I refused to go four core for technical reasons, as for the hhd it was only 65$
Lol I understand why you don't want any more cores, they don't take a whole lot away from the initial core. The second core jsut calculates numbers. Need to use the built in calculator? You're using core two. Everything else? Core one. I don't know what the otehrs are for, I only know core two, but they probably don't do that much. As for the processor itself, I imagine that the higher core processors also have better a better processing speed. It would make sense but that's not a confirmed fact, I have no idea. Some company makes processors with 56 cores or something like that. I'd like to know what each core does..... Core thirty-seven probably loads a single pixel XD.
Ummm..accually I think you've mistaken that for the ALU..thats apart of one of the cores.
Each core itself processes instructions seperatly but not every computer application is multi-core optimized(only most modern games). The most compatible setup for gaming rigs would be a 2 core system due to the fact that multiple cores are best used for multitasking. Some games can only make use of two cores...that means the other 2 cores are not being used and the game is running at half your total computer processing speed.
Last edited by ; November 22nd, 2011 at 09:31 AM. Reason: mistype
Sorry but that's pure bs. I don't see any reason why you should stay @ a phenom ii x2. The Intel quads are MUCH better and cheap.
heck i could have went phenom 6 core, that would have been alot faster for video editing/rendering but i wanted something that was most compatible with games, there are a few games/emulators that i have that only support 2 cores
plus that certain chip was the fastest cheapest one on newegg...intel is awesome but pricy
intel is quite cheap compared to amd.. mid/high end is a clear lose for amd
but let's keep it here would like to see more specs
I was given that information from my father, who knows quite a bit about computers and went to school for programming. I should trust his knowledge of computers but I honestly don't..... He isn't caught up with all this new technology, and all the new styles and formats. He doesn't like to show it but I know it confuses him greatly. I honestly think more cores would actually do something but he keeps insisting that they do next to nothing >.> What would be the point of adding more cores if they only did a few tiny things? There has to be a reason, and I think it's cause they actually do something. If someone knows what they're talking about please explain, I would like to know the truth about this becasue I don't fully believe in teh info I was given....
When you have more than one core you have something like multiple computer engines processing all of the data for all of your programs. its like giving yourself 2 or 4 or even more brains in which to think with.
Some cores share the work load. Such as the i5 and i7, they're optimized to adapt or share when necessary so people won't realise that if Intel came with a single core nowadays they would need a refund.
https://i44.tinypic.com/25ov1gw.jpg
All rise for the SC2Mafia National Anthem.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0yDrtNEr_5M