Search:

[QUOTE=Helz;944870]I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.[/QUOTE]

I would think a moral leader would be one who protected a persons liberties/freedoms vs sacrificing themselves for 'safety'.

Originally Posted by Helz

I think we should think whatever makes us think that we are right. If you think about it thought processes like these need to be controlled to protect society and prevent the collateral expansion of chaos that naturally comes from such concepts. The loss of free thought is a minor sacrifice when compared to the protection gained by society through controlling the radical thought processes created by a free society. At the end of the day any moral leader must acknowledge the only true protection a society can offer to the individual is to remove their freedom before they destroy the freedom of other individuals and that the acceptance of oppression is the true logical conclusion of protecting freedom.

I would think a moral leader would be one who protected a persons liberties/freedoms vs sacrificing themselves for 'safety'.

how can i not be sure ur not a globalist trying to blame the deep state.

i bet ur the one putting chemicals in the water turning frogs gay

how can i not be sure ur not a globalist trying to blame the deep state.

i bet ur the one putting chemicals in the water turning frogs gay

So audit results were that there was a lot of fraud/discrepencies, but not enough to swing the state. Am i getting it right, im way too lazy to actually look into this.

Even if audit result told us the state should have went to Trump, it wouldn't change anything.

So audit results were that there was a lot of fraud/discrepencies, but not enough to swing the state. Am i getting it right, im way too lazy to actually look into this.

Even if audit result told us the state should have went to Trump, it wouldn't change anything.