Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Secondpassing is showing indecisiveness. He wanted to follow one train of thought, changed his mind and went the other way. Not a scum or town tell, but course correcting from pre-flip associating to not doing that after realizing that's a noob move, is town motivated.
Making blatant assumptions on a players actions with poor reasoning followed by calling that inconsistency a town sided move (On secondpassing). Its also odd she jumped on a comment this quickly when it was a poke directed at another player.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Well you left without voting and I know at mafiascum RVS is more of a thing than here.
I feel secondpassings explanation of their thought process made sense. They just didn't explain well the first time.
Once again defusing pressure on secondpassing.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Also secondpassing hit L-1 way too easily there. The quick inviting seems town motivated from several players but that was still really fast and raises eyebrows.
And again pushing logic that suggests secondpassing is town.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
POD, for putting them at L-1 and leaving them there. I don't find SP scummy, and that was very bandwagon-y. I feel like SP is exhibiting Mikecall-ish behavior and knowing our track record (sc2mafia) of putting someone at L-1 for bad reasons, and hammering way early and without a claim all the time, its irresponsible as a town to do that.
I don't regard POD as a top tier player however, so it's eyebrow raising but could also just be POD being a troll.
Once again pushing that SP does not appear scummy. From these posts you can identify a pattern of town reading a slot with a disconnect between the players provided reasoning and certainty. There is literally no reason to so consistently jump to defend SP or to town peg any slot just a few pages into D1.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Thanks for answering my question POD.
-vote Excalibur
Let's get rid of it. Idk why Calix let it into this game, other than for this to happen.
Grab your torches and pitchforks! Banana's calling for a policy lynch.
In this post she flat out pushes to lynch a slot. Its not a call to pressure it to contribute and it does not have any reasoning reflecting any kind of ‘scum read’ on the slot. Its just saying ‘lets kill this slot'.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
I usually hate policy lynches too
But this account was made by a staff member to troll. It won't play. Look at its other games. 100% troll, nothing more.
If the account starts playing I'll move my vote. Otherwise you'll have to lynch me to get my vote off it. Taking a firm stance on this one.
Avoiding in game reasoning in favor of OOG Bias to justify a lynch. You will also notice around here that she is flat out avoiding direct questions from Firebringer in spite of making multiple interactive posts that show she was both online as well as keeping up with the thread. This goes on for the players next 5 posts or so.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
You're right, you can't.
I'm basing this off of one thing, and the rest of what you've said rings of annoyance, but not scum. Hmm. I shouldn't tunnel.
-vote powerofdeath
Hop, hop, hop like a bunny!
Once again the slot seems to jump on a target with little reasoning. At this point in the game PoD would probably have been the easiest lynch bait and Banana bit off on it.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Anyway I have zero regrets about how I played this game. I won't /in any games with Excalibur anymore and my mislynch is lead by noobs who don't know how to play mafia, nor care about winning. I think I've outgrown this site. Playing with the lot of you that don't want to improve is too boring.
This post is pure AtE as another player mentioned. It seems very over defensive and even seems like flailing under pressure.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
Who the hell is Jake?
Also, if you're positive about lynching me, the cancerous terrible play of this site has gotten to you. Hammer me and complete your passage to the noob side of Mafia.
More AtE, instead of trying to give original analysis and post some reads when she was under L-1, she continues to rage at the possibility of getting lynched.
Originally Posted by
BananaCucho
I've got a town read on SJ. It may be biased because we've been in sync this day, but my reads are always fluid and can change.
POD stinks of scum though.
Says they have a town read on a slot based on bias and no real reasoning.
Banana seems to be giving out town cred way too easily almost as if she knows alignments. This town cred is handed out with a mix of buddying other players by redirecting pressure away from them as well as a gap between the expressed reasoning of a read and the conclusion drawn. Another instance of this is her "Townread" On SuperJack Based on Personal Bias.