?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷ - Page 3
Register

User Tag List

Page 3 of 59 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 13 53 ... LastLast
Results 101 to 150 of 2921
  1. ISO #101

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Riiiight, I honestly don't think I'm going to get anything more out of you, sad that you seem to think mechanics are the only way to solve a game.
    its all about survival now. at any cost. people out there are always looking for an angle. looking to play on your weakness. they measure you by what they can take from you. by how they can use you to live.

  2. ISO #102

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Masterpiece View Post
    okay so this is disturbing.. on so many levels..
    Why? That's along the lines of what I would expect the alignment list to look like (BEFORE RECIEVING MY ROLECARD, not influenced by anything in my rolecard, I'm town, don't you try scumpainting me). Please explain.
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Scum.
    -vote S-FM yoek

    This is not an exercise. Get your cooking tools and eat this egg. I repeat, this is not a test.
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Please No Picture Shameing. This Is My Safe Space.
    Lettuce Not?

  3. ISO #103

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM :( View Post
    Care to elaborate? I'd ping you, but sadly, FM accounts do not take pings.
    Town has to eliminate all the other roles. Makes it seem we cannot win with neutrals if they are in game.

    So it's not standard get rid of x number of scum to win. It's get rid of x number of scum and potential neutrals

    in which we know nothing ab what exists on the board.

    the neutrals and or scum could possibly have an advantage, and since a few of them only need 51% to win, they need to get some mislynchs which is easy in a secret set up with anon accounts.

    bed forrealz now.

  4. ISO #104

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Masterpiece View Post
    its all about survival now. at any cost. people out there are always looking for an angle. looking to play on your weakness. they measure you by what they can take from you. by how they can use you to live.
    Yes that's called reality, and it can be a bitch.

  5. ISO #105

  6. ISO #106

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Did host give you that avatar? Have you read the entire thread?
    Yes, for I have refused to sumbit to host tyranny of "sumbitting MSPaint avatars", in other words kneeling and bowing to the oppressor. In fact, I think that the host is a good counter train to Yoek. wink wink

  7. ISO #107

  8. ISO #108

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    imma add 4 more mechanics related observations to consider

    1. we likely invented a majority if not all roles in this fm. counterclaiming is going to be a slippier slope than i originally considered

    consider that if a scum player invented a town role and it was given to a player on the ropes, they'd push the role to be unfeasible or underpowered in an uncertain scope after that player revealed it. there is a lot of lee-way

    2. we do not know if last wills are enabled. please contact your local fm host just in case. do not give scum extra room.

    3. ill preemptively say that i highly doubt a healing role was invented. doesnt seem like first nature for people to invent insane healing roles given the requirements to play and ive yet to see a picture of one. unless you consider me to be an ambulance driver (with one seat) or a healing egg.

    4. we do not know if reveal is on? i dont think mafia had a night chat

  9. ISO #109

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM screams View Post
    Town has to eliminate all the other roles. Makes it seem we cannot win with neutrals if they are in game.

    So it's not standard get rid of x number of scum to win. It's get rid of x number of scum and potential neutrals

    in which we know nothing ab what exists on the board.

    the neutrals and or scum could possibly have an advantage, and since a few of them only need 51% to win, they need to get some mislynchs which is easy in a secret set up with anon accounts.

    bed forrealz now.
    Isn't that quite standard though?

    If we don't suck, we should be good

  10. ISO #110

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM :( View Post
    Why? That's along the lines of what I would expect the alignment list to look like (BEFORE RECIEVING MY ROLECARD, not influenced by anything in my rolecard, I'm town, don't you try scumpainting me). Please explain.

    -vote S-FM yoek

    This is not an exercise. Get your cooking tools and eat this egg. I repeat, this is not a test.


    Lettuce Not?
    Oh hell no you don't.

    You don't get to do that, then use the word Lettuce, and expect everything to just be peachy.

    You realize that this egg is your kryptonite right?

  11. ISO #111

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM :( View Post
    Yes, for I have refused to sumbit to host tyranny of "sumbitting MSPaint avatars", in other words kneeling and bowing to the oppressor. In fact, I think that the host is a good counter train to Yoek. wink wink
    i don't buy that. you did that intentionally

    that is mspaint font

    source: my magnum opus drawing

  12. ISO #112

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    imma add 4 more mechanics related observations to consider

    1. we likely invented a majority if not all roles in this fm. counterclaiming is going to be a slippier slope than i originally considered

    consider that if a scum player invented a town role and it was given to a player on the ropes, they'd push the role to be unfeasible or underpowered in an uncertain scope after that player revealed it. there is a lot of lee-way

    2. we do not know if last wills are enabled. please contact your local fm host just in case. do not give scum extra room.

    3. ill preemptively say that i highly doubt a healing role was invented. doesnt seem like first nature for people to invent insane healing roles given the requirements to play and ive yet to see a picture of one. unless you consider me to be an ambulance driver (with one seat) or a healing egg.

    4. we do not know if reveal is on? i dont think mafia had a night chat

    My role is a standard FM role with a little twist.

  13. ISO #113

  14. ISO #114

  15. ISO #115

  16. ISO #116

  17. ISO #117

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    imma add 4 more mechanics related observations to consider

    1. we likely invented a majority if not all roles in this fm. counterclaiming is going to be a slippier slope than i originally considered

    consider that if a scum player invented a town role and it was given to a player on the ropes, they'd push the role to be unfeasible or underpowered in an uncertain scope after that player revealed it. there is a lot of lee-way

    2. we do not know if last wills are enabled. please contact your local fm host just in case. do not give scum extra room.

    3. ill preemptively say that i highly doubt a healing role was invented. doesnt seem like first nature for people to invent insane healing roles given the requirements to play and ive yet to see a picture of one. unless you consider me to be an ambulance driver (with one seat) or a healing egg.

    4. we do not know if reveal is on? i dont think mafia had a night chat
    Yeah mechanics are great and all but how about some other thread presence, like offering reads and talking about situations pertaining to whats going on in the thread.

    This is a friendly jibba jabba.

  18. ISO #118

  19. ISO #119

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    oh I thought we were suppose to draw our roles

    so we can infer that yolk is probably lynch proof and night immune
    What? No we can't infer that lol, avatars and roles aren't linked, or at least have no confirmed link, so that's a horrible reasoning if you say that you now know that we aren't supposed to draw our roles...
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    somebody might literally have the role yolk, however
    but... whyyyy
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM Harold View Post
    you sound like hard boiled scum. crack him, boys.
    -vote S-FM Harold

    you cracked me up

  20. ISO #120

  21. ISO #121

  22. ISO #122

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Yeah mechanics are great and all but how about some other thread presence, like offering reads and talking about situations pertaining to whats going on in the thread.

    This is a friendly jibba jabba.
    laying some basic mechanical observations out for everyone playing the game sounded like a more pro town strategy then fucking around over an egg pic for the next 150 pages

  23. ISO #123

  24. ISO #124

  25. ISO #125

  26. ISO #126

  27. ISO #127

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM screams View Post
    My role is a standard FM role with a little twist.
    Spoiler : Seizure alert :


    Stoppeth in mediately befoar sumding bad sharpens. Thanks.

  28. ISO #128

  29. ISO #129

  30. ISO #130

  31. ISO #131

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    laying some basic mechanical observations out for everyone playing the game sounded like a more pro town strategy then fucking around over an egg pic for the next 150 pages
    Well in my experience scum tend to "lay out" these mechanical situations to appear town and avoid communicating in the thread/posting reads, just want to make sure time isn't wasted speculating on the unknown, driving the thread into nothing.

    Egg talk is better then discussing what if's hands down.

  32. ISO #132

  33. ISO #133

  34. ISO #134

  35. ISO #135

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Well in my experience scum tend to "lay out" these mechanical situations to appear town and avoid communicating in the thread/posting reads, just want to make sure time isn't wasted speculating on the unknown, driving the thread into nothing.

    Egg talk is better then discussing what if's hands down.

    I agree the mechanics talk is just like host meta speculating, it only seems like it's moving the game forward without actually moving the game forward.

  36. ISO #136

  37. ISO #137

  38. ISO #138

  39. ISO #139

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Oh hell no you don't.

    You don't get to do that, then use the word Lettuce, and expect everything to just be peachy.

    You realize that this egg is your kryptonite right?
    Ok then
    -vote S-FM Screams
    Trying to look useful but can't really be useful by jumping around and trying to guess rolecards and to get claims (AKA TPR hunting) when nothing happened yet.

    If you convince me I'll vote the host, mr Screams

  40. ISO #140

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM :( View Post
    What? No we can't infer that lol, avatars and roles aren't linked, or at least have no confirmed link, so that's a horrible reasoning if you say that you now know that we aren't supposed to draw our roles...

    but... whyyyy
    \
    avatar and role don't have a direct correlation per se. but some have already submitted that they designed their ms paint around their role or not.

    i missed this. we cannot counterclaim whether we created a role or not. that will be important later on. a mafia member can still say they made a role but we can't reveal the actual role we made.

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM screams View Post
    you and ur tesla are so smart
    just getting the basics out of the way while i drive to mcdonalds

  41. ISO #141

  42. ISO #142

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM yoek View Post
    Well in my experience scum tend to "lay out" these mechanical situations to appear town and avoid communicating in the thread/posting reads, just want to make sure time isn't wasted speculating on the unknown, driving the thread into nothing.

    Egg talk is better then discussing what if's hands down.
    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM screams View Post
    I agree the mechanics talk is just like host meta speculating, it only seems like it's moving the game forward without actually moving the game forward.
    Strange, coming from you, is it not? =) (=

  43. ISO #143

  44. ISO #144

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM :( View Post
    Ok then
    -vote S-FM Screams
    Trying to look useful but can't really be useful by jumping around and trying to guess rolecards and to get claims (AKA TPR hunting) when nothing happened yet.

    If you convince me I'll vote the host, mr Screams
    lol if you think I'm tpr hunting you're nuts.

    lynching me only serves you if you're evil.

  45. ISO #145

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    avatar and role don't have a direct correlation per se. but some have already submitted that they designed their ms paint around their role or not.



    i missed this. we cannot counterclaim whether we created a role or not. that will be important later on. a mafia member can still say they made a role but we can't reveal the actual role we made.



    just getting the basics out of the way while i drive to mcdonalds
    You have a Tesla and you go to McDonalds? Obvious incoherence, confirmed scum

  46. ISO #146

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM deviantart View Post
    avatar and role don't have a direct correlation per se. but some have already submitted that they designed their ms paint around their role or not.



    i missed this. we cannot counterclaim whether we created a role or not. that will be important later on. a mafia member can still say they made a role but we can't reveal the actual role we made.



    just getting the basics out of the way while i drive to mcdonalds
    I had mcdonalds for dinner

  47. ISO #147

  48. ISO #148

  49. ISO #149

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM screams View Post
    lol if you think I'm tpr hunting you're nuts.

    lynching me only serves you if you're evil.


    I'm not against being nuts.
    And you have no proof of that
    I'm not asking you for proofs though, simply... convincing arguments. Which you did not give. So for now, you are my little nut

  50. ISO #150

    Re: ?KRC i̷ ̸w̴i̸s̴h̸ ̴t̶o̵ ̴d̸i̵e̷

    Quote Originally Posted by S-FM :( View Post
    Strange, coming from you, is it not? =) (=
    Stating I'm a TPR with a classic FM role with slight variation and stating that I did not receive the role I submitted is not mechanics conversation...it's providing evidence that there are classic roles (at least) sprinkled in the set up, and that least some of us didn't get the roles we submitted.

    I think what I provided is helpful for those who are smart enough to derive the information from it :P

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •