This list reads as
incredibly survivalistic to me. His scum reads are the two people voting him, his null read is the most recent person to unvote him, and his weakest town read was the other person to have previously voted him. But I do like that he's owning up to voting people who disagree with his methods. In general, I'd consider this a scum-motivated move, but in this case, from past encounters with Duckk, I'm willing to consider that this is how he plays as town, even if suboptimal.
-FoS on Duckk
I must disagree very strongly with the approach. Duckk, if you're town, listen to me. People are going to have different playstyles and ideas about how the game should go. One of the easiest ways for scum to win is to trap town into thinking "agrees with me" = "is my alignment." Town is inevitably going to disagree with town on reads and how to vote simply because they're uninformed, especially on D1. However, basically any half-decent can be swayed to your position if your case is sound and you present it well. Trying to lynch people who disagree with you is self-defeating; if you can convince enough people to lynch those who disagree with you, then you can convince people to vote with you on your actual scumreads. But the two lists, your scumreads and your ideological opponents, shouldn't overlap so neatly. Scum aren't revealed by what they think about how the game should be played, but rather by their motives and, more importantly, how these motives match what they're doing. You don't want to look at who agrees/disagrees with you, but rather, why.
@
PLZLEAVEDUCKK
, in the meantime, would you care to elaborate on why you have BananaCucho as your highest townread?