S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party - Page 40
Register

User Tag List

Page 40 of 59 FirstFirst ... 30 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 50 ... LastLast
Results 1,951 to 2,000 of 2921
  1. ISO #1951

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Spoiler : Quote wall :

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    Some thoughts that I have:

    -----There's only 2 Triad Randoms, one of them is 100% Dark Magician. Leaving only one possible TPR among us to be capable of producing TPR feedback (if applicable) while still being triad

    -----There's minimum 1 triad in Frostbyte/MattZed (because they're the only inferred or direct citizen claims, Yzb25 claimed vague TPR)

    I'm assuming max 2 citizens in the setup for a few reasons:

    1. The power-role count for scums and town generally should be equal based on past balancing advice on this forum
    2. The setup has almost 40% of its players as scum roles; some places only advise AT MOST 30% scum ratio for the majority of setups
    3. The double input of Busdrivers in the game, with 1 confirmed and the other not, seemed designed to cause counter-claims and guarantee a miselimination fmpov. (This could be debatable though)


    And with #3 add an * as that may also mean double butler is less likely since #3 has already happened.
    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    Continuing on with this (with me believing Unkown to be the butler)

    assuming Renegade is lock-town as Locksmith

    then last 3 scum (other than DM) are in this group of 4:

    Frostbyte + MattZed + Naz + Helz
    Quote Originally Posted by Unknown1234 View Post
    In this situation, Helz and Naz would be confirmed triad.
    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    Good spot.

    I forgot about one of my earlier assumptions, where there's max 1 triad in Mattzed / Frostbyte lol.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed View Post
    This line of reasoning implies Helz is scum. If he were town, then I'm town and you only have at most 2 scum in your scumpool. It would also imply Naz is scum because SOMEONE has to be a Cit.
    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    Yeah, it DOES imply Helz is scum even if I don't like it.

    Only way out of that is if there's Renegade as Moulder.....

    Which means there's a possible Naz + Renegade + Mattzed scum world

    but that's not possible since the triad only have 1 left-over Triad Random, which would plausibly be Naz and not Renegade.
    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    Err I mean Helz not MattZed



    If CA gets us to miseliminate one time, that's 4v4....

    As long as we avoid a CA and/or miselimination, or one of the protectives (Me and Renegade) block just ONE town kill,

    the we basically win if my reasoning has been correct so far.
    A.K.A "That One Idiot"

  2. ISO #1952

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    Spoiler : Quote wall :

















    If CA gets us to miseliminate one time, that's 4v4....

    As long as we avoid a CA and/or miselimination, or one of the protectives (Me and Renegade) block just ONE town kill,

    the we basically win if my reasoning has been correct so far.
    This is another reason why I think lynching DM is the correct play.

    Assuming Renegade isn't triad, if we choose to lynch someone else we are letting a witch have control of a TPR. In the event that DM did get binded, we might be in trouble regardless.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  3. ISO #1953

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    I'll simplify this.

    I'm the locksmith.
    @Renegade
    Who did you target N1 and N2? What was your reasoning for those targets?
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  4. ISO #1954

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by FrostByte View Post
    We've got time. We don't need a mass claim today and waiting is beneficial for town.

    We have a short term roadmap for now, we should stick to that and deal with the rest when we get there. All you're doing is trying to nail down targets for triad nightkills right this second.
    @FrostByte
    The mass claim has already happened. If you confirm that you are not a Citizen it means we have 1 more absolutely confirmed town. That goes a long way to solving the game. I honestly dont see any reason for you not to simply claim between TPR or Citizen.
    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    ya'know town random can still be citizen so I guess these arent really citizen cc's
    Fair point. So Frost Cit claim =/= 1 scum between them but Frost TPR claim does = a second confirmation that he is Town.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  5. ISO #1955

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    What is the way around this. We don't have to eliminate DM, we could go for someone else. Very risky, but high reward if you have been bound to DM.
    Its really alarming to see you pushing against the DM lynch yet again. I actually called you on a pattern of that last night.

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    This shouldn't be seen as a vote of confidence in DM. He very well could be traid now, so is a good candidate for tomorrow.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Oh come on.

    GET THE SWITcHER WTF.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    It is so abundantly clear that DW needs to go today that I am very suspicious of anyone not voting him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    We didn't hesitate to eliminate goofy Oberon when he claimed switcher. Now we have a second switcher claim. What's the deal?

    No let's get DM, who may or may not be triad, let the switcher switch around and end up with another goofy scenario tomorrow.

    Damn, just cuz you like the guy I mean, if you are town and not voting the switcher cuz he is friends with you that is really lame.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    If a switcher is outed, it is automatically built in that they have to claim they were formally triad so they can buy enough time to switch out again.

    Folks I have some lovely time shares I'd like you to take a look at.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Lmfao. DM is likely triad cuz DW said so?

    That is the switchers only chance at survival, you realize that right?
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    I've got a gun to my head! IT WASn'T ME, IT WAS *POINTS FINGER* I SWEAR SHOOT HIM AND LET ME GO!
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    All I'm saying is, anything DW says today is heavily tainted with the desperation to survive another night and switch out.

    Ya'll taking it as gospel. Prosperity gospel at least I hope.
    I did particularly note how Renegade shifted from desperately lobbying to get off DM and hit DW into casting shade on the potential of DM being Triad. This feels like potential Triad priorities.

    1- Lobby against potential teammates train by pushing their counter wagon
    2- Cast shade on the argument condemning the potential team mate

    It felt very focused and had a higher emotional tone to it than the majority of his other posts. Something we may want to observe as we go into tomorrow assuming we dont have a kind Vig to handle our little Dark Magician problem for us.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  6. ISO #1956

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    I think the alternative would be to yolo kill helz.

    If helz is town, it confirms Matt and while we lose you.
    If helz is triad, nothing of value was lost -- except you.

    ----------------------------------

    BUTTTT now I'm having another problem. Yzb hasn't claimed his TPR, and he's green checked by unknown.

    so we really have yet another TPR who hasnt told us what he is..
    Or Frostbyte claims and Matt is potentially confirmed. I find this likely given how they are pushing against the logic that it confirms him.

    I would also point out there is absolutely no reason to even consider lynching anyone other than DM unless Renegade did not lockdown DM.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  7. ISO #1957

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    Or Frostbyte claims and Matt is potentially confirmed. I find this likely given how they are pushing against the logic that it confirms him.

    I would also point out there is absolutely no reason to even consider lynching anyone other than DM unless Renegade did not lockdown DM.
    how would frostbyte claiming citizen potentially confirm matt?
    (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶

  8. ISO #1958

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    how would frostbyte claiming citizen potentially confirm matt?
    Claiming non-citizen confirms Matt.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  9. ISO #1959

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    @FrostByte
    The mass claim has already happened. If you confirm that you are not a Citizen it means we have 1 more absolutely confirmed town. That goes a long way to solving the game. I honestly dont see any reason for you not to simply claim between TPR or Citizen.
    What difference does it make whether I claim today or after today? I legit don't see the benefit. We're still gonna have a fuckton of unverifiable TPR claims. Y'all are being impatient.
    FMX: fm Kevinpowers - Citizen (WIN)
    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    I will go ahead and fuck this cat
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Heavy Handed View Post
    yeah I'm not gonna sit around here analyzing the fucking particle fluctuations in the quantum foam or whatever the fuck trying to find shit on D1

  10. ISO #1960

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    I'd be completely okay with reading what you wrote from literally anyone except you.

    Helz is the only one who knows if he's telling the truth, unless you're scum because then you also know he's not telling the truth.

    I'm keeping it as an open scenario. DM was pretty likely to be our lynch going into D3. CA would be saving DM and killing me, I think that's optimal.
    @Frinckles
    If you end up pushing a lynch on me through under the logic of the PoE which I created after I pushed you to take on leadership I am going to laugh my ass off. Thats not quite irony but it would be a pretty comical way to go
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  11. ISO #1961

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    @Frinckles
    If you end up pushing a lynch on me through under the logic of the PoE which I created after I pushed you to take on leadership I am going to laugh my ass off. Thats not quite irony but it would be a pretty comical way to go
    I highly doubt we lynch anyone besides DM today. But if I am killed because of CA, Martin literally needs to stop us from losing the game at night.
    (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶

  12. ISO #1962

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    I highly doubt we lynch anyone besides DM today. But if I am killed because of CA, Martin literally needs to stop us from losing the game at night.
    Yup, preety much lol
    A.K.A "That One Idiot"

  13. ISO #1963

  14. ISO #1964

  15. ISO #1965

  16. ISO #1966

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    I can see why people were excited to play this setup. It really seems to allow for a lot of unique situations to happen
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  17. ISO #1967

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    btw

    @Awut

    this has been a great game so far imo even if we find out we effectively lose by SoD4

    I really enjoyed playing it
    (except that one part)

    very fun game and it was nice to play with some new people and some old people and the new old ones too
    (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶

  18. ISO #1968

  19. ISO #1969

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    @Frostbite

    Defend yourself.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  20. ISO #1970

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Hi, going to bed now. The bloodlust has calmed down a lot, but just for my own peace of mind, I request there are no hammers while I sleep. I still have a lot of ideas I want to crunch that can only be done today.

    Cheers.

    (I'm also enjoying the setup a lot!)
    Quote Originally Posted by Blinkstorteddd02 View Post
    naz, he's claiming to have been at your house last night and infected you. I know u were drunk but PLEASE try as hard as you can to remember... That burning you felt the next morning when you went pee was from me, not him.

  21. ISO #1971

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    how would frostbyte claiming citizen potentially confirm matt?
    It wouldn't in any way. I said "I find this likely given how they are pushing against the logic that it confirms him" because there would be no reason to attack that logic unless Frostbyte was a TPR.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  22. ISO #1972

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by FrostByte View Post
    What difference does it make whether I claim today or after today? I legit don't see the benefit. We're still gonna have a fuckton of unverifiable TPR claims. Y'all are being impatient.
    It gives us more information for today to solve the game. If we are not going to do that we may as well just hammer and skip the day.

    On the other side it does not hurt at all. Literally every other player in the game has claimed so this is a "High reward low-zero risk" kind of play. All I can say is that I strongly encourage you to claim Cit/TPR even if you do not respect mechanical scum hunting as a technique.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  23. ISO #1973

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    And Naz' list to check got much smaller.

    Yzb when do you plan on claiming
    I was hoping there would've been a cit thunderdome and I could clear/nab one but tee bee dee rn. I'm kinda speed reading atm
    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    President Fielzanks walks up to his stage, preparing his n1 speech. In front of him, his two cronies MM and David stood. In front of him, his immaculately written n1 speech was prepared. 'Gentleman, what is the soul of capitalism?', he asked his small audience. 'Money?', MM guessed. 'Waifus?', David asked. 'No' Fielz replied, disappointed in his trash scumteam .
    Quote Originally Posted by aamirus View Post
    Naz would never forget the Chik-Fil-A Sauce

  24. ISO #1974

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Unknown1234 View Post
    I can see why people were excited to play this setup. It really seems to allow for a lot of unique situations to happen
    We need to run it again at some point so @BananaCucho can play it, he seemed real excited for it when it was first being made
    A.K.A "That One Idiot"

  25. ISO #1975

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by MartinGG99 View Post
    We need to run it again at some point so @BananaCucho can play it, he seemed real excited for it when it was first being made
    Maybe I'll host it so Auwt can play it as well if he wanted
    A.K.A "That One Idiot"

  26. ISO #1976

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    I highly doubt we lynch anyone besides DM today. But if I am killed because of CA, Martin literally needs to stop us from losing the game at night.
    Kinda. The game would just become inverted.

    I have played a game where it happened before. Scum didnt know their team mates so the game just flipped from people claiming how they were town into people claiming that they were scum. If we walk into a 3v4 situation tomorrow the game would not end- it would simply be the town arguing that they are scum.

    This game will continue until the last town or scum dies because scum are not informed.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  27. ISO #1977

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    Kinda. The game would just become inverted.

    I have played a game where it happened before. Scum didnt know their team mates so the game just flipped from people claiming how they were town into people claiming that they were scum. If we walk into a 3v4 situation tomorrow the game would not end- it would simply be the town arguing that they are scum.

    This game will continue until the last town or scum dies because scum are not informed.
    Oh word. That sounds crazy as hell.
    (๑˃̵ᴗ˂̵)ﻭ 레드벨벳 ! ! ٩(♡ε♡ )۶

  28. ISO #1978

  29. ISO #1979

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Let me run through CA candidates in order they appear on the D1 post:

    Helz - could be CA
    DM - I don't see why DW wouldn't give away that DM became CA; it's a very valuable role to yeet
    Martin - could be CA who was hoping to use their ability to cover their own ass after the first BD died
    FrostByte - could be CA
    Frinckles - confirmed Scientist
    yzb - COULD be, but then Unknown is also triad and we've all been misreading yzb
    Unknown - could be CA
    naz - can't be CA given her D2 lead
    Renegade - COULD be, but then there's no Locksmith/Moulder, so Martin is a lying scum

    I will admit this was not particularly helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrow View Post
    What. You got me. Stop unvoting and stretch my neck, dammit.

  30. ISO #1980

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Frinckles View Post
    Oh word. That sounds crazy as hell.
    Its fucking hilarious. Really weird feeling trying to make arguments as to how your evil instead of good.

    I will also point out we don't need to worry about that unless Renegade didn't lockdown DH which is why I pinged him on it earlier.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  31. ISO #1981

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed View Post
    Let me run through CA candidates in order they appear on the D1 post:

    Helz - could be CA
    DM - I don't see why DW wouldn't give away that DM became CA; it's a very valuable role to yeet
    Martin - could be CA who was hoping to use their ability to cover their own ass after the first BD died
    FrostByte - could be CA
    Frinckles - confirmed Scientist
    yzb - COULD be, but then Unknown is also triad and we've all been misreading yzb
    Unknown - could be CA
    naz - can't be CA given her D2 lead
    Renegade - COULD be, but then there's no Locksmith/Moulder, so Martin is a lying scum

    I will admit this was not particularly helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  32. ISO #1982

  33. ISO #1983

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    I don't see a better option at this point.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  34. ISO #1984

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed View Post
    So we're yeeting DM in a non-premature-day-ending way, right?
    Yup. Yzb25 has requested to have more time anyways and so I'm going to respect that.

    Also I don't think Renegade and maybe some others were here to see me narrow down the pool of suspects that I made about an hour ago.
    A.K.A "That One Idiot"

  35. ISO #1985

  36. ISO #1986

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    I'm going to look into Helz' interactions with Matt tonight or tomorrow, not feeling well so ill probably take a nap. I would appreciate it if it's not ended before I get the chance to do that.

    -unvote
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  37. ISO #1987

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    I will also say, I didnt want to quote like 30 messages to point to it but a lot of that theory crafting on page 39 relied a few bad assumptions:

    "There's minimum 1 triad in Frostbyte/MattZed (because they're the only inferred or direct citizen claims, Yzb25 claimed vague TPR)"
    No, Frostbyte's statements suggest they are TPR and even if they claim Cit as Frinckles pointed out Citizen can roll as Town Random.

    "assuming Renegade is lock-town as Locksmith"
    There is no reason to assume this. Renegade should be considered no more town than Naz given their role is verified (unless Yzb or Frostbyte cc) but that role can be either alignment. For that matter Martin is not lock town, I simply didnt put him in the PoE because the way he CCed D1 looked very genuine.

    This is mechanical hunting done wrong with a generous level of theory crafting in a game with no association tells. So ignore all that and feel free to say that points to me being scum.

    I kinda feel like the conversation should have a bit more scum hunting. The mechanical side will only point us where to scum hunt as of right now.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  38. ISO #1988

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    I'm heading off soon, but my final thoughts for a while:

    Frinckles - basically mechanically confirmed
    Renegade - boldly claimed Locksmith when it seemed there likely was one; doubt they're moulder, and to lie about locking entirely they would need to KNOW Martin is a fellow triad making up the story.
    Yzb - Gut townread from his behavior, and if he's triad so is Unknown, which eliminates far too many more scummy suspects
    Martin - the BD claim was bold if he's not BD. Not impossible, though. He even admits to targeting someone claimed to be locked down on the night of no kills

    Unknown
    Naz
    Helz

    FrostByte - really scummy during the end of the massclaim, but I'm open to a *small* number of possible explanations
    Dark Magician

    If this day last another 24 hours, I will ISO each of Helz, Naz, and Unknown.
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrow View Post
    What. You got me. Stop unvoting and stretch my neck, dammit.

  39. ISO #1989

  40. ISO #1990

  41. ISO #1991

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    I'm not molder. Why would I even act if I was?
    I *could* see a moulder acting to make one of their fellow triad immune from detection/swap/kill. But Martin claims you would have protected one of Frinckles/DM, which doesn't fit this.
    Quote Originally Posted by Arrow View Post
    What. You got me. Stop unvoting and stretch my neck, dammit.

  42. ISO #1992

  43. ISO #1993

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    who teh fook do i watch tonight KJFKS:JFLSKJDFSLKDFJ im gonna be so upset if i pick the person who fucking dies again lol
    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    President Fielzanks walks up to his stage, preparing his n1 speech. In front of him, his two cronies MM and David stood. In front of him, his immaculately written n1 speech was prepared. 'Gentleman, what is the soul of capitalism?', he asked his small audience. 'Money?', MM guessed. 'Waifus?', David asked. 'No' Fielz replied, disappointed in his trash scumteam .
    Quote Originally Posted by aamirus View Post
    Naz would never forget the Chik-Fil-A Sauce

  44. ISO #1994

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Helz View Post
    Its really alarming to see you pushing against the DM lynch yet again. I actually called you on a pattern of that last night.
    It is so fucking obvious if the CA has a brain what is going to happen.

    I'm fine to vote him, 100% ready to eliminate him. But when Frinckles dies I can't prot him from that.

  45. ISO #1995

  46. ISO #1996

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Nvm, wasn't going to be able to fall asleep this early. Back to reading.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  47. ISO #1997

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed View Post
    I *could* see a moulder acting to make one of their fellow triad immune from detection/swap/kill. But Martin claims you would have protected one of Frinckles/DM, which doesn't fit this.
    It kinda does though. Frinckles was widly scum read D1. He was actually even scum read though a good chunk of D2 until he nabbed the Switcher.
    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Both N1 and N2 were Frinckle.

    He seemed to be the obvious choice after Obe flipped BD. I wouldn't have locked him if Obe was indeed the switcher.
    This makes me feel like you could be a molder.

    N1 you targeted Frinckles who was widely scum read and N2 you chose not to cover DM even though it could cause us to walk into tomorrow with a 3v3 situation.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

  48. ISO #1998

  49. ISO #1999

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    If I look at it mechanically, this is what I see right now as possibilites for roles

    DH: MattZed/FrostByte
    CA: Helz
    Triad Random: DM
    Triad Random: Naz/Renegade

    OR

    DH: Helz
    CA: MattZed/FrostByte
    Triad Random: DM
    Triad Random: Naz/Renegade

    This is without reading into Helz' claim, but I don't feel like anyone else really fits into this spot.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    1-I really and truly believe @Unknown1234 is town. He stuck by me when I needed him
    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    Wow, this game was really easy. I just had to talk dumb shit to survive some days more. :P
    Quote Originally Posted by Mike View Post
    If sheriff cleared you honestly I would take him out of my town core and put him as scum.

  50. ISO #2000

    Re: S-FM 316 : The Fooling Party

    Quote Originally Posted by Renegade View Post
    Ya'll spent a whole day yesterday telegraphing the main d3 lynch target without a drop of wine, maybe not the brightest move once you read the CA rolecard. @Helz
    And I still remember how you emotionally pushed against anyone who didn't vote Deathworlds. Then as soon as he was locked in as the lynch started casting shade on the case against the case on DM. Then last night you chose not to lock down DM.

    Just saying. These things are a very bad look to me.
    Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
    If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •