Search:

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;788705]BK and Arbys you have agreed to lych popeyes many times. you saying it and doing it will be 2 different things.[/QUOTE]

He is L-2, waiting for KFC and JitB to say something about it. The second one of us switches he can be insta hammered by dominos to end the day faster.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

BK and Arbys you have agreed to lych popeyes many times. you saying it and doing it will be 2 different things.

He is L-2, waiting for KFC and JitB to say something about it. The second one of us switches he can be insta hammered by dominos to end the day faster.

Legends say Jack in the Box is still showering till this day.

Legends say Jack in the Box is still showering till this day.

[QUOTE=Arbys;788692]It is also possible if we go with popeyes lynch to have JitB witch Dominos onto Starbucks. If Dominos goes for the kill he kills Starbucks. If Dominos roleblocks then he just blocks Subway from doing the kill. KFC kills a scum.[/QUOTE]

Sorry meant Subway.

Originally Posted by Arbys

It is also possible if we go with popeyes lynch to have JitB witch Dominos onto Starbucks. If Dominos goes for the kill he kills Starbucks. If Dominos roleblocks then he just blocks Subway from doing the kill. KFC kills a scum.

Sorry meant Subway.

[QUOTE=Burger King;788688]Actually, thinking more about it- if we can't possibly win if the masons betray us, then maybe we should just lynch Popeyes. If we confirm them as town, we know we can count on Jack in the Box and can still win, if we confirm them as scum, I can kick back and stop stressing so much about this game because we lose. lol

Not switching my vote yet, though. Don't want to end day early and still want Jack in the Box to weigh in.[/QUOTE]

It is also possible if we go with popeyes lynch to have JitB witch Dominos onto Starbucks. If Dominos goes for the kill he kills Starbucks. If Dominos roleblocks then he just blocks Subway from doing the kill. KFC kills a scum.

Originally Posted by Burger King

Actually, thinking more about it- if we can't possibly win if the masons betray us, then maybe we should just lynch Popeyes. If we confirm them as town, we know we can count on Jack in the Box and can still win, if we confirm them as scum, I can kick back and stop stressing so much about this game because we lose. lol

Not switching my vote yet, though. Don't want to end day early and still want Jack in the Box to weigh in.

It is also possible if we go with popeyes lynch to have JitB witch Dominos onto Starbucks. If Dominos goes for the kill he kills Starbucks. If Dominos roleblocks then he just blocks Subway from doing the kill. KFC kills a scum.

So let me get this straight [MENTION=36695]KFC[/MENTION]

You want us to lynch Subway. Then you fire your gun at Dominos. JitB witches popeyes onto himself. Correct?

It is extremely likely they are both scum because subway could have literally just sent a . for her crier message to confirm she was still one. Dominos is a safer option imo, but because chances are so high that Subway is scum that I am probably fine with lynching her and letting you take the shot.

[MENTION=36691]Taco Bell[/MENTION] you realize BK just put down what popeyes is claiming right?

Regardless my vote is going to stay on Dominos atm until I get BK's input if he thinks it is fine to switch.

So let me get this straight @KFC

You want us to lynch Subway. Then you fire your gun at Dominos. JitB witches popeyes onto himself. Correct?

It is extremely likely they are both scum because subway could have literally just sent a . for her crier message to confirm she was still one. Dominos is a safer option imo, but because chances are so high that Subway is scum that I am probably fine with lynching her and letting you take the shot.

@Taco Bell you realize BK just put down what popeyes is claiming right?

Regardless my vote is going to stay on Dominos atm until I get BK's input if he thinks it is fine to switch.

Also I'm not entirely against a popeyes lynch since he is probably scum, but Dominos is way safer since we followed him and caught him in a lie.

Also I'm not entirely against a popeyes lynch since he is probably scum, but Dominos is way safer since we followed him and caught him in a lie.

Also I will state again. I AM NOT AN ESCORT. Dominos is the CONSORT.

Also I will state again. I AM NOT AN ESCORT. Dominos is the CONSORT.

[QUOTE=Burger King;788295]Ok. Then answer me this- How do you suppose you could you have affected Subway's crier article while you were roleblocking KFC last night?

[vote]Dominos[/vote][/QUOTE]

Correct
[vote]Dominos[/vote]

Originally Posted by Burger King

Ok. Then answer me this- How do you suppose you could you have affected Subway's crier article while you were roleblocking KFC last night?

-vote Dominos

Correct

-vote Dominos

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;788041]only one that makes sense to me is the one where Popyes, BK and arby is werewolf. unless Arbys and BK and DQ where purple.

I checked Subway day 1 she was not a werewolf[/QUOTE]

Ok think about this.
If culting really is in the game then a n2 cult of Subway would mean she wouldn't get a n3 article if it overwrites original role. Conclusion Article Missing
Likewise if she is a scum mate with DQ and with DQ dying d3. She has to perform the night kill instead of crier ability. Conclusion Article Missing

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

only one that makes sense to me is the one where Popyes, BK and arby is werewolf. unless Arbys and BK and DQ where purple.

I checked Subway day 1 she was not a werewolf

Ok think about this.
If culting really is in the game then a n2 cult of Subway would mean she wouldn't get a n3 article if it overwrites original role. Conclusion Article Missing
Likewise if she is a scum mate with DQ and with DQ dying d3. She has to perform the night kill instead of crier ability. Conclusion Article Missing

[QUOTE=KFC;788029]Well, first, an important takeaway is that it confirms he had a scum buddy.

As for why there was still a purple attack, there are two possible lines of reasoning:

1. It is highly likely that ANYONE in the purple action can choose to be sent for the night kill instead of their regular night action. This is standard mafia practice. It is also the same mechanic seen in your mason team with JitB; either of you can be sent for the smite but must forgo their regular night action. Thus, killing DQ doesn't prevent the purple kill, but it does force the other purple to sacrifice their regular night action in order to keep killing. Important takeaway: If the second purple was the consort that has been roleblocking, then he wouldn't have been able to roleblock tonight. I got roleblocked, so clearly, that is not the case.

2. It is technically possible that BK/Arbys lied about their detective action and merely knew that DQ was scum through other means (They already know who everyone is because they're part of the other scum team? They're bussing a teammate to get themselves townread? They have a sheriff action as well that they've hidden? Or pure deductive gamble? Many possibilities). This would mean that the regular purple killer was DQ's scum buddy, and DQ was some other unrevealed scum role.[/QUOTE]

Yes because it isn't like Chick's last will directly states that we all share a detective ability.

Originally Posted by KFC

Well, first, an important takeaway is that it confirms he had a scum buddy.

As for why there was still a purple attack, there are two possible lines of reasoning:

1. It is highly likely that ANYONE in the purple action can choose to be sent for the night kill instead of their regular night action. This is standard mafia practice. It is also the same mechanic seen in your mason team with JitB; either of you can be sent for the smite but must forgo their regular night action. Thus, killing DQ doesn't prevent the purple kill, but it does force the other purple to sacrifice their regular night action in order to keep killing. Important takeaway: If the second purple was the consort that has been roleblocking, then he wouldn't have been able to roleblock tonight. I got roleblocked, so clearly, that is not the case.

2. It is technically possible that BK/Arbys lied about their detective action and merely knew that DQ was scum through other means (They already know who everyone is because they're part of the other scum team? They're bussing a teammate to get themselves townread? They have a sheriff action as well that they've hidden? Or pure deductive gamble? Many possibilities). This would mean that the regular purple killer was DQ's scum buddy, and DQ was some other unrevealed scum role.

Yes because it isn't like Chick's last will directly states that we all share a detective ability.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;788024][MENTION=36695]KFC[/MENTION] if DQ was the purple killer why was there a purple attack?[/QUOTE]

We know that there are at least 2 purple now. Either it is DQ was like a mafioso/godfather and goes for the kill each night and when he died the other purple turned into a mafioso or the purple faction can choose who to send for the kill each night.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

@KFC if DQ was the purple killer why was there a purple attack?

We know that there are at least 2 purple now. Either it is DQ was like a mafioso/godfather and goes for the kill each night and when he died the other purple turned into a mafioso or the purple faction can choose who to send for the kill each night.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;788017]Pops pissed me off with I bet you won't hammer. I do not like to be told what not to do[/QUOTE]

And yet you still wonder why JitB is uncooperative with you.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Pops pissed me off with I bet you won't hammer. I do not like to be told what not to do

And yet you still wonder why JitB is uncooperative with you.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;788009]Why would KFC be role blocked? [MENTION=36696]Arbys[/MENTION] explain why you Role blocked KFC[/QUOTE]

I felt like it.




[SIZE=1]Before you take that seriously you fucking idiot I AM NOT AN ESCORT[/SIZE]

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Why would KFC be role blocked? @Arbys explain why you Role blocked KFC

I felt like it.




Before you take that seriously you fucking idiot I AM NOT AN ESCORT

[MENTION=36686]Subway[/MENTION] How come you didn't vote DQ in the end despite you even saying you think he is scum?

@Subway How come you didn't vote DQ in the end despite you even saying you think he is scum?

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;787994]NO NO NO you where not in the night chat with him. it was all arguing[/QUOTE]

I can't possibly understand why.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

NO NO NO you where not in the night chat with him. it was all arguing

I can't possibly understand why.

[QUOTE=Burger King;787970][MENTION=36696]Arbys[/MENTION]

Based on this turn of events I think we need to keep our feedback hidden for now.[/QUOTE]

I agree with that, I do though really want to figure out why there wasn't a crier article.

Originally Posted by Burger King

@Arbys

Based on this turn of events I think we need to keep our feedback hidden for now.

I agree with that, I do though really want to figure out why there wasn't a crier article.

Wtf is the nonsense you are saying Taco Bell. Why is popeyes still alive?

Wtf is the nonsense you are saying Taco Bell. Why is popeyes still alive?

[QUOTE=KFC;787577]What I know to be true:

Dominos claimed roleblocked, and Arbys claimed witched. If these are both true, Starbucks action would have gone through. If Starbucks action went through, it would have targeted DQ, Dominos, or Taco Bell. None of those people received Starbucks feedback, therefore: Either Dominos or Arbys HAS to be lying. And right now, neither of those people are on the lynch stand. I want this explored more, and I want Dominos/DQ/Subway input, before we hammer anyone.[/QUOTE]

I have no reason to lie about being witched.

Here is something to bring up. Didn't Mcdonalds claim he architected dominos and got a roleclaim from him? Mcdonalds hasn't said anything about the fact dominos claimed he was roleblocked. I'm guessing he claimed something that wasn't an escort and since none of the rest of us claim escort then dominos is guaranteed lying. Mcdonalds though said he believes the claim so he had to have claimed a confirmable role unless mcDonalds really just has a lot of blind trust. I don't think he has posted since though so maybe just hasn't had time. Regardless I am staying on DQ because I know he is lying and a killer.

Originally Posted by KFC

What I know to be true:

Dominos claimed roleblocked, and Arbys claimed witched. If these are both true, Starbucks action would have gone through. If Starbucks action went through, it would have targeted DQ, Dominos, or Taco Bell. None of those people received Starbucks feedback, therefore: Either Dominos or Arbys HAS to be lying. And right now, neither of those people are on the lynch stand. I want this explored more, and I want Dominos/DQ/Subway input, before we hammer anyone.

I have no reason to lie about being witched.

Here is something to bring up. Didn't Mcdonalds claim he architected dominos and got a roleclaim from him? Mcdonalds hasn't said anything about the fact dominos claimed he was roleblocked. I'm guessing he claimed something that wasn't an escort and since none of the rest of us claim escort then dominos is guaranteed lying. Mcdonalds though said he believes the claim so he had to have claimed a confirmable role unless mcDonalds really just has a lot of blind trust. I don't think he has posted since though so maybe just hasn't had time. Regardless I am staying on DQ because I know he is lying and a killer.

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;787004]ALRIGHT: Arbys, you directly visited me last night and share a night chat with BK?[/QUOTE]

How is it so hard to understand you dog.

Chick / Burger / I - We all share a night chat together.
Each night we vote on who to do a detective check on. Nobody is sent for the check. It cannot be roleblocked, redirected, or seen by a detective/lookout.
We are all sent the feedback for the check.

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

ALRIGHT: Arbys, you directly visited me last night and share a night chat with BK?

How is it so hard to understand you dog.

Chick / Burger / I - We all share a night chat together.
Each night we vote on who to do a detective check on. Nobody is sent for the check. It cannot be roleblocked, redirected, or seen by a detective/lookout.
We are all sent the feedback for the check.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;786992]Arby you said DQ killed Starbucks. but starbucks was killed by Purple. This is not adding up at all.[/QUOTE]

Well I just know from the detective check that DQ visited Starbucks. DQ claims he doesn't visit. Starbucks died to purple.
Conclusion: DQ is purple.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Arby you said DQ killed Starbucks. but starbucks was killed by Purple. This is not adding up at all.

Well I just know from the detective check that DQ visited Starbucks. DQ claims he doesn't visit. Starbucks died to purple.
Conclusion: DQ is purple.

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;786979]LOL so you are pitching that 3 "town" players are in a "town night chat" ? I pegged the scum gambit to be a lot higher quality then that.

I'll let everyone else figure out what they think.[/QUOTE]

Yes I am exactly claiming that.

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

LOL so you are pitching that 3 "town" players are in a "town night chat" ? I pegged the scum gambit to be a lot higher quality then that.

I'll let everyone else figure out what they think.

Yes I am exactly claiming that.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;786963]WTF everyone now claiming blue but Blue did not know each other but they have night chat? WTF save is this.[/QUOTE]

Read Chick's last will and look at the posts I quoted.
Yes the ICU has a night chat. Chick/BK/I are all in it.
We vote for a detective check each night and the feedback goes out to all of us.
N1: Voted Starbucks > Visited KFC
N2: Voted Dairy Queen > Visited Starbucks

Now he is claiming he doesn't even move which is a blatant lie.
Your feedback on Popeyes being Cult is likely true since both DQ and Popeyes seem to have been buddy buddy on getting everyone to reveal rp names.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

WTF everyone now claiming blue but Blue did not know each other but they have night chat? WTF save is this.

Read Chick's last will and look at the posts I quoted.
Yes the ICU has a night chat. Chick/BK/I are all in it.
We vote for a detective check each night and the feedback goes out to all of us.
N1: Voted Starbucks > Visited KFC
N2: Voted Dairy Queen > Visited Starbucks

Now he is claiming he doesn't even move which is a blatant lie.
Your feedback on Popeyes being Cult is likely true since both DQ and Popeyes seem to have been buddy buddy on getting everyone to reveal rp names.

[QUOTE=Chick-fil-A;784731]Dominos
Chipotle
[COLOR="#00FF00"]KFC[/COLOR]
Burger King
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Pizza Hut[/COLOR]
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Dairy Queen[/COLOR]
[COLOR="#008000"]Chick-fil-A[/COLOR]
Papa Johns
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Subway[/COLOR]
Wendys
Jack in the Box
Starbucks
Popeyes
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Taco Bell[/COLOR]
McDonalds
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Arbys[/COLOR]

People I'd like not to see lynched. It's basically almost everyone I've interacted with :sheep: with some exceptions.[/QUOTE]



[QUOTE=Chick-fil-A;785804]Dominos
Chipotle
KFC
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Burger King [/COLOR]
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Dairy Queen
Chick-fil-A [/COLOR]
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Subway [/COLOR]
Jack in the Box
Starbucks
Popeyes
Taco Bell
[COLOR="#00FF00"]McDonalds [/COLOR]
[COLOR="#00FF00"]Arbys[/COLOR]

If it wasn't obvious. That first one is when I had only made one post in the game.

These are the people who are currently alive. The green ones I consider not good options to be lynched. I believe most of the scums are in the other non-colored group.[/QUOTE]

Yes I am the 3rd detective in the ICU and the last. I wasn't going to vote BK because I believe him to be blue as well.

Now, I was witched last night. Since the mechanic of our group is a voted detective check, it cannot be redirected, detected, or roleblocked.

Here's the detective check for last night. We voted Dairy Queen was our best option. [B]Dairy Queen visited Starbucks.[/B]

[MENTION=36691]Taco Bell[/MENTION]
Why do you think DQ is pushing to get everyone to reveal their names?
Why do you think DQ pulled that gambit on you yesterday to make sure you wouldn't check him?

I know DQ isn't a protective, if he was an investigative why would he be visiting Starbucks? Obviously not a lookout since he didn't state he found the killer. There wouldn't be a reason for him to be roleblocking him since he townread him. Time to hear his claim.

The rest of you guys better not fucking claim your names, the cult is trying to pinpoint the other mason.
[vote]Dairy Queen[/vote]

Originally Posted by Chick-fil-A

Dominos
Chipotle
KFC
Burger King
Pizza Hut
Dairy Queen
Chick-fil-A
Papa Johns
Subway
Wendys
Jack in the Box
Starbucks
Popeyes
Taco Bell
McDonalds
Arbys

People I'd like not to see lynched. It's basically almost everyone I've interacted with with some exceptions.

Originally Posted by Chick-fil-A

Dominos
Chipotle
KFC
Burger King
Dairy Queen
Chick-fil-A
Subway
Jack in the Box
Starbucks
Popeyes
Taco Bell
McDonalds
Arbys

If it wasn't obvious. That first one is when I had only made one post in the game.

These are the people who are currently alive. The green ones I consider not good options to be lynched. I believe most of the scums are in the other non-colored group.

Yes I am the 3rd detective in the ICU and the last. I wasn't going to vote BK because I believe him to be blue as well.

Now, I was witched last night. Since the mechanic of our group is a voted detective check, it cannot be redirected, detected, or roleblocked.

Here's the detective check for last night. We voted Dairy Queen was our best option. Dairy Queen visited Starbucks.

@Taco Bell
Why do you think DQ is pushing to get everyone to reveal their names?
Why do you think DQ pulled that gambit on you yesterday to make sure you wouldn't check him?

I know DQ isn't a protective, if he was an investigative why would he be visiting Starbucks? Obviously not a lookout since he didn't state he found the killer. There wouldn't be a reason for him to be roleblocking him since he townread him. Time to hear his claim.

The rest of you guys better not fucking claim your names, the cult is trying to pinpoint the other mason.

-vote Dairy Queen

Ugh, I really hate phone posting and if it isn't obvious I still have a running fever. I don't think the BK lynch is a good idea.

I do think Chipotle is scum and the likely witch so [vote]Chipotle[/vote]

Ugh, I really hate phone posting and if it isn't obvious I still have a running fever. I don't think the BK lynch is a good idea.

I do think Chipotle is scum and the likely witch so

-vote Chipotle

[QUOTE=KFC;785958]Just wanted to go back and draw attention to this part specifically: This is in no way a believable scum win condition, as technically, it doesn't even oppose the Town's win condition. The Town win condition's primary requirement is that at least 1 Town is alive at the end. The only way another win condition can oppose that is if it specifically requires all town to be dead (or converted?). Otherwise, the game would have ended already in a mutual victory, because we have at least 1 town alive, and at least 1 scum alive, and those conditions don't directly oppose each other.[/QUOTE]

Ok, I'll admit I was wrong in that regard. I believe chick to be with the town. Maybe it is just town vs town aligned.

Anyways there is a cult if Taco Bell is to be believed. I do believe him that there is cult. I don't think McD would be a n1 target. We know that he can architect chat. If he is scum currently then he would be starting scum. While it would be a gamble, I believe a win condition can always be fake able which is why I'll still keep some doubts. I wasn't in any way advocating we lynch him though if that is what you were thinking. I do think he has a very dense view point.

Like I said before the interaction between you and him on day one left me somewhat suspect, but maybe I really am just trying to see something that isn't there.

[QUOTE=Popeyes;785971]
[MENTION=36696]Arbys[/MENTION]
I’m very sorry you are down with the sickness.
Would you mind weighing in on the reactive nature of StarBucks vs Burger King?[/QUOTE]

I don't want to do a low detailed post about what I think right now between the both of them because I'm about to pass out and go to bed again. I'll try my hardest to give a good read on this in the morning. I do want to ask one question to Starbucks though before I go.

[QUOTE=Starbucks;785920]
Conspiracy, this fucker is the cult whos fears my not being recruitable because of my unique feedback and actually wants to squash communication so he can lurk to victory. He's been openly scum since post #447 but his entire defense was "nope", which is either a grossly low value defense not fit to earn support, or a trolly prod (given my character) for which he then wants to turn around and scum read me for. Hypocrisy.
[/QUOTE]
How are you so sure that being recruited to the cult removes your current role actions? Maybe I just misunderstanding how you worded this.

Also [MENTION=36691]Taco Bell[/MENTION]. You said that the cult recruits and kills each night. Do you know if one of them does both? IE Werewolf visits someone to kill and someone to recruit therefore visiting 2 people.

Originally Posted by KFC

Just wanted to go back and draw attention to this part specifically: This is in no way a believable scum win condition, as technically, it doesn't even oppose the Town's win condition. The Town win condition's primary requirement is that at least 1 Town is alive at the end. The only way another win condition can oppose that is if it specifically requires all town to be dead (or converted?). Otherwise, the game would have ended already in a mutual victory, because we have at least 1 town alive, and at least 1 scum alive, and those conditions don't directly oppose each other.

Ok, I'll admit I was wrong in that regard. I believe chick to be with the town. Maybe it is just town vs town aligned.

Anyways there is a cult if Taco Bell is to be believed. I do believe him that there is cult. I don't think McD would be a n1 target. We know that he can architect chat. If he is scum currently then he would be starting scum. While it would be a gamble, I believe a win condition can always be fake able which is why I'll still keep some doubts. I wasn't in any way advocating we lynch him though if that is what you were thinking. I do think he has a very dense view point.

Like I said before the interaction between you and him on day one left me somewhat suspect, but maybe I really am just trying to see something that isn't there.

Originally Posted by Popeyes

@Arbys
I’m very sorry you are down with the sickness.
Would you mind weighing in on the reactive nature of StarBucks vs Burger King?

I don't want to do a low detailed post about what I think right now between the both of them because I'm about to pass out and go to bed again. I'll try my hardest to give a good read on this in the morning. I do want to ask one question to Starbucks though before I go.

Originally Posted by Starbucks

Conspiracy, this fucker is the cult whos fears my not being recruitable because of my unique feedback and actually wants to squash communication so he can lurk to victory. He's been openly scum since post #447 but his entire defense was "nope", which is either a grossly low value defense not fit to earn support, or a trolly prod (given my character) for which he then wants to turn around and scum read me for. Hypocrisy.

How are you so sure that being recruited to the cult removes your current role actions? Maybe I just misunderstanding how you worded this.

Also @Taco Bell . You said that the cult recruits and kills each night. Do you know if one of them does both? IE Werewolf visits someone to kill and someone to recruit therefore visiting 2 people.

[QUOTE=Popeyes;785700]Im also curious about [MENTION=36696]Arbys[/MENTION] not voting Starbucks, but voting Wendys (whilst stating that we need the information) once that train occurred.
What are you current thoughts on the day proceedings today?[/QUOTE]

Sorry very busy and I have a fever now so not doing well currently. Still reading through everything.

Current thoughts, Taco bell's mason reveal was odd. I believe he just really felt like getting the point across that there was cult this game. I want to feel like he did this from a town perspective, but some stuff just is weird about it. He had no reason to reveal the other name imo. While 1 for 1 is generally good for town, if his other mason has the ability to smite cult then scum getting him killed is to their advantage heavily since Taco Bell confirmed he can only check if someone is cult. So he gave cult the opportunity in the future to use his partner's name and he doesn't even know who his partner is. Second not having a night chat with the other mason seems relatively uncommon, but I believe it is possible. Taco bell's posting style is incredibly confusing, but I believe that is more player indicative rather than alignment. Lastly it could be possibly, but would he really know that they can bite and cult someone each night? I feel like he would probably just know there is a cult that can kill. Not such a specific mechanic.

[QUOTE=McDonalds;785333]my win con is to eliminate all players with an opposing win condition and make sure that 1 town member is alive at the end.

Chick talked about being part of some kind of corporation and that made me think that he is not town.[/QUOTE]

Switch town for scum
my win con is to eliminate all players with an opposing win condition and make sure that 1 scum member is alive at the end.

That sounds like a believable scum win condition too. It would be ballsy, but not unrealistic. He is by no means confirmed town to me just because he put his win condition forward. Especially for such a hardcore tunnel on Chick when Subway's rp specifically states that ICU were hired by her so it is believable chick has a win condition that aligns with town.

As for roles, I'm surprised so many people didn't realize that your rp name is your role.

I actually contemplated the idea that the setup may have a witch based off of the rp given by Starbucks about Julien hiring women, waking up with no memories, and it was probably the witch that cursed the family rp wise.

Based off of the votes at the current time it seems that pressure is mainly on Chipotle and people have moved away from the topic of the poisoned food. It is probably understandable since I don't think the rp is supposed to tell us exactly who the scum are. More it is probably just so we get an understanding of the roles in the game. Witch aside since it is implied that a witch is already a female. I have to read deeper into Chipotle's posts to get an accurate read. Based off of what I've read I wouldn't be entirely surprised if she flipped witch since female and the open citizen claim on day one is suspect.

I wish Wendys would have said more when the votes went on her. Probably didn't suspect the train to go through with such little time. The timing of her coming in at the end to join a train and then when votes flipped onto her just shouting about scum buddies didn't look good. The poison part without her revealing rp just sounded like discredit towards the people who claimed to work with food.

KFC are you FULLY sure you don't know anything about McDonalds? Your clearing of him alleviating any pressure based on the premise it seemed like his rp aligned with what your's said.
Then before that
[QUOTE=KFC;785000]In my experience, scum are rarely the lurkers, but I’d vote with you to get Mickey D to contribute more if I weren’t already pressuring someone who conveniently decided to disappear once I voted them and started questioning them directly.[/QUOTE]
Just looks like you were defending him, but I could be reading into nothing. I generally find you pro town, but that chain looked like defending.

Lastly, I just want to say I find the irony of the 2 deaths hilarious. Both pizza places too.

Going back to reading now.

Originally Posted by Popeyes

Im also curious about @Arbys not voting Starbucks, but voting Wendys (whilst stating that we need the information) once that train occurred.
What are you current thoughts on the day proceedings today?

Sorry very busy and I have a fever now so not doing well currently. Still reading through everything.

Current thoughts, Taco bell's mason reveal was odd. I believe he just really felt like getting the point across that there was cult this game. I want to feel like he did this from a town perspective, but some stuff just is weird about it. He had no reason to reveal the other name imo. While 1 for 1 is generally good for town, if his other mason has the ability to smite cult then scum getting him killed is to their advantage heavily since Taco Bell confirmed he can only check if someone is cult. So he gave cult the opportunity in the future to use his partner's name and he doesn't even know who his partner is. Second not having a night chat with the other mason seems relatively uncommon, but I believe it is possible. Taco bell's posting style is incredibly confusing, but I believe that is more player indicative rather than alignment. Lastly it could be possibly, but would he really know that they can bite and cult someone each night? I feel like he would probably just know there is a cult that can kill. Not such a specific mechanic.

Originally Posted by McDonalds

my win con is to eliminate all players with an opposing win condition and make sure that 1 town member is alive at the end.

Chick talked about being part of some kind of corporation and that made me think that he is not town.

Switch town for scum
my win con is to eliminate all players with an opposing win condition and make sure that 1 scum member is alive at the end.

That sounds like a believable scum win condition too. It would be ballsy, but not unrealistic. He is by no means confirmed town to me just because he put his win condition forward. Especially for such a hardcore tunnel on Chick when Subway's rp specifically states that ICU were hired by her so it is believable chick has a win condition that aligns with town.

As for roles, I'm surprised so many people didn't realize that your rp name is your role.

I actually contemplated the idea that the setup may have a witch based off of the rp given by Starbucks about Julien hiring women, waking up with no memories, and it was probably the witch that cursed the family rp wise.

Based off of the votes at the current time it seems that pressure is mainly on Chipotle and people have moved away from the topic of the poisoned food. It is probably understandable since I don't think the rp is supposed to tell us exactly who the scum are. More it is probably just so we get an understanding of the roles in the game. Witch aside since it is implied that a witch is already a female. I have to read deeper into Chipotle's posts to get an accurate read. Based off of what I've read I wouldn't be entirely surprised if she flipped witch since female and the open citizen claim on day one is suspect.

I wish Wendys would have said more when the votes went on her. Probably didn't suspect the train to go through with such little time. The timing of her coming in at the end to join a train and then when votes flipped onto her just shouting about scum buddies didn't look good. The poison part without her revealing rp just sounded like discredit towards the people who claimed to work with food.

KFC are you FULLY sure you don't know anything about McDonalds? Your clearing of him alleviating any pressure based on the premise it seemed like his rp aligned with what your's said.
Then before that

Originally Posted by KFC

In my experience, scum are rarely the lurkers, but I’d vote with you to get Mickey D to contribute more if I weren’t already pressuring someone who conveniently decided to disappear once I voted them and started questioning them directly.

Just looks like you were defending him, but I could be reading into nothing. I generally find you pro town, but that chain looked like defending.

Lastly, I just want to say I find the irony of the 2 deaths hilarious. Both pizza places too.

Going back to reading now.

[QUOTE=KFC;785246]This. At this point if there are enough votes to muster for a Wendys lynch, especially given Wendys limited contribution and uncooperative nature (And blatant OMGUS against Popeyes, who started the train), this is our best bet for the day.[/QUOTE]

We need the information and if Wendys is town he better have left information in his last will.
[vote]wendys[/vote]

Originally Posted by KFC

This. At this point if there are enough votes to muster for a Wendys lynch, especially given Wendys limited contribution and uncooperative nature (And blatant OMGUS against Popeyes, who started the train), this is our best bet for the day.

We need the information and if Wendys is town he better have left information in his last will.

-vote wendys

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785184]MR Simon?????? Oh shit

[vote]Wendys[/vote][/QUOTE]


[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785218]Wait wait wait why are we voting Wendys now????? I am getting all confused as fuck. Starbucks was the scummy one.[/QUOTE]

Why would you vote and then question your vote later?

