Search:

[QUOTE=OzyWho;956687]Flour in UK has to be fortified, it means "by statute any white wheat flour that is milled in the UK has to have calcium carbonate, iron, thiamine/Vitamin B1 and Nicotinic acid added." (Outdated list I think)
Calcium carbonate = chalk.

I feel like when I googled it, all first page was a hit. Though most of them talked about fortification as a whole and not chalk specifically.

That reddit post talks about how that statute (somehow different from law?) is based on outdated beliefs. However, that reddit post itself is slightly outdated, as for example it doesn't include this:
"UK's move to fortify flour with folic acid to help prevent birth defects hailed. The UK government's decision to finally make it mandatory to add folic acid to non-wholemeal wheat flour to help prevent life-threatening spinal conditions in babies is being hailed by all concerned." - 2021
(Though not sure if it doesn't talk about different kinds of flour?)

Ftr, here's the link to the current law of it:
[url]https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/141[/url]
(Click "latest available" if it's not on by default)
Essential ingredients still include CaCO3.[/QUOTE]

so much justification
[vote]OzyWho[/vote]

Originally Posted by OzyWho

Flour in UK has to be fortified, it means "by statute any white wheat flour that is milled in the UK has to have calcium carbonate, iron, thiamine/Vitamin B1 and Nicotinic acid added." (Outdated list I think)
Calcium carbonate = chalk.

I feel like when I googled it, all first page was a hit. Though most of them talked about fortification as a whole and not chalk specifically.

That reddit post talks about how that statute (somehow different from law?) is based on outdated beliefs. However, that reddit post itself is slightly outdated, as for example it doesn't include this:
"UK's move to fortify flour with folic acid to help prevent birth defects hailed. The UK government's decision to finally make it mandatory to add folic acid to non-wholemeal wheat flour to help prevent life-threatening spinal conditions in babies is being hailed by all concerned." - 2021
(Though not sure if it doesn't talk about different kinds of flour?)

Ftr, here's the link to the current law of it:
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1998/141
(Click "latest available" if it's not on by default)
Essential ingredients still include CaCO3.

so much justification

-vote OzyWho

[QUOTE=Stealthbomber16;956303]You’re not new anymore. Stop playing this card.[/QUOTE]
+1
[QUOTE=Stealthbomber16;956305]You had a very strong scum game last game and you were voted MVP in a game offsite. [MENTION=45969]NotPaopan[/MENTION]

I know you’re a better player than what you’re letting on in this thread. [vote]NotPaopan[/vote][/QUOTE]

Could be an intentionally underperforming scum, but he hasn't really been that bad thus far, so I wouldn't be too harsh, [I]at least for now.[/I]

Also, I should probably move my vote away from RVS o.O realized I forgot to do that! [vote]pqrnhack[/vote]
Could be scum based on tone, and his flip would be informative, so I'm placing my vote there until something more interesting comes up.

Originally Posted by Stealthbomber16

You’re not new anymore. Stop playing this card.

+1

Originally Posted by Stealthbomber16

You had a very strong scum game last game and you were voted MVP in a game offsite. @NotPaopan

I know you’re a better player than what you’re letting on in this thread.

-vote NotPaopan

Could be an intentionally underperforming scum, but he hasn't really been that bad thus far, so I wouldn't be too harsh, at least for now.

Also, I should probably move my vote away from RVS o.O realized I forgot to do that!

-vote pqrnhack

Could be scum based on tone, and his flip would be informative, so I'm placing my vote there until something more interesting comes up.

[QUOTE=Gikkle;956278]Meta wise this doesn’t really feel like mafia PQRn. He could be neutral like I said (tonally he feels different from both his town games and his scum games) but I don’t really see the need to go after the 3p right now.[/QUOTE]

[MENTION=34329]Frinckles[/MENTION] I guess I shouldn't put quotes when I'm paraphrasing, but I was referring to this post ^

Originally Posted by Gikkle

Meta wise this doesn’t really feel like mafia PQRn. He could be neutral like I said (tonally he feels different from both his town games and his scum games) but I don’t really see the need to go after the 3p right now.

@Frinckles I guess I shouldn't put quotes when I'm paraphrasing, but I was referring to this post ^

I am falling asleep on my keyboard for some reason, so I might be posting things that make little sense and should probably stop lol. Here's a last one

[QUOTE=BradLand;956025][B]Seanzie[/B] appears to be into a tunnel upon page 1-2. Probably town.

[B]Mesk's[/B] opening is quite bad...

#92 is a good post by [B]Gikkle[/B] in terms of a nuanced read.

[B]Dr.Zeus[/B] confidence level on page 3 gives town vibes.

#168 and #169 feels towny from [B]Loldebite[/B] for me. First for the "I feel awful after my last game" which...same and the second post being "I don't care if Paopan is ML'd it's best for town anyways" because...I've said the same about others...

#198 I think the "2 are voting me already, let's keep them coming!" comment had way more joy and confidence in it than I would imagine a mafia would have.
The rest of the post felt more like policy speaking when coming to voting certain players and preference to how to play. Definitely more "food for discussion" which could be a distraction to give town, but he's also talking about not instantly voting a certain player without reason so not feeling like a mafia member avoiding being boxed in.
[B]Townleaning porn man.[/B]

[B]Hollowkatt and Seanzie[/B] planning out the ITA shots feels towny, also Hollowkatt's "Glad Seanzie is obvs towning himself so I don't have to worry about him" post feels real.

Also [B]Hollowkatt[/B] has had about 2 or 3 takes on why Martin could be town and I'm inclined to take those and put Martin into my townlist.
Final thing being HollowKatt's "Don't expect me to do much Day 1 because I'm busy" then proceeding to do stuff Day 1 and contributes a ton is also a very good look because I feel like if a town player gains momentum they start rattling off everything post by post.[/QUOTE]

Generally makes sense when it comes to the townreads. Can you elaborate on Mesk's opening, though? Also, I have to object about PQ's joy and confidence being towny. He is always like this, as far as I know.

I am falling asleep on my keyboard for some reason, so I might be posting things that make little sense and should probably stop lol. Here's a last one

Originally Posted by BradLand

Seanzie appears to be into a tunnel upon page 1-2. Probably town.

Mesk's opening is quite bad...

#92 is a good post by Gikkle in terms of a nuanced read.

Dr.Zeus confidence level on page 3 gives town vibes.

#168 and #169 feels towny from Loldebite for me. First for the "I feel awful after my last game" which...same and the second post being "I don't care if Paopan is ML'd it's best for town anyways" because...I've said the same about others...

#198 I think the "2 are voting me already, let's keep them coming!" comment had way more joy and confidence in it than I would imagine a mafia would have.
The rest of the post felt more like policy speaking when coming to voting certain players and preference to how to play. Definitely more "food for discussion" which could be a distraction to give town, but he's also talking about not instantly voting a certain player without reason so not feeling like a mafia member avoiding being boxed in.
Townleaning porn man.

Hollowkatt and Seanzie planning out the ITA shots feels towny, also Hollowkatt's "Glad Seanzie is obvs towning himself so I don't have to worry about him" post feels real.

Also Hollowkatt has had about 2 or 3 takes on why Martin could be town and I'm inclined to take those and put Martin into my townlist.
Final thing being HollowKatt's "Don't expect me to do much Day 1 because I'm busy" then proceeding to do stuff Day 1 and contributes a ton is also a very good look because I feel like if a town player gains momentum they start rattling off everything post by post.

Generally makes sense when it comes to the townreads. Can you elaborate on Mesk's opening, though? Also, I have to object about PQ's joy and confidence being towny. He is always like this, as far as I know.

