ChefRemseys: 1-S2-1-10954816, awesomeperso: 1-S2-1-5915373, LoudMouth: 1-S2-1-4487648, CloneLeet: 1-

[Etheopian]

To whom it may concern:

Please consider reviewing the below report. I am accusing two (2) pairs of players for 3rd party communications. Both incidents pertain to the same match played.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Pair 1:

Account Name: ChefRemseys
Account ID: 1-S2-1-10954816
In-Game Name: Jeauseus

Account Name: awesomeperso
Account ID: 1-S2-1-5915373
In-Game Name: goodboi

Crimes Committed: 3rd party communication, gamethrowing

Summary: Players are in adjacent lobby slots (2 & 3). Unusual PM's occur between the two on day 1. Both players role bodyguard and both seem to have an unspoken agreement to protect each other the entire game. They do not tell the Mayor (me) of this agreement. As a bodyguard, not protecting a revealed mayor is gamethrowing.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

Pair 2:

Account Name: LoudMouth
Account ID: 1-S2-1-4487648
In-Game Name: Umberto D'Aquino (2 in-game)

Account Name: CloneLeet
Account ID: 1-S2-1-9754386
In-Game Name: Motherless (9 in-game)

Crimes Committed: 3rd party communication, multi-accounting

Summary: Players are not fully responsive in the game. On day two, 9 appears to claim the role and LW of 2 after stalling for a minute. There was no way 9, a veteran, could produce the correct role and LW of 2, a jailor. 2 claims nothing. Both players remain relatively non-responsive after that. These are symptoms of multi-accounting in the same game. I theorize that the multi-accounter got his windows mixed up and typed a response using 9's instance of the game that was intended for 2's instance of the game.

/////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

It was a very unusual game. The four players could be all together but they seem like separate, unrelated incidents.

Partiers.SC2Replay

Please consider reviewing the information and determining if this is in violation of the rules. Thank you.

[MrMostache]

SC ID VERIFICATION
ChefRamseys : 1-S2-1-10954816
awesomeperso: 1-S2-1-5915373


LoudMouth: 1-S2-1-4487648
CloneLeet: 1-S2-1-9754386

Previous Offenses
Only CloneLeet has a gamethrowing/greifing offense. He even got a gamethrowing offense, in a report he submitted.

Respective Hotkeys
Awesome : 1
Chief : 2
Clone : 3
Loud : ctrl +3.


Game:
First pair appears in adjacent slots, but second pair is away. I have also noticed three people with "YO10" clan tag. Chief and Loud appears as new.

awesome is 15 gooboi the Bodyguard. Chef is 5 Jeusesus the Bodyguard.

Clone is 9 Motherless the Veteran. Loud is 2 Umberto the Jailor.

Day 1:
Pms happen between 5 and 15. One of them seems to be introducing the other to the game. This does however indicate some outside communication, as they didn't really choose obvious names giving them away.

Night 1: 5 and 15 protects each other. 9 goes on alert. 2 doesn't jail and leaves the lw "poop".

Day 2:
Witch 3 dies. 8 the Mayor reveals. 5 and 15 pms him correct roles and lws.

Now 9 pms 8 " Jailor, N1 8 Coroner" where 8 is the mayor who just revealed. Straight up gamethrowing right here.

1 is trialed, and claims exe. He is innoed.
8 asks 5 if he was rbed. taking too long, 5 is trialed. 4 is trailed next and claims lookout. He is innoed.

8 realizes 9's weird lw, and trials him next. In trial, 9 says " I jailed someone, a coroner". He is surprisingly innoed.

10 claims that he was jailed but he wasn't. He was mass murderer though and might assumed 9 was jester and played along. 11 the Dh is lynched.

8 asks 9 again who he jailed, and he says he jailed 10.


Night 2: 15 and 5 keeps protecting each other. 9 goes on alert. I don't think Jailor (LoudMouth) will be relevant in this report.

Day 3: vigilante couldn't kill silencer because liaison rbed him.

10 is trialed since he has no proper lw. 9 defends him.. 10 is lynched as mm.

8 questions the bgs not protecting him.

Night 3: 5 and 15 keeps protecting each other. 9 goes on alert and kills an escort.

Day 4:
8 starts losing it after find that the town are not listening to him, and that 9 is veteran. He tries to vote 9, but everyone else votes 2. 2 is lynched who seems to be clueless.

Night 4: 5 and 15 keeps protecting each other. Luckily killing the last triad. and ending the game.


Was the Game Result altered?
No, Mayor was actually very competent.


Player Offenses
awesome & Chef: Skyping ( PMing each other n1, and protecting each other).

Loud: None ( He does nothing actually this game. He didn't jail 10 or anyone else).

CloneLeet: Intentional-Gamethrowing:


Recommended Action
awesome & Chef: Watch List x2

CloneLeet: Ban List x2

Additional Notes
I'm honestly not worried about the first pair. I don't think you will see them that much together in future games.
I feel justified in giving Clone his banlist, due to his experience in gamethrowing. Absolutely no reason to tell a mayor in pm that he is a false role.

[Arrow]

Punished as recommended.