S-FM 209: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies
Register

User Tag List

Page 1 of 31 1 2 3 4 5 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 50 of 1545
  1. ISO #1

    S-FM 209: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    SETUP






    Living Players
    Graveyard
    2. @JealousTL
    3. @MattZed Replaced by Unknown1234
    4. @Gingerape
    5. @Alles_Paletti Replaced by Eggy
    6. @Yukitaka Oni
    7. @Shapelog
    9. @Spruance Replaced by secondpassing
    10. @Slayer Replaced by SuperJack
    11. @Titus
    12. @PLZLEAVEDUCKK
    13. @Calix
    14.
    15. @Klingoncelt
    @RLVG : Citizen
    @Never Unlucky : Mafioso
    @Kovath : Friendly Neighbor


    GROUP 1
    GROUP 2
    GROUP 3
    Titus
    Shapelog
    Unknown1234
    Klingoncelt
    Alles_Paletti
    Calix
    JealousTL
    SuperJack
    PLZLEAVEDUCKK
    secondpassing
    Gingerape
    Kovath
    Yukitaka Oni
    Never Unlucky



    When everyone has confirmed their role, and it is a good time for me to start the game, The game will start.

    EOD 1:
    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS



    SOD 2:
    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS



    Day 2 post

    End of DP: I: Day 2
    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS



    EOD DP: II:
    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS



    SOD 3:
    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS



    NEW GROUPS WILL BE GIVEN AT SOD 3!

    GROUP 1
    GROUP 2
    Unknown1234
    Titus
    Gingerape
    secondpassing
    Shapelog
    JealousTL
    PLZLEAVEDUCKK
    Firebringer
    Eggy
    Yukitaka Oni
    Klingoncelt
    Calix

    End of DP: I: Day 3:
    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS

    Last edited by Quick; August 18th, 2016 at 03:21 PM.
    Mafia Record:
    Spoiler : On Site/Universal Total :
    ..Total: 5/9 = 55.6% | 61/104 = 58.3%..
    ...Town: 3/5 = 60% | 42/76 = 55.3%...
    ....Mafia: 0/2 = 0% | 14/23 = 60.9%....
    .....3P: 1/1 = 100% | 3P: 3/5 = 60%.....
    My advice on Mafia play:
    Get the Led Out

  2. ISO #2

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Game will begin when 13/15 players have confirmed by

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS

    Mafia Record:
    Spoiler : On Site/Universal Total :
    ..Total: 5/9 = 55.6% | 61/104 = 58.3%..
    ...Town: 3/5 = 60% | 42/76 = 55.3%...
    ....Mafia: 0/2 = 0% | 14/23 = 60.9%....
    .....3P: 1/1 = 100% | 3P: 3/5 = 60%.....
    My advice on Mafia play:
    Get the Led Out

  3. ISO #3

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    13/15 players have confirmed.

    With 3 Groups of 5 people each, it takes 8 to pick a group. 8 votes to hammer.

    1. @Never Unlucky
    2. @JealousTL
    3. @MattZed
    4. @Gingerape
    5. @Alles_Paletti
    6. @Yukitaka Oni
    7. @Shapelog
    8. @RLVG
    9. @Spruance
    10. @Slayer
    11. @Titus
    12. @PLZLEAVEDUCKK
    13. @Calix
    14. @Kovath
    15. @Klingoncelt

    Game Starts now.

    First half of the day ends in:

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    • 00

    DAYS HOURS MINUTES SECONDS

    Last edited by Quick; August 12th, 2016 at 03:23 PM.
    Mafia Record:
    Spoiler : On Site/Universal Total :
    ..Total: 5/9 = 55.6% | 61/104 = 58.3%..
    ...Town: 3/5 = 60% | 42/76 = 55.3%...
    ....Mafia: 0/2 = 0% | 14/23 = 60.9%....
    .....3P: 1/1 = 100% | 3P: 3/5 = 60%.....
    My advice on Mafia play:
    Get the Led Out

  4. ISO #4

  5. ISO #5

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    -vote Group 1


    Guess this is the part where we talk about the setup? Not sure if I understand it correctly myself, but each group has 1 or 2 scum in it, right?

    Assuming that's correct, we already have a lot of information about which scum teams AREN'T possible in the game.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  6. ISO #6

  7. ISO #7

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    -vote Group 1

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    -vote Group 2


    I'm curious as to how good Never Unlucky is. Quick said he was good. I'm curious.
    I can't say I'm good, but I can say that I don't have a bowl haircut.

    If you're curious to see how 'good' I am, wouldn't you be voting for Group 3, my group?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    DUDE, YOURE ONLY LEFT ALIVE BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EXTRA CHROMOSOME DO YOU NOT SEE THAT

  8. ISO #8

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Lucky number 13 started the game boys.

    Let's go.
    >says he wants to start the game off
    >makes no attempt aside from saying "let's go" to actually get things going

    Strong.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  9. ISO #9

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Also it doesn't look like the votes are appearing on the automated vote system. @Quick might want to get that checked with the admins.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  10. ISO #10

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Yeah if I understand it right, there is 1 scum per group. Kinda like a cell mafia (where there are 5 cells, each cell has 1.) minus having a mayor decided the order the Cells get brought up.

    Also this part of the game is usually when people just post random things tills someone trys to bring discussion into the game.

    ALSO IDC IF THERE ARE NEW POSTS, I DON'T WANT TO REVIEW THEM SITE!

    GO AWAY, LET ME FREAKING POST THIS.
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  11. ISO #11

  12. ISO #12

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Never Unlucky View Post
    -vote Group 1



    I can't say I'm good, but I can say that I don't have a bowl haircut.

    If you're curious to see how 'good' I am, wouldn't you be voting for Group 3, my group?
    Nope. I find people are at their best when they aren't facing a lethal firing squad.

  13. ISO #13

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Yeah if I understand it right, there is 1 scum per group. Kinda like a cell mafia (where there are 5 cells, each cell has 1.) minus having a mayor decided the order the Cells get brought up.

    Also this part of the game is usually when people just post random things tills someone trys to bring discussion into the game.

    ALSO IDC IF THERE ARE NEW POSTS, I DON'T WANT TO REVIEW THEM SITE!

    GO AWAY, LET ME FREAKING POST THIS.
    One of the groups has to have two scum, so either the scum will be inclined to vote for that group (because mislynching + killing a member from that group helps them achieve their win con faster) or they'll want to avoid it to lower the odds of scum being lynched. I feel like the latter is more likely though.

    You can turn off that if you go to 'settings' by the way.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  14. ISO #14

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    >says he wants to start the game off
    >makes no attempt aside from saying "let's go" to actually get things going

    Strong.
    >Complains about not wanting to do anything
    >Expects me not to do anything to follow that up
    >Does something to follow it up
    >????
    >Profit
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  15. ISO #15

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    If nothing else, I will keep track of the group votes.
    Mafia Record:
    Spoiler : On Site/Universal Total :
    ..Total: 5/9 = 55.6% | 61/104 = 58.3%..
    ...Town: 3/5 = 60% | 42/76 = 55.3%...
    ....Mafia: 0/2 = 0% | 14/23 = 60.9%....
    .....3P: 1/1 = 100% | 3P: 3/5 = 60%.....
    My advice on Mafia play:
    Get the Led Out

  16. ISO #16

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    >Complains about not wanting to do anything
    >Expects me not to do anything to follow that up
    >Does something to follow it up
    >????
    >Profit
    Responding to my post with trolling. Noted.

    Moving on. Which site do you herald from and what's the standard 'meta' over there?
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  17. ISO #17

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    Nope. I find people are at their best when they aren't facing a lethal firing squad.
    I disagree.

    People need a Barrel of a 50. Cal in their face everyday.
    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    One of the groups has to have two scum, so either the scum will be inclined to vote for that group (because mislynching + killing a member from that group helps them achieve their win con faster) or they'll want to avoid it to lower the odds of scum being lynched. I feel like the latter is more likely though.

    You can turn off that if you go to 'settings' by the way.
    Oh they can different amounts? I just this was going to be like cell lol.

    Do you find it strange that Group 1 has 3 votes already given the bold?
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  18. ISO #18

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    I disagree.

    People need a Barrel of a 50. Cal in their face everyday.


    Oh they can different amounts? I just this was going to be like cell lol.

    Do you find it strange that Group 1 has 3 votes already given the bold?
    If we have 4 mafia and only 3 groups then one of them HAS to have 2 scum in it.

    NU and I are the only people who have voted for Group 1. Titus voted for Group 2. Given that I voted first and NU followed me (nothing unusual there) I don't consider it strange.

    Why haven't you voted?
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  19. ISO #19

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Yeah if I understand it right, there is 1 scum per group. Kinda like a cell mafia (where there are 5 cells, each cell has 1.) minus having a mayor decided the order the Cells get brought up.

    Also this part of the game is usually when people just post random things tills someone trys to bring discussion into the game.

    ALSO IDC IF THERE ARE NEW POSTS, I DON'T WANT TO REVIEW THEM SITE!

    GO AWAY, LET ME FREAKING POST THIS.
    This post gave me a Spruance/Mesk feeling...



    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    -vote Group 1


    Guess this is the part where we talk about the setup? Not sure if I understand it correctly myself, but each group has 1 or 2 scum in it, right?

    Assuming that's correct, we already have a lot of information about which scum teams AREN'T possible in the game.
    That is correct.

    You're neglecting the 'Traitor' wildcard which would nuance your post.
    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    Nope. I find people are at their best when they aren't facing a lethal firing squad.
    Why though? Why would players who are safe for the day (i.e. they can't be lynched and feel no pressure) would be at their best?

    Side-note: You and I have a similar avatar, you and I have similar posting styles(from what I can see so far)... I, too, am curious to see your play.

    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    DUDE, YOURE ONLY LEFT ALIVE BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EXTRA CHROMOSOME DO YOU NOT SEE THAT

  20. ISO #20

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Never Unlucky View Post
    This post gave me a Spruance/Mesk feeling...





    That is correct.

    You're neglecting the 'Traitor' wildcard which would nuance your post.

    Why though? Why would players who are safe for the day (i.e. they can't be lynched and feel no pressure) would be at their best?

    Side-note: You and I have a similar avatar, you and I have similar posting styles(from what I can see so far)... I, too, am curious to see your play.

    If you were lurking, it would be a scumclaim. Removing the pressure of fucking up gets more open and honest communication (by open and honest meaning your natural state, which could be a lying gambiter but you get the idea).

  21. ISO #21

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    Responding to my post with trolling. Noted.

    Moving on. Which site do you herald from and what's the standard 'meta' over there?
    Will see where that gets you.

    I am from Team liquids mafia subforum. I've played like over 15 or so games there, and currently in 1 like i said. If our database wasn't screw-up, I would say you could my personal meta quite easily.

    As a site, TL usually spends D1 joking for the first half, looking for tone/meta/questionable posts, and then goes into more heavy discussion later on. Its pretty active compare to other sites (usually in a decent game now a days, 40 pages per cycle) and a good chuck of people are narcissist or funny. Minus a few are try hards.

    Later in the day it changes with how the games go. I will say the site as a whole focuses a bit heavy on associative reads (I personally might breezily talked about 1 thought, but I typically wait till after a scum lynch.) and not enough of filter diving over all. VCA differs from person to person, case building is pretty good when looking at those players who been there more then 5 games.

    Jealous also comes from TL as well.
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  22. ISO #22

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Never Unlucky View Post
    That is correct.

    You're neglecting the 'Traitor' wildcard which would nuance your post.
    Forgot that was a thing.

    20 minutes in and I can already tell that this is going to be one of those games where I have the setup open in a separate tab 24/7.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  23. ISO #23

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    Forgot that was a thing.

    20 minutes in and I can already tell that this is going to be one of those games where I have the setup open in a separate tab 24/7.
    Oh you think this is complicated? I eat this setup for breakfast.

  24. ISO #24

  25. ISO #25

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Will see where that gets you.

    I am from Team liquids mafia subforum. I've played like over 15 or so games there, and currently in 1 like i said. If our database wasn't screw-up, I would say you could my personal meta quite easily.

    As a site, TL usually spends D1 joking for the first half, looking for tone/meta/questionable posts, and then goes into more heavy discussion later on. Its pretty active compare to other sites (usually in a decent game now a days, 40 pages per cycle) and a good chuck of people are narcissist or funny. Minus a few are try hards.
    Heads up, our ISO feature is a bit awkward to use, but we have an automated vote counter which is just at the top of the thread.

    How D1 goes varies a bit on this site. Sometimes you get a lot of trolling/ shit-posting to start, but usually we have RVS/ setup spec/ meta/ odd posts for the start.

    Not sure how this game will go at all, given that we have a lot of off-site players put together with some mod players and casuals. It's why I want to clear up any possible meta clashes sooner rather than later.

    Later in the day it changes with how the games go. I will say the site as a whole focuses a bit heavy on associative reads (I personally might breezily talked about 1 thought, but I typically wait till after a scum lynch.) and not enough of filter diving over all. VCA differs from person to person, case building is pretty good when looking at those players who been there more then 5 games.

    Jealous also comes from TL as well.
    If you're referring to pre-flips, then I'm personally not a fan of those unless I'm looking at independent scum-reads.

    I'll keep the rest in mind.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  26. ISO #26

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    Oh you think this is complicated? I eat this setup for breakfast.
    I have next-to-no experience with these kind of setups as it seems like something you'd find on MS more than here, so yeah I do feel like I am fumbling around.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  27. ISO #27

  28. ISO #28

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    Oh you think this is complicated? I eat this setup for breakfast.
    Cocky, eh? I like this guy already.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    @Never Unlucky , Do you perform better under pressure?
    I become the saltiest bitch (Though Duck is a serious contestant) you'll ever get to play with and think out loud.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    If you were lurking, it would be a scumclaim.
    I'm not following you.

    Removing the pressure of fucking up gets more open and honest communication (by open and honest meaning your natural state, which could be a lying gambiter but you get the idea).
    Fair enough.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    DUDE, YOURE ONLY LEFT ALIVE BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EXTRA CHROMOSOME DO YOU NOT SEE THAT

  29. ISO #29

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick View Post
    Vote count reset. Try again.
    -vote Group 1
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  30. ISO #30

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    Not sure how this game will go at all, given that we have a lot of off-site players put together with some mod players and casuals. It's why I want to clear up any possible meta clashes sooner rather than later.
    Which one am I?

    Quote Originally Posted by Quick View Post

    Vote count reset. Try again.
    -vote Group 1
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    DUDE, YOURE ONLY LEFT ALIVE BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EXTRA CHROMOSOME DO YOU NOT SEE THAT

  31. ISO #31

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    If we have 4 mafia and only 3 groups then one of them HAS to have 2 scum in it.

    NU and I are the only people who have voted for Group 1. Titus voted for Group 2. Given that I voted first and NU followed me (nothing unusual there) I don't consider it strange.

    Why haven't you voted?
    Oh there is 4 mafia players rofl. I thought this was /m13.

    Oh I miscounted then. I scrolled up too fast.

    AS for not voting, I am honestly just going to put the vote on what ever group has the most votes when I get off (since I be back tomorrow if needed to change it), unless a certain player from a group really sticks out to me before then. That way we are more likely to get a group elected since we need 8. The only person I personally know is Jealous, and I never actually played with him IIRC (I hosted/cohosted games with him in it, and gave pointers etc.) so meta is kinda thrown out of the picture for me.

    I also see no special benefit of trying to rush a group into the voting stage.
    Quote Originally Posted by Never Unlucky View Post
    This post gave me a Spruance/Mesk feeling...





    That is correct.

    You're neglecting the 'Traitor' wildcard which would nuance your post.

    Why though? Why would players who are safe for the day (i.e. they can't be lynched and feel no pressure) would be at their best?

    Side-note: You and I have a similar avatar, you and I have similar posting styles(from what I can see so far)... I, too, am curious to see your play.

    There are people like me in this game?
    YES!

    (I actually get better later in the game, much like a AD carry)


    Oh fuck, Traitors are in this game. I hate them.
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  32. ISO #32

  33. ISO #33

  34. ISO #34

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Never Unlucky View Post
    Which one am I?
    You fall under the category that wears PTB's helmet.

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Oh there is 4 mafia players rofl. I thought this was /m13.

    Oh I miscounted then. I scrolled up too fast.

    AS for not voting, I am honestly just going to put the vote on what ever group has the most votes when I get off (since I be back tomorrow if needed to change it), unless a certain player from a group really sticks out to me before then. That way we are more likely to get a group elected since we need 8. The only person I personally know is Jealous, and I never actually played with him IIRC (I hosted/cohosted games with him in it, and gave pointers etc.) so meta is kinda thrown out of the picture for me.
    Content aside, the way you presented your vote decision feels townie to me.

    Might be how you talk but I'm too lazy to check for myself so I'm just going to roll with it.

    (it's too early to tell how easily we'll be able to gain a majority vote for groups so can't really comment there)

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    I tend to be more of the angrily annoyed variety. I'm sure some of you can attest.
    I can confirm this.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  35. ISO #35

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Oh there is 4 mafia players rofl. I thought this was /m13.

    Oh I miscounted then. I scrolled up too fast.
    Excuses, ok...

    There are people like me in this game?
    YES!
    No, it's not a good thing.

    (I actually get better later in the game, much like a AD carry)
    League of Legends loser, lol.


    Oh fuck, Traitors are in this game. I hate them.
    Happy to see another person using GIFs.

    [QUOTE=Titus;633302]
    -vote Group 2


    @Never Unlucky , You accepted a challenge to be your best. Lurking is not your best. You wouldn't even be trying, thus scumclaim.[/vote]

    I'm lurking, huh?

    Second, salty hmmm. I tend to be more of the angrily annoyed variety. I'm sure some of you can attest.

    Third, I'm a woman.
    I'm turned off.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mesk514 View Post
    DUDE, YOURE ONLY LEFT ALIVE BECAUSE YOU HAVE AN EXTRA CHROMOSOME DO YOU NOT SEE THAT

  36. ISO #36

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    Oh you think this is complicated? I eat this setup for breakfast.
    Hidden joke here,
    Breakfast SETS you UP for the rest of the day.
    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    Heads up, our ISO feature is a bit awkward to use, but we have an automated vote counter which is just at the top of the thread.

    How D1 goes varies a bit on this site. Sometimes you get a lot of trolling/ shit-posting to start, but usually we have RVS/ setup spec/ meta/ odd posts for the start.

    Not sure how this game will go at all, given that we have a lot of off-site players put together with some mod players and casuals. It's why I want to clear up any possible meta clashes sooner rather than later.



    If you're referring to pre-flips, then I'm personally not a fan of those unless I'm looking at independent scum-reads.

    I'll keep the rest in mind.
    Oh you guys have RVS...That explains a lot rn.

    It is also worth noting I have played 2 games on INTP Fourm's and 1 on OMGUS. OMGUS one is old though.

    Personally I never founded the benefit of RVS. Maybe once in a blue moon, you might get a correct scum read due to pressure that results from it. But A) Mafia knows about it, B)Decent mafia can Counter it IMO, C)Mafia gets careful due to it, etc. At least in my opinion they do.

    Personally I like approaching my sus. player with questions (which I try to predict the answer each alignment would say towards it) on d1 to determine their alignment better. Sometimes I am aggressive with it early on, other times I am more passive.

    Not sure how this game will go at all, given that we have a lot of off-site players put together with some mod players and casuals. It's why I want to clear up any possible meta clashes sooner rather than later.
    Reasonable enough
    If you're referring to pre-flips, then I'm personally not a fan of those unless I'm looking at independent scum-reads.
    Me either, that is why I told the newbies in the last newbie game i host how i felt about them and them doing them N1 without no scum flipping.
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  37. ISO #37

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    [QUOTE=Never Unlucky;633306]Excuses, ok...



    No, it's not a good thing.



    League of Legends loser, lol.



    Happy to see another person using GIFs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    -vote Group 2


    @Never Unlucky , You accepted a challenge to be your best. Lurking is not your best. You wouldn't even be trying, thus scumclaim.[/vote]

    I'm lurking, huh?



    I'm turned off.
    No. I did not not say you were lurking.
    Context: I said if you lurked it would be a scumclaim.
    You: huh?
    Me: *explains why Lurking would be a scumclaim*

  38. ISO #38

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Oh you guys have RVS...That explains a lot rn.

    It is also worth noting I have played 2 games on INTP Fourm's and 1 on OMGUS. OMGUS one is old though.

    Personally I never founded the benefit of RVS. Maybe once in a blue moon, you might get a correct scum read due to pressure that results from it. But A) Mafia knows about it, B)Decent mafia can Counter it IMO, C)Mafia gets careful due to it, etc. At least in my opinion they do.
    Mostly I just use it because of a) it's a reliable way of getting a conversation going and b) tradition. I don't consider it something that would find scum by themselves unless said scum are inexperienced/ terrible under pressure.

    Personally I like approaching my sus. player with questions (which I try to predict the answer each alignment would say towards it) on d1 to determine their alignment better. Sometimes I am aggressive with it early on, other times I am more passive.
    What situations would determine wherever you are more aggressive/ passive?
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  39. ISO #39

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Hidden joke here,
    Breakfast SETS you UP for the rest of the day.

    Oh you guys have RVS...That explains a lot rn.

    It is also worth noting I have played 2 games on INTP Fourm's and 1 on OMGUS. OMGUS one is old though.

    Personally I never founded the benefit of RVS. Maybe once in a blue moon, you might get a correct scum read due to pressure that results from it. But A) Mafia knows about it, B)Decent mafia can Counter it IMO, C)Mafia gets careful due to it, etc. At least in my opinion they do.

    Personally I like approaching my sus. player with questions (which I try to predict the answer each alignment would say towards it) on d1 to determine their alignment better. Sometimes I am aggressive with it early on, other times I am more passive.


    Reasonable enough

    Me either, that is why I told the newbies in the last newbie game i host how i felt about them and them doing them N1 without no scum flipping.
    Hi Professor.

    None of us are your students.

  40. ISO #40

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    I want to say a few things. One I am slightly intoxicated so forgive me for anything incredibly stupid that is more unintelligent than my normal vernacular. I am slightly perturbed that quick has used the hidden mechanic as a joke/personal gripe towards me. I am hardclaiming that I DO NOT KNOW MY ALIGNMENT. To paraphrase I was "knocked unconscious by a rival spy and when I awoke they had stolen my identity and I forgot who I was."

    Not only am I a SELF AWARE "miller" per say, but I DO NOT KNOW MY ROLE OR ALIGNMENT UNTIL THE END OF NIGHT 1.

    I had planned to vote on my own group, however since I do not know my alignment, I personally think it would be best to vote group 3 and lynch RLVG. There are too many players I do not know to risk going after new players, and I think it is better to see waht they have. RLvg has shown consistenlyy that he is posting below the normal threshold, and is more trolly. I think lynching him will be good for town regardless of flip. Also, I just pray others don't have the same or equally retarded fucking PM.

    This game is going to be extremely annoying for me because I feel it is as if I am culted. If I play as if im town (71.4%), and I lynch a scum, then find out I am actually scum tonight, I will be fucking livid.

    I do want to say that if I had to guess I am a town role because I do not expect that quick assumed me, and maybe others?, would claim this right away and if a sheriff green checks a mafia that is basically gg for town.

    WHY DOES HE START THE GAME WHEN I GO OUT TO DINNER.

    -vote group3

  41. ISO #41

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    I'm not saying I have a problem with what is happening in the thread right now, but keep ad homs to a min please. I want a clean game, not a shitfest.
    Mafia Record:
    Spoiler : On Site/Universal Total :
    ..Total: 5/9 = 55.6% | 61/104 = 58.3%..
    ...Town: 3/5 = 60% | 42/76 = 55.3%...
    ....Mafia: 0/2 = 0% | 14/23 = 60.9%....
    .....3P: 1/1 = 100% | 3P: 3/5 = 60%.....
    My advice on Mafia play:
    Get the Led Out

  42. ISO #42

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    @Never Unlucky , Do you perform better under pressure?
    Haven't caught up yet, need to get water before I can fucking reading comprension, but I will say that the #1 thing players from other sites SHOULD do as town, is ask about the playstyle of new players. I hard townread titus for this, probably more than warratns a strong town read.

    Also titus=symmetra?

  43. ISO #43

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    So Duck's claiming to have some kind of negative-utility rolecard that would mean that he essentially invalidates everything he says as NAI until Day 2.

    It's not a mechanic that I've ever heard of before and this is meant to be 'balanced' so I'm not sure wherever a) he's telling the truth or b) this is one of his insane conspiracy theories that he's made up as part of a convoluted plan.

    Both are equally possible when it comes to him.
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  44. ISO #44

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    So Duck's claiming to have some kind of negative-utility rolecard that would mean that he essentially invalidates everything he says as NAI until Day 2.

    It's not a mechanic that I've ever heard of before and this is meant to be 'balanced' so I'm not sure wherever a) he's telling the truth or b) this is one of his insane conspiracy theories that he's made up as part of a convoluted plan.

    Both are equally possible when it comes to him.
    Here is what we know:

    1) If I am lieing, I am always mafia and doing this
    2) I will likely have cooridnated this in night chat already and my partner will be going along with it in some way or fashion?

    If you can find town or mafia motivation in what happened to me share it, and use it for or against me.

    I have stated many times in previous games that I DO NOT plan my opening posts or plays. I do everything as it happens, if you think that is alignment indicative then read me in that way, because guess what I can't fucking tell you if you are right or wrong about me.
    @Calix Personally I feel our group would be bad to select because this site has a bad meta where activity is read as town. I would argue my activity and yours would make us "immune", do you agree with this, and what are your thoughts on that?

  45. ISO #45

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post
    So Duck's claiming to have some kind of negative-utility rolecard that would mean that he essentially invalidates everything he says as NAI until Day 2.

    It's not a mechanic that I've ever heard of before and this is meant to be 'balanced' so I'm not sure wherever a) he's telling the truth or b) this is one of his insane conspiracy theories that he's made up as part of a convoluted plan.

    Both are equally possible when it comes to him.
    There's two choices.
    1) Vote Group 2 to lynch him to remove the hassle.
    2) Ignore him and document changes. Compare the second version to his towngame and the first.

  46. ISO #46

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Calix View Post

    Might be how you talk but I'm too lazy to check for myself so I'm just going to roll with it.

    (it's too early to tell how easily we'll be able to gain a majority vote for groups so can't really comment there)
    Eh let me know if you want recent games (either from the site or from my games) since I got that tab open playing another game. I sure we can share past game links and such.

    As for the groups, eh, depends on how the thread feels honestly. If they rest of the players have a mob mentality, then it will reach it prob by tomorrow for me in my timezone.

    [QUOTE=Never Unlucky;633306]Excuses, ok...



    No, it's not a good thing.



    League of Legends loser, lol.



    Happy to see another person using GIFs.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    -vote Group 2


    @Never Unlucky , You accepted a challenge to be your best. Lurking is not your best. You wouldn't even be trying, thus scumclaim.[/vote]

    I'm lurking, huh?



    I'm turned off.
    Lol, I never have played a moba, I just know the terms. Why isn't it a good thing for there to be people how i act?
    "Subsequently clicking post is like launching a doomsday's worth of nukes' equivalent in dopamine."

  47. ISO #47

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    There's two choices.
    1) Vote Group 2 to lynch him to remove the hassle.
    2) Ignore him and document changes. Compare the second version to his towngame and the first.
    While I really liked your opening, I strongly agree with your point 2.

    If you want to lynch me over the "mechanic", that I can understand. But to "ignore" me is one of the most INSANE things I have EVER heard. MY READS ARE 100% UNBIASED. Even If I am lynched, YOU should be paying attention to my reads. Everything I give will be from a town scum hunting perspective. You might not agree with the things I read, but to ignore them is one of the most anti-town things to do.

  48. ISO #48

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by Shapelog View Post
    Eh let me know if you want recent games (either from the site or from my games) since I got that tab open playing another game. I sure we can share past game links and such.
    Quote Originally Posted by Quick View Post
    RULES OF CONDUCT:
    NO QUOTING ANYTHING FROM OUTSIDE THE GAME
    Reread the rules.
    Mafia Record:
    Spoiler : On Site/Universal Total :
    ..Total: 5/9 = 55.6% | 61/104 = 58.3%..
    ...Town: 3/5 = 60% | 42/76 = 55.3%...
    ....Mafia: 0/2 = 0% | 14/23 = 60.9%....
    .....3P: 1/1 = 100% | 3P: 3/5 = 60%.....
    My advice on Mafia play:
    Get the Led Out

  49. ISO #49

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by PLZLEAVEDUCKK View Post
    Here is what we know:

    1) If I am lieing, I am always mafia and doing this
    2) I will likely have cooridnated this in night chat already and my partner will be going along with it in some way or fashion?

    If you can find town or mafia motivation in what happened to me share it, and use it for or against me.

    I have stated many times in previous games that I DO NOT plan my opening posts or plays. I do everything as it happens, if you think that is alignment indicative then read me in that way, because guess what I can't fucking tell you if you are right or wrong about me.
    @Calix Personally I feel our group would be bad to select because this site has a bad meta where activity is read as town. I would argue my activity and yours would make us "immune", do you agree with this, and what are your thoughts on that?
    1. Agreed because it makes no sense for town to try and write off their contributions from square one as "null"
    2. Wait, did the mafia even have a N0 chat?

    Voting for my own group means that I have little influence over who gets lynched today and if there's something I know, it's that nobody gives a flying fuck about what you have to say when you can't vote.

    So hell fucking no am I doing that shit anytime soon, regardless of how we're read.

    Quote Originally Posted by Titus View Post
    There's two choices.
    1) Vote Group 2 to lynch him to remove the hassle.
    2) Ignore him and document changes. Compare the second version to his towngame and the first.
    Second option makes more sense. If anything, the unknown element in Group 2 makes it a hazard.

    On second thoughts, I'm going to switch to Group 3. This is based on nothing but meta as I've played with 4/5 of the players in that block so I have a better chance of detecting which 1-2 of them are scum.

    -vote Group 3
    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    Why'd you leave out the sun emoji? I think it creates a huge sense of tone that is critical for the interpretation of the chat.
    Quote Originally Posted by FM Romeo View Post
    Go fuck yourself in the cucho.
    Quote Originally Posted by MattZed
    Your accent has ruined medieval fantasy films.

  50. ISO #50

    Re: S-FM 210: Surreptitious: The Game of Spies

    Quote Originally Posted by PLZLEAVEDUCKK View Post
    I want to say a few things. One I am slightly intoxicated so forgive me for anything incredibly stupid that is more unintelligent than my normal vernacular. I am slightly perturbed that quick has used the hidden mechanic as a joke/personal gripe towards me. I am hardclaiming that I DO NOT KNOW MY ALIGNMENT. To paraphrase I was "knocked unconscious by a rival spy and when I awoke they had stolen my identity and I forgot who I was."

    Not only am I a SELF AWARE "miller" per say, but I DO NOT KNOW MY ROLE OR ALIGNMENT UNTIL THE END OF NIGHT 1.

    I had planned to vote on my own group, however since I do not know my alignment, I personally think it would be best to vote group 3 and lynch RLVG. There are too many players I do not know to risk going after new players, and I think it is better to see waht they have. RLvg has shown consistenlyy that he is posting below the normal threshold, and is more trolly. I think lynching him will be good for town regardless of flip. Also, I just pray others don't have the same or equally retarded fucking PM.

    This game is going to be extremely annoying for me because I feel it is as if I am culted. If I play as if im town (71.4%), and I lynch a scum, then find out I am actually scum tonight, I will be fucking livid.

    I do want to say that if I had to guess I am a town role because I do not expect that quick assumed me, and maybe others?, would claim this right away and if a sheriff green checks a mafia that is basically gg for town.

    WHY DOES HE START THE GAME WHEN I GO OUT TO DINNER.

    -vote group3
    Why were you originally planning to vote your own group?
    Death, yet the Town.
    ~The Town Code

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •