Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
You should learn a bit about tempo control. The objective of RVS is to create content to analyze. By tunneling on stupid shit off the bat we create this content as a town and move into a deeper phase of the game quickly maximizing the towns ability to use the day. It is anti town to kick your feet up and tread water counting down the clock just because nothing hardcore is on the table.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Oh. Apparently I am at L1 only a few hours into the game. Be careful with your votes.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
-vote unvote
zzzzzz
-vote unknown1234
If activity does not pick up in the next 24 hours I will be asking for a replacement.
Im working through some stuff right now. Getting a feeling for the game again now that I am sober : )
But feel free to ask me anything.
And out of curiosity do you feel that Banana was trying to pocket you in her recent posts?
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Seeing how much she defended me when she does not agree with the the reads or the style of play yes. My posts have been mostly trash tier so even if they give her a town tell she should have been more alarmed and questioned me.
I still read her as town for now, but there was one interaction that has me skeptical. When I mentioned that she would pay for picking hanzo over widomaker (shitpost to the max), I expected an angry banana, but I got a hanzo quote reply. Banana is the kind of player to expect highly analytical thought provoking posts, yet she did not criticize the worst post I could make.
@Helz , what do you make of BananaCucho's activity so far?
What is drawing my attention is her quickly giving out passes for D1. In her 2nd post she flat out says she wont lynch MattZed today. Then in post 178 she says she does not want to lynch Unknown or you today. She is very quickly letting players know they can feel safe with her which would be a strong way to 'feel players out' for a mafia team mate while also giving the players that have a higher potential for being the D1 lynch target an inclination to follow and trust her.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
I posted a bit of that just now in post 216 but in general I am looking at her play so far pretty critically. She is not being very confrontational or showing any kind of real aggression while tossing out soft buddy attempts and contributing very little of value. I would like to see more from her and to draw attention to her play so far today.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Would it be fucked up if I am just now realizing that day chat goes away after D1? I suppose its starting to make more sense that you are stacking up multiple days of lynches now..
Just to clarify the rule states that players can not post unless they are posting a vote. Does this mean that we can still post content along with the vote or is it restricted to just the vote?
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
I can read scum motivation into Duckk's attempted 1v1. Scum can win by getting 3 mislynches in a row, but alternatively they can shorten it to two mislynches if the D2 lynch is on scum. I'd say that, in this setup, it's easier for scum to win 4v1 MYLO than 3v2 LYLO. (A LYLO that buys us a mislynch if we succeed) Hence, one route to scum victory is to have one partner be the D2 lynch. Setting up a 1v1 on someone scum townreads is precisely the case for that, because it means the partner only needs to secure one more mislynch. No need to be clever and find your partner; just need to suicide and take someone with you.
Of course, this is all predicated on Duckk actually townreading Unknown. I can buy this, since Duckk hasn't given a non-meta reason to scumread Unknown, (thus, his true meta read could be a townread) but I don't actually see directly evidence at the moment that Duckk townreads Unknown. Yes, the 99.99% comment is clearly false, but I'm not confident saying "He is scum lying about his townread" as opposed to just "he's town with a meta read that he's being hyperbolic about."
Yeah. Given this mechanic I absolutely hate how Banana is giving out 'I wont lynch you' passes this early in the game. I am just going to leave my vote here for now.
-vote BananaCucho
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Day chat* Night chats are not even a thing in this game.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
I am back, I saw early Helz was in L-1 range. Who was bright person to do that this early?
Don't pet growlithe, he will bite you.
I am pretty sad that chat ends D1. With scum not knowing who etch other are we are not left with very much at all... This will be a pretty insane win for the town if we manage to pull it out.
Also the more I read the more comfortable I am with a Banana lynch. I am confident that this player will be in my lynch pool at the end of the day.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
-vote PLZLEAVEDUCKK
Jesus spell your name with less ks.
Don't pet growlithe, he will bite you.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
Yeah. Optimal play is for every player to go super townie and cut out all trolling nonsense. As much as I dislike the process I think it will be easier to scum hunt via clearing town than to lean on pegging scum. The only way we are going to pull this out is if we stick to providing reason with our reads. Keep in mind that scum will also be scum hunting for their team mate and likely playing more like a SK than team scum given the curved mechanics when scum are lynched.
I will have to think about it more for how to deal with the private chats.. That sort of thing is going to be complicated. But I would be careful about people quoting others posts. If you see something insane or out of place like a player quoting another player who is saying "I am mafia, I know you are my team mate" or some shit do not quickly cast a vote. Exercise hammer control and investigate the situation.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
I should have been playing very differently.. Kinda sucks.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.
How so?? This Day 1 is for us to create baselines of discussion with players. Then in QTs we will try sort people through more 1on1s and then probably trying to create town blocks and make sure all information is still going to each other. We want to however keep the scum from finding each other, though that will be hard to do. Theres high chance town will also do gambits in the QTs so that should be considered.
HOw would you have played this day differently if you knew what you know now?
Don't pet growlithe, he will bite you.
I think you're the person we're needing to see more substantive content from, not MattZed.
Asking someone else for their thoughts can be towny or scummy depending on the situation, but with you having such a dearth of content you should start with yourself before asking someone else. It makes me think you're fishing around for reads by other towns, a commonly made argument I admit, but one I think is applicable to you in this situation.
Death, yet the Town.
~The Town Code
Was not a fan of this post because of the way you started with “Legit, Yes.” I don’t think this is as strong as cases I have seen on other people, but it is similar to when someone will say “I actually believe this” as if other posts were them trying to be something they were not.
Comfortable response.
I didn’t like this post for several reasons. First of all the obvious calix vote, but I really don’t hold that against you it was just odd. What I am more concerned about is “telling my UNKNOWN scum team mate”. Seeing as that is an actual player in the game who was already my top scum read it definitely raises alarm bells. I know it is a fairly common word, but it is a possible strategy in this setup and it is worth noting regardless if it has meaning.
You wanted me to explain my scumread on unknown, but give mattzed a free pass for no reason?
Fire’s initial vote swapping is interesting, but for me it is slightly towny. I like where you point out that during the vote swaps he scumreads mattzed, however puts him in his town circle. His post on 51 definitely is odd given that his previous vote swaps were weakly grounded at best.
Your response to his response on post 69 is good. You are analyzing more than just the words, but the type of player it is coming from.
I really don’t feel like responding to the remaining night wall of texts so I will jump to posts from today.
I don’t like your response here. I understand you doubt my ability to make too good of reads off little to no content, but the “I know you lying” rubs me the wrong way. The only way you would know I was lying is if you were mafia and had a good idea of who the other one is thus making my strong read on unknown wrong.
The morp(you) was directed at the mattzed orpz hydra.
Banana defending me could be pocketing, but it could be she realizes how silly the points against me were. It could just as easily be her as town trying to discredit ridiculous attempts at people trying to make something out of nothing.
Did you not give mattzed the same pass for reasons you said you would not state? Shouldn’t you be considering a world where she is town since both of you feel so strong in reading mattzed as town?
Just want to point out this, even though I think its plainly obvious.
Scum primary motivation isn't likely to not get lynched today, its probably to cut of our best communication source (Day 1), and ending it early. This is why PLZ putting Helz at L-1 so early in the day, is so terrible.
With little to go off, the PTs will be harder for us to come to conclusions, it will be harder to communicate our thoughts altogether, and it will make it easier for scum to manipulate mislynches.
We have still two more days, and I definitely don't think we should do a lynch up until last few hours of this game day.
Don't pet growlithe, he will bite you.
Intellectual growth comes from discussions, not arguments. If you are unwilling to change your position and hear the other persons side you are closed minded and wasting your time.
If you can not clearly explain what the other sides reasoning is you can not disagree with their position because you do not understand it.