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

MR Simon?????? Oh shit

-vote Wendys

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Wait wait wait why are we voting Wendys now????? I am getting all confused as fuck. Starbucks was the scummy one.

Why would you vote and then question your vote later?

[QUOTE=Popeyes;785219]No recollection of any argument I’ve had with the people at this ball[/QUOTE]

Do you know if you have any relatives?

Originally Posted by Popeyes

No recollection of any argument I’ve had with the people at this ball

Do you know if you have any relatives?

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785218]Wait wait wait why are we voting Wendys now????? I am getting all confused as fuck. Starbucks was the scummy one.[/QUOTE]

You're vote is on Wendys. What?

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Wait wait wait why are we voting Wendys now????? I am getting all confused as fuck. Starbucks was the scummy one.

You're vote is on Wendys. What?

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;785203][vote]unvote[/vote] oh fuck. FUCK, WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY SOMETHING EARLIER WHEN HE SAID HIS NAME?

Did you have his name?
or
Did you have that you worked for a catering company?[/QUOTE]

I'm believe he stated he didn't have a name in his. It is most likely through the catering company.

Now [MENTION=36699]Popeyes[/MENTION] are you stating you don't know anything about the conversation either?

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

-vote unvote

oh fuck. FUCK, WHY DIDN'T YOU SAY SOMETHING EARLIER WHEN HE SAID HIS NAME?

Did you have his name?
or
Did you have that you worked for a catering company?

I'm believe he stated he didn't have a name in his. It is most likely through the catering company.

Now @Popeyes are you stating you don't know anything about the conversation either?

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;785141]Fuck if I know I like to drink and have a good time there's no harm in that, or their has been foul play involved via the tampering of my memory.[/QUOTE]

Drugs?

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

Fuck if I know I like to drink and have a good time there's no harm in that, or their has been foul play involved via the tampering of my memory.

Drugs?

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785131]Maybe the person you argued with is the one with the curse. So that has to mean you know who has it. Who is listed in your role card [MENTION=36686]Subway[/MENTION][/QUOTE]

Subway stated that she doesn't know anything about this curse. So therefore it is unlikely she was the one talking there.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Maybe the person you argued with is the one with the curse. So that has to mean you know who has it. Who is listed in your role card @Subway

Subway stated that she doesn't know anything about this curse. So therefore it is unlikely she was the one talking there.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785124]He says "I am married to Dg" and he is confirmed town WTF???? I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone. Understand now.[/QUOTE]

I am assuming you meant Dq not Dg

Had me confused for a while there

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

He says "I am married to Dg" and he is confirmed town WTF???? I feel like I am in the Twilight Zone. Understand now.

I am assuming you meant Dq not Dg

Had me confused for a while there

[QUOTE=Subway;785115]No, I have absolutely no information about having talked to a guest, or a curse, or anything Taco said. So I don't think I'm the Mrs Wagstaff of his roleplay, because it'd be a really low blow from the host to not tell me about a curse my char actually knows about xD[/QUOTE]

Yea I understand that, then if the Mrs.Wagstaff is a different person. The person being talked to still is likely to be a relative given the context of the discussion.

Originally Posted by Subway

No, I have absolutely no information about having talked to a guest, or a curse, or anything Taco said. So I don't think I'm the Mrs Wagstaff of his roleplay, because it'd be a really low blow from the host to not tell me about a curse my char actually knows about xD

Yea I understand that, then if the Mrs.Wagstaff is a different person. The person being talked to still is likely to be a relative given the context of the discussion.

[QUOTE=Subway;785102]And ????? meaning that you don't know, or don't want to say it?

I have zero information about any curse whatsoever. Which leads me to think that... there might be another Mrs Wagstaff. Since I probably took my husband's name, it could be his sister, or even his mother lol.[/QUOTE]

Are we sure that the person you talked to in Taco Bell's rp is a female? I don't think he ever explicitly stated the gender.

Originally Posted by Subway

And ????? meaning that you don't know, or don't want to say it?

I have zero information about any curse whatsoever. Which leads me to think that... there might be another Mrs Wagstaff. Since I probably took my husband's name, it could be his sister, or even his mother lol.

Are we sure that the person you talked to in Taco Bell's rp is a female? I don't think he ever explicitly stated the gender.

[QUOTE=Subway;785099]That's very possible, yea.

[MENTION=36691]Taco Bell[/MENTION] What the hell is a family curse. DOES IT HAVE A LINK WITH THE VAMPIRE AND WEREWOLF THINGS DAIRY QUEEN SAID, AND KFC ADDED THAT THEY WERE MORTAL ENEMIES???[/QUOTE]

Well now with that information coming out and Taco Bell saying you were talking about a family curse, it is probably safe to assume that the person you talked to is a relative in some sort. We also know it wasn't Julien being talked to now.

Originally Posted by Subway

That's very possible, yea.

@Taco Bell What the hell is a family curse. DOES IT HAVE A LINK WITH THE VAMPIRE AND WEREWOLF THINGS DAIRY QUEEN SAID, AND KFC ADDED THAT THEY WERE MORTAL ENEMIES???

Well now with that information coming out and Taco Bell saying you were talking about a family curse, it is probably safe to assume that the person you talked to is a relative in some sort. We also know it wasn't Julien being talked to now.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785034]Why what point does that matter?[/QUOTE]

Chances are her character is just a rich snob though.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Why what point does that matter?

Chances are her character is just a rich snob though.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785034]Why what point does that matter?[/QUOTE]

Mainly just wondering if Bobbi's rp about what the decorations and shit look like is just rp or if it is actually relevant.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Why what point does that matter?

Mainly just wondering if Bobbi's rp about what the decorations and shit look like is just rp or if it is actually relevant.

Taco Bell, was there anything in your rp about what this place looks like since you were in front of the house?

Taco Bell, was there anything in your rp about what this place looks like since you were in front of the house?

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;785025]Why are they shitty? I assume we are in some sort of mansion, I figured they would have went all out with the decor.[/QUOTE]

Hastily put this ball together for some reason?

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

Why are they shitty? I assume we are in some sort of mansion, I figured they would have went all out with the decor.

Hastily put this ball together for some reason?

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;785017]Interesting do you think this could possibly be some sort of halloween party?[/QUOTE]

If this is a ball and we are wearing masks then I am guessing it is a Masquerade.

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

Interesting do you think this could possibly be some sort of halloween party?

If this is a ball and we are wearing masks then I am guessing it is a Masquerade.

[QUOTE=McDonalds;785005]is it against the rules to claim your exact role name?[/QUOTE]

If it was against the rules there would have been a lot of modkills unless you believe all the people who have claimed names are lying.

Originally Posted by McDonalds

is it against the rules to claim your exact role name?

If it was against the rules there would have been a lot of modkills unless you believe all the people who have claimed names are lying.

[QUOTE=Chick-fil-A;784960]Since when were LWs allowed? :)[/QUOTE]

You can ask the host for your confirmation, but yea Last Wills are allowed.

Originally Posted by Chick-fil-A

Since when were LWs allowed?

You can ask the host for your confirmation, but yea Last Wills are allowed.

[QUOTE=Cryptonic;784948][COLOR="#00FFFF"]you guys can write this story, I just want to watch and be entertained lol[/COLOR][/QUOTE]

Questions about roles, etc, will not be answered publicly. Please use the PM system!

[MENTION=5896]Cryptonic[/MENTION] Time to modkill the host!

Originally Posted by Cryptonic

you guys can write this story, I just want to watch and be entertained lol

Questions about roles, etc, will not be answered publicly. Please use the PM system!

@Cryptonic Time to modkill the host!

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;784942]Dude, Why would I make it up? What good would come of it? Are you scared of the info?[/QUOTE]

I'll say that we do have to take the info with a grain of salt, but I do believe that the info you gave was true.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Dude, Why would I make it up? What good would come of it? Are you scared of the info?

I'll say that we do have to take the info with a grain of salt, but I do believe that the info you gave was true.

Well if they were arguing in rp and appear to be family it sounds like. It is likely that they know who each other are regardless of which alignment they both are.

Well if they were arguing in rp and appear to be family it sounds like. It is likely that they know who each other are regardless of which alignment they both are.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;784930]Yes they do, There where arguing about some family curse.[/QUOTE]

I was meaning more that if they know who each other are in game.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Yes they do, There where arguing about some family curse.

I was meaning more that if they know who each other are in game.

[QUOTE=KFC;784920]Then the intriguing question would be, if most people here are not on the list of names you've seen, what's so special about DQ that he IS on the list? Why was he here already passed out drunk when the rest of us were just arriving? I wonder what sort of unique lore/gameplay interactions are in store for us in this game.

All I can say for sure is, I'm excited to meet everyone, figure it all out, and have a blast![/QUOTE]

Makes me wonder if the reason for him being passed out drunk lies in another's rp. Either DQ knows why and kept it or he truly doesn't know.

Originally Posted by KFC

Then the intriguing question would be, if most people here are not on the list of names you've seen, what's so special about DQ that he IS on the list? Why was he here already passed out drunk when the rest of us were just arriving? I wonder what sort of unique lore/gameplay interactions are in store for us in this game.

All I can say for sure is, I'm excited to meet everyone, figure it all out, and have a blast!

Makes me wonder if the reason for him being passed out drunk lies in another's rp. Either DQ knows why and kept it or he truly doesn't know.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;784922]Wait No

Julien Wagstaff is the person I saw on the lawn when I came to this ball.

He claimed he was drunk from partying

Also, it says the 2 Arguing are Guests that arrived before me.[/QUOTE]

Ah well I was thinking he was the groundskeeper based on your earlier posts.
The 2 arguing guests would debunk that theory for sure though.
I wonder if they know each other.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

Wait No

Julien Wagstaff is the person I saw on the lawn when I came to this ball.

He claimed he was drunk from partying

Also, it says the 2 Arguing are Guests that arrived before me.

Ah well I was thinking he was the groundskeeper based on your earlier posts.
The 2 arguing guests would debunk that theory for sure though.
I wonder if they know each other.