A lynch idea.

[Sarzael]

If a player is going to be lynched, a player can choose to be lynched instead whit the command -Lynch.
Jester couldnt of course use this command.

If a player is lynched instead, get more points that if he was killed, but less that if he winned.

[oops_ur_dead]

This makes it imba for town, so no.

[Sarzael]

There is still a die. And you could accidentally even save a mafia or something.

[MrSmarter]

If a player is going to be lynched, a player can choose to be lynched instead whit the command -Lynch.
Jester couldnt of course use this command.

If a player is lynched instead, get more points that if he was killed, but less that if he winned.

No way, this would ruin the balance in so many ways. No one would ever have a good reasons to use this anyways except to grief.

[Sarzael]

@MrSmarter:


There is still a die. And you could accidentally even save a mafia or something.

[Computer]

this will only benefit exec and jester

[Sarzael]

Why?
Jester cannot use this skill.
Executioner wouldnt be benefit from this, for example:
A sheriff which is target of executioner is going to die.
Executioner: YAIII I WIN :)
A citizen saves sheriff.
Executioner: Nooo!!! I lose :(
*Citizen dies and Sheriff is alive*

So they save a sheriff losing a Citizen.
That way if someone trusts a player and he got a small role like a citizen, he could save that player and get extra points :)

[Deolrin]

OP for town.
Citizens, escorts etc can suicide to save a Sheriff, Investigator etc.

[Ancanus]

On the other hand, a role that can take the place of someone who is about to be lynched sounds interesting.

[Inca_Killa]

OP for town.

Not to mention if you get a citi role its in your best interest to let yourself get lynched to save a DR/sheriff etc just like it is to get killed at night to save a power role.

Also, trolls could easily use this to stop obv. mafia/neutral roles from dying just to make town lose the next day.