{Ban List} RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177
Register

User Tag List

Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. ISO #1

    RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    Account Name: RachylMellow
    Account ID: 1-S2-1-8062177
    In-Game Name: Exeter sucks Nigger Dick

    Crimes Committed: Hacking, Griefing and Gamethrowing

    Your Account Name: Exeter

    Summary:
    Picks the name "Exeter sucks Nigger Dick" and rolls Incense Master in slot #12.

    Setup Phase: RachylMellow spams "EXETER IS GAY" and gets told to cut it out by other players (Seth, Fuuton, myself).

    D1: RachylMellow spams in day chat to display her name. Day 1 chat is dominated by RachylMellow and #1 (Fuuton), with small interjections from other players, including one line from #10 (me): "oh god".

    N1: RachylMellow tries hard to convince her DH to attack #10. DH is AFK, so RachylMellow uses -target to kill #10. However, #10 is saved when he gets swapped with #8 (Arsonist) by a Bus Driver.

    D2: On D2, when it is revealed that #10 is still alive, RachylMellow immediately reveals that #10 is night immune and that he is Exeter. Since the Triad hit a night immune last night, it immediately throws suspicion on her as being the DH who failed to kill her target. When Town raises this point, RachylMellow says "im taking exeter down with me ^_^".

    Town chooses to vote RachylMellow up instead, but due to three leavers (all of whom are Town) they do not have enough votes to put her up.

    N2: RachylMellow tells her DH to attack #10 again. DH continues to AFK, so RachylMellow uses -target to kill #10 again. The DH successfully kills #10.

    D3: RachylMellow taunts the now-dead #10 in day chat. #13 (Max) speaks up against RachylMellow, citing her past reports on the forums.

    N3: RachylMellow targets #13 for insulting her. However, #13 is a Bus Driver and swaps himself with #9, who dies in his place.

    D4: RachylMellow and Max swap insults. RachylMellow is put on trial and lynched. Before she dies, she identifies Max's real identity and asks why he's treating her this way when he was so nice to her the previous day.

    The game culminates in a Town victory on D5, with the Bus Driver leveraging on RachylMellow's reveal that #10 is night immune to identify the Arsonist (#8, whom #10 was swapped with on N1).

    * * *

    Key Points to Note:

    1. HACKING: RachylMellow was able to identify me from the beginning of the game, even though I picked a generic model and hat, used a name that I have never used before, and only said "oh god" on D1 chat. By N1, she was already targeting me.

    2. HACKING: RachylMellow was able to correctly identify other players' identities in the game, namely Fuuton and Max. Fuuton has a distinctive style and perhaps can be easily identified even without hacking, but Max behaved in a fairly non-identifying manner.

    When Max showed aggression to RachylMellow on D3, her first assumption should be Seth, who was telling her to stop her behaviour during the Setup Phase. Instead, she correctly identifies Max's identity out of nowhere.

    3. GRIEFING: RachylMellow tried hard to convince her DH to kill me N1, and was visibly frustrated when her teammate #6, the Interrogator, chose to execute #4, confusing the Interrogator's action for the DH's. She then used -target to kill me, but when that failed on N1, hard-pushed a lynch on me on D2. Her reveal of my identity indicates that it is a relevant factor behind her hard push.

    4. GAMETHROWING: RachylMellow implicitly revealed her real alignment (Triad), did not deny the accusations, and exhibited a willingness to be lynched so long as I get lynched too. In her own words on D2: "im taking exeter down with me".
    Attached Files Attached Files
    Last edited by Exeter350; November 19th, 2018 at 11:27 PM.


    Your friendly neighbourhood Asian.

  2. ISO #2

    Re: RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    SC ID VERIFICATION
    1-S2-1-8062177 is Correct.


    Respective Hotkey:

    7

    Previous Offenses:

    Lots.

    Player Offenses:

    Hacking

    Key Points:
    Players in question:

    RachylMellow, INCENSE MASTER, 12.

    Game:


    Setup: Rachyl talks a lot of shit in setup phase.
    Names: None
    Roles: None
    D1: 12 repeatedly spams until antispam kicks in.
    N1: 12 encourages DH to kill 10.
    D2: 12 claims 10 is NI on no evidence, 3 quits, 4(VIGILANTE) is dead. 12 claims 10 is EXETER, a player they have a grudge against. This is correct. Multiple quits.
    N2: 12 demands a kill on 10 again.
    D3: 11(LOOKOUT), 10(AMNESIAC-CLEANED), 5(MAYOR), 14(BODYGUARD), 3(ESCORT) are dead. No lynch.
    N3: Night.
    D4: 9(CLEANED, but clearly invest by LW), 15(DRAGON HEAD), 2(WITCH) are dead. 12(INCENSE MASTER) is hung 1-0.
    N4: Night.
    D5: 7(BODYGUARD) and 6(ENFORCER) are dead. 8(ARSONIST) is hung by the other two players and town wins.

    Was the game result altered?
    Town still won, but this was a shitshow.

    Punishment:

    RachylMellow: Permaban

    Additional Notes:
    Rachyl's had a number of breaks, warnings, and vacations. I can't believe she wasn't using some form of hacking tool for battlenet IDs in this game.

    Thank you for the report!
    Last edited by Arrow; November 19th, 2018 at 11:18 PM.

  3. ISO #3
    Rachyl
    Guest

    Re: RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    Quote Originally Posted by Arrow View Post
    SC ID VERIFICATION
    1-S2-1-8062177 is Correct.


    Respective Hotkey:

    7

    Previous Offenses:

    Lots.

    Player Offenses:

    Hacking

    Key Points:
    Players in question:

    RachylMellow, INCENSE MASTER, 12.

    Game:


    Setup: Rachyl talks a lot of shit in setup phase.
    Names: None
    Roles: None
    D1: 12 repeatedly spams until antispam kicks in.
    N1: 12 encourages DH to kill 10.
    D2: 12 claims 10 is NI on no evidence, 3 quits, 4(VIGILANTE) is dead. 12 claims 10 is EXETER, a player they have a grudge against. This is correct. Multiple quits.
    N2: 12 demands a kill on 10 again.
    D3: 11(LOOKOUT), 10(AMNESIAC-CLEANED), 5(MAYOR), 14(BODYGUARD), 3(ESCORT) are dead. No lynch.
    N3: Night.
    D4: 9(CLEANED, but clearly invest by LW), 15(DRAGON HEAD), 2(WITCH) are dead. 12(INCENSE MASTER) is hung 1-0.
    N4: Night.
    D5: 7(BODYGUARD) and 6(ENFORCER) are dead. 8(ARSONIST) is hung by the other two players and town wins.

    Was the game result altered?
    Town still won, but this was a shitshow.

    Punishment:

    RachylMellow: Permaban

    Additional Notes:
    Rachyl's had a number of breaks, warnings, and vacations. I can't believe she wasn't using some form of hacking tool for battlenet IDs in this game.

    Thank you for the report!
    Thanks, i just saw this report, and i want it appealed, i didnt hack, i knew it was him because of the way he was talking actually, i need to watch this replay and understand why it was reported for hacking, because ive never hacked this stupid game. theres ways of telling who someone is. so yeah, i want this appealed, i didnt know this report was out on me

  4. ISO #4
    Rachyl
    Guest

    Re: RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    WAIT now i know exactly what happened!!!! the game previously before we played this game Exeter said "oh god" thats how i knew it was him! I didnt hack! now please appeal and reverse my perma ban this is dumb!!!

  5. ISO #5
    Rachyl
    Guest

    Re: RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    and the "gamethrowing" accusation is stupid because i know other players that reveal theyre triad on the stand because they got caught. that isnt even gamethrowing! thats stupid! and the least you could say this is griefing thats all. exeter is so mad that i exist and he wants me dead in real life. please reinstate my account. as i did not hack, and someone just brought this report to my attention. thank you very much!

  6. ISO #6

    Re: RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachyl View Post
    WAIT now i know exactly what happened!!!! the game previously before we played this game Exeter said "oh god" thats how i knew it was him! I didnt hack! now please appeal and reverse my perma ban this is dumb!!!
    This is rubbish. You can instantly identify a player beyond any doubt for saying a commonly-used phrase once on D1, and nothing else?

    If her appeal actually gets considered based on this point, I'm gonna go back and find the "previous game" replay that she's talking about, just to see if there's any validity to her argument.

    Personally, I think it's her responsibility to provide proof, since she's the one making the appeal, and evidence is readily available.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachyl View Post
    and the "gamethrowing" accusation is stupid because i know other players that reveal theyre triad on the stand because they got caught. that isnt even gamethrowing! thats stupid! and the least you could say this is griefing thats all.
    Spoiler : From the rules section :

    Crime: Intentional Game-Throwing
    This is intentionally playing to lose.
    Example: A Mafioso giving out the names of his fellow Mafia to the town during his trial.
    Type: Intentional

    In her attempt to push a lynch on me, she implicitly revealed and confirmed her alignment as Triad. She didn't care about winning, she just wanted me dead. It's gamethrowing because she was playing to lose. She was willing to die on D2 just to carry out her vendetta.

    It is also griefing, but that doesn't mean it's not gamethrowing - they're not mutually exclusive offenses.

    * * *

    You know @Rachyl , I thought that the 4x Banlist would've mellowed you out a bit. Instead, you are still as belligerent as ever. Evidently, you have learned nothing from your ban.
    Last edited by Exeter350; December 22nd, 2018 at 10:42 AM.


    Your friendly neighbourhood Asian.

  7. ISO #7
    Rachyl
    Guest

    Re: RachylMellow: 1-S2-1-8062177

    Quote Originally Posted by Exeter350 View Post
    This is rubbish. You can instantly identify a player beyond any doubt for saying a commonly-used phrase once on D1, and nothing else?

    If her appeal actually gets considered based on this point, I'm gonna go back and find the "previous game" replay that she's talking about, just to see if there's any validity to her argument.

    Personally, I think it's her responsibility to provide proof, since she's the one making the appeal, and evidence is readily available.



    Spoiler : From the rules section :

    Crime: Intentional Game-Throwing
    This is intentionally playing to lose.
    Example: A Mafioso giving out the names of his fellow Mafia to the town during his trial.
    Type: Intentional

    In her attempt to push a lynch on me, she implicitly revealed and confirmed her alignment as Triad. She didn't care about winning, she just wanted me dead. It's gamethrowing because she was playing to lose. She was willing to die on D2 just to carry out her vendetta.

    It is also griefing, but that doesn't mean it's not gamethrowing - they're not mutually exclusive offenses.

    * * *

    You know @Rachyl , I thought that the 4x Banlist would've mellowed you out a bit. Instead, you are still as belligerent as ever. Evidently, you have learned nothing from your ban.
    your a coward. case closed.

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •