January 29th, 2021, 12:38 PM
[QUOTE=S-FM Magoroth;918062]Don't talk to me like I'm dead.[/QUOTE]
Damn I wonder who’s been neg repping you
Originally Posted by
S-FM Magoroth
Don't talk to me like I'm dead.
Damn I wonder who’s been neg repping you
January 22nd, 2021, 04:34 PM
[QUOTE=Grayswandir;917100]people already did that, there was a huge conspiracy when trump got elected that he got helped by Russia in the election, twitter won’t mind
regardless, since when does twitter get to decide whats false and whats not?
and, i dont think its ‘verifiably false’ that trump won the election, its not clear to me what happened exactly. there were some inconsistencies that i didn’t really understand, and while im not jumping the gun and saying he 100% won and there was widespread fraud, i dont think its fair to qualify the statement that he lost it as verifiable either[/QUOTE]
Whether you think there was voting fraud or not, it’s objectively true that congress counted the electoral college votes and determined that Biden was the winner.
Originally Posted by
Grayswandir
people already did that, there was a huge conspiracy when trump got elected that he got helped by Russia in the election, twitter won’t mind
regardless, since when does twitter get to decide whats false and whats not?
and, i dont think its ‘verifiably false’ that trump won the election, its not clear to me what happened exactly. there were some inconsistencies that i didn’t really understand, and while im not jumping the gun and saying he 100% won and there was widespread fraud, i dont think its fair to qualify the statement that he lost it as verifiable either
Whether you think there was voting fraud or not, it’s objectively true that congress counted the electoral college votes and determined that Biden was the winner.
January 22nd, 2021, 02:09 PM
[QUOTE=Grayswandir;917035]Not that it matters where you or I got it from, what matters is that Twitter is selective about what it deems violent rhetoric and what it doesn’t, and the theme seems to be, if you attack Israel, or white people, especially white MEN, that’s not violent :P but if you think the election was unfair, and you have a speech on how it was stolen (did any of you read the full transcript of his speech or watch it? I did recently, and it wasn’t anywhere near as bad as ppl made it out to be, it’s your typical MAGA Trump speech, like literally; ironically I read it on Al-Jazeera, which if I’m not mistaken is an islamic fundamentalist news network, funny how they can be more objective than CNN, I wonder what that says about CNN and other news networks like them)[/QUOTE]
well i don't really go on twitter but I thought the "censoring" was mainly posts that were verifiably false like "Trump won the 2020 election".
I think you would prove your point if you tried tweeting "Trump won the 2020 election" and "Hillary won the 2016 election", and see if twitter flags/censors both posts or not.
Originally Posted by
Grayswandir
Not that it matters where you or I got it from, what matters is that Twitter is selective about what it deems violent rhetoric and what it doesn’t, and the theme seems to be, if you attack Israel, or white people, especially white MEN, that’s not violent :P but if you think the election was unfair, and you have a speech on how it was stolen (did any of you read the full transcript of his speech or watch it? I did recently, and it wasn’t anywhere near as bad as ppl made it out to be, it’s your typical MAGA Trump speech, like literally; ironically I read it on Al-Jazeera, which if I’m not mistaken is an islamic fundamentalist news network, funny how they can be more objective than CNN, I wonder what that says about CNN and other news networks like them)
well i don't really go on twitter but I thought the "censoring" was mainly posts that were verifiably false like "Trump won the 2020 election".
I think you would prove your point if you tried tweeting "Trump won the 2020 election" and "Hillary won the 2016 election", and see if twitter flags/censors both posts or not.