Search Results - SC2 Mafia
Register

Search:

Type: Posts; User: Titus

Page 1 of 40 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.09 seconds.

  1. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    I was scum. Peace out.

    Shit way to play by implying I accused you of cheating.
  2. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    The fuck you on aboot? I implied i am also stubborn, so you and i would be stubborm v stubborn, just like you and ika. God damn it woman, not everything is a personal attack.
    You imply I accuse you of cheating it is. There was no reason to bring him into this. No reason to talk about him.

    After this daybreak, I'm going to go far away from you. Do not talk to me about him.
  3. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    The Titus case isn't bad.
    Voting Whad even though they have stated Whad is basically confirmed town to them.
    Distancing themselves from a Whad mislynch.
    Not scum hunting, only defending others.
    Appeasing to me like crazy, borderline buddying.

    Wouldn't be out of this world to see Titus as scum this game.
    I already found the scumteam like holy shit.

    The problem is people are too caught up in their own egos.
  4. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    This is me defending someone i town read, and wanting to move votes to a scum read. You know, playing the game?

    You even knowingly accept whad will be a mislynch so that crypt can follow your leads tomorrow.
    Why would I accept a lynch I know is on town as opposed to being open to the possibility of being wrong?

    Why would I expect Crypt to follow my reads in death when he wouldn't when I was alive?

    Just shut up. I know this is a 3 v 1.
  5. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Yzb is right, you do pull shut from your ass. When did i imy you were a cheater? I said you were as stubborn as ika to test if your anger was feigned or not. You take far too many liberties analysing speech for someone who uses 'semantics' as a defense every second post.
    You implied I accused you of cheating when you compared yourself to ika.
  6. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    So, we have Gyr unvoting right before deadline and lurking shit out.
    Iced trying to argue voting for survival and correcting my townreads is turning against my townblock.
    Mesk has just lurked and placed an opportunistic vote.

    ^^^ There's your scums. Like how hard is this?
  7. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Well im caught up. Still confident that titus is scum and more beneficial than a whad lynch. Shes also voting one of her proposed bloc members, and arguing with another now that her head is on the chopping block. Good to see there was no real commitment to that team.

    @SuperJack @Cryptonic i implore you guys to move your vote to titus. Im not pinging mz, hes is my scum pool, and on whad which is more suspicious. @Gyrlander you speak of titus distancing herself from a lynch, but you havnt voted either. Get in here
    This is 1000% scum.

    Like I'm trying to get my block to not be idiots. Yet, I know I'm town and I'm not about to chance my own death. No other wagon is viable.
  8. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    ME NO SAY YOU SCUM READ ME FOR THAT.
    ME GIVE EXAMPLE OF OPINION. HOPE YOU UNDERSTAND OPINIONS.

    ME NOT PISSED AT SCUM READING ME. ME PISSED AT PEOPLE NOT READING. IF LOGIC, OK TO SCUM READ.
    YOU NO GET WHAT I SAY, SO YOU THINK SCUM. ME NO CAN EXPLAIN.

    YOU NO MISUNDERSTAND. YOU MISREPRESENT. WHOLE ARGUMENT MISREPRESENT.
    Yup. that's his ego.

    We'll lynch Whad today. See who is right. Then tomorrow, we lynch in my scumreads and actually probably hit a scum.
  9. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    But, you shouldn't.
    I will pressure and lynch my team so hard if they look like scum from my Town perspective.

    Maybe it's just me, but I really don't even think about prior games nor what anyone has done ever. I don't think any of it matters, and even if it did I wouldn't be able to formulate a strong enough argument to have someone lynched for it. I prefer to rely on my own gut feeling in the moment.
    And that's how you play. We all play differently. All are biases. Town have biases. Scum have biases. No one is immune. I lead town and protect town from anyone I feel is a threat once in my block, which is why I tried to diffuse this and highlight scum but everyone started lurking like mofos when I'm on until 30 minutes until deadline.
  10. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    I never said I scumread you for your views on Whad, or, as you said earlier, your proposal to lynch SJ/Matt.

    I still scumread you, but, if you're town, I apologize for misunderstanding you. I did not bear any bad will against you, and I really am trying to listen to people. That said, you getting this pissed at people for scumreading you, even if you find their reasons stupid, is uncalled for, given you're not perfect either and you've also misunderstood me several times.
    I find he's understood you correctly. You on the other hand, think you're the best thing since sliced cheese.
  11. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    Nah, I don't think so.
    People evolve. Mafia evolves.

    No one will continue playing the same way if people know they play specific ways. The whole point of the game is deception, so why would anyone follow their own meta?

    That's why I play every game as if I was a Citizen. That way, I can just play the same way every game and don't want to worry about meta.
    To elaborate, when I hunt you, I look for flaws based in assumptions others wouldn't have. Whad has to hunt you, you react negatively, fueling a fight. That's your T v T.

    Flaws in logic exist in every slot. It's the flaws that tell alignment.
  12. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    Nah, I don't think so.
    People evolve. Mafia evolves.

    No one will continue playing the same way if people know they play specific ways. The whole point of the game is deception, so why would anyone follow their own meta?

    That's why I play every game as if I was a Citizen. That way, I can just play the same way every game and don't want to worry about meta.
    I used to do this, but there are some things that don't really change.

    Like, I protect people who I view as on my team. That never really changes, because that's part of who I am. I help my team. That's how meta can be used. It's not well so and so did this jump move so SCUMMM or TOWNNN. It's about getting to know a person and the choices they make and how they think.

    Most of it is trash because people want a fast tell. It isn't.
  13. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    META BAD.
    NO USE META. IT NO WORK.
    WHO CARE PAST GAMES?


    YOU GAVE 1. PLEASE NO USE PLURAL. YOU BAD READING.
    CRYPTONIC TOWN.
    PERSONALITY META CAN WORK, IF NOT STARTING FROM EGO GARBAGE. MOST START THERE.
  14. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    I didn't add unnecessary fluff. Everything I posted, especially the post that you had quoted saying that I "took 5 lines to write 1" all supported each other and created my point. I'm sorry my opinions are not: WHAD BAD. WHAD SCUM. CRYPTONIC LYNCH.
    What I type is made to each add support to my case, help paint the picture, or explain things in another way that could be understood by players. And you even misrepresented me when I brought up Sc2 Mod, because it was validated by my argument prior to it.

    I'll be sure to dumb down my posts when responding to you, since you can't seem to see a whole picture.


    And I also never said I'm genuinely trying to read Gyrlander, so another point you're reading into incorrectly.
    Thank goodness this is not a majority game, otherwise we might have to policy yzb to get scum.
  15. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    I'm familiar with aspergers, I'm just a dopey guy lol.
    The things you have said about people with aspergers are just blatantly false, so with all due respect, you aren't and I find that blatantly offensive.
  16. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    I just checked the post-game of Give or Take. I'm pretty sure you said something like that, but given you didn't say it in the post game, if you said it you said it during the game while you were scum LOL so I can't really use that.

    Again, no response to the first point.

    "Titus' style of writing posts while I've hardly caught up is something I almost never do as town, unless I have to because I physically can't catch up before bed. This is because, if I'm town, I want to make my reads as modern and well-informed as possible, and I don't want to risk wasting my time with a read that turns out to be stupid upon catching up. However, if I'm scum, I can write loads of reads that are ultimately meaningless / have no effect on the game and seem towny. It's largely projection, but Titus' play definitely seems scummy."



    I was more "K"ing to the "oh no this Whad train is gonna flip town and then you're gonna mislynch me/crypt and you're going to lose this game!"

    I literally gave examples of where Crypt seemed to ramble only for the sake of looking town. It's not like it's something he continuously does in every post, but it's there.

    It might be worth digging up the BS you pedalled in that youvs.Iced thing.
    Yeah, you're tuning out Crypt because you are too desiring to be right than listen.

    My style is NAI. I post as I go because it reinforces my reads. Already said that.
  17. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Google aspie tells, first link.
  18. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    What, are you saying Crypt's reasons have been short?

    At this point it's pretty clear my scumread on Gyr was flawed. I don't see how voting you is ego.

    K.
    Well, when Whad flips we'll see that won't we?

    Crypt's reasons have been concise and to the point. When he stops getting pissed about Whad being wrong, we'd wreck this game.

    Right now, the lynch is terrible and I stand by that.

    I'd just rather take the small chance I am wrong.

    I bet everyone voting ATM is town but for Iced, Gyr and Mesk.
  19. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    No response to the first point? Why would you post like that?

    Wow, no I did not know that. If you're an aspie, it's not obvious lol. You've talked specifically about how you manipulate your own emotions to suit your interests as scum. This is why I also scumread the Iced-Ika thing. It reminded me of when you let yourself get easily offended in Give or Take, while in the FM you had the self-control of a saint (Ika was basically poking / insulting you for 100s of posts before you cracked).

    That doesn't sound like the aspies I know teehee ^^
    Nah, I cannot manipulate my own emotions as scum and would never say that. I say I play to others emotions or try to. Aspies as a whole take cheating very seriously. Iced implying that I cheated or was accusing him of cheating ranks high. One of the tells of being an aspie is having a heightened sense of right and wrong and taking things literally.
  20. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    This is as short as I can make it, sorry lol:

    1) Inflating posts to look more substantial / towny:

    In my discussions with him, he often added lots of unnecessary stuff that only seemed there to make him look more towny. He takes a lot of care in writing his posts, so I wouldn't expect that fluff to make it into his final posts.

    2) His interactions with you:

    He often didn't seem like he was genuinely trying to read you. Like, when he had you as a null slot because none of your posts had an impact on him but he was still telling you to "take it easy you don't need to defend yourself d1". If I had someone as a null slot for that reason I would NOT have the same attitude.

    Bear in mind, you hadn't even made that readwall yet at this moment.

    Then he said he townread you for expressing shock at SJ's vote and reasoning, even though I think this is something anyone could do and does not deserve a townread. Just didn't seem sincere.
    Dude, get over yourself. Crypt is town.

    Short reasons = no garbage

    You were right on Grylander and got persuaded by shit and now you're just basically voting with your ego.

    Whad will flip town, and more likely than not you'll go after me/Crypt and wham.
  21. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    Titus' style of writing posts while I've hardly caught up is something I almost never do as town, unless I have to because I physically can't catch up before bed. This is because, if I'm town, I want to make my reads as modern and well-informed as possible, and I don't want to risk wasting my time with a read that turns out to be stupid upon catching up. However, if I'm scum, I can write loads of reads that are ultimately meaningless / have no effect on the game and seem towny. It's largely projection, but Titus' play definitely seems scummy.

    Also, this whole "I'm Titus I take everything seriously" feels very fake. I doubt Titus actually scumreads Mesk for her jokey posts at all. Titus, in my experience, is a very emotionally adept player, and doesn't have this "take everyone's statements as they are", so her lack of nuance in dealing with Mesk feels very wrong from the player who was able to suss out FB in the last FM and manipulate BC in Give or Take. When Titus and Iced argued, I felt like she was pulling a lot of stuff out her arse too.

    -vote Titus


    Here goes nothing.
    I'm flattered but you know this to be false. I'm an aspie and there's a litany of games where I take "jokes" literally. Most of the time "jokes" aren't "jokes" when done like that.
  22. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Me or Whad makes this simple.

    -vote Whad


    Scum aren't going to vote themselves. *shrug* I can't make people listen if they aren't ready.
  23. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Crypt, why don't you feel engaged?
  24. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    "Most americans will be at work so let me vote you without any actual meaning because it won't happen."
    Yeah, the guy who isn't voting at all shades someone for trying to swing a wagon on scum.

    And you unvoted because of "a comment" that "felt town". That's really easy to retcon later.
  25. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    More votes get lynched, or randomed between those with most votes.
    Well that explains why I cannot get a viable wagon with my reads. Town's imploding. Just help a woman out will you?
  26. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    Because I don't really see many signs today of "most likely scum".... So, how can I push for something I do not see? So, in return, I pushed the second best thing. Someone who MIGHT flip scum, and will offer loads of information regardless of the flip. I even stated that the flip offers information on myself; if Mesk flips Town, that doesn't paint me in the best light.


    Please don't tell me how to play when you don't even read the game nor the setup. Like, we went over the lack of night kill over like 100 posts... The main case against Gyrlander was that he didn't know that Mafia had no NK... You have no idea what's going on, and you're tunneling in an attempt to stay relevant.
    I'm feeling lazy, I'm not seeing motion of votes to avoid a no lynch.

    What happens in deadline no lynch?
  27. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    A major problem I see with a Whad lynch is if he flips Town then we literally gain 0 information from the lynch.
    Then why are you on it? Why not Gyr or Iced? Or Mesk?
  28. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    Mesk still best lynch (sorry Mesk )
    Well you're voting my townread so *shrug*. All the wagons I care for are equally vanity wagons. The only place I could compromise on is Orpz. I hard tr you and Whad so...
  29. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Seriously, not one decent wagon. That unvote by Gyr was pbad. Deadline's coming and most Americans will be at work. I think Gyr wants a deadline lynch on Wad with no accountability.

    -vote Gyrlander


    Flashwagon?
  30. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Whad View Post
    I haven't been able to sort Zed either. I just wouldn't want us to lynch a slot that is basically empty and could be filled with a replacement.

    I need to go back and analyze the Gyrlander/Orpz/Cryptonic reaction to my SJ town lean since the huge pushback against that makes me think that at least one of the 3 could be scum with SJ and trying to paint associations between me and SJ...
    That's a stretch. Scum really don't plant associatives before they are going to get lynched. We're nowhere near a consensus.
  31. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Ok I guess everyone is gone. XCOM 2 calls my name.
  32. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Whad View Post
    Stuff like this always happens in games with Iced_Monopoly, but I find it largely to be NAI. I'm not comfortable with lynching him today since I've picked up a few town nuggets. Try not to let it bother you or affect your ability to scumhunt.

    Based on the people that I'm liking right now, I think we need to focus on Orpz or SJ. Have to finish up some work, but I'll be popping in and out.
    If this bad behavior always happens with Iced, maybe it's time he learned a lesson and stopped hmm?

    Who are you liking right now? Orpz and SJ are fine, but why not Zed? He hasn't posted like at all? I need to sort all three, so I'd be ok with this if I couldn't get my actual scumreads lynched. Yet, the two you picked are actually posting.
  33. Forum:Mafia Bug Archive

    Thread:Probe is mispelled

    Thread Author:ccantman

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    10
    Views
    4,102

    ►►Re: Probe is mispelled◄◄

    Acorns. Did someone promise Acorns for a shit post?
  34. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Oh no, his scum hunting tactics dont align with me, sadface, better just ignore.

    Ive already posted my reads on you, both prior to iso, iso, and post iso.
    You've failed to answer my questions in numerous posts, brushing them off.
    Im only still talking to you because theres nobody else around, and we might aswell continue to discuss to make it easier for others to read us, and give them something to do when they return.
    Oh semantic again. I have laid out my scumreads and why I have them and why I townread who I townread and who I am willing to lynch. That's more I can say for you. You have a lot of posts, but they don't do anything. That's one of my favorite scum tactics.

    [places Iced on ignore] [not literally as that's against the rules but you get the idea]
  35. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    "Sure, I want them to lynch you, but if they won't I'll go to plan B."

    A democratic member of a bloc wouldve written along the lines of "Sure, I want them to lynch you, but if they don't, its fine, we'll lynch someone else we agree on"

    Not "well then, if you wont die, guess il just employ MY secretive plan b."
    Oh gee, another semantic quib. Plan B is another read we agree on.

    If you don't have an actual reads based discussion to have, we're done here and I'll just ignore you until someone else comes on. I doubt this helps anyone sort me or you.
  36. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    So youre saying that your bloc has no real power, and that if they dont agree with you, you'll do something else? Isnt the point of a bloc to be a democracy?

    I posted your ISO myself, its trash.
    Mine says I distrust most, but have townreads of some. Im only really hating on you and mesk. Yes the Ika post was for a reaction, it went well.
    I love the implicit shade at Whad, Crypt, and yzb by saying they have no power. The four of us, if we could agree, would be a little less than half the game. A bloc is a democracy. If they all agree not to lynch you, I'm likely losing.
  37. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Spamming is more closely aligned to your out-of-date posting, than my current posting. If there was ever a case to be made about spamming, it would have you at its centre.

    Blocs in a game with no confirmable roles is irresponsible, especially given this sites nature of heaving bussing.
    So you're bussing. Good to know.

    Human Nature is irresponsible. Check. I vote with my townreads. Sure, I want them to lynch you, but if they won't I'll go to plan B.

    Everyone knows where I stand on every major issue. Reading my ISO is informative. Yours just says you hate everyone and are going to try and pop a less information lynch and use semantic and pointless attacks rather than talk about reads. Seriously, that ika comparison was shit designed to get me pissed off.
  38. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Alright, fair enough, although I disagree on you not seeing him as stubborn. You have me in a bad mood too, mostly due to your posting style of out-of-date & current information being posted simultaneously, and trying to draw conclusions by combining both.

    I am against a bloc being formed, especially when you are anywhere near it. This is a group game, the decision will not be made by a small force when there is a high concentration of scum.

    Yes the current vote count is chaotic and all over the place, but it can be refined by everyone contributing, not by being directed by a minority.

    Lets start shall we? Of the three candidates you have pooled to be scum, which do you believe is most beneficial to lynch today, and why
    You, pretty obvious from my posts. If you want to keep the post count down, don't spam. You're the most divisive person here.

    Blocks always form. I'm just transparent about it. If town pools, we win since you cannot kill anyone.
  39. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Invisible mode? Really? We'll I'm here for the next few hours.
  40. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Hey Whad, I'm caught up now I think.

    Care to talk?
  41. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    That entire post was for your scumteam theory.
    Not even sure where youre going with townreading crypt. I very obviously said that you were townreading crypt
    "You agree with a lot of crypts posts about whad and yzb, but then you dont put either of them in the group?" - Implying Whad and YZB, not crypt.
    I agree with Crypts posts. I don't agree they are scum. I agree that Crypt is correct in theory though and certain things aren't good. I just think Whad and YZB are town and wrong. i.e. Village idiots.
  42. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    You and Ika might not get along, but its amazing how similar the two of you are. Stubborn v Stubborn, not surprising in the least. Guess you and I are going to have the same relationship.
    Are you a cheater who ruins games because he cannot get players sitebanned? Ok, no. Then shut up and don't dare compare me to that. ika isn't stubborn. He's a game ruiner. You're stubborn and you have me in a bad mood.
  43. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    Titus (1 [L-5]):
    Iced_Monopoly
    Cryptonic (3 [L-3]):
    yzb25, SuperJack, Whad
    Mesk514 (2 [L-4]):
    Titus, Cryptonic
    Whad (1 [L-5]):
    Orpz
    This VC doesn't really give with my reads. Hmm... that is unless Superjack is town too and scum are just lurking hoping we lynch Cryptonic because threat...
  44. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    lol double post. Sorry :3
    I'm going to need vodka. Your reads are shit. When you get on, we should talk. You and Crypt need to get together. Kiss and make up. Then, you me Whad and Crypt determine this lynch.
  45. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    I want everyones thoughts on Titus' case against mesk, and her other interactions as well, especially from those that were previously reading her town.
    Case against Mesk? The only thing that could be interpreted as a case against Mesk is the fact Mesk tried to argue they had no serious reads. Something you pushed on it too. Seems like you want your cake and to eat it too.
  46. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Oooo wow, such contribution!

    You spent 50% of your posts doing nothing but shitposting. The posts that arent shitposting are nothing but fencesitting "OOOO I REALLY WANNA VOTE YOU BUT I DONT", or theyre just spent defending yourself. defending yourself from the god damn start post you made, not even anything recent. Where the fuck is the scum hunting, or actively trying to read players outside of the group that are approaching you or reading you. stop being so damn reactive and start contributing on your own terms;
    Ok, I get the feeling Iced is just randomly shitting on everyone and seeing who he can get away with. That doesn't help anyone. Probably going to vote him unless something changes.
  47. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Gyrlander View Post
    "My town reads are these guys that have the same thoughts as me, if you don't agree with me, well, prepare your booty!"
    Glad someone else sees it. Where's your vote? Not on Iced.
  48. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    It appears that you like to think of yourself as being at the center of the universe. I mean, you comment that the biggest thing the thread wants to see is your reads list, which isnt true, Only I was particularly vocal about hearing from you. As you can see, the votes are very split right now, which indicates everyone is waiting to hear from different members in relation to questions theyre posing, there really is no consensus right now on who the biggest/most important person is to hear from.

    Also, I would like you to expand on your reads/scum grouping.

    Your case on me is based on my first half of the day, where I was in discussion with Whad. You appear to have completely overlooked (intentionally?) all my posts from today.
    Your case on Gyr, best I can get from what youve posted is just commenting that you like other peoples posts on Gyr.
    Your case on mesk is still based on your worthless arguement from D1, plus the fact she hasnt started posting seriously yet (this part I do agree with).

    How do the three of us fit together?
    Why does nobody else fit together with us?
    You agree with a lot of crypts posts about whad and yzb, but then you dont put either of them in the group?

    All of this reads as a lazy grouping. Maintaining your shit reads, plus reactively adding in others, or just chucking easy targets for the hell of filling out your list. I maintain my vote on you for today, and with your expanding interactions with others in this past hour, going into d2 with your head on a pike is definitely beneficial for us.
    LMAO, calls cases weak... after just realizing they are me reading the thread and commenting as I go. Ignores my scumteam theory and pretends I don't townread Crypt as of now. LOL.
  49. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    At this point, im scum reading almost everyone in the game.

    The only people im Town reading are YZB, for having very similar thought processes to my own, and Crypt, for being reasonably close to my thoughts, and for being targeted for absurd reasoning.

    Whad has been responding reasonably well to my posts against him, although his recent reads list attracted a reasonable amount of criticism from player I T read. Willing to lump him in the null basket as of now.

    MZ doesnt even exist.

    Mesk, Gyr, Orpz, and SJ are all shitposting or just avoiding contributing at all, and are coming across as pretty scummy. Orpz and SJ I expect more from than the other two, which is more troubling than anything that theyre not contributing meaningfully.

    Titus is my biggest scum read (see my ISO), so im moving my vote here.
    -vote Titus
    This seems like buddying. I don't like the lack of opinion on Whad here. He also seems focused on being Mr. No Fun Man.
  50. Forum:Archived S-FMs

    Thread:S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)

    Thread Author:Unknown1234

    Post Author:Titus

    Replies
    619
    Views
    63,976

    ►►Re: S-FM 222: Black Flag Nightless (2.0)◄◄

    Quote Originally Posted by Iced_Monopoly View Post
    Agreed, lynching a null/inactive is useless to us today.
    Then why did your vote wind up on me before I woke up? That seems off Iced.
Results 1 to 50 of 2000
Page 1 of 40 1 2 3 4