I was talking about the plurality w/o majority thing. I dislike it because it disables hammering, which some might argue to be anti-town (now people can't get lynched midway through the day, so if it were a regular lynch, it would be slightly more difficult to pressure people). Only town can vote for plurality/ect, it's not important because of angleshooting/the fact that only town could've voted for it (and thus they all had town reasons in mind for choosing plurality w/o majority over other systems, so there is no scum motive that can be discerned for hunting).
How is it scummy? I don't understand.
Mayor vote of course, and I don't see why I wouldn't troll about something like this early onOriginally Posted by Distorted
[/QUOTE]
Nothing, it's just a meme :PWhat makes you trust distorted? Why vote him so lulz and follow up with this?
I'm not, I'm simply offering ideas. I'm stating what I believe to be the safest venture, mostly because Mayor lynch isn't that hot in this setup.Why are you directing the Mayors behavior before a mayor is even chosen?
[/QUOTE]
I'll put it this way: if we agree that the Mayor should follow consensus, then I won't be mad if he kills someone else anyway if that someone else is Mafia (pref. Framer). However, if they go rogue and end up killing someone who wasn't being widely scumread (without a decent reason), then I'll want them gone.Why are you telling the potential mayor to be a sheep?