S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN! - Page 4
Register

User Tag List

View Poll Results: ???

Voters
19. You may not vote on this poll
  • Option 1

    8 42.11%
  • Option 2

    7 36.84%
  • Option 3

    7 36.84%
Multiple Choice Poll.
Page 4 of 32 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 14 ... LastLast
Results 151 to 200 of 1574
  1. ISO #151

  2. ISO #152

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Bibble View Post
    I chose the first option (reading vs ripping my eyes out).
    -fuck setup speculation, this is stealth-fucking-bomber and ay-fucking-vion, who knows what's in their crazy master-minds. pretending to understand higher beings is a sin.
    -obviously we need to see flips and mechanics to confirm alignments, and reads are obviously the best way to "solve this game"
    -stop trusting the hosts, thats a bad habit
    -lynching is good
    -vote s-fm bibble

    for quoting this entire post without spoiler

  3. ISO #153

  4. ISO #154

  5. ISO #155

  6. ISO #156

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Unfunny View Post
    Ok both mods posted about it so it apparently is part of the game.

    Ok who came up with this role Failed Comedian you failed so bad as a comic that even the mods Dis you.

    I mean come on really??
    this

    is interesting

    me thinks if

    I said something you

    would very much know my

    role because it may

    be what you

    submitted for

    game




    though

    of course

    you cannot say

    or admit that if

    it is indeed

    very much

    true

  7. ISO #157

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Unfunny View Post
    I guess the mod dissing has stoped lol. Let’s see

    Why did the dog cross the road

    To get to the other side.


    Hahahaha

    Everybody is equally weak on the inside, just that some present their ruins as new castles and become kings –
    Deep into that darkness peering, long I stood there, wondering, fearing, doubting, dreaming dreams no mortal ever dared to dream before.
    If your dear heart is wounded, my wild heart bleeds with yours.

  8. ISO #158

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    @S-FM Unfunny

    What are some tips to make people not like me? I’m way too popular and people are following me around and it’s kind of annoying.

    I’m asking you because nobody fucking likes you so you’re the perfect person to ask
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Unfunny View Post
    How dare you send me another box of cereal
    Quote Originally Posted by ChannelMiner View Post
    Anyways I shot Brad due to my morbid fear of zombies.

  9. ISO #159

  10. ISO #160

  11. ISO #161

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthbomber16 View Post
    @S-FM Unfunny

    What are some tips to make people not like me? I’m way too popular and people are following me around and it’s kind of annoying.

    I’m asking you because nobody fucking likes you so you’re the perfect person to ask
    @Stealthbomber16

    Here's

    an uncalled

    for tip; just

    say dat my role

    haz a secret true role

    dat I don't know of and

    will use over my current role's abilities

    because my current role card is just fake

  12. ISO #162

  13. ISO #163

  14. ISO #164

  15. ISO #165

  16. ISO #166

  17. ISO #167

  18. ISO #168

  19. ISO #169

  20. ISO #170

  21. ISO #171

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    i confirm unfunny is unfunny

    Spoiler : for the mammal bird's eyes' sake :
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Jolly Rancher View Post
    I

    have had

    a few thonks

    and I will share some


    1. No one has mentioned whether there's plurality or not. It appears there's Majority at least (given the X number of votes), but no indication of whether its plurality.

    2. Since Majority is already a given and determined, I suspect the poll at the top of the page is NOT related to the voting system.

    Also I am slightly concerned that the person who made several thonks on the setup page

    hasn't mentioned this yet or came across it

    -vote S-FM ZKL3DJ


    I normally don't think its either doggo or w00fer indicative

    but this thonk gives me pawse for thee momentz


    As I said it means nothing, he wrote that before the game started. I'm voting for all three options and hoping they aren't three curses

  22. ISO #172

  23. ISO #173

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Bibble View Post
    i confirm unfunny is unfunny



    As I said it means nothing, he wrote that before the game started. I'm voting for all three options and hoping they aren't three curses
    Voting for all 3 options is literally the same as voting for no options

    What a waste of time, not only in voting 3 times, but also in posting about it

    You are the 3rd scum

  24. ISO #174

  25. ISO #175

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Unfunny View Post
    No I am funny, and oooo is my friend. He was the first person to diss me so I can not vote him. Today. When the mods dissed me the first player to dis me I have to be there special friend.

    Who ever came up with this role omg roflol
    -vote s-fm unfunny
    no roles that mess with votes, this is a lie

  26. ISO #176

  27. ISO #177

  28. ISO #178

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Bibble View Post
    we are screwed


    @Stealthbomber16 can you put a setup link on the op pls
    Why are we screwed? I have no idea what you’re talking about

    But I can do the setup link.
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Unfunny View Post
    How dare you send me another box of cereal
    Quote Originally Posted by ChannelMiner View Post
    Anyways I shot Brad due to my morbid fear of zombies.

  29. ISO #179

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Bibble View Post
    -vote s-fm unfunny
    no roles that mess with votes, this is a lie
    Vanilla blackmailer or vote stealer roles are strictly banned. I will permit roles that restrict the way a player can communicate in funny or interesting ways. Amuse me.
    6. No roles that receive additional votes or roles that have traditional lynch immunity.
    It

    does not

    say anything about

    roles that must protect someone

    or not vote someone specifically; a

    traditional blackmailer prevents any voting by a

    player, and this interaction doesn't add votes to

    anyone, it just dictates who they must not vote

  30. ISO #180

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Jolly Rancher View Post
    It

    does not

    say anything about

    roles that must protect someone

    or not vote someone specifically; a

    traditional blackmailer prevents any voting by a

    player, and this interaction doesn't add votes to

    anyone, it just dictates who they must not vote
    See, the mod agrees with me

  31. ISO #181

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Jolly Rancher View Post
    It

    does not

    say anything about

    roles that must protect someone

    or not vote someone specifically; a

    traditional blackmailer prevents any voting by a

    player, and this interaction doesn't add votes to

    anyone, it just dictates who they must not vote
    although

    I wonder

    if that is

    just all he does

    because if that role were

    mafia alignment then it may be

    very bad and roles are suppose to

    work as any alignment so I'm not sure

    Your rolecard should not be balanced for a specific faction.
    Although

    I suppose

    it doesn't say

    anything about being negatively

    imbalanced for a specific faction

  32. ISO #182

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM oooo View Post
    Voting for all 3 options is literally the same as voting for no options

    What a waste of time, not only in voting 3 times, but also in posting about it

    You are the 3rd scum
    no
    -vote s-fm oooo
    sinner, what if we need the options to reach a certain threshold of votes
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM oooo View Post
    Btw the rule is:

    "No roles that receive additional votes or roles that have traditional lynch immunity."

    Not "No roles that mess with votes"
    true

    i did say "this is a lie", just didnt expect me to be the liar

  33. ISO #183

  34. ISO #184

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Bibble View Post
    no
    -vote s-fm oooo
    sinner, what if we need the options to reach a certain threshold of votes


    true

    i did say "this is a lie", just didnt expect me to be the liar
    Well, thanks to YOU, the options are 6 6 6 now

    I hope you're HAPPY, YOU'VE JUST CAUSED THE WORLD TO END

    -End World

  35. ISO #185

  36. ISO #186

  37. ISO #187

  38. ISO #188

  39. ISO #189

  40. ISO #190

  41. ISO #191

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Bibble View Post
    You shall not diss the Lord, thy Mod.

    That letters and numbers guy who posts in pink's setup talk is 100 % NAI since it was prepared pre-game (so pre-alignments), and I'm not sure whether I want to read his posts or to rip my eyes out of my face.
    Yes!
    I just want to be as helpful as possible, I read through the last run of this setup and it was quite the doozy~

  42. ISO #192

  43. ISO #193

  44. ISO #194

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM oooo View Post
    Voting for all 3 options is literally the same as voting for no options

    What a waste of time, not only in voting 3 times, but also in posting about it

    You are the 3rd scum
    We don't know if each players' vote on the poll has an individual effect,
    it might not be about what result wins, but who votes for which option.
    I'm voting for number 1

  45. ISO #195

  46. ISO #196

  47. ISO #197

  48. ISO #198

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Chernobyl View Post
    Quod licet Iovi, non licet bovi
    I see you speak GOD's language

    ...to speak of vile pagan deities


    I don't like
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Pig Spider Monkey View Post
    It’s like you post that and dip.

    -vote S-FM Birdie


    Until I see more and I’m not talking about cluster. I want actual game related content.
    my vote stays.
    It's like Spigkey wants to look scumhunty through any possible means including a meaningless attack on an equally meaningless post

  49. ISO #199

  50. ISO #200

    Re: S-FM 307: ?KRC AGAIN!

    I was thinking about it when I went to bed last night, about the fact that we last saw 13 players in the signups page, yet only 11 accounts here.
    I think it's entirely possible that one account is shared by multiple people.

    Now this theory may be a bit out there, but I have a little bit of evidence for it.
    In the S-FM queue, a player count was kept for this game, it was originally at 9 players until suddenly it was changed to an "???" amount of players.
    I suspect that someone wrote a role who's main feature is sharing an account with two other players, presumably they'd have their own roles as well, they could effectively be some sort of mason/mafia faction.
    I had a similar idea at some point :P

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •