And re read page 29 soviets posts there... If you dont get pro rule followerr vibes from that then your either dumb or a rule breaker
Anyways im going to sleep it seems theres only a few people actually playing anyways prob not gonn a get no where nite nite
Scv pulled this one time with me and proceeded to get gangbanged.
Provide reasoning.
-vote blinkskater
Your backpeddling is bullshit and I've lost my patience with you.
It's absolutely blantant to me at this point that you're some sort of breaker at this point, most likely a com hunter.
And this next set of posts is equally bullshit.
Understandable to an extent but the half-assed dedication "yea i meant this but yknow i wasnt compleeeetely wrong"
If you meant something other than what you meant then why bother to continue defending your point?
Side note:
I have 50 post pages enabled so please provide either quotes or post numbers.
Yeah d00d I know I'm new to FM and all but just because some people talk a lot doesn't mean their points make sense. So far both mafia-led kills have been shit... killing a gamethrower town instead of letting it modkill (Thus making it one person easier for a maf win, giving gamethrower the victory) and then randomkilling someone who turns out to be a rule-follower. Then, instead of admitting their mistake, they double-down by saying Spruance was acting sketchy and try to turn on me.
I am confused why MM and Secondpassing seem so sure about each other, and why they think stealth is also rule-follower. I think at least one of these three has to be scum, and I honestly think MM or secondpassing. I liked the logic in a lot of MM's original posts, so I am going to go with secondpassing to start.
What you should do:
If you lynch me and I am a rule-follower, then you need to admit your mistake, and given that at least 1 maf is probably a rule-breaker, either lynch secondpassing or MM after me. Or modkill whatever. (Spoiler: I am a ruler-follower).
-vote secondpassing
We have heard a lot of from Marshmallow Marshall, Secondpassing, and Stealthbomber16 [and blink, who seems to be making a lot of sense to me lately]. I would like to hear more recent thoughts from @Hybrid @naz @Efe @Gyrlander (the jailor?). Some of you guys have to be rule-followers, help a brother out here.
Additionally, other than vague nonsense about his reads @Stealthbomber16 still hasn't given a good reason why I'm the "Skyper" but other people followed, and moreover, who it is that I am supposedly skyping with. What he has done is lead a lynch train of people who consistently have their hunches refuted. But we have inactivity from a lot of people, so scum can delay again and the maf will kill another random town. Doesn't it make sense NOT TO LYNCH PEOPLE OR USE MAF KILLS until we communicate with the host more?
We lose nothing. We can wait until we all coordinate to ask Distorted if he wants us to lynch someone using the tactic that I proposed previously. This would be a logical thing to do instead of risking a 6/10 chance of killing another rule-follower tonight.
@Distorted if you are reading this, rule-followers could really use a modkill of one of the 3 who've been leading this town to disaster (specifically secondpassing or MM). You get 2 modkills before it's gg, town needs you.
My question for host today is going to be:
Please reply "Yes" if you think we should lynch Marshmallow Marshall, "No" if you think we should lynch secondpassing, and "ignore" if you think we should lynch someone else or not lynch someone.
Soviet Love
_____
If any other rule-followers want to help follow this strategy, just pick another 2 names that I didn't say (even if one is me, w.e) and communicate with host. If we coordinate we can gain info.
But You Wrote Me Wrong So Die
-vote Soviet_Love
I Like Ice Cream
@Marshmallow Marshall
I am trusting Blink because he is a idio I mean because My Ego Suspects No Challenger
I Like Ice Cream
it's almost 2 am here and i just want to say my strongest scum read is MM, with possible buddying of sb16 (skypers?); hybrid also possible scum, but idk how to read that little monkey
soviet is my strongest rule follower read
sad about spruance, but u didn't play ur best bro, ;^(
if i vote to lynch today it'll probably be mm
We should be able to get enough on board to atleast lynch secondcoming seems like nobody cares to lynch mm much so @naz tallah @Soviet_Love @Efekannn02 @Hybrid lets start to purge these rule breaking mafia members who kill whomever they want without respecting ANY of our judgements/input they completly randomed scv and got lucky per say, completly muffed the spruance kill, and have been saying im Scum since day one , but yet low and behold im still here? Let's shift this game into towns favor a bit and rely on out actual jailor to start making kills MM and secondcomings ways of doing things are not working-vote secondcoming
-vote secondpassing
-vote secondpassing
ok blink-vote secondpassing
I Like Ice Cream
@SuperJack in this setup can a member of the mafia role block one of his own?
can a member of the mafia roleblock one of his own?
Good news if we get rid of the unrole blockable Godfather then we can control The Kills via role blockin or at least agree upon a Target if no agreement then I can roll block hybrid and Soviet can block MM so if someone dies who's not supposed to die then we know there's a rat in the mafia also I understand that mm has an unblockable jail kill so we will have to hope he does not use that because if he does we will know and he can be lynched
I also think that second passings Lynch will make things a lot clearer on whos who and all the townies that don't want to vote any mafia it makes your game throwing case look strong
Blink is now my strongest rule-follower read, followed by Naz and then Efe.
The three that I mentioned: Stealthbomber16, MM, and SecondPassing are my scummy reads. I think one of them may legitimate be a rule-follower but is being led astray by the others.
I would love to roleblock maf kill if necessary
I have just returned from school. First, I'd like to confirm I'm the Jailor. I see Secondary Roles don't mean much on this setup + Host already knows everyone so yep. I jailed naz last night but we talked basically nothing.
Should I use my jail ability? And if so, on who?
Thank you Anonymous Donor
As a summary:
From where I stand, there's currently 2 main groups:
(1) Stealthbomber16, Marshmallow Marshall, Secondpassing
(2) Myself (Soviet_Love), Blink
(3) Naz, Hybrid, Efekann02, Gyrlander, Suntax [neutrals]
So far, group (1) has been leading this town. I, MM, and secondpassing are mafia. Secondpassing is gf, MM is kidnapper, I'm consort.
Right now, I think someone in group 1 is scummy and is leading this town to disaster. I'd appreciate if you joined us and voted up Secondpassing. If, at the end of the day, we aren't able to get enough lynches, I think that you should jail Secondpassing and preferably execute. That way I can use my roleblocking abilities on MM and we can only have 1 death (unless MM also executed someone).
Gyr my issue with this explanation is that at the moment blink is appearing to be an antagonistic piece of shit rule breaker and that Soviet is pushing people while simultaneously having votes on him
The game is very divided and honestly I would be okay with not lynching today, we need to stay calm and reach a conclusion. That being said, I’ll remain on blink.
Doing that will lead people to being inactive, and will give potential skypers time to prepare their win (yes their win, they'll win if we do that). Plus, your haste on getting me/secondpassing smells gamethrower hardcore. I just wonder if there could be on in town AND one in mafia, but I guess roles were randomized...
Also he gets ONE modkill as error, since the other is instant loss.
Because jailor has to be one of the AFKs. Noone claimed being jailed (out of my own kidnaps), and Secondpassing is the Godfather. So the only one left is @Gyrlander , which means he reallyyyyyy should come on and say something lol.
@SuperJack
According to the Rule Follower rolecard, if one dies and hasn't seen 2 Rule Breakers lose they don't win, am I correct? (For example, Spruance has already lost)
Thank you Anonymous Donor
Seeeee? =)
Always use your night jail ability. Even just to get a private chat with someone. Actually, I'd like you to jail Soviet_Love, and to ask him to explain his thoughts.
I don't get how you can form a town read on basically nothing, like in the Efekannn case. I know he has good thoughts and he's a follower read just because I jailed him, but YOU DON'T. (addressed to soviet love, not to gyrlander)
For now, I'm quite confused with Rule Follower win condition as it says THIS in the role card:
"In order to win you must see more than 2 Rule Breakers not accomplish their Primary win condition."
But in the win conditions part it says:
"Rule Follower: Have the game last longer than day 4, and see no more then 2 rule breakers win"
Which, in the end, are two different things.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
Pretty sure this is a crucial issue that was missed by everyone including the people reviewed the setup lmao. If not, I'm just dumb.
Thank you Anonymous Donor
No it's not xD
In the mod, witch must "Stay alive until the end and see the Town lose." Seeing town lose can be done as dead, no? Also, there are 5 rule breakers. So not more than two winning or more than two losing is same thing (not exactly, but the number of losing breakers stays the same)