Curious to hear your thoughts on my #2298, especially question at the end.
its also possible, and more likely, that MM lied about being role blocked to soft TPR.
you know what I'd do as magus? target wrath and frinckles.
as fire magus off
Hello. im glad everyone is joining my train on MM.
Could anyone give me a quick update on what has happened while i was sleeping and then working?
oh boy.
blinkskater implied he got levelled up (and possibly also down) last night (as villager). Frinckles revealed as Archer and said Yuesford visited blink skater last night. Yuesford later cryptically confirmed that he did in fact level up blinkskater on d1 (not n1). For some reason Frinckles thinks this makes Yuesford and blink shadows. :shrug:
I then revealed as Knight with a Shadow check on MM
can either of you explain why I'd threaten to kill ppl as jester/mafia on d1 yesterday? :P
I don't think you can: if I were jester I'd be mighty afraid of getting night killed and as mafia there's literally no reason to defend someone so hard. I could've just been okay with both lynches
and lets fuck with the mechanics a bit:
@Auwt what happens if a Rogue hides behind another Rogue who hides behind someone else that gets role blocked?
@Auwt what happens if a shaman targets a rogue, and a rogue hides behind the shaman?
@Auwt what happens if the horror visits an inactive Magus? Which form would the Magus take, if any?
ummmm @Marshmallow Marshall @Frinckles I just realised that if Yuesford is shadow and he just turned blink into e.g. Prophet, if the Magus uses his kill on Yuesford, and the Prophet uses his kill also, these ppl would drop dead at the same time. the prophet's nightkill has a delay of one day, same as fire magus'. why exactly were you going crazy about the prophet dropping kills on us? lol
@Auwt even weirder question: what happens if someone who got visited by Horror got redirected into a rogue who hid behind someone that got role blocked?
I swear on blink's children on his behalf that he won't flip mafia.
None of the Rogues would be roleblocked since the one being roleblocked is the one "accomodating" the Rogues, and not the Rogues themselves.
Then the Shaman could be linked to whoever the other person is.
It would work like a Villager, would randomly visit but do nothing.
Once again the roleblock part would not change the situation, then this someone would end up visiting the person whom has been redirected by the Rogue.
Okay, I'm assuming this is the primary thing you guys wanted my opinion on. I'm close to 15 pages behind seeing as I was busy yesterday.
I concur with this opinion, we shouldn't have lynched ozzy.
So we have frinckles CCing the level up, this is something I could see a scum doing every day of the week, so this could be indicative of a Frinckles scum team.
Or you just made it up, that's also a possibility. You're making this seem like that is out of the question and that brings into question your scum potential.
I'm on the fence with it too, but I credit that to Wrath being the jester in this game IMO
This is true
You're way overcomplicating this, he discreditted Wrath to the point where his opinion is basically useless, he's the jester, and I quite frankly came to the same conclusion earlier.
Oh, also, outing every power role in one fell swoop is a scum play, literally you gave the scum options for killing/deleveling especially if they figure out who the Magus is out of them.
He couldn't give a hint until the next day seeing as the level up happens as beginning N1, so this is again looking like paint.Originally Posted by Frinckles
Yes, considering you mentioned the option, I do think you would do that.
This is the same guy who completlely tricked everyone in Simply Arsonist by appealing to our reasoning that "Since he said it, he wouldn't do it!"
It's quite the opposite, I think you just told us exactly what you planned to do.
I don't like the recent developments, will post more once I'm not on mobile and back home
So Yuesford hard claimed Magus?
Because here is says otherwise:
What the fuck I just read and he claimed Magus tooOriginally Posted by Yuesford
I think that deserves a huh?Originally Posted by Yuesford
If you are actually magus, you'll want to protect yourself tonight because Scum is going to shoot you
If you're scum, we'll be able to tell pretty quickly if you're real or not.
I'm following on Frinckle's vote as I think we all benefit from it greatly.
Both of these are likely off
Blink I think is citizen that was levelled up
Frinkles I think is probably scum framing Yues into visiting blink and as such forcing a mislynch which he'll have to defend tomorrow
No, in no way does that scum list make sense, I don't even need to explain why.Originally Posted by Oberon
@Varcron main point of confusion was Auwt earlier describing the mechanic of leveling up at night incorrectly, he has since corrected that, specifically that the new LVL1 villager (upped from Vanilla villager, which Blink claims) cannot perform their LVL1 role's action until the following night (N2). With this clarified by Auwt, I don't think anyone is counter-claiming Blink's level-up. What we are not sure of is if he legit picked Paladin or might be a Shadow that got leveled up. There was also some questioning of whether upped villager would pick Paladin as their choice of role, Blink indicated he had a strong read on Magus (so he was planning to check that player to see if level 3, I suppose).
With no Magus CC, it seems that Frinckles may have found 2 townies.
Oberon also claims Knight and that MM came up as Shadow.
so varcron thinks frinckles pulled a big brain scum play and yuesford is something else, not magus?
aaa you're all overthinking this.
blink: bad
Yues: bad
Me:Good
Frinckles:good
Seriously there's no need to scumread one comment and analyze it 50000000 times to overcomplicate shit.
@Varcron I am talking about this possibility (if applied to a Shadow that is LVL 1 Horror):