S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread - Page 55
Register

User Tag List

Page 55 of 92 FirstFirst ... 5 45 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 65 ... LastLast
Results 2,701 to 2,750 of 4558
  1. ISO #2701

  2. ISO #2702

  3. ISO #2703

  4. ISO #2704

  5. ISO #2705

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho View Post
    No its

    Everyone Else Is Blind
    Hah, right.

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    Okay, I found out how the no feedback is possible based off of the setup


    By definition a drug dealer visited me and stole my feedback.
    What feedback?

  6. ISO #2706

  7. ISO #2707

  8. ISO #2708

  9. ISO #2709

  10. ISO #2710

  11. ISO #2711

  12. ISO #2712

  13. ISO #2713

  14. ISO #2714

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    I'm assuming that I actually have a night action based off of the role I claimed and saw that I was given.
    There's been a dozen times when I feel like voting you, but decide against it because "that's just too dumb, can't be scum", and if I start a train on you, chances are it won't stop.

    You just used doubting your assigned role and the likelihood of being a lunatic as an excuse to target Banana.

    BGs get no feedback unless they save their target, and that's assuming you aren't a lunatic. Why would you try to make it sound like a drug dealer is the most likely case?

    And then there's this:

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    I wouldn't say insecure so much as I've built a shitty defense and know there isn't much to save it.
    Sounds like genuine scum self-awareness.


    -vote Varcron

  15. ISO #2715

  16. ISO #2716

  17. ISO #2717

  18. ISO #2718

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    There's been a dozen times when I feel like voting you, but decide against it because "that's just too dumb, can't be scum", and if I start a train on you, chances are it won't stop.

    You just used doubting your assigned role and the likelihood of being a lunatic as an excuse to target Banana.

    BGs get no feedback unless they save their target, and that's assuming you aren't a lunatic. Why would you try to make it sound like a drug dealer is the most likely case?

    And then there's this:



    Sounds like genuine scum self-awareness.


    -vote Varcron
    We can assume there could be one given the amount of randoms in this save. I do agree though that BG does not typically get feedback, so it could be either or.

  19. ISO #2719

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho View Post
    Sen is so wishy washy with that vote today
    Piss off:

    To recap:


    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    So just to make sure I'm getting it right:

    - You thought he was scum.

    - You thought that most believed him to be scum and that someone would shoot him.

    - You decided to try and save your -and half of the players'- top scum read.
    Yes, I thought he would have been hit (even though he was our top scum read, but don't mind that) so I went and "protected" him (keep in mind I wanted to make sure I wasn't a killer/vigi so I went to him anyways.

    Near EOD I switched back to Banana after it was clear the push on MM was gone to break a 2 way tie as well.


    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    Try looking at it from a potential lunatic point of view, any one of us could have been a killing role given a protective rolecard.
    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    I'm assuming that I actually have a night action based off of the role I claimed and saw that I was given.



    He said that he visited you because he thought he was a lunatic vigilante. just some minutes later, he claims to assume that his rolecard was correct. Furthermore, he doesn't even know what the feedback of his supposed rolecard is.

  20. ISO #2720

  21. ISO #2721

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    There's been a dozen times when I feel like voting you, but decide against it because "that's just too dumb, can't be scum", and if I start a train on you, chances are it won't stop.

    You just used doubting your assigned role and the likelihood of being a lunatic as an excuse to target Banana.

    BGs get no feedback unless they save their target, and that's assuming you aren't a lunatic. Why would you try to make it sound like a drug dealer is the most likely case?

    And then there's this:



    Sounds like genuine scum self-awareness.


    -vote Varcron
    Yeah if you start this train there's no going back. I'd really want to hear how MM posts before joining you.

    Eh I might join you anyway.

  22. ISO #2722

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    Piss off:

    To recap:













    He said that he visited you because he thought he was a lunatic vigilante. just some minutes later, he claims to assume that his rolecard was correct. Furthermore, he doesn't even know what the feedback of his supposed rolecard is.
    I just agreed with you on that, read my previous #2718

  23. ISO #2723

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    Piss off:

    To recap:













    He said that he visited you because he thought he was a lunatic vigilante. just some minutes later, he claims to assume that his rolecard was correct. Furthermore, he doesn't even know what the feedback of his supposed rolecard is.
    Yeah and last time you let him off cause who knows why. Once I vote him again, your vote will return to me, the cycle will continue.
    Quote Originally Posted by BananaCucho

  24. ISO #2724

  25. ISO #2725

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperJack View Post
    Remember if you have the insanity modifier you receive randomly generated feedback.

    So if you peeps think you have some magical n1 mega feedback that will solve the game think again.
    Thats Why I Ask Other PPLs Feed Back.. Cant Trust Mine..

  26. ISO #2726

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    I just agreed with you on that, read my previous #2718
    First you claimed to take the dumbest night action because of the assumption that you could be a lunatic vigilante and didn't want to risk it.

    Right after it, you said that you assumed that you are the role that you were given (you claimed having a bg card).

    So what is it? Do you trust your rolecard, and thus should have targetted a proper town player to protect them, and decided not to?

    Or do you think you're a lunatic vig as you first claimed? And if so, why would you claim to expect bodyguard feedback that you would only get if someone shot Banana?

    First you say that you doubt your card, then you say you assume it's correct, and say that there must be a drug dealer stealing your information.

    None of it makes sense, no matter where you look it from.

  27. ISO #2727

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    First you claimed to take the dumbest night action because of the assumption that you could be a lunatic vigilante and didn't want to risk it.

    Right after it, you said that you assumed that you are the role that you were given (you claimed having a bg card).

    So what is it? Do you trust your rolecard, and thus should have targetted a proper town player to protect them, and decided not to?

    Or do you think you're a lunatic vig as you first claimed? And if so, why would you claim to expect bodyguard feedback that you would only get if someone shot Banana?

    First you say that you doubt your card, then you say you assume it's correct, and say that there must be a drug dealer stealing your information.

    None of it makes sense, no matter where you look it from.
    I trusted my rolecard however suspected otherwise, so a 50/50 if you could call it that. It kind of makes sense as I would rather if it were the 50 I didn't want I would have shot Banana (an easy mislynch and y'alls scumread) but if it were the 50 I did want it would have just been protection

  28. ISO #2728

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    I trusted my rolecard however suspected otherwise, so a 50/50 if you could call it that. It kind of makes sense as I would rather if it were the 50 I didn't want I would have shot Banana (an easy mislynch and y'alls scumread) but if it were the 50 I did want it would have just been protection
    There's isn't a 50% chance of you being a lunatic vigilante. There's 14 possible town roles, so being overly paranoid and assuming a 50% chance of being lunatic, you had a 1/28 chance of being a lunatic vigilante.

  29. ISO #2729

  30. ISO #2730

  31. ISO #2731

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    You get my point.
    No, I don't.

    Besides the train hopping and other questionable action from yesterday, none of your claims make any sense: first outing yourself as a bg on d1, then protecting the scummiest player around, and finally saying that there must be a drug dealer because you didn't get feedback as a bodyguard.

  32. ISO #2732

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    No, I don't.

    Besides the train hopping and other questionable action from yesterday, none of your claims make any sense: first outing yourself as a bg on d1, then protecting the scummiest player around, and finally saying that there must be a drug dealer because you didn't get feedback as a bodyguard.
    You do with the lunatic and roles, I have a 50% chance of being my role, AND a 1 in 28 after that of being any other role.

  33. ISO #2733

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    You do with the lunatic and roles, I have a 50% chance of being my role, AND a 1 in 28 after that of being any other role.
    And here we go again; I explained multiple times that everyone should assume being town-aligned regardless of their rolecard. "I have the tinniest chance of being this specific role" will never be a valid excuse for anything. Not after how many times I mentioned this, including the times when I did it as a direct quote to you.

  34. ISO #2734

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Sen View Post
    And here we go again; I explained multiple times that everyone should assume being town-aligned regardless of their rolecard. "I have the tinniest chance of being this specific role" will never be a valid excuse for anything. Not after how many times I mentioned this, including the times when I did it as a direct quote to you.
    I'd rather waste 1 night action on confirming I am actually a non-killing rather than defend a 100% townread of mine and kill him.

