June 12th, 2016, 01:50 AM
Also this puts PoD at L-1...
DO NOT HAMMER HIM until we all discuss....
Also this puts PoD at L-1...
DO NOT HAMMER HIM until we all discuss....
June 12th, 2016, 01:48 AM
This will be my FINAL post most likey for the day will be out all day and then I work the night shift. Any more posts from this account will be from my lovely partner, Quick. :)
~AIVION
This will be my FINAL post most likey for the day will be out all day and then I work the night shift. Any more posts from this account will be from my lovely partner, Quick.
~AIVION
June 12th, 2016, 01:47 AM
BCD... Interesting. Both Quick and I were debating hard between BCD and PoD... Luckily this means I was right xD
[vote]powerofdeath[/vote]
Also to your mole post, SD... I'm thinking there is no mole too... 1.) No more than 2 kills because I believe the mole has a factional night kill. 2.) I'm believing that Voss's Last will is actually ACCURATE and he did indeed target PoD Night 1 and it failed... It honestly makes sense if you think about it.
PoD Hasn't given us a single shred of clues AT ALL ever since he outlined the tailor claim. He's been dead silent the whole time.. Also a Consort + Underboss team is an incredibly powerful team and To be quite honest this is probably the top tier choice that anyone would make if they could choose a role. 3 DDs = 2 Underbosses most likely IMPOSSIBLE.
Let us discuss at our leisure town.
~AIVION
BCD... Interesting. Both Quick and I were debating hard between BCD and PoD... Luckily this means I was right xD
-vote powerofdeath
Also to your mole post, SD... I'm thinking there is no mole too... 1.) No more than 2 kills because I believe the mole has a factional night kill. 2.) I'm believing that Voss's Last will is actually ACCURATE and he did indeed target PoD Night 1 and it failed... It honestly makes sense if you think about it.
PoD Hasn't given us a single shred of clues AT ALL ever since he outlined the tailor claim. He's been dead silent the whole time.. Also a Consort + Underboss team is an incredibly powerful team and To be quite honest this is probably the top tier choice that anyone would make if they could choose a role. 3 DDs = 2 Underbosses most likely IMPOSSIBLE.
Let us discuss at our leisure town.
~AIVION
June 10th, 2016, 03:34 PM
[QUOTE=Borderline Crazy Dealers;611431]That's not why we wanted to lynch Kovath. You are misrepping my slot by oversimplifying it.
We gave a long descriptive read of why we wanted to lynch Kovath. Finding it unlikely that there were three DDs was part of that.
Then yesterday after Fatalis revealed as Underboss, I SWITCHED MY VOTE onto POD as I found him the more scummy of the two underboss claim because it is EVEN LESS LIKELY that there are two underbosses.
THEN gaslight said Kovath lied and that he didn't roleblock Kovath night 1. THAT is when I switched back to Kovath as I found him more scummy than gaslight.
Don't misrep my positions that have been crystal clear.[/QUOTE]
I'm not misrepping shit. You admit yourself Having 3 Town DDs was part of your reasoning.
I would've expected you to flip your shit at Matt for having 3 Town DDs, but since you are not a lynch option you don't have to. I find that very convenient for you.
Originally Posted by
Borderline Crazy Dealers
That's not why we wanted to lynch Kovath. You are misrepping my slot by oversimplifying it.
We gave a long descriptive read of why we wanted to lynch Kovath. Finding it unlikely that there were three DDs was part of that.
Then yesterday after Fatalis revealed as Underboss, I SWITCHED MY VOTE onto POD as I found him the more scummy of the two underboss claim because it is EVEN LESS LIKELY that there are two underbosses.
THEN gaslight said Kovath lied and that he didn't roleblock Kovath night 1. THAT is when I switched back to Kovath as I found him more scummy than gaslight.
Don't misrep my positions that have been crystal clear.
I'm not misrepping shit. You admit yourself Having 3 Town DDs was part of your reasoning.
I would've expected you to flip your shit at Matt for having 3 Town DDs, but since you are not a lynch option you don't have to. I find that very convenient for you.
June 10th, 2016, 03:15 PM
[QUOTE=Borderline Crazy Dealers;611423]Yeah, okay mc derpington[/QUOTE]
Nope, yesterday you wanted to lynch Kovath because there was no way we had 3 DD, what happened to that argument? You are the one derping.
Originally Posted by
Borderline Crazy Dealers
Yeah, okay mc derpington
Nope, yesterday you wanted to lynch Kovath because there was no way we had 3 DD, what happened to that argument? You are the one derping.
June 10th, 2016, 03:14 PM
[QUOTE=Sino;611416]Exactly, you're giving scum an opportunity to hammer without hearing from everyone by putting someone at L-1[/QUOTE]
Let me put it to you this way - if anyone hammers before everyone has spoken they are tomorrow's lynch. BCD isn't that stupid to do that.
Originally Posted by
Sino
Exactly, you're giving scum an opportunity to hammer without hearing from everyone by putting someone at L-1
Let me put it to you this way - if anyone hammers before everyone has spoken they are tomorrow's lynch. BCD isn't that stupid to do that.
June 10th, 2016, 03:13 PM
[QUOTE=Borderline Crazy Dealers;611418]Yawn. Nobody is playing aggro anymore. Take a chill pill.[/QUOTE]
If it was up to me, you would be the lynch today.
Originally Posted by
Borderline Crazy Dealers
Yawn. Nobody is playing aggro anymore. Take a chill pill.
If it was up to me, you would be the lynch today.
June 10th, 2016, 03:12 PM
In what world does it matter if we have 2 Underboss when we already know what role everyone in the game is? No, we have a 1 and a 1 left over from a 1v1 and 1v2 and that is who we are lynching.
In what world does it matter if we have 2 Underboss when we already know what role everyone in the game is? No, we have a 1 and a 1 left over from a 1v1 and 1v2 and that is who we are lynching.
June 10th, 2016, 03:09 PM
[QUOTE=Sino;611413]Yeah, and that's why she unvote
We shouldn't put anyone at L-1 so early....[/QUOTE]
Why not? Don't you think they are Scum? Only thing NOT to do at this point is Lynch until we hear from everyone. Nothing else matters because we know G4 is the Lynch today.
Originally Posted by
Sino
Yeah, and that's why she unvote
We shouldn't put anyone at L-1 so early....
Why not? Don't you think they are Scum? Only thing NOT to do at this point is Lynch until we hear from everyone. Nothing else matters because we know G4 is the Lynch today.
June 10th, 2016, 03:07 PM
[QUOTE=Sino;611409]You were the one to jump on the train[/QUOTE]
what is your point? I knew I was putting him at L-1.
Originally Posted by
Sino
You were the one to jump on the train
what is your point? I knew I was putting him at L-1.
June 10th, 2016, 03:06 PM
Like not hearing from POD yesterday was bad.
Like not hearing from POD yesterday was bad.
June 10th, 2016, 03:05 PM
[QUOTE=Borderline Crazy Dealers;611398]I still want to hear from Fatalis before hammering gaslight
He should still be the lynch[/QUOTE]
OK, so NOW you want to hear from everyone before EOD, Hypocritical much?
Originally Posted by
Borderline Crazy Dealers
I still want to hear from Fatalis before hammering gaslight
He should still be the lynch
OK, so NOW you want to hear from everyone before EOD, Hypocritical much?
June 10th, 2016, 02:59 PM
K, got to page 195 (the thought of it), and I find it curious that BCD says how unlikely it is for there to be 2 Town Underbosses buts says nothing about it being unlikely there are 3 Town DD. Frankly I think the unlikely hood of there being 3 DD to be more unlikely than 2 UB.
In any case, the lynch today is
[vote]G4slight[/vote]
K, got to page 195 (the thought of it), and I find it curious that BCD says how unlikely it is for there to be 2 Town Underbosses buts says nothing about it being unlikely there are 3 Town DD. Frankly I think the unlikely hood of there being 3 DD to be more unlikely than 2 UB.
In any case, the lynch today is
-vote G4slight