November 18th, 2020, 02:07 PM
[QUOTE=Unknown1234;905311]You're on the wrong site dude.[/QUOTE]
We could all find something in common to hate? Like how about shitty wifi? fuck that guy
Originally Posted by
Unknown1234
You're on the wrong site dude.
We could all find something in common to hate? Like how about shitty wifi? fuck that guy
November 13th, 2020, 02:41 PM
[QUOTE=Plotato;902979]> We need to be united under one mega government to make this work efficiently.
Imagine thinking government can micromanage the world when they can't even micromanage shit KEKW[/QUOTE]
Under the rule of a plotato, it might work
Originally Posted by
Plotato
> We need to be united under one mega government to make this work efficiently.
Imagine thinking government can micromanage the world when they can't even micromanage shit KEKW
Under the rule of a plotato, it might work
November 13th, 2020, 07:19 AM
[QUOTE=thedougler;902816]Based and redpilled.
Seriously though, I agree with most of what Oberon has said. And if a backwater little internet forum like this with at most a few thousand users bans or censors someone that the administrators don't like, then it isn't that big a deal. The problems arise when forums which have become the de facto "digital commons" like Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, etc. start banning speech that the administrators don't like, all the while pretending that they aren't acting as publishers under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. When enough of these big players adopt woke ideologies and speech codes, you can't just pack up and exercise your right to free speech elsewhere. There is no elsewhere. Those sites represent a giant chunk of the internet.
If Facebook, Twitter, etc. don't want to be seen as publishers, then they should be forced to act as dumb pipes for the free speech of others, just as they wanted ISPs to act as "dumb pipes" for the transmission of data under net neutrality. Exceptions can be made for blatantly illegal content like CP and death threats, but as a general rule if speech would be permitted under the first amendment, then that speech should be permitted on most web platforms.[/QUOTE]
If twitter and Facebook are the standard then I guess our site is a glorious bastion of free speech so people should stop bitching.
Look watch this:
Bitch nigger cuck fag
I’d be like instantly banned on any of those sites.
Food for thought to all the whiners who want sc2mafia to be their personal 8chan
Originally Posted by
thedougler
Based and redpilled.
Seriously though, I agree with most of what Oberon has said. And if a backwater little internet forum like this with at most a few thousand users bans or censors someone that the administrators don't like, then it isn't that big a deal. The problems arise when forums which have become the de facto "digital commons" like Twitter, Facebook, Youtube, etc. start banning speech that the administrators don't like, all the while pretending that they aren't acting as publishers under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. When enough of these big players adopt woke ideologies and speech codes, you can't just pack up and exercise your right to free speech elsewhere. There is no elsewhere. Those sites represent a giant chunk of the internet.
If Facebook, Twitter, etc. don't want to be seen as publishers, then they should be forced to act as dumb pipes for the free speech of others, just as they wanted ISPs to act as "dumb pipes" for the transmission of data under net neutrality. Exceptions can be made for blatantly illegal content like CP and death threats, but as a general rule if speech would be permitted under the first amendment, then that speech should be permitted on most web platforms.
If twitter and Facebook are the standard then I guess our site is a glorious bastion of free speech so people should stop bitching.
Look watch this:
Bitch nigger cuck fag
I’d be like instantly banned on any of those sites.
Food for thought to all the whiners who want sc2mafia to be their personal 8chan
November 12th, 2020, 08:49 PM
[QUOTE=Helz;902713]So do you think riots are coming?[/QUOTE]
for sure, whether biden is officially declared winner or trump. I'd be surprised if either loser just sits down
Originally Posted by
Helz
So do you think riots are coming?
for sure, whether biden is officially declared winner or trump. I'd be surprised if either loser just sits down
November 12th, 2020, 05:32 PM
[QUOTE=Helz;902677]I will point out though- The republicans may be protesting and rallied for fake news fraud but they are not lighting shit on fire, looting stores, and attacking cops like the democrats do. Imagine what would be going on right now if Trump had won.[/QUOTE]
The craziest people on the right don’t believe Biden has actually won yet, so they have nothing to riot over.
Originally Posted by
Helz
I will point out though- The republicans may be protesting and rallied for fake news fraud but they are not lighting shit on fire, looting stores, and attacking cops like the democrats do. Imagine what would be going on right now if Trump had won.
The craziest people on the right don’t believe Biden has actually won yet, so they have nothing to riot over.