Originally Posted by
SCP
This is flawed logic in a lot of ways, and indicative of very little life experience; considering you're more or less arguing with a slippery-slope fallacy.
What's the point of a law if it's not to be used?
The whole premise of the law is to incite a type of self-censorship, and to intimidate those via force to use said pronouns.
Answer me this: What's the point of said law, if it's not intended to be used eventually?
Sure no one may have been arrested over it yet, but if the whole point is it's not meant to be used to arrest anyone anyway, then it shouldn't exist in the first place.
An example demonstrating my point is 'The Patriot Act'.
No one was against the idea initially because they didn't think it would actually be used against those domestically; however after it existed for some time, no one was arrested under it, and people forgot that it was something passed relatively recently, that they resigned it as being a new reality.
The whole point I'm making here is that humans are very susceptible to normalization of new horrific realities, given enough exposure, repetition, and conditioning.
Hence what underlines the whole concept of the 'Stockholm Syndrome'.
Because there literally is an organized effort to shame europeans out of a culture, and heritage.
See the statues of famous Europeans being torn down, the revision of history, and current guilt-complex being thrusted unto current-day "white" people, shaming them for "colonizing" and "slavery" that they had no part or benefit from in current day.
Even the concept of "white privilege" is indicative of this very fact, that "white" people are being shamed for a contrived 'original sin' to otherwise erode cohesion, and promote race-mixing agendas.
I'm curious (((shill))), how many shekels were you paid for this post?
Oh it's "your" country now?
It's ironic and hypocritical that you take this stance.
You seem to imply disdain those that claim ownership of something, yet do the same yourself.
Furthermore; stop acting like such a victim, and misrepresenting the state of affairs in the grand scheme of things.
Objectively speaking: Canada is considered (as a whole) a very leftist country, with laws pertaining to taxation, gun control, social issues, etc...
You know this just as well as anyone else, but you're attempting to gaslight, and make a mountain over a mole-hole because you KNOW you don't have a leg to stand on to make such a haphazard argument.
With all due respect, you're a disgrace; you claim to morally grand-stand about "muh objectivity" or "muh critical thinking skills" yet you then betray your emotional stake, and confirmation bias by the hostile connotations therein.
The cognitive dissonance is so real within your post, if only you took a second to re-read the nonsense you're spewing, you would see you contradict yourself in the very same paragraph.
I could continue to list the rife hypocrisies within your crude attempt at a point, however I believe I've already made it rather clear how you come off as a triggered, bleeding-heart leftist; as it's already rather apparent without my comments detailing such.
./thread
Reply With Quote
