Forum Mafia III Sign Ups

[FalseTruth]

If I am in fact hosting, I will make the following restrictions.

1) If you were in the last forum mafia, you had to have posted at least 10 times throughout the game(excluding n1 deaths)
2) You are not allowed to post images in the day chat. You can, however, do what Narks did for a last will as it does not distract from discussion.
3) You cannot sign other people up. i.e. S.A.S. signing up Narks.
4) You cannot have a warning level on the forums. inb4 FalseTruth giving everyone he doesn't like a 1% warn level the day before the game

Also, Narks is hereby prohibited from signing up for trolling the last forum mafia. He didn't troll the game, idiot.

Why do you assume a total asshole like you?

[FalseTruth]

Me and Goon will probably agree on a more standardized setup like we see in sc2 mafia, but will add in factions like cult and masons as well.

[Narks]

just because you dont want me to play, im going to sign up

ah
ha
ha
ha

[oops_ur_dead]

If FalseTruth and Goonswarm host the game it will be filled with rage and AIDS.

[Elixir]

@people talking about the set up. You have seen the poll in dead chat right?

[TheJackofSpades]

No, because I am not dead.

[Raiden]

@people talking about the set up. You have seen the poll in dead chat right?

Oh, i would like to see that too. Could you... move the thread, or something like that? I actually like the current setup, i wouldn't mind another of those. Especially, i'd like to see the two mafia factions and the cult again. Neutrals and town roles are somewhat less important to me, even if i happen to be one of those.

[Elixir]

I'll move into general later.

[Elixir]

I'll move into general later.

By later I mean now.

[CaressMeTenderly]

Well.
I'm okay with anyone besides Falsetruth hosting, given his terrible rules that effectively remove SAS, Narks, and I.

[FalseTruth]

SAS is not eliminated. I said it images would not be allowed in future games. You receive no punishment for having used it in the last game.

You happen to be eliminated for having a warning level, yes. Narks has been eliminated for trolling.

[CaressMeTenderly]

SAS has a warning level.
So does Oops.
Oops: 9%
SAS: 14%


So no wait you've effectively removed FOUR people. Good job.

[oops_ur_dead]

If I am in fact hosting, I will make the following restrictions.

1) If you were in the last forum mafia, you had to have posted at least 10 times throughout the game(excluding n1 deaths)
2) You are not allowed to post images in the day chat. You can, however, do what Narks did for a last will as it does not distract from discussion.
3) You cannot sign other people up. i.e. S.A.S. signing up Narks.
4) You cannot have a warning level on the forums. inb4 FalseTruth giving everyone he doesn't like a 1% warn level the day before the game

Also, Narks is hereby prohibited from signing up for trolling the last forum mafia. He didn't troll the game, idiot.

Why do you assume a total asshole like you?

What is this English isn't.

Also warning level is actually your awesome percentage. The higher you are the more master race you are.

[FalseTruth]

When i say warning level I mean >20% such that you are either watched or moderated.

[CaressMeTenderly]

SAS is watched.


You're very bad at checking your information, by the way.
How can you be trusted to moderate a mafia forums game when you're the moderator of the forums yet have absolutely no idea who is on the watched list and inaccurately believe you need >20% to be placed in the "watched" category?

[oops_ur_dead]

This is obviously an attempt by FalseTruth to breed a master race of rule-following mafia players so that he can take over Mafiascum.

[FalseTruth]

Okay, if you really don't want him in, I won't let him play.

[CaressMeTenderly]

Excellent counter-argument. "Oh, I made a mistake, and you pointed it out, so I guess now I'll just ban him and change my idea of >20%."

[oops_ur_dead]

SAS is watched.


You're very bad at checking your information, by the way.
How can you be trusted to moderate a mafia forums game when you're the moderator of the forums yet have absolutely no idea who is on the watched list and inaccurately believe you need >20% to be placed in the "watched" category?

I agree. FalseTruth is very disorganized.
I can imagine him accidentally leaking info on roles and players because of his carelessness.

[Elixir]

Ironically, I removed caressme from that list a couple of hours ago because I was sick of having to approve his shit.

[FalseTruth]

I was intending on letting SAS play, but you seem to desperately want to prevent him from playing, so I'm letting you have your way.

I personally didn't like how he played the last game, but he DID play a legit game, so I planned on giving him a second chance.
I also clarified that warning level needs to be <20% so that he would be allowed to play.

[oops_ur_dead]

I propose that Narks and I host the next forum mafia.
Certainly would be better than Goonswarn and FalseTruth.

[chocopaw]

Can I change my vote? Under these circumstances I really would like FalseTruth to host.

[CaressMeTenderly]

No, this is what you said.

When i say warning level I mean >20% such that you are either watched or moderated.

You were under the inaccurate assumption that >20% = watched/moderated, <20% = nothing. I pointed out your inaccuracy.

also clarified that warning level needs to be >20% so that he would be allowed to play.

Wait, what?

So if he has a warning level OVER 20% he can play? You're not making any sense.

Ironically, I removed caressme from that list a couple of hours ago because I was sick of having to approve his shit.

ILY

[Elixir]

You don't need to forbid anyone from joining until you start pushing 25-30 players. Even Ozys lurking has contributed to the current game in one way or another.

[oops_ur_dead]

Can I change my vote? Under these circumstances I really would like FalseTruth to host.

I will ban you and anyone you associate with.

[vornksr]

It seems reasonable to forbid people from playing who actively distract from the game or make it less enjoyable for others to play. Complete lurking (i.e. total inactivity during night & day) is also not really acceptable, imo.

[Elixir]

Can I change my vote? Under these circumstances I really would like FalseTruth to host.

You can now.

Remember this poll means nothing btw.

[chocopaw]

Can I change my vote? Under these circumstances I really would like FalseTruth to host.

I will ban you and anyone you associate with.

Cool. You're getting better at moderating from post to post.

[CaressMeTenderly]

It seems reasonable to forbid people from playing who actively distract from the game or make it less enjoyable for others to play. Complete lurking (i.e. total inactivity during night & day) is also not really acceptable, imo.

SAS did not "actively distract" or make the game less enjoyable. He is still being banned.

[divemaster127]

sign me up

[fred]

-joins-

[FalseTruth]

Can I change my vote? Under these circumstances I really would like FalseTruth to host.

Like Elixir said, the votes mean nothing. Eventually, Elixir and DR have the deciding vote on who will be the next host(s).

Also, oops is just trolling his ass off for no apparent reason and Caress has already been moderated by 3 different mods for his trolling on the forums.

Caress will not be allowed to play Forum Mafia III, regardless of who is hosting. Whether Narks is allowed to play will depend on the host.

Playing forum mafia should be considered a privilege, not a right. Do not exploit our kindness.

[vornksr]

SAS did not "actively distract" or make the game less enjoyable. He is still being banned.

I actually wasn't referring to SAS. For the most part, what he posted on the forums was entirely reasonable.

I just meant to say that I think there ought to be reasonable standards of behavior that we hold players to.

[CaressMeTenderly]

Can I change my vote? Under these circumstances I really would like FalseTruth to host.

Like Elixir said, the votes mean nothing. Eventually, Elixir and DR have the deciding vote on who will be the next host(s).

Also, oops is just trolling his ass off for no apparent reason and Caress has already been moderated by 3 different mods for his trolling on the forums.

Caress will not be allowed to play Forum Mafia III, regardless of who is hosting. Whether Narks is allowed to play will depend on the host.

Playing forum mafia should be considered a privilege, not a right. Do not exploit our kindness.

Ahahahaha.
Who made you Dark Revenant?

[oops_ur_dead]

kindness.

Shut the fuck up.

[CaressMeTenderly]

SAS did not "actively distract" or make the game less enjoyable. He is still being banned.

I actually wasn't referring to SAS. For the most part, what he posted on the forums was entirely reasonable.

I just meant to say that I think there ought to be reasonable standards of behavior that we hold players to.

I'm aware, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of FalseTruth's standards.

[FalseTruth]

No, this is what you said.

When i say warning level I mean >20% such that you are either watched or moderated.

You were under the inaccurate assumption that >20% = watched/moderated, <20% = nothing. I pointed out your inaccuracy.

also clarified that warning level needs to be >20% so that he would be allowed to play.

Wait, what?

So if he has a warning level OVER 20% he can play? You're not making any sense.

Ironically, I removed caressme from that list a couple of hours ago because I was sick of having to approve his shit.

ILY

You know exactly what I mean and are using typos as arguments. I suggest you GTFO this thread and go troll on some other forums.

[oops_ur_dead]

I suggest you shut the fuck up.

[CaressMeTenderly]

No, this is what you said.

When i say warning level I mean >20% such that you are either watched or moderated.

You were under the inaccurate assumption that >20% = watched/moderated, <20% = nothing. I pointed out your inaccuracy.

also clarified that warning level needs to be >20% so that he would be allowed to play.

Wait, what?

So if he has a warning level OVER 20% he can play? You're not making any sense.

Ironically, I removed caressme from that list a couple of hours ago because I was sick of having to approve his shit.

ILY

You know exactly what I mean and are using typos as arguments. I suggest you GTFO this thread and go troll on some other forums.

>mfw he has no idea who he's talking to

By the way, those aren't typos, those are factual inaccuracies.

[Narks]

I propose that Narks and I host the next forum mafia.
Certainly would be better than Goonswarn and FalseTruth.

this

i would make whales a role

[Elixir]

Can yous have your domestic in another thread? This is sign ups.

[CaressMeTenderly]

Sure. Sorry about that.

[Sherlock Holmes]

sign me up!

[Narks]

i wish to sign up to the forum to the mafia

[Goonswarm]

The other option I spoke with Elixir about is him hosting with my help as well. Outside of that I really don't care, but I agree having 2 people would make it a lot better.

[oops_ur_dead]

Will you force bullshit rules like FalseTruth's onto people?

[MrSmarter]

/sign
If I get invest again....

[NorthStar]

Why arn't I on the list? SIGN MEH UP PL3X

[Elixir]

Why arn't I on the list? SIGN MEH UP PL3X

Was at uni, updating it now

edit: SO WE'RE CLEAR. I am hard capping this at 30 players.

Narks, I thought you actually dont want to play and said you'd break my kanagaroos neck if I invited you. Please let me know if this is incorrect.

S.A.S - I'm not signing anyone up without their presence in this thread. So Procyon needs to post.