  35. ISO #2735

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    @deathworlds

    Rage in Grief: Upon the death of a Occult Leader, Cult Leader, Jester King, Serial Killer, Witch, Mass Murderer, Ritual Killer, or Drug Dealer. A random Lunatic that is a Sinister receives information that somewhat confirms their alignment.
    Just to clarify:
    You use "Upon the death" which I take to mean "immediately following." One could argue that receiving that information and the end of the night would still be "upon"
    If I replaced "Upon the death" with "Immediately following" would that be correct?

  36. ISO #2736

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by secondpassing View Post
    @deathworlds



    Just to clarify:
    You use "Upon the death" which I take to mean "immediately following." One could argue that receiving that information and the end of the night would still be "upon"
    If I replaced "Upon the death" with "Immediately following" would that be correct?
    Yes, thanks for correcting my sentence structure.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed View Post
    deathworld's and RLVG's suicides made me lul. I take a lot of pleasure in knowing that I gave you an night action, and that you used it to kill yourself.
    Quote Originally Posted by yzb25 View Post
    At least Mesk has lewdy lefty and raunchy righty. You're not even Canadian.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM-Shocked Kirby Face View Post
    Deathworlds is simply better than us at this game. Don't kill them for that.
    Quote Originally Posted by Stealthbomber16 View Post
    fucketh me in the ass

  37. ISO #2737

  38. ISO #2738

  39. ISO #2739

  40. ISO #2740

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Hello guys! So, first of all: this is the craziest day 1 I've ever seen, minus perhaps one game on Mafiascum where 13 players posted 2x more than 50 players (in another game) in the same time lapse...

    Second thing: I was visited last night. I recieved no feedback from it. As for the rest of my feedback, I'll wait on the host's reply to my question before talking about it, but there's something else

    Third thing: Everyone should reveal if their cell was visited last night (or not visited). That will greatly help everyone figure things out.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  41. ISO #2741

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by SuperJack View Post
    You also can't trust theirs.
    We can trust crossed feedbacks, though, and we can trust role-specific feedbacks.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  42. ISO #2742

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    Hello guys! So, first of all: this is the craziest day 1 I've ever seen, minus perhaps one game on Mafiascum where 13 players posted 2x more than 50 players (in another game) in the same time lapse...

    Second thing: I was visited last night. I recieved no feedback from it. As for the rest of my feedback, I'll wait on the host's reply to my question before talking about it, but there's something else

    Third thing: Everyone should reveal if their cell was visited last night (or not visited). That will greatly help everyone figure things out.
    Mine was not visited according to the feedback I received.

  43. ISO #2743

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Light_Yagami View Post
    Thats Why I Ask Other PPLs Feed Back.. Cant Trust Mine..
    Have you recieved anything interesting recently @Light_Yagami ?
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  44. ISO #2744

  45. ISO #2745

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Oh wait, I am utterly stupid lol, I just realized something. Don't ask me what it is, I will reveal it if I deem it is pro-town to do so.

    By the way, I really think Light is town, as painful as it is to say...
    beep beep choo choo
    -vote Varcron
    I didn't like him yesterday, both because of gut and because his "oppressive veterans" thing works well as a way to not contribute... It looks like there was the beginning of a train against him, so I'm adding pressure here. I didn't read everything yet, though, so my mind may change.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  46. ISO #2746

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    Oh wait, I am utterly stupid lol, I just realized something. Don't ask me what it is, I will reveal it if I deem it is pro-town to do so.

    By the way, I really think Light is town, as painful as it is to say...
    beep beep choo choo
    -vote Varcron
    I didn't like him yesterday, both because of gut and because his "oppressive veterans" thing works well as a way to not contribute... It looks like there was the beginning of a train against him, so I'm adding pressure here. I didn't read everything yet, though, so my mind may change.
    That was from a few games ago now

    It doesn't really work as a way to contribute, seeing as to how I'm voted based off of that.

  47. ISO #2747

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    What's your opinion on Sen and Cucho?
    I really like Cucho. It's a mix of the following: I like the fact he's pulling gambits and that it actually helps town, and I like that he's putting himself in a bad light under the public eye by doing so. I also think (although that's a personal interpretation that could be totally wrong) that he prefers scum to town, and that when he's town, he tries to make things interesting with the gambits. Of course, this doesn't exclude the possibility of him doing scum gambits, but the one he pulled this game was pro-town IMO, and it worked.

    Sen is a slot I honestly believe I'm not competent enough to read. He has been sticking to absolutely logical posts, most of them making sense, but he hasn't really been scummy. Perhaps a slight town read because he looked town-tunneled on Cucho earlier, but that could be mimicked by scum!Sen, especially with the amount of experience and skills he seems to have.
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  48. ISO #2748

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall View Post
    I really like Cucho. It's a mix of the following: I like the fact he's pulling gambits and that it actually helps town, and I like that he's putting himself in a bad light under the public eye by doing so. I also think (although that's a personal interpretation that could be totally wrong) that he prefers scum to town, and that when he's town, he tries to make things interesting with the gambits. Of course, this doesn't exclude the possibility of him doing scum gambits, but the one he pulled this game was pro-town IMO, and it worked.

    Sen is a slot I honestly believe I'm not competent enough to read. He has been sticking to absolutely logical posts, most of them making sense, but he hasn't really been scummy. Perhaps a slight town read because he looked town-tunneled on Cucho earlier, but that could be mimicked by scum!Sen, especially with the amount of experience and skills he seems to have.
    Cucho I can agree with, however I don't really think that we should rule him out as scum yet simply due to the extensive amount of wolfing from yesterday (from a prot role I don't personally believe that that was a smart play on his part)

    I'm going to highlight a little spot here I want to touch on

    Quote Originally Posted by Marshmallow Marshall
    town-tunneled on Cucho earlier, but that could be mimicked by scum!Sen, especially with the amount of experience and skills he seems to have.
    I think that Sen could potentially be using those logical plays as scum with a greater likelihood than town. HOWEVER, I also think that there could always be a chance he is town, therefore I will not apply pressure on the slot at this point until we see more

    He has also been very wishy woshy with his vote already today.

  49. ISO #2749

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Ganelon View Post
    Varcron's been incredibly apathetic this entire game. I do not buy his sob story of how he feels oppressed by the "veteran players", and I find it very suspicious that he voted Banana over Frinckles - Frinckles was objectively far scummier than Banana. In fact I think everyone who didn't vote Frinckles should be looked at.
    Mhmm, fair, especially since we had Banana the Red Knight yesterday, and that... there's no damn reason to scumread Banana outside of "unorthodoxy", which is, according to Varcron's principle, not something that should be scumreadable.
    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    The story that wasn't brought up this game? GOOFY!

    You literally said yesterday that you didn't know what Banana was doing, and were just blindly following him

    I'll give you the quote once I find it momentarily.
    HMMMMMMM? I'm pretty sure you did say it, and I even noted that you had pushed Banana in contradiction with what you claim to be your principles. I'll look at your ISO and try to find a post proving you wrong
    Quote Originally Posted by The Lawyer View Post
    Besides your lamp and your refridgerators, do you find anyone else suspicious?
    Quote Originally Posted by oliverz144 View Post
    it looks like many, e.g. MM and lag, suffered under the influence of paopan. However there is a victim: frinckles. He left the path of rationality and fully dived into the parallel reality of baby shark, king shark, and soviet union pizzas.
    Spoiler : The meaning of life :

  50. ISO #2750

    Re: S-FM 299: Insanity 2: the Second One, Gamethread

    Quote Originally Posted by Varcron View Post
    HOWEVER, I also think that there could always be a chance he is town, therefore I will not apply pressure on the slot at this point until we see more
    WEAK.

    I'm here. Apply pressure right now. Let's see if there's anything behind those words, or if they'll fall apart just as easily as all of your claims so far.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •