The circlejerk issue - Page 2
Register

User Tag List

View Poll Results: Which option

Voters
27. You may not vote on this poll
  • Option 1

    14 51.85%
  • Option 2

    9 33.33%
  • Something else (make a post)

    4 14.81%
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 1 2
Results 51 to 76 of 76
  1. ISO #51

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Appley isn't really in a position to know about rule breakings since he didn't see the approved rules prior to them not being posted properly for members.

    Basically they were just wording changes to mean that you could go after people and stuff but you had to keep it restrained or we'd come down on you. Mostly it was just a loosening of the personal attack rules instead of outright allowance.

  2. ISO #52

  3. ISO #53

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by oops_ur_dead View Post
    People really like option 1. I'll implement that sometime shortly, then.
    lol

    I'd rather say that people really hate option 2 and no one bother to think about option 3.
    When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
    When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
    They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
    Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
    ---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.

  4. ISO #54

  5. ISO #55

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by ThinkLiveLife View Post
    I do not like this idea. This is what I think would need to be changed to make the CJ environment acceptable..

    No Excessive Language
    No Necroing Threads
    Do Not Insult Other Members (In a direct and personal way) to (Indirectly)
    Do Not post about Mod Abuse in General Discussion

    Every one of those has a purpose. And at heart this community is from SC2. It would make this community look worse than it already does to other blizzard communities if we started encouraging this kind of behavior in a thread that was not specifically made for such nonsense.
    I'm confused about "Mod Abuse". Does it mean mods abusing others or mods being abused?

  6. ISO #56

  7. ISO #57

  8. ISO #58

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    both
    I love oops

    Spoiler : :

    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒░▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒░░▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒░░░▒▒▒▒▒▄
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒░░░░▒░▒▒▒▒▌
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▌░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▓▒░░░░░░▒▒░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▌▒░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓
    ▁▁▒▁▁▁▁▁▒▒░░░▒░░░░░░▒░░░░░▒░░░▒
    ▁▁▁▐▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░▁▐█▁▐░▒▒▁▐█▁░░░
    ▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▌░░░░░░▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▀▀░░░░▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒▒░░░░░░░▄▄▄▄██▓▓▌▀░▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▀▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▐▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▓▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▄▒░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▓
    ▁▁▁▁▁▁▁▓▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▌
    ▁▁▁▁▁▄▒▒░░░░░░░░░░░░░░▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▒▄

  9. ISO #59

  10. ISO #60

  11. ISO #61

  12. ISO #62

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by dyedfire View Post
    Regardless, people will (and always) want to have fun.
    Oh, and so you read this

    Tag: pimp. CJ, oops is cool, praise raptor (unsure why), free speech, landstander's gone lol
    For the drunk post:
    Raptor is a certified badass as far as staff is concerned.
    And I can't wait for this topic to die~
    Happy new year!

  13. ISO #63

  14. ISO #64

  15. ISO #65

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    That kind of thinking kills discussion on site X_X
    Ok, so circlejerk died to a vote. Fair enough.
    General Discussion = Rap Forum?

    Also, I have no idea what chatbox is, much less locate it. This seems like an unnecessary barrier to entry...
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    X_X
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    X_X
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    X_X
    Quote Originally Posted by Cryptonic View Post
    X_X

  16. ISO #66

  17. ISO #67

  18. ISO #68

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Frog View Post
    You have won two internets for this. Thank you. Maybe it should be more easily viewed? Understood what it is for people to use? How many people actually use chatbox?
    Me, Bunny, NoctiZ, Mateo, PoD, Orpz and ika are probably the most frequent visitors.
    Then a bunch of other people pop in every now and then. Slaol, Hypersniper, ect

  19. ISO #69

  20. ISO #70

  21. ISO #71

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by AppleyNO View Post
    No.
    We should have a pegasister/brony reservation.
    When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
    When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
    They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
    Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
    ---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.

  22. ISO #72

  23. ISO #73

    Re: The circlejerk issue

    Quote Originally Posted by Orpz View Post
    PAing in chatbox is like using WinRAR after 40 days

    Not even WinRAR gives a fuck
    No one gives a flying feather about PA in chat box
    An Pan

    When we talked about pubs, we are talking about us.
    When they talked about pubs, they exclude themselves.
    They say only bad players want to modify citizens, and they do not satisfy bad players.
    Are we bad players? We include bad players, but that is just a part of us.
    ---They put veteran, mayor, allowed jester to visit for nothing, and they regretted and say those things are brainless.

  24. ISO #74

  25. ISO #75

  26. ISO #76

 

 

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •