#19
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
This is in response to my RVS vote on MattZed and is likely poking at MattZed's tradition of being lynched early in games. Not much to see here.
#24
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Mind explaining your "not random" vote?
This is in response to Gyrlander's cryptic comment about his RVS vote not being random. I assume Gyrlander was trolling with that comment because he never explained what it meant. Banana seemed justified in raising this as a red flag early.
#31
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
This is in response to Gyrlander voting pisskop after pisskop (jokingly) said he wasn't going to do anything. This doesn't catch me oddly given the red flag mentioned in #24 -- i.e. Gyrlander was presumably on her radar and was continuing to troll.
#40
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
My vote says it all.
Refuses to give a further explanation of why she voted Gyrlander. Either irritation with him, laziness, or null, but doesn't register much eitehr way.
#129
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
"Pre-flip associations are bad and those that use them are bad Mafia players" - Toadette
In response to MattZed's suggestion that pisskop and AIVION could be scum buddies. Banana / Toadette has been burned a lot by pre-flip associations which have turned out to be odd. Seems like a reasonable mention to me in terms of encouraging careful play.
#130
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Omg what happened to the rest of my post
I quoted Grylander - his read list is bad because its too early to even have reads like that. Seems like trying yo appear as a try hard player
Quoted Darkness - both he and Grylander forgot me
Quoted something else but its gone now and I'm not in theood to find it again. Going to go do dishes and play hearthstone, peace
Loses her quote list, but calls out Grylander on the shoddy read list (I agree with this), the fact that both Grylander and I didn't notice that she wasn't included in his reads list, and something else she forgot about. Point 1 was contribution with the rest being a bit fluffy.
#219
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
DarknessB (1 [L-6]):
AIVION
HeadShrinker (3 [L-4]):
DarknessB, powerofdeath, MattZed
Saik0Shinigami (1 [L-6]):
Calix
Gyrlander (1 [L-6]):
BananaCucho
Calix (1 [L-6]):
Saik0Shinigami
GameFreak (1 [L-6]):
SuperJack
MattZed (1 [L-6]):
HeadShrinker
AIVION (2 [L-5]):
GameFreak, pisskop
Wtf
I'll be catching up at work today. Don't think I'll be too busy (have to stop myself from playing Hearthstone every free minute I got)
Provides copy of votes for VCA purposes and comments that our votes are all over the place. Mildly helpful reference post.
#222
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
lol I like you
I like this. I was about to question the town read which made no sense.
Annnnnd it wasn't a town play to see if POD accepted the buddying... It was a joke followed by actual buddying by Gyrlander. Gyr is scum.
#1 is a joke reference to a snarky post by HeadShrinker. #2 and #3 are commenting on Gyrlander pushing against POD (which she liked) and withdrawing the push / trying to bargain that the two not vote for each other. I agree that was extremely fishy of Gyrlander and this seems like a decent point to make.
#223
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
This feels town
This is survivalistic. Trying to push off pressure off of him onto a lurker
#1 is agreeing with GameFreak on Town not needing to say they are Town (seems reasonable). #2 is commenting on Gyrlander acting survivalistic in terms of potentially advocating for a lurker policy lynch and saying scummy actions doesn't mean he's scum. Both reads seem reasonable.
#224
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Votes are too spread. Start stacking them on 2-3 people
Comments on the votes being spread out again -- fine.
#233
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Neutral or Mafia, it's all non town and must die
Comments on it not mattering if we go after the Mafia or SK -- fine.
#239
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Gyr is acting scummy, AIVION like a failed troll. I'd rather lynch Gyr, and if he flips neutral or Mafia, its a win.
Expresses preference to go after Gyrlander over AIVION. This matched other players' views at the time given Gyrlander was making scummy statements while AIVION was trolling / RPing for the most part.
#241
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
I quoted and said a bunch of stuff about you. Try harder to discredit me.
Pushes back against Gyrlander who was being very defensive in his post.
#254
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Is there a reason you aren't voting anyone?
Calls out Gyrlander for not placing his vote anywhere.
#264
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
What the fuck LOL
Lynch this guy (Gyr)
Expresses concern ovre Gyrlander basically trying to bargain with AIVION to have them both remove their votes on each other. This was very scummy behavior by both Gyrlander and AIVION and was right to be called out.
#286
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Not voting is being neutral, or "not stepping on toes" as piss called it. Scum tend to do this as they don't want to make enemies, while town does this to fish for reactions, test to see how other people respond (if they sheep the vote), etc, aka scum hunt.
Scum can no vote, avoid attention, and win from doing that strategy which is why it screams as scummy behavior
Explains why non-voting can be a scum-tell in terms of avoiding controversy or enemies. Reasonable to me.
#287
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
See this is scummy. Instead of hunting and trying to find scum, you're avoiding more possible enemies (possible OMGUS votes) by relaxing, and simply hoping the votes will dissapate. Not happening.
Negatively comments on Gyrlander's view that we have 29 hours let and can therefore wait. Makes sense in terms of not letting the clock run down.
#291
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
The only way you could town read him is if you knew he was town
Do you know something we don't SJ?
Expresses surprise at SJ's sudden and unexplained townread of Gyrlander.
#302
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
So your argument is that you ARE being survivalistic?
Comments on how weak Gyrlander's argument is -- i.e. saying he is trying to survive vs. establishing towncred.
#307
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Pretty sure they're referring to Sephiroth
Which again is survivalistic as Gyr is hinting he reads you as Sephiroth... When you are voted by SJ in counter to him
Tries to provide clarity on SJ's comment, which was addressed at finding the SK (Sephiroth). On this point, interesting that SJ seemed more intent on finding the SK than the Mafia...
#312
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
So you admit to being scummy on purpose, meaning if you are town you're not an important role and we can get info from your lynch as to who had legit reasons for voting you and who didn't - but after purposely acting scummy and seeing you're about to be lynched you consider yourself important enough to save, decide to push on AIVION who is also being widely scum read by many not because of a scum read but to survive, meaning you consider your value in this game > his, and now you've suggested Darkness is Neutral scum because again you figure your value > Darkness
This screams scum, and if you ARE town I recommend you reevaluate just WHY this is very piss poor play and don't pull that shit again
Points out Gyrlander's flailing and immediately focusing on me after SJ troll voted me for using red in a comment.
#314
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
I'm announcing my full support of the "meta sucks ass" mentality. Votes based on meta (especially for new players learning and adjusting) are lazy and most of the time incorrect.
Comment on the limitations of meta in response to MattZed defense of AIVION for meta reasons.
#319
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Lmao, of course the player who likes to try shitty things like play scummy on purpose (which LOSES games) will jump to Gyr's defense. Not surprised in the slightest.
Poor play does not indicate alignment, but that's not my argument. I feel he is scum flailing trying to justify his actions as now "intentional", but if he is town its piss poor play that he should learn from and stop doing. Don't use MZ as a role model for your games.
Pushes back against MattZed for defending AIVION and reminding the Town that poor play is not alignment indicative either way. Agree with this.
#322
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Then when SJ says he wants to get rid of long swordy man, why do you think its Darkness?
You vote AIVION and say you'll unvote when he does
You say "Yay SJ, let's get rid of long swordy man! Who is it? Probably Darkness"
Now in this post you say "guess what! I was being town on purpose guise. For no reason. Wasn't strategy. I'm TOWN, let's focus on Banana"
Gyrlander (4 [L-3]):
AIVION, DarknessB, BananaCucho, pisskop
This is too easy with you. You're obvious and can be read like a book.
Pushes back Gyrlander again in terms of his tendency to latch onto other people's targets that are not himself.