[QUOTE=Takumi Fujiwara;955803]Trying to remove yourself from the PoE in your first post would be noteworthy. Also, you used smiley faces at least three different times and I take smiley faces very seriously.[/QUOTE]

I think this is town Frinckles. It's very plausible that he's actually analyzing smileys :D :) :weed:

Originally Posted by Takumi Fujiwara

Trying to remove yourself from the PoE in your first post would be noteworthy. Also, you used smiley faces at least three different times and I take smiley faces very seriously.

I think this is town Frinckles. It's very plausible that he's actually analyzing smileys

[QUOTE=Takumi Fujiwara;956293]Speaking of which, I don't remember HollowKatt being such a pointed player. Maybe I just remember the cute bear picture while he nonchalantly wolfed to a W. Maybe different metas? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'm also wondering if Gikkle is just scum playing it cool to shake off push attempts. Kind of seems that way to me. Smart thing to jokingly suggest his slot being neutral to make players second guess his alignment and look elsewhere.[/QUOTE]

Assuming a scum!PQ, Gikkle would indeed be suspicious for this: it would make sense for a scummate to defend a scummate by saying "at worst he's neutral and not a threat for now", making people dismiss PQ as a suspect without needing to straight up say he is town.

I said "indeed", but when I reread your post, I feel like you're talking about Gikkle-HK. If that is correct, I'm not sure where you're coming from.

Originally Posted by Takumi Fujiwara

Speaking of which, I don't remember HollowKatt being such a pointed player. Maybe I just remember the cute bear picture while he nonchalantly wolfed to a W. Maybe different metas? ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I'm also wondering if Gikkle is just scum playing it cool to shake off push attempts. Kind of seems that way to me. Smart thing to jokingly suggest his slot being neutral to make players second guess his alignment and look elsewhere.

Assuming a scum!PQ, Gikkle would indeed be suspicious for this: it would make sense for a scummate to defend a scummate by saying "at worst he's neutral and not a threat for now", making people dismiss PQ as a suspect without needing to straight up say he is town.

I said "indeed", but when I reread your post, I feel like you're talking about Gikkle-HK. If that is correct, I'm not sure where you're coming from.

[QUOTE=NotPaopan;955853][SPOILER=long list of reads][B][SIZE=3][COLOR="#FFFFFF"]Good day everyone! It is I, [COLOR="#FF0000"]Paopan [/COLOR]back from the dead[/COLOR][/SIZE][/B]
[COLOR="#FFFFFF"]~9 hours has already passed and I kinda like how the thread revolves around me for a bit. [/COLOR]
[COLOR="#00FFFF"]So what do we have here. Ohhh nice, I'm the top voted player again. Juicy~ To be honest I want to take the first ITA shot. My gambling sense is tinkling because of this. This should be included in every FM game. [/COLOR]
[COLOR="#FF0000"]It's read list time!! Feel free to quote your respective slot and we'll go back to back from there on. ISO links are broken so faaaaaaaaaaak this is gonna be harsh[/COLOR]

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]Marshmallow Marshalt[/COLOR]
Hello Marshmallow, how dare you notice deathworlds vote whilst ignore mine???
Are you creating some distance between us. I mean that's okay if you are scum!MM
But I know how to read you so it's only a matter of time

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]MartinGG99[/COLOR]
Hello. This is our first time playing with each other I believe (you are just an host before)
Instead of parrying other players' opinions. Might be your playstyle I don't know yet.
But tell me what do you personally think about PQ and Gikkle??

[COLOR="#FFA500"]StealthBomber16[/COLOR]
Sup fellow scum. Where u at? Talk to us later okay??
If you lie low for more than 24h I will vote heavily scum read you okay??

[COLOR="#FFA500"]Mesk514[/COLOR]
Locking someone as town 5h after the game has passed. Pretty sus??? brooo.

[COLOR="#FFA500"]loldebite [/COLOR]
Be wary of this slot. This slot is going to vote me up later on and will use his/her "personal beef" with me as an excuse to hide the real motives.

Also, -1 for blatant lies about me spamming, everyone here can refer to the archived games involving me and I will guarantee you I am not in any of the top 5 posters of all those games.

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]Deathworlds[/COLOR]
Oh you voted me. It's okay, we need to know each other first.
Sup man. Ur old player but we new to each other lah?
NGL but I like your MM vote also.
Guess we both got fooled by scum!MM in the past???

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]Boba Fett[/COLOR]
Sup. I have seen any substance from you yet.
Since this is the first time you are playing on this site (I'm currently assuming you aren't anon)
Are you new or experienced in FM? Just sooo we can place our expectations from you ya know...

[COLOR="#FF8C00"]Gikkle [/COLOR]
Your first post of the day is to vote me without explanation.
Then your follow-up quote is to say hollowkatt is sus?
Doesn't make any sense coming from you (as a strong player I believe)
Currently, that's a pretty weak vote even in an RVS stage

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]Hollowkatt [/COLOR]
Heya. Nice meeting you! Are you new to FM or only just new to this site?
Give this lamb some info about your experience on this game

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]DoctorZeus [/COLOR]
Hey! I think you are not new to FM. But welcome to the site.
What do you think of me, Paopan?

[COLOR="#00FF00"]Takumi Fujiwara[/COLOR]
YOU ARE DRIVING AN AE86. CONFIRMED TOWN!!

[COLOR="#FF8C00"]PQRnHack[/COLOR]
Just meh. When I was town and you are scum (with MM)
On day 1, you buddied with me but even though I knew it was obvious.
I like having friends on day 1, but I also hate that's one of the reasons why we lost as a town on day 2.
Using that as a reference, right now, I am scum-leaning you but I want you to change my mind. We still have 40h or so~

[COLOR="#FFFF00"]Seanzie[/COLOR]
I like and hate on how he is trying to establish himself as town leader. (Must be me!!)
In any case, his clash with PQ and ITA idea deserves a +1 but I'll hold it for now
Although this is my first time playing with Seanzie, so if he's a strong player, it's pretty good to have him as town.

[COLOR="#FF0000"][B]Now that I have placed my trap cards. I will end my turn[/B][/COLOR][/SPOILER][/QUOTE]

A lot of face value reads (activity reads, not liking Mesk randomly "clearing" someone early on when it's probably a joke, criticizing Gikkle for doing RVS stuff during RVS), Seanzie read that makes sense, and PQ suspicion that looks like correct paranoia - I like what I'm seeing here. It is at least much more coherent than in Paopan's last scum game I've seen, and is generally not agenda-y.

Originally Posted by NotPaopan

Spoiler : long list of reads :

Good day everyone! It is I, Paopan back from the dead
~9 hours has already passed and I kinda like how the thread revolves around me for a bit.
So what do we have here. Ohhh nice, I'm the top voted player again. Juicy~ To be honest I want to take the first ITA shot. My gambling sense is tinkling because of this. This should be included in every FM game.
It's read list time!! Feel free to quote your respective slot and we'll go back to back from there on. ISO links are broken so faaaaaaaaaaak this is gonna be harsh

Marshmallow Marshalt
Hello Marshmallow, how dare you notice deathworlds vote whilst ignore mine???
Are you creating some distance between us. I mean that's okay if you are scum!MM
But I know how to read you so it's only a matter of time

MartinGG99
Hello. This is our first time playing with each other I believe (you are just an host before)
Instead of parrying other players' opinions. Might be your playstyle I don't know yet.
But tell me what do you personally think about PQ and Gikkle??

StealthBomber16
Sup fellow scum. Where u at? Talk to us later okay??
If you lie low for more than 24h I will vote heavily scum read you okay??

Mesk514
Locking someone as town 5h after the game has passed. Pretty sus??? brooo.

loldebite
Be wary of this slot. This slot is going to vote me up later on and will use his/her "personal beef" with me as an excuse to hide the real motives.

Also, -1 for blatant lies about me spamming, everyone here can refer to the archived games involving me and I will guarantee you I am not in any of the top 5 posters of all those games.

Deathworlds
Oh you voted me. It's okay, we need to know each other first.
Sup man. Ur old player but we new to each other lah?
NGL but I like your MM vote also.
Guess we both got fooled by scum!MM in the past???

Boba Fett
Sup. I have seen any substance from you yet.
Since this is the first time you are playing on this site (I'm currently assuming you aren't anon)
Are you new or experienced in FM? Just sooo we can place our expectations from you ya know...

Gikkle
Your first post of the day is to vote me without explanation.
Then your follow-up quote is to say hollowkatt is sus?
Doesn't make any sense coming from you (as a strong player I believe)
Currently, that's a pretty weak vote even in an RVS stage

Hollowkatt
Heya. Nice meeting you! Are you new to FM or only just new to this site?
Give this lamb some info about your experience on this game

DoctorZeus
Hey! I think you are not new to FM. But welcome to the site.
What do you think of me, Paopan?

Takumi Fujiwara
YOU ARE DRIVING AN AE86. CONFIRMED TOWN!!

PQRnHack
Just meh. When I was town and you are scum (with MM)
On day 1, you buddied with me but even though I knew it was obvious.
I like having friends on day 1, but I also hate that's one of the reasons why we lost as a town on day 2.
Using that as a reference, right now, I am scum-leaning you but I want you to change my mind. We still have 40h or so~

Seanzie
I like and hate on how he is trying to establish himself as town leader. (Must be me!!)
In any case, his clash with PQ and ITA idea deserves a +1 but I'll hold it for now
Although this is my first time playing with Seanzie, so if he's a strong player, it's pretty good to have him as town.

Now that I have placed my trap cards. I will end my turn

A lot of face value reads (activity reads, not liking Mesk randomly "clearing" someone early on when it's probably a joke, criticizing Gikkle for doing RVS stuff during RVS), Seanzie read that makes sense, and PQ suspicion that looks like correct paranoia - I like what I'm seeing here. It is at least much more coherent than in Paopan's last scum game I've seen, and is generally not agenda-y.

[QUOTE=DoctorZeus;955742]I dont like how your defence of him was done by implying seanzie is wolf

Wolfy to me.

If I'm right on these two I'll look forward to my mvp card[/QUOTE]

Not too sure how Frinckles aka japanese guy's obvious joke about Seanzie powerwolfing could be interpreted as a serious accusation or as a defense of PQ. That being said, Zeus doesn't look too bad. He at least looks like he is trying to solve, which is good. It's probably best to remain cautious on the matter, though, since the game is still young.

Originally Posted by DoctorZeus

I dont like how your defence of him was done by implying seanzie is wolf

Wolfy to me.

If I'm right on these two I'll look forward to my mvp card

Not too sure how Frinckles aka japanese guy's obvious joke about Seanzie powerwolfing could be interpreted as a serious accusation or as a defense of PQ. That being said, Zeus doesn't look too bad. He at least looks like he is trying to solve, which is good. It's probably best to remain cautious on the matter, though, since the game is still young.

/exist

[QUOTE=Seanzie;955963]Okay, at this point, I am going to go to bed soon, but haven't heard any strong objections or requests for changes to the plan I proposed. In order to give people time to confirm they understand the plan, I'm going to lay it out now.

[SIZE=6]Since I did not hear any objections, I'm going to insist we go with the following ITA plan:[/SIZE]

We will likely have enough ITAs to kill two extra people today. Here is how I propose we do it. Note that one facet of this plan is that while I will play some part in facilitating the plan, the plan is specifically designed to not have me have any extra power, so even if you don't townread me, you can trust the plan.

[SIZE=5]There will be two "artificial deadlines" added in addition to the EoD deadline. One will be at [B]11 pm EST on 1/24[/B] (when ITAs become available), and one will be at [B]7am EST on 1/24[/B] (4 hours before EoD). Whomever is the top wagon at these artificial EoDs will very likely be killed, so please take this seriously!![/SIZE]

At the first EoD, I will screenshot and post the current VC. If there is a tie, I will figure out who reached the "winning" number of votes first, so there is a unique person targeted. At that point I will ask people in the thread to ITA that person until they die. Hopefully they will die quickly so we can see their flip and re-evaluate before the second artificial EoD. The second artificial EoD will happen in the same way.

[SIZE=7]Any ITAs that do NOT respect the votecount of the first or second artificial deadline will be considered a scum claim. Do NOT shoot outside the two names we agree on as a group.[/SIZE]

[SIZE=5]If you have read this plan and agree, please respond to this saying you agree. If you have questions, please ask well before the first artificial deadline.[/SIZE]

If anyone knows they'll be available at 7am EST on 11/24 can you volunteer to facilitate the second artificial deadline (figure out who is the vote, and get anyone who hasn't used their ITA yet to shoot that person)? I can try to be up then, but that is very early for me, so if someone else can agree to do it, that would be much better for me.

Everyone else, please respond to this to agree to the plan.




[SPOILER=tags] [MENTION=46070]Marshmallow Marshalt[/MENTION] [MENTION=21928]MartinGG99[/MENTION] [MENTION=15807]Stealthbomber16[/MENTION] [MENTION=28193]Mesk514[/MENTION] [MENTION=27307]Loldebite[/MENTION] [MENTION=9527]deathworlds[/MENTION] [MENTION=46057]Boba Fett[/MENTION] [MENTION=45931]Gikkle[/MENTION] [MENTION=45969]NotPaopan[/MENTION] [MENTION=46060]hollowkatt[/MENTION] [MENTION=46062]DoctorZeus[/MENTION] [MENTION=46065]BradLand[/MENTION] [MENTION=46071]Takumi Fujiwara[/MENTION] [MENTION=12998]PQRnHack[/MENTION]
[/SPOILER][/QUOTE]
Hmm, makes sense, at least for the start of the game, when town has a clear majority and when it's useful to analyze people's reactions to the consensus. When scum get closer to parity, though, this is going to be a little more touchy. We'll see when we get there, though. For now, I'm in.

Oh and although I don't have a great knowledge of Seanzie's meta, this is much more similar to town!Seanzie than to scum!Seanzie. Meta-read based on... 2 games, 1 town 1 scum, so take it with a pinch of salt lol. Making a plan isn't inherently towny, but it's not scummy either, the plan makes sense, and my weak metaread makes him sort of trust Seanzie here.
[QUOTE=PQRnHack;955968]This is great Sean, the scum are probably trembling in a corner right now :D LETS GO TEAM!!!![/QUOTE]

I don't have a high level of confidence in reading PQ, considering I death tunnelled him in a TvT situation last game I played with him, but I'd at least like to have other people's thoughts on this post, because it looks fake to me. It's not like Seanzie's plan is actually solving anything, it just makes the shots follow the will of the People instead of following individuals' impulses. Scum trembling in a corner?
[IMG]https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NuboJNti6do/UU98vCcjRdI/AAAAAAAABkg/egF677sjJkw/s400/I-have-such-doubts.gif[/IMG]

/exist

Originally Posted by Seanzie

Okay, at this point, I am going to go to bed soon, but haven't heard any strong objections or requests for changes to the plan I proposed. In order to give people time to confirm they understand the plan, I'm going to lay it out now.

Since I did not hear any objections, I'm going to insist we go with the following ITA plan:

We will likely have enough ITAs to kill two extra people today. Here is how I propose we do it. Note that one facet of this plan is that while I will play some part in facilitating the plan, the plan is specifically designed to not have me have any extra power, so even if you don't townread me, you can trust the plan.

There will be two "artificial deadlines" added in addition to the EoD deadline. One will be at 11 pm EST on 1/24 (when ITAs become available), and one will be at 7am EST on 1/24 (4 hours before EoD). Whomever is the top wagon at these artificial EoDs will very likely be killed, so please take this seriously!!

At the first EoD, I will screenshot and post the current VC. If there is a tie, I will figure out who reached the "winning" number of votes first, so there is a unique person targeted. At that point I will ask people in the thread to ITA that person until they die. Hopefully they will die quickly so we can see their flip and re-evaluate before the second artificial EoD. The second artificial EoD will happen in the same way.

Any ITAs that do NOT respect the votecount of the first or second artificial deadline will be considered a scum claim. Do NOT shoot outside the two names we agree on as a group.

If you have read this plan and agree, please respond to this saying you agree. If you have questions, please ask well before the first artificial deadline.

If anyone knows they'll be available at 7am EST on 11/24 can you volunteer to facilitate the second artificial deadline (figure out who is the vote, and get anyone who hasn't used their ITA yet to shoot that person)? I can try to be up then, but that is very early for me, so if someone else can agree to do it, that would be much better for me.

Everyone else, please respond to this to agree to the plan.

Spoiler : tags :

@Marshmallow Marshalt @MartinGG99 @Stealthbomber16 @Mesk514 @Loldebite @deathworlds @Boba Fett @Gikkle @NotPaopan @hollowkatt @DoctorZeus @BradLand @Takumi Fujiwara @PQRnHack

Hmm, makes sense, at least for the start of the game, when town has a clear majority and when it's useful to analyze people's reactions to the consensus. When scum get closer to parity, though, this is going to be a little more touchy. We'll see when we get there, though. For now, I'm in.

Oh and although I don't have a great knowledge of Seanzie's meta, this is much more similar to town!Seanzie than to scum!Seanzie. Meta-read based on... 2 games, 1 town 1 scum, so take it with a pinch of salt lol. Making a plan isn't inherently towny, but it's not scummy either, the plan makes sense, and my weak metaread makes him sort of trust Seanzie here.

Originally Posted by PQRnHack

This is great Sean, the scum are probably trembling in a corner right now LETS GO TEAM!!!!

I don't have a high level of confidence in reading PQ, considering I death tunnelled him in a TvT situation last game I played with him, but I'd at least like to have other people's thoughts on this post, because it looks fake to me. It's not like Seanzie's plan is actually solving anything, it just makes the shots follow the will of the People instead of following individuals' impulses. Scum trembling in a corner?

[QUOTE=MartinGG99;955700]What's the point in asking me that if...you're asking me exactly that?

I mean, I was in essence wondering why Loldebite brought it up.

Now you're wondering why I was wondering why loldebite brought it up and so brought my own wonderment up into the thread.

.....I will admit I don't think I've written many sentences more prone to confusion than that lol

but point is you're kinda doing question-inception, if that's even a concept[/QUOTE]

:S

Because I wonder what intent brings you to ask that to Loldebite. Because if there's no proper intent, it may or may not be suspicious and just "posting to be there".

Originally Posted by MartinGG99

What's the point in asking me that if...you're asking me exactly that?

I mean, I was in essence wondering why Loldebite brought it up.

Now you're wondering why I was wondering why loldebite brought it up and so brought my own wonderment up into the thread.

.....I will admit I don't think I've written many sentences more prone to confusion than that lol

but point is you're kinda doing question-inception, if that's even a concept

Because I wonder what intent brings you to ask that to Loldebite. Because if there's no proper intent, it may or may not be suspicious and just "posting to be there".

Stop hiding your real intent! We know you are plotting our downfall! We shall choose No!

Stop hiding your real intent! We know you are plotting our downfall! We shall choose No!

[QUOTE=MartinGG99;955698]oh god your avatar is horizontally flipped that's why it was screwing with me so much lol

[SIZE=1]for certain particular legal reasons I must disclose this is only game-unrelated commentary and for all I know the avatar was placed there before alignments were randed and so game discussion shouldn't involve or consider the avatar[/SIZE][/QUOTE]

I couldn't find the original one :(

Originally Posted by MartinGG99

oh god your avatar is horizontally flipped that's why it was screwing with me so much lol

for certain particular legal reasons I must disclose this is only game-unrelated commentary and for all I know the avatar was placed there before alignments were randed and so game discussion shouldn't involve or consider the avatar

I couldn't find the original one

[QUOTE=Gikkle;955691]I'd give seanzie a boring "did something to bring us out of rvs" >rand town read, but i don't really feel like making that commitment, can someone else do it for me[/QUOTE]

I wouldn't. If you're talking about asking for one's meta, that isn't exactly difficult to do and doesn't really advance the gamestate, thus making it easy for scum to do without actually helping town. Of course, it's not scummy either, since it's a fair question that could eventually help him with his personal reads, but I wouldn't give him kudos for it.

Originally Posted by Gikkle

I'd give seanzie a boring "did something to bring us out of rvs" >rand town read, but i don't really feel like making that commitment, can someone else do it for me

I wouldn't. If you're talking about asking for one's meta, that isn't exactly difficult to do and doesn't really advance the gamestate, thus making it easy for scum to do without actually helping town. Of course, it's not scummy either, since it's a fair question that could eventually help him with his personal reads, but I wouldn't give him kudos for it.

[QUOTE=Gikkle;955687]Hollowkatt's entrance is fishy. He has earned my sus.[/QUOTE]
My gut agrees with this, but does your brain have reasons to bring to the table?
[QUOTE=Seanzie;955689]Well this is annoying. I multiquoted and now they seem to be permanently stuck. Any idea how I can get rid of these quotes I multiquoted?[/QUOTE]

Click on the multiquote buttons where it's checked to unmultiquote them.

Originally Posted by Gikkle

Hollowkatt's entrance is fishy. He has earned my sus.

My gut agrees with this, but does your brain have reasons to bring to the table?

Originally Posted by Seanzie

Well this is annoying. I multiquoted and now they seem to be permanently stuck. Any idea how I can get rid of these quotes I multiquoted?

Click on the multiquote buttons where it's checked to unmultiquote them.

[QUOTE=Loldebite;955668]It not particularly important, i simply dislike showing up late because it shows a lack of concern/investment in the game and that's not a message i want to give.[/QUOTE]

Does this mean you disliked every single start of game you played in (except for last one)? :P

Also Martin, why you feel like this was something to bring up?

Originally Posted by Loldebite

It not particularly important, i simply dislike showing up late because it shows a lack of concern/investment in the game and that's not a message i want to give.

Does this mean you disliked every single start of game you played in (except for last one)? :P

Also Martin, why you feel like this was something to bring up?

Greetings. I will be playing under this account instead of my main (Marshmallow Marshall) because of the host's rules about accidental posts in closed threads.

~~

2 votes on me? I'm in danger! [I]chuckles[/I]

[QUOTE=Mesk514;955677]Just woke up, haven't read anything... gotta do some chores like taking out the trash.
[vote]Marshmallow Marshall [/vote]
He'll start to smell if he's not dealt with[/QUOTE]

I have no intent to start a thunderdome with you, considering it likely won't result in much good. Context for everyone: Mesk and I have a love-hate relationship that tends to include more hate than love, so I would like to avoid a tunnel derailing the thread.
[MENTION=15807]Stealthbomber16[/MENTION] so this game is your dream come true, right? A truly American game :D the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon! [vote]Stealthbomber16[/vote]

Greetings. I will be playing under this account instead of my main (Marshmallow Marshall) because of the host's rules about accidental posts in closed threads.

~~

2 votes on me? I'm in danger! chuckles

Originally Posted by Mesk514

Just woke up, haven't read anything... gotta do some chores like taking out the trash.

-vote Marshmallow Marshall

He'll start to smell if he's not dealt with

I have no intent to start a thunderdome with you, considering it likely won't result in much good. Context for everyone: Mesk and I have a love-hate relationship that tends to include more hate than love, so I would like to avoid a tunnel derailing the thread.
@Stealthbomber16 so this game is your dream come true, right? A truly American game the right to bear arms shall not be infringed upon!

-vote Stealthbomber16