Stormtrooper: 1-S2-1-9775809; CerealKiller: 1-S2-1-315416

[MrMostache]

Account Name: Stormtrooper
Number: 1-S2-1-9775809
In-game name: Stormstrooper (5)
Crime: Game throwing and spamming

Summary: This person kept spamming "kill yourself" through the setup and day 1,2, which ended in him being lynched day 2. He decided to reveal his teammates in his lw.


Account Name: CerealKiller
Number : 1-S2-1-315416
In-game name: Taddeo Ricci (15)
Crime Spamming, and partial game throwing.

Summary: Kept spamming the same thing along with the previous person. As he was getting lynched, he also revealed the last mafia, hence why I considered it partial game throwing

-Mafia- (892).SC2Replay

[Nighthawk]

ID Verification:
Stormtrooper: 1-S2-1-9775809 - Correct
CerealKiller: 1-S2-1-315416 - Correct

Players Added to Report:



Hotkeys
Stormtrooper: 4
CerealKiller: 5


Summary
Stormtrooper chooses the name "Stormtrooper" and roles Godfather in slot #4.
CerealKiller is given the name "Taddeo Ricci" and roles Blackmailer in slot #15.

At game start, #4 immediately spams until STOP SPAMMING appears, then enters in this LW: "4 is gf, 15 is blackmailer, 7 is framer"
#15 starts spamming also.

#4 and #15 spam non-stop.

DAY 2: #4 is lynched and his LW is reveals the mafia players.

DAY 3: #15 is lynched and affirms that #7 is the Framer.


Was the game result altered?
Yes, the game ended on Day 4 with a Town victory.


Player Offenses
Stormtrooper: Griefing, Intentional Game Throwing, Skyping
CerealKiller: Griefing, Intentional Game Throwing, Skyping


Previous Offenses
Stormtrooper: None
CerealKiller: None


Recommended Action
Stormtrooper: Watch List x7
CerealKiller: Watch List x7


Additional Notes
Players were in adjacent slots, took same actions, game threw together, endlessly spammed the entire game, and quit at the same time. Recommend a long watch list for aggregate of all offenses.


Thanks for helping to keep the game clean!

[Arrow]

1-S2-1-315416
1-S2-1-9775809: 7x WL for both.

[Ice52berg]

While I know I'm not the players in this report and am risking an infraction, I believe this review requires another look. I've read through a lot of the permabans posted recently and they sound extremely like this case here. The spamming, adjacent slots, gamethrowing. I honestly and truly believe this is another case of smurfing.

[Arrow]

Thank you for your input.

Without firm evidence of hacking, we rarely jump straight to banlist; almost everyone gets a WL first so they can't complain they weren't warned. However, we will keep an eye on this situation. Further offenses are likely to result in ban lists quite quickly.