Guess why I didn't make the first post ? I had nothing to say and would rather spend my precious posts reacting to other people's, because it was quite obvious that I'd be under the most cautious scrutiny.
|1) If loldebite had been the first to post on d2, it would've been a one-liner.
("Well that fucking sucks.")
[COLOR="#FFA500"]Loldebite self-admittedly didn't make the first post before someone else to fall under the radar. Wolfy for focus on self-preservation.
Loldebite now regrets not adding comments about Varcron's #97 comments about him.
As Martin put it: "Why is that important?"
Again, loldebite focus on self-preservation.
|2) Uses dead town's wording in regards to self. And even then, you rarely would ever do this if that person was still alive.
("Not very surprised tbh, which may explain my "fixation" as varcron put it.")
I'd advise Martin to not force other's to infer his point.
Might be able to infer to what he's getting that. Not going to.
Wtf do you want me to say about 3) I obviously don't agree with the reasoning according to which I'm the most wolfy of the SB trimvirat
|3) Despite having some level of self-consciousness (as shown in point 2), they completely missed Varcron saying they should be looked at if sb16 flipped town (p#97) and did not mention it at all. In fact, they responded to the very Varcron post which said that on d1.(p#99)
|There's a lack of understanding from loldebite of what Martin was referring to (being #99).
Martin's point here has to yet again be inferred manually by the reader if they want to understand to what he's getting at - which seems to be a common trait among Martin's posts sadly. (don't you enjoy inferring other people's points, and then infer from the inferred points what's the conclusion? )
I believe Martin was snarkily(why??) implying that loldebite was pretending to be acting as if they weren't aware of what Varcron said in #97. We know, due to loldebites response to "1)" - that loldebite WAS aware of what Varcron said.
What makes Martin think loldebite was acting as if they weren't aware of what Varcron said in #97? A misunderstanding about of Varcron's original WIFOM comment, see in next part.
What ? Obviously it's a WIFOM kill, either I did it and killed the whoever accused me, or someone else did to make it look like the former. Is that not what is meant by "WIFOM kill" ? That's what I was referring to.
|4) "it was a WIFOM kill" argument on slot that would highly suspect him in this situation.
("The kill is probably made for the WIFOM, but IIRC varcron was the most vocally doubtful of MM so I guess there's a world where that's why he's dead.")
Yes, WIFOM kill does make look loldebite suspect. Nobody here is denying it. "As for the last part, fine. I guess people can call it a WIFOM kill and mean that, but personally I think WIFOM is a very broad term and can happen in various ways and so specification beyond the words of "WIFOM" is generally useful."
Loldebite asked Martin what's the point and this is Martin's response:
So they both agree that point 4) was irrelevant.
Point #4 being irrelevant is agreed upon.
Point #3 being irrelevant comes from #4 being irrelvant.
Point #2, no comment, I'm not a mindreader.
Point #1, loldebite's responses indicate clear focus on self preservation.