PDA

View Full Version : {Ban List} PandaCA: 1-S2-1-2098259



taak
August 2nd, 2020, 12:22 PM
Account Name: PandaCA
Account ID: 1-S2-1-2098259
In-Game Name: Giacomo the Short

Crimes Committed: Leave Train start

Your Account Name: TaaK
Summary: Typed This one is straight forward. Doesn't like the save, attempts to start a leave train. Given his history, this guy is toxic in the community.

27347

taak
August 2nd, 2020, 05:56 PM
Account Name: PandaCA
Account ID: 1-S2-1-2098259
In-Game Name: pretty gud save

Crimes Committed: Intentional throw potential skyping.

Description: As Marshall lynching confirmed town. I was confirmed escort at that point and PM'ed my lw to Marshall, blocking 4. 4 then confirmed he was blocked, then Marshall lynched both me and 4. Likely skyping with 10 in game (thesehoes). This has nothing to do with my previous report on PandaCA as those are two separate but reportable offenses that occured during the same day. Didn't even know it was PandaCA until game ended.


27349

MrMostache
August 7th, 2020, 04:51 AM
PandaCA: 1-S2-1-2098259

Game 1:
This one of the many games where Panda leaves just because he wasn't repicked. 8331 save is picked with confirmed judge and marshall. Panda says "I'm not playing this" and leaves.


Game 2:
He gets marshall. Two cults die n1. Day 2, 8 the sheriff accuses 6 of being triad. Panda does his gimmick of asking 8 "Are traps gay?". When 8 doesn't answer, he reveals and lynches him. He then lynches 6, and 9 the sk.

Next day 1 the silencer is lynched. Marshall asks 5 the escort to rb 4.

Day 4, 4 confirms that he is rbed. Marshall says "I'm disappointed in you 5", and lynches him and 4, despite both of them surely not being DH. He then lynches 7, for giving him advice to use -lynch.

Triad wins the game, despite town having a major lead.


Greifing, Gamethrowing, Leave Train
BLx3

He is not as bad as that anon guy, but he is still bad.

Arrow
August 8th, 2020, 03:31 PM
Dude had 1 day left on his WL...

1-S2-1-2098259 3x Banlist

PandaCA
August 8th, 2020, 04:06 PM
Not once in the 7 years of playing this game have i ever, and i mean EVER game threw.

First Mostache's first comment about me leaving... I was told I am allowed to do so if it's a save I don't like

proof:
https://discordapp.com/channels/158545084583903232/158545084583903232/736354627896999958

Mostache's second comment about me randoming...
All the investigative roles were dead and I needed some way to determine who was evil. If someone claimed escort and another person corroborated that statement, they are in cahoots. That either means they're both good or they're both bad so I took a chance decided they were both evil because we were running out of time, at this point in time 1 escort had died so only 1 more Town Prot remained, it wasn't optimal to random but I didn't have the luxury. This was my rationale and I think it's valid, HOW I chose to implement that rationale (by talking about traps) may be distasteful but its not against the rules and my strategy wasn't to just 'game throw' I honestly didn't see a better option at the time than to risk it

DJarJar
August 9th, 2020, 10:40 PM
Not once in the 7 years of playing this game have i ever, and i mean EVER game threw.

First Mostache's first comment about me leaving... I was told I am allowed to do so if it's a save I don't like

proof:
https://discordapp.com/channels/158545084583903232/158545084583903232/736354627896999958

Mostache's second comment about me randoming...
All the investigative roles were dead and I needed some way to determine who was evil. If someone claimed escort and another person corroborated that statement, they are in cahoots. That either means they're both good or they're both bad so I took a chance decided they were both evil because we were running out of time, at this point in time 1 escort had died so only 1 more Town Prot remained, it wasn't optimal to random but I didn't have the luxury. This was my rationale and I think it's valid, HOW I chose to implement that rationale (by talking about traps) may be distasteful but its not against the rules and my strategy wasn't to just 'game throw' I honestly didn't see a better option at the time than to risk it

Could you confirm that you’ve actually read his review and watched the replay? Because your defense doesn’t match at all...

The traps are gay note is for day 2.

The players you claim to think were on a team... I mean 2/3 of triad was dead already. Like did you even read the review?

Renegade
August 22nd, 2020, 11:43 AM
PandaCA is operating with a smurf named "traps", SC2 ID of 1-S2-1-11677542.

taak
August 27th, 2020, 10:30 AM
I think you may need to file a separate report with screenshots/replay.