Search:

[QUOTE=Rachyl;769498]Dont be an Exeter, he picks on defenseless woman like the true coward that he is :)[/QUOTE]

I think you confused this site with the Crying Club. Go back to your special corner lol

Originally Posted by Rachyl

Dont be an Exeter, he picks on defenseless woman like the true coward that he is

I think you confused this site with the Crying Club. Go back to your special corner lol

[QUOTE=Fuuton;769489]tl;dr

you're a bitch and I made you anxious!!![/QUOTE]

Don't be a rochyl pls.

Originally Posted by Fuuton

tl;dr

you're a bitch and I made you anxious!!!

Don't be a rochyl pls.

Chill, unless he reports you, it doesn't matter anyway.

If he does, you can copy and paste that defense, it looks well-reasoned.

The factors that I think are relevant here are: [B](1)[/B] actions or words that indicate a knowledge of his player identity, and [B](2)[/B] actions or words that indicate that killing him was done out of spite (e.g. taunting, arguing). If these can be established, then a case can be made, but both seem to be absent based on your account of what happened.

Another point of contention is that he claims an unnamed player targets him him every game, but you claim it was a one-off thing. Since replays in SC2 are automatically saved, it should be no problem for (and indeed should be the onus of) the accuser to supply evidence that it was in fact a problem spanning multiple games. Therefore if it was really only a one-time thing, you can at least easily debunk this point, which in turn will harm the credibility of the rest of the report due to a tendency to exaggerate.

However, only the replay(s) will tell what really happened in the game.

But you know, just chill. Unless he files a report, he's just venting. He didn't even mention your name so he's not badmouthing anybody. All just take it easy fams.

^ Saying all of this as Fuuton's friend btw. All just chill. Life's good.

Chill, unless he reports you, it doesn't matter anyway.

If he does, you can copy and paste that defense, it looks well-reasoned.

The factors that I think are relevant here are: (1) actions or words that indicate a knowledge of his player identity, and (2) actions or words that indicate that killing him was done out of spite (e.g. taunting, arguing). If these can be established, then a case can be made, but both seem to be absent based on your account of what happened.

Another point of contention is that he claims an unnamed player targets him him every game, but you claim it was a one-off thing. Since replays in SC2 are automatically saved, it should be no problem for (and indeed should be the onus of) the accuser to supply evidence that it was in fact a problem spanning multiple games. Therefore if it was really only a one-time thing, you can at least easily debunk this point, which in turn will harm the credibility of the rest of the report due to a tendency to exaggerate.

However, only the replay(s) will tell what really happened in the game.

But you know, just chill. Unless he files a report, he's just venting. He didn't even mention your name so he's not badmouthing anybody. All just take it easy fams.

^ Saying all of this as Fuuton's friend btw. All just chill. Life's good.

Yeh

Yeh