Moon: 1-S2-1-10273169

[Bloodwrath]

Account Name: Moon
Account ID: 1-S2-1-10273169
In-Game Name: krabby patty thief

Crimes Committed: Griefing

Your Account Name: Bloodwrath

D4: Judge got killed, confirming me (Pleura) as the Crier.
An Escort is also killed leaving a last will saying #5 got roleblocked N1 and N2 (So #5 is confirmed not SK, not Enforcer and not DH because no RBI)
Neutral Random slot is still up though.

#5 is finally put up, only claiming not to be triad, nor SK, yet not claiming their role. Also Neutral is still up.

#5 is obviously guiltied, refused to give his role and lw to a confirmed town government role. This is gamethrowing.

-Mafia- Moon.SC2Replay

[Bloodwrath]

Another instance of Moon gamethrowing today.

I am the town government Mayor (#7) and Moon is vigilante (#5). I reveal day 2 and ask for role/lw. Moon does not pm me a role/lw and proceeds to vote me up.

Given the nature of the save (8 evils) and the fact that there is no reason for a town role to vote up a Mayor in this save, I then lynch 5 despite him claiming vigilante.

This is gamethrowing - there is no reason for a town to vote up revealed Mayor in this scenario. Moon claimed to be afk, but he checked chat log before he voted me up.

Moon gamethrow 2.SC2Replay

[DJarJar]

ID Verification:
Moon: 1-S2-1-10273169 Correct

Summary
Replay 1 -
Roles doctor in slot 5 with name "krabby patty thief".
N1 takes no action.
N2 goes to heal 1 but is rbed.

D2 he counterclaims the crier. Gets trialed. Does not claim a role but just that he was roleblocked for 2 nights in a row. Gets innoed.

N3 the crier spams that he should have been guiltied since he didn't give a role/lw
He chooses not to heal anybody. He puts in his lw that he's 100% confirmed town which is not even true anyway.

D4 he gets trialed again at the behest of the crier and again refuses to claim a role/lw. This time gets guiltied.



---------------------
Replay 2 -
He did put a single vote on you but he then checked log, saw u were mayor, and then did pm you his role before u trialed him. So nothing wrong here imo.

Player Offenses
Replay 1 - griefing/gamethrowing

Previous Offenses
several from mid-2020. Just approved a WLX4 for the same behavior in another thread (https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...1-S2-1-1608654)

Recommended Action
upgrade that approved WLX4 to BL X2

Additional Notes
Getting roleblocked may confirm that he is not SK or mafioso, but it does not confirm that he is town. There is a neut rand and any rand slot that can even be cult. Additionally, on top of refusing to claim his role he also counterclaimed the crier. And for 2 out of 3 nights he did not choose to doc anybody.

Thanks for your report!

[Arrow]

1-S2-1-10273169 : 2x Banlist

[abcmoon123]

i dont think this is fair because in that gamestate, the only role that town wants to look for is the enforcer, which based on the escort actions i was NOT the enforcer, therefore i didnt think i needed to reveal my role seeing as it was obvious that i wasnt the evil.

in regards to the second game that bloodwrath posted, posing as evil is a good way to get other evils to lower their guard and expose themselves, so its not a bad play to pretend to be an evil.

[abcmoon123]

also i really dont think the mod justification is correct. the only evil in that game was a triad turned enforcer, and there would be zero reason to suspect cult activity. does that mean i can just lynch anyone at any time because any random can always be a cult? i think the biggest offense is the crier just ignoring evidence in order to lynch someone that he dislikes.

in addition i would like to note this player, Bloodwrath, privately messaged me in game almost daily saying he would get me banned. its clear hes only doing this for revenge. in fact, i believe he got watchlisted for this very same game for ignoring evidence.

[Auwt]

Wasn't there a neutral (in addition to the enforcer) still alive at the moment you were put up ?
That's something I noticed in the replay you submitted against Bloodwrath, who quoted my review in the orginal post.

[DJarJar]

Wasn't there a neutral (in addition to the enforcer) still alive at the moment you were put up ?
That's something I noticed in the replay you submitted against Bloodwrath, who quoted my review in the orginal post.

There’s a neutral and an any random slot both which can be any of the neut evil roles including cult

Additionally, as mentioned in the review, you counterclaimed the crier and chose not to heal on 2 out of 3 nights...

[abcmoon123]

i chose not to heal because i was afraid of getting killed by a veteran, and counterclaiming the crier isnt even gamethrowing. im not sure of the circumstances of this game but i probably also said this as a sarcastic joke if the judge was already revealed as dead, which doesnt come across well in text. people can say whatever they want in mafia, its a game of deceit. veterans claim that they are government all the time to vet bait. healing as a doctor is a game of luck, claiming gov and getting shot, therefore buying town an extra day while not losing an important role such as the actual gov or investigative roles, is a better play than randomly clicking hoping to heal someone

the fact is that bloodwrath was presented evidence that i was 100% not the enforcer and chose to ignore it just because he had personal bias, and he still has this personal bias because hes taunting me in private messages in game.

again, your claim of cult activity doesnt really hold up well, if we follow that logic, everyone in every game can be lynched at any time just because you can accuse them of being the cult in the any random slot

[MrMostache]

and counterclaiming the crier (as town by the way) isnt even gamethrowing.

There is your problem.

Also considering you also made a nonsensical appeal in a previous report https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/showt...light=10273169,
I find it hard to take your appeal seriously when you are clutching at straws to justify your behavior.

Denied.