Search:

[QUOTE=secondpassing;867213]I'm saying Ganelon's vote system is town sided.

And no, I haven't. Hopefully it worked out and people liked playing with the condorcet voting system.[/QUOTE]

i've a few post rants on why things like hammering and majority lynch should be considered "scum sided", as opposed to "not town sided", but mag and aamirus are going to kill me if I derail it.

to be more on topic:

mag, maybe this will suit your purpose? use condorcet to give vote power, and then use a concurrent other vote system like plurality to actually dish out lynch votes?

Originally Posted by secondpassing

I'm saying Ganelon's vote system is town sided.

And no, I haven't. Hopefully it worked out and people liked playing with the condorcet voting system.

i've a few post rants on why things like hammering and majority lynch should be considered "scum sided", as opposed to "not town sided", but mag and aamirus are going to kill me if I derail it.

to be more on topic:

mag, maybe this will suit your purpose? use condorcet to give vote power, and then use a concurrent other vote system like plurality to actually dish out lynch votes?

[QUOTE=secondpassing;866725]But in order to be pushing a scum agenda, evils will need to do inherently bad things.
I think the game with this sort of voting will not have things like:
fast hammers
scum-lead turbo lynches
scum-lead lynchings of town leaders who are town

It also reduces the amount of cooperation needed for town to lynch in an order, as one person will continue holding the vote power

__

On the plus side it might reduce lurking.[/QUOTE]

I'm reading this as the current vote system is scum sided.

I don't think yzb, or secondpassing has played a condorcet/ranked vote system game huh.

Originally Posted by secondpassing

But in order to be pushing a scum agenda, evils will need to do inherently bad things.
I think the game with this sort of voting will not have things like:
fast hammers
scum-lead turbo lynches
scum-lead lynchings of town leaders who are town

It also reduces the amount of cooperation needed for town to lynch in an order, as one person will continue holding the vote power

__

On the plus side it might reduce lurking.

I'm reading this as the current vote system is scum sided.

I don't think yzb, or secondpassing has played a condorcet/ranked vote system game huh.

[QUOTE=aamirus;866707]I don't think that would be weighted against evils at all. Really this idea just rewards the most town-read players and gives them the ability to do whatever they want. I like that idea quite a bit because the highest townreads are usually those putting in the most effort. It feels proportionally fair.[/QUOTE]

also this 100%. evils aren't punished. the scum read people are.

Originally Posted by aamirus

I don't think that would be weighted against evils at all. Really this idea just rewards the most town-read players and gives them the ability to do whatever they want. I like that idea quite a bit because the highest townreads are usually those putting in the most effort. It feels proportionally fair.

also this 100%. evils aren't punished. the scum read people are.

I love the idea conceptually! The only problem with mixing in ranking is that you run into this mathematical feedback loop where the people that are towniest might be considered that way because the 'scummiest' people are voting them there.

I love the idea conceptually! The only problem with mixing in ranking is that you run into this mathematical feedback loop where the people that are towniest might be considered that way because the 'scummiest' people are voting them there.