a player is shitposting / non-participating enough to warrant a replacement. Any sort of an "objective" measure isn't going to work and will just be worked around. I understand hosts feel better having a clear rule, but at the end of the day, it's their game and they should be the sole judge of whether someone warrants replacement, not some arbitrary rule.[/QUOTE]
Yes, I like that better.
Dino, I think you'd be better off following DB's advice of judging by yourself who's lurking/hindering others' experience with their excessive shitposts than by drawing a clear-cut line between what you deem okay and bad with some arbitrary value.
Originally Posted by
DarknessB
Any sort of a numerical cut-off is fraught with problems because undoubtedly, the host and player are going to get into a pissing match as to what constitutes a game-related or relevant post. If the idea to empower hosts to do something, they should just use their own judgment to decide whether a player is shitposting / non-participating enough to warrant a replacement. Any sort of an "objective" measure isn't going to work and will just be worked around. I understand hosts feel better having a clear rule, but at the end of the day, it's their game and they should be the sole judge of whether someone warrants replacement, not some arbitrary rule.
Yes, I like that better.
Dino, I think you'd be better off following DB's advice of judging by yourself who's lurking/hindering others' experience with their excessive shitposts than by drawing a clear-cut line between what you deem okay and bad with some arbitrary value.
December 8th, 2016, 03:33 PM
[QUOTE=Dino;658891]I'd like to add a rule as an experiment :
At least 50% of players' posts much be relevant to the game, what is and isn't relevant to the game is decided by the host.[/QUOTE]
How about: "Players must make a minimum of x game-related posts" then? This policy would help against lurkers as well as the so-called "shitposters" without giving the players a feeling that they have to censor themselves to meet the 50% quota.
Originally Posted by
Dino
I'd like to add a rule as an experiment :
At least 50% of players' posts much be relevant to the game, what is and isn't relevant to the game is decided by the host.
How about: "Players must make a minimum of x game-related posts" then? This policy would help against lurkers as well as the so-called "shitposters" without giving the players a feeling that they have to censor themselves to meet the 50% quota.
December 6th, 2016, 06:25 PM
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;657854]It's exactly what I said.[/QUOTE]
Fact-check:
[QUOTE]executioner have as target a disguiser .
disguiser kill someone so stay alive as someone else , but in the graveyard HIS NUMBER
says he is dead to all player eyes!
then the executioner do not turn jester [/QUOTE][QUOTE=Never Unlucky;657760]Having a disguiser who swaps identity as his target does not make the Executioner turn into Jester.[/QUOTE]
We rate this claim: True.
Originally Posted by
Never Unlucky
It's exactly what I said.
Fact-check:
executioner have as target a disguiser .
disguiser kill someone so stay alive as someone else , but in the graveyard HIS NUMBER
says he is dead to all player eyes!
then the executioner do not turn jester
Originally Posted by
Never Unlucky
Having a disguiser who swaps identity as his target does not make the Executioner turn into Jester.
We rate this claim: True.
December 6th, 2016, 07:05 AM
How does shitposting "[make] days (mostly D1) almost unreadable and [destroy] some player's motivation to play, severely dropping this site's quality at the same time"?
I can understand the problem you have with players who solely shitpost -- and thus make no serious contribution to the game, but I think shitposting in and of itself is not a problem. We are not robots, we don't have to be serious all the time. I find games with little shitposting to be not entertaining and games with a good ratio of banter & jokes/serious posts to be much more fun to read and play in.
Also, I don't understand this: "shitpost all the way through d1 and need to be policy lynched, that shows there's a big problem with the entire site, why do such players get a free pass everytime ?" Do they get PLed or do they get a free pass?
How does shitposting "[make] days (mostly D1) almost unreadable and [destroy] some player's motivation to play, severely dropping this site's quality at the same time"?
I can understand the problem you have with players who solely shitpost -- and thus make no serious contribution to the game, but I think shitposting in and of itself is not a problem. We are not robots, we don't have to be serious all the time. I find games with little shitposting to be not entertaining and games with a good ratio of banter & jokes/serious posts to be much more fun to read and play in.
Also, I don't understand this: "shitpost all the way through d1 and need to be policy lynched, that shows there's a big problem with the entire site, why do such players get a free pass everytime ?" Do they get PLed or do they get a free pass?
December 5th, 2016, 08:55 PM
[QUOTE=Cryptonic;657831]What site do you play on? I see other sites getting like 600 posts per game (larger than this, too). That's including "ghosts" posting.[/QUOTE]
TeamLiquid.
The last completed game I played had around 1500 posts with 9 players, and it ended on day 2.
The game before that ended on day 4 with 13 players - it cumulated 3.6k posts.
Game prior to that had 3k posts with 13 players, and it also ended on day 4.
To be fair, it is common for games on this site to allow players to talk during night, so the activity is a bit boosted by that factor.
Originally Posted by
Cryptonic
What site do you play on? I see other sites getting like 600 posts per game (larger than this, too). That's including "ghosts" posting.
TeamLiquid.
The last completed game I played had around 1500 posts with 9 players, and it ended on day 2.
The game before that ended on day 4 with 13 players - it cumulated 3.6k posts.
Game prior to that had 3k posts with 13 players, and it also ended on day 4.
To be fair, it is common for games on this site to allow players to talk during night, so the activity is a bit boosted by that factor.
December 5th, 2016, 08:48 PM
[QUOTE=dude54;657835]the disguiser was the target read original post at least
or watch replay[/QUOTE]
It's exactly what I said.
Originally Posted by
dude54
the disguiser was the target read original post at least
or watch replay
It's exactly what I said.
December 5th, 2016, 05:22 PM
[QUOTE=Sino;657761]It's about the site, part of the reason you left is the games general quality dropping, isn't it ?[/QUOTE]
While I'm here, I might as well explain why I migrated to another site:
-The players who I considered good (RLVG, Paladin, DB, [I]Calix[/I]) were not participating in new games anymore. Motivation to play in games took a nosedive.
-The way lurkers are dealt with. Rarely are they replaced or modkilled.
-The activity of the games is lower than on other sites.
-Level of play decreased.
-The ISO function is lacking.
-Setups usually are majority lynch, and I much prefer plurality lynch.
-Few funny people.
-SuperJack's optimism.
Some are more personal, but I think most people who quit this community agree with the first 4 lines.
Originally Posted by
Sino
It's about the site, part of the reason you left is the games general quality dropping, isn't it ?
While I'm here, I might as well explain why I migrated to another site:
-The players who I considered good (RLVG, Paladin, DB, Calix) were not participating in new games anymore. Motivation to play in games took a nosedive.
-The way lurkers are dealt with. Rarely are they replaced or modkilled.
-The activity of the games is lower than on other sites.
-Level of play decreased.
-The ISO function is lacking.
-Setups usually are majority lynch, and I much prefer plurality lynch.
-Few funny people.
-SuperJack's optimism.
Some are more personal, but I think most people who quit this community agree with the first 4 lines.
December 5th, 2016, 05:04 PM
[QUOTE=PowersThatBe;657753]Are you no longer playing? We should do a game together![/QUOTE]
I play on a different site nowadays :3
I would love to ***** with you though; we both read players based on tone and emotions, and it would make for an interesting archon.
I'll think about it ;)
Originally Posted by
PowersThatBe
Are you no longer playing? We should do a game together!
I play on a different site nowadays :3
I would love to ***** with you though; we both read players based on tone and emotions, and it would make for an interesting archon.
I'll think about it ;)
December 5th, 2016, 05:01 PM
The Executioner would turn into a Jester if a disguiser were to disguise as his target.
Having a disguiser who swaps identity as his target does not make the Executioner turn into Jester.
Source: Experience.
The Executioner would turn into a Jester if a disguiser were to disguise as his target.
Having a disguiser who swaps identity as his target does not make the Executioner turn into Jester.
Source: Experience.
December 5th, 2016, 04:55 PM
Is this canceled? :/
Is this canceled? :/
December 5th, 2016, 04:48 PM
[QUOTE=PowersThatBe;657745]A little stat. Not counting my first game and not counting mw3 (bc on going and such) but I've found at least one scum day 1 every game. I have also failed to get them lynched every single time lmao. I'm like the Greek myth Cassandra.[/QUOTE]
You are really entertaining to read, PTB ^^ I'm sad our "FM careers" missed each other :/
Originally Posted by
PowersThatBe
A little stat. Not counting my first game and not counting mw3 (bc on going and such) but I've found at least one scum day 1 every game. I have also failed to get them lynched every single time lmao. I'm like the Greek myth Cassandra.
You are really entertaining to read, PTB ^^ I'm sad our "FM careers" missed each other :/
December 5th, 2016, 04:46 PM
GG, Cryptonic. Your impersonation of Orange was rather accurate though I think you pushed the logic fallacies a bit too far ^^
I read this game from around post 1150, and those were the posts that made me think be sure that you were the SK without a doubt
[QUOTE=S-FM Pink Masquerader;656961]I'm almost half expecting a no-kill tonight to prevent these reads.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=S-FM Orange Masquerader;657286]It's time to put the bacon down and focus.
Pink was the Serial Killer, because green was an emotional player who tunnels hard.
The Serial Killer would have to be lobotomized to disguise as red. Pink would have to double his activity to not be intrusive.[/QUOTE]
In both of these posts you seemed to be praising/buddying Calix very weirdly which I don't ever see town doing. Calix didn't notice, but it's a thing to be wary of in the future ^^
[MENTION=18974]Iced_Monopoly[/MENTION] I think the setup was wayyy too town favored. In two faction games, town should have as many mislynches at hand as there are scum members. In this case, there was one SK, so imo there should have been a total of 5 players and thus one possible ML (Though I understand that you wanted to force the SK to disguise at least once and whatnot). From what I read I think that Cryptonic deserved the win as Calix driving two MLs (Blue was obvious town too zzz) should have been punished with a loss imo. Overall I liked the concept ^^
Also, I think Calix pushed the personal insults a bit too far with Blue and should have looked to understand her instead of bashing her down at EoD. She should have stopped insulted her when she saw that she wasn't having a good time. :/
GG, Cryptonic. Your impersonation of Orange was rather accurate though I think you pushed the logic fallacies a bit too far ^^
I read this game from around post 1150, and those were the posts that made me think be sure that you were the SK without a doubt
Originally Posted by
S-FM Pink Masquerader
I'm almost half expecting a no-kill tonight to prevent these reads.
Originally Posted by
S-FM Orange Masquerader
It's time to put the bacon down and focus.
Pink was the Serial Killer, because green was an emotional player who tunnels hard.
The Serial Killer would have to be lobotomized to disguise as red. Pink would have to double his activity to not be intrusive.
In both of these posts you seemed to be praising/buddying Calix very weirdly which I don't ever see town doing. Calix didn't notice, but it's a thing to be wary of in the future ^^
@Iced_Monopoly
I think the setup was wayyy too town favored. In two faction games, town should have as many mislynches at hand as there are scum members. In this case, there was one SK, so imo there should have been a total of 5 players and thus one possible ML (Though I understand that you wanted to force the SK to disguise at least once and whatnot). From what I read I think that Cryptonic deserved the win as Calix driving two MLs (Blue was obvious town too zzz) should have been punished with a loss imo. Overall I liked the concept ^^
Also, I think Calix pushed the personal insults a bit too far with Blue and should have looked to understand her instead of bashing her down at EoD. She should have stopped insulted her when she saw that she wasn't having a good time. :/
December 5th, 2016, 04:32 PM
[QUOTE=deathworlds;654966][MENTION=27959]Never Unlucky[/MENTION]
I may have to have you send me some music.[/QUOTE]
Still need help?
Originally Posted by
deathworlds
Still need help?
October 30th, 2016, 02:05 PM
/out for now as well. Have two games starting in the next 2 weeks off-site.
/out for now as well. Have two games starting in the next 2 weeks off-site.
October 29th, 2016, 04:22 PM
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;645231]Maybe try [URL="https://www.onlinevideoconverter.com/mp3-converter"]this[/URL]?[/QUOTE]
Working? ʕ•ᴥ•ʔ
Originally Posted by
Never Unlucky
Working? Ê••á´¥•Ê”
October 29th, 2016, 04:05 PM
[QUOTE=deathworlds;645230]I like the workaround, I'll send you a list of songs I'd like you do download momentarily.[/QUOTE]
I preferred the social security number one. :P
Originally Posted by
deathworlds
I like the workaround, I'll send you a list of songs I'd like you do download momentarily.
I preferred the social security number one. :P
October 29th, 2016, 04:04 PM
Maybe try [URL="https://www.onlinevideoconverter.com/mp3-converter"]this[/URL]?
Maybe try this?
October 29th, 2016, 04:00 PM
Ok, we may try. Send me your e-mail address along with your social security number via PM, and I will give you the files.
The other workaround is you give me the links of the songs you'd like to download, I use the app, extract the mp3 file, and send it to you on e-mail.
Edit: Is this ^ illegal? Can I get fined for sending other people 'torrented' music? ._.
Ok, we may try. Send me your e-mail address along with your social security number via PM, and I will give you the files.
The other workaround is you give me the links of the songs you'd like to download, I use the app, extract the mp3 file, and send it to you on e-mail.
Edit: Is this ^ illegal? Can I get fined for sending other people 'torrented' music? ._.
October 29th, 2016, 03:50 PM
I was thinking that too, but I think you need some sort of wizard to[I] install [/I]the app on your PC if that makes sense. Like, I could send you the files, but I don't know if you would be able to use the app afterwards, ya' feel?
I was thinking that too, but I think you need some sort of wizard to install the app on your PC if that makes sense. Like, I could send you the files, but I don't know if you would be able to use the app afterwards, ya' feel?
October 29th, 2016, 03:43 PM
1.7 is the version I have.
Shit, homes, I don't know what to say.
1.7 is the version I have.
Shit, homes, I don't know what to say.
October 29th, 2016, 03:19 PM
[QUOTE=deathworlds;645221]It won't let me download something more than once without paying $50. :([/QUOTE]
Strange. I've downloaded tens of songs using this app for free.
I know that I did not download the app from their official website. Perhaps that's the problem? If you'd still like to give this a chance, maybe this [URL="https://www.google.ca/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwiQrr-7hYHQAhWoxYMKHavfAuUQFggvMAI&url=http%3A%2F%2Fummy.en.softonic.com%2Fdownload&usg=AFQjCNEQ-RMiMQxb2O7n-9yO9n7RRerDlg&sig2=zd_m0jqp7Om_Bvuj0BvGBg"]link'll[/URL] work better.
Originally Posted by
deathworlds
It won't let me download something more than once without paying $50.
Strange. I've downloaded tens of songs using this app for free.
I know that I did not download the app from their official website. Perhaps that's the problem? If you'd still like to give this a chance, maybe this link'll work better.
October 28th, 2016, 07:40 PM
1. You download the app, copy-paste the YT link into the app's input, select how you want to download the video (mp3, mp4, etc.), and profit.
2. Yes, I use it. I've never had an issue with it.
3. I cannot guarantee it won't, but I can tell you mine was fine with it. Same for my other anti-ware apps.
4. It's not. I, too, have this shitty OS.
Fuck mobile posting.
1. You download the app, copy-paste the YT link into the app's input, select how you want to download the video (mp3, mp4, etc.), and profit.
2. Yes, I use it. I've never had an issue with it.
3. I cannot guarantee it won't, but I can tell you mine was fine with it. Same for my other anti-ware apps.
4. It's not. I, too, have this shitty OS.
Fuck mobile posting.
October 28th, 2016, 02:47 PM
[QUOTE=BananaCucho;645191]M-FM Fringe. Coming to a forum near you, Spring... 2018[/QUOTE]
Golden post. :')
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
M-FM Fringe. Coming to a forum near you, Spring... 2018
Golden post. :')
October 28th, 2016, 09:51 AM
[QUOTE=Drizzt;645141]I'm a fan of the skype mafia format. It took a little getting used to, but its very engaging. FMs are difficult for me personally because of the time commitment. I don't feel like I should be playing when life is busy and I can't devote the attention an FM game deserves.
TL;DR - More Skype mafia[/QUOTE]
Good thing you included that TL;DR. Saved me a good time from reading the first two lines.
Originally Posted by
Drizzt
I'm a fan of the skype mafia format. It took a little getting used to, but its very engaging. FMs are difficult for me personally because of the time commitment. I don't feel like I should be playing when life is busy and I can't devote the attention an FM game deserves.
TL;DR - More Skype mafia
Good thing you included that TL;DR. Saved me a good time from reading the first two lines.
October 28th, 2016, 09:47 AM
[URL="https://videodownloader.ummy.net/"]Ummy.[/URL]
Ummy.
October 27th, 2016, 07:08 PM
[QUOTE=MasterNinja;645159]who would be fan of a 10 year old with alot of rage?[/QUOTE]
I am but your dearest fan.
Originally Posted by
MasterNinja
who would be fan of a 10 year old with alot of rage?
I am but your dearest fan.
October 27th, 2016, 08:44 AM
[QUOTE=Gyrlander;645128]I remember having 310 active players or so like 2/3 months ago? So we're FUCKED.[/QUOTE]
... unless Crylander makes a return, and the resultant drama brings back ole people.
Originally Posted by
Gyrlander
I remember having 310 active players or so like 2/3 months ago? So we're FUCKED.
... unless Crylander makes a return, and the resultant drama brings back ole people.
October 26th, 2016, 06:12 PM
#5 sums up where I'm coming from.
[QUOTE=DarknessB;645100]Yeah, I was going to do something with color-coding to that effect. [B] All those players taking a step back from FM, as well as Season 4 mainstays like Calix doing the same[/B], is the problem in a nutshell.[/QUOTE]
Is [B]that[/B] what she told you?
#5 sums up where I'm coming from.
Originally Posted by
DarknessB
Yeah, I was going to do something with color-coding to that effect. All those players taking a step back from FM, as well as Season 4 mainstays like Calix doing the same, is the problem in a nutshell.
Is that what she told you?