Search:

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;785231]You wanted no lych than Starbucks yet now you are ok with info lych WTF????[/QUOTE]

What? Stop panicking and remember correctly. I was always against a Starbucks lynch and I was kinda against a Wendys lynch, still am but at this point it's too late to switch onto someone else. If it's between a lynch on Wendys or no lynch I'll almost always pick Wendys.

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

You wanted no lych than Starbucks yet now you are ok with info lych WTF????

What? Stop panicking and remember correctly. I was always against a Starbucks lynch and I was kinda against a Wendys lynch, still am but at this point it's too late to switch onto someone else. If it's between a lynch on Wendys or no lynch I'll almost always pick Wendys.

[QUOTE=Subway;785214]UUHHHHHUHUHHHU GUYS...

I have no idea of what catering is. So I googled it. And guess what the first fucking thing was... [URL="https://www.chipotle.com/catering"]https://www.chipotle.com/catering[/URL]

DOESN'T THAT IMAGE REMIND YOU OF SOMETHING????? Did Crypt really go that far lol?[/QUOTE]

[url]https://www.subway.com/en-US/Catering/CateringProducts[/url]

Hmm...

Originally Posted by Subway

UUHHHHHUHUHHHU GUYS...

I have no idea of what catering is. So I googled it. And guess what the first fucking thing was... https://www.chipotle.com/catering

DOESN'T THAT IMAGE REMIND YOU OF SOMETHING????? Did Crypt really go that far lol?

https://www.subway.com/en-US/Catering/CateringProducts

Hmm...

I'm okay with sheeping Wendys even if I don't personally believe in it. Maybe it's about time to reveal some info though, Wendys? It might be your last chance.

I'm okay with sheeping Wendys even if I don't personally believe in it. Maybe it's about time to reveal some info though, Wendys? It might be your last chance.

[QUOTE=Subway;785198][I]Your [/I]contributions have also been ass...

Did you even read the stuff about Dairy Queen?[/QUOTE]

Did you even read mine? They aren't too shabby compared to quite a few people here and while that's not setting the bar very high, it's the best I could do with my level of activity.

Sure I did, but nothing especially incriminates Starbucks in my eyes. That's why I'm saying it.

Originally Posted by Subway

Your contributions have also been ass...

Did you even read the stuff about Dairy Queen?

Did you even read mine? They aren't too shabby compared to quite a few people here and while that's not setting the bar very high, it's the best I could do with my level of activity.

Sure I did, but nothing especially incriminates Starbucks in my eyes. That's why I'm saying it.

Why am I coming back to Starbucks being voted by a few people? This Starbucks train is dumb. There haven't really come up any new reasons since the last time people were suspicious of Starbucks and I was already against it then.

I'd be more inclined for a lynch on Wendy as that is gaining traction. It'd only be due to the fact that the contributions have been ass and I'm not sure if that's enough for me.

Why am I coming back to Starbucks being voted by a few people? This Starbucks train is dumb. There haven't really come up any new reasons since the last time people were suspicious of Starbucks and I was already against it then.

I'd be more inclined for a lynch on Wendy as that is gaining traction. It'd only be due to the fact that the contributions have been ass and I'm not sure if that's enough for me.

[QUOTE=Jack in the Box;784909]I'm of the personal opinion that, unless this setup is totally whack, one town for one scum is good in 90% of scenarios. Because of that I don't really know why someone would use another persons name when they could easily just come up with a fake name, fake rp and just say they aren't important to the rp.[/QUOTE]

This.

Originally Posted by Jack in the Box

I'm of the personal opinion that, unless this setup is totally whack, one town for one scum is good in 90% of scenarios. Because of that I don't really know why someone would use another persons name when they could easily just come up with a fake name, fake rp and just say they aren't important to the rp.

This.

[QUOTE=Burger King;784907]Yeah, but like, what if that person is super important and getting them to come forward is totally scum's goal.[/QUOTE]

This will reveal scum though. I doubt any scum's win con will be reached by just knowing who someone is. Maybe that'd be part of it but we'd be a big step closer to winning if that'd reveal a scum we can lynch. Just saying.

[QUOTE=KFC;784908]Easier for scum to get a mislynch out of counter-claiming an already-claimed-and-confirmed RP name, than trying to invent one themselves that matches Taco Bell's descriptions.[/QUOTE]

Sure, but right now there's no pressure on him to reveal anything. If they just never claim we won't get anywhere. I'm not advocating to reveal some names for example Taco Bell has but rather for the person we suspect to reveal theirs. That is if we do believe Chick-fil-A to be a person of interest. And having a mislynch and then following it up with a correct lynch is better than not finding scum at all.

Originally Posted by Burger King

Yeah, but like, what if that person is super important and getting them to come forward is totally scum's goal.

This will reveal scum though. I doubt any scum's win con will be reached by just knowing who someone is. Maybe that'd be part of it but we'd be a big step closer to winning if that'd reveal a scum we can lynch. Just saying.

Originally Posted by KFC

Easier for scum to get a mislynch out of counter-claiming an already-claimed-and-confirmed RP name, than trying to invent one themselves that matches Taco Bell's descriptions.

Sure, but right now there's no pressure on him to reveal anything. If they just never claim we won't get anywhere. I'm not advocating to reveal some names for example Taco Bell has but rather for the person we suspect to reveal theirs. That is if we do believe Chick-fil-A to be a person of interest. And having a mislynch and then following it up with a correct lynch is better than not finding scum at all.

[QUOTE=Burger King;784848]But if he did that, couldn't you just, like, lie and say you're one of the names on that list?

I don't like it.[/QUOTE]

That'll be very easily counter claimed though as there can only be one of that person.

Originally Posted by Burger King

But if he did that, couldn't you just, like, lie and say you're one of the names on that list?

I don't like it.

That'll be very easily counter claimed though as there can only be one of that person.

[QUOTE=Chick-fil-A;784815]That post? It actually said:



So yeah, don't change my words...[/QUOTE]

Do you not think you came across as if you were prodding for information on DQ and asking if he was a lover? Because it's very easy to read that into your question and I don't see any other reason for you to phrase that question and ask it the way you did. Either way, you have to think of what you say before you say it.

Originally Posted by Chick-fil-A

That post? It actually said:



So yeah, don't change my words...

Do you not think you came across as if you were prodding for information on DQ and asking if he was a lover? Because it's very easy to read that into your question and I don't see any other reason for you to phrase that question and ask it the way you did. Either way, you have to think of what you say before you say it.

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;784765]I still do not see why everyone town reads Starbucks. Dude is scummy. He comes in very disrupting. Attacking in a way that feels TPR hunting. Yet adds a few flavor posts to make people read him as town. I do not trust Subway at all.[/QUOTE]

Also you meant to say Starbucks at the end instead of Subway, right?

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

I still do not see why everyone town reads Starbucks. Dude is scummy. He comes in very disrupting. Attacking in a way that feels TPR hunting. Yet adds a few flavor posts to make people read him as town. I do not trust Subway at all.

Also you meant to say Starbucks at the end instead of Subway, right?

[QUOTE=Taco Bell;784765]I still do not see why everyone town reads Starbucks. Dude is scummy. He comes in very disrupting. Attacking in a way that feels TPR hunting. Yet adds a few flavor posts to make people read him as town. I do not trust Subway at all.[/QUOTE]

He wasn't being disrupting, he was being aggressive for the sake of being able to pressure, something you seemingly don't know how to do as someone else pointed out earlier as well. Wasn't that Starbucks even?

Originally Posted by Taco Bell

I still do not see why everyone town reads Starbucks. Dude is scummy. He comes in very disrupting. Attacking in a way that feels TPR hunting. Yet adds a few flavor posts to make people read him as town. I do not trust Subway at all.

He wasn't being disrupting, he was being aggressive for the sake of being able to pressure, something you seemingly don't know how to do as someone else pointed out earlier as well. Wasn't that Starbucks even?

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;784768]Well, even at face value I don't find it to be TPR hunting because he's taking valuable names and valuable role play into consideration to try and solve the game, wolfs don't need to try and solve the game villagers do. His "middle ground" is what strikes me as odd but I can see town sided gambits there. Of course there could be scum sided ones also but that's not what i'm getting from him ATM.[/QUOTE]

Town can't solve the game the same way scum can though. There'll always be a lot more uncertainty when town tries their hand and at the same time scum gets all the tools to peg the TPRs and remove important threats. Trying to solve the game like that is heavily anti-town. Just saying that's possible, not necessarily that this is what Chick-fil-A was doing.

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

Well, even at face value I don't find it to be TPR hunting because he's taking valuable names and valuable role play into consideration to try and solve the game, wolfs don't need to try and solve the game villagers do. His "middle ground" is what strikes me as odd but I can see town sided gambits there. Of course there could be scum sided ones also but that's not what i'm getting from him ATM.

Town can't solve the game the same way scum can though. There'll always be a lot more uncertainty when town tries their hand and at the same time scum gets all the tools to peg the TPRs and remove important threats. Trying to solve the game like that is heavily anti-town. Just saying that's possible, not necessarily that this is what Chick-fil-A was doing.

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;784762]Nice you meet you Mr. Pusser. I can think of a few possible reasons from a town perspective that would coordinate with Starbucks' actions. However I find them to be highly selfish and ANTI town in an overall mindset, which leads me to believe there were better ways to go about his "gambit" if he is actually town. Although if his reasoning , if he ever actually explains it aligns with what I'm currently thinking then I actually would be more inclined to town read him, but I don't think he'll ever explain.[/QUOTE]

Of course there are a few things he could say while explaining his actions that'd easily put him on my figurative shit-list but the way I'm reading into this it's enough to make me call you both town for now. I understand how he read a NE into your slot but I'm also seeing something else beyond this in your interactions as well as the things you've said so far afterwards that makes me currently think neither of you is scum.

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

Nice you meet you Mr. Pusser. I can think of a few possible reasons from a town perspective that would coordinate with Starbucks' actions. However I find them to be highly selfish and ANTI town in an overall mindset, which leads me to believe there were better ways to go about his "gambit" if he is actually town. Although if his reasoning , if he ever actually explains it aligns with what I'm currently thinking then I actually would be more inclined to town read him, but I don't think he'll ever explain.

Of course there are a few things he could say while explaining his actions that'd easily put him on my figurative shit-list but the way I'm reading into this it's enough to make me call you both town for now. I understand how he read a NE into your slot but I'm also seeing something else beyond this in your interactions as well as the things you've said so far afterwards that makes me currently think neither of you is scum.

I believe that Starbucks vs Dairy Queen is a TvT matchup at the moment despite the way they seem to accuse eachother. I believe atleast one party has views that are actually different from the surface views that they are offering up. I will not be pursuing either of those today.

Who I do find a bit suspicious is Chipotle who readily hardclaimed citizen, or so he says. We'll see about the honesty of his claim at a later date but currently this is a little bit of an anti-town move in my books.

Regarding the RP and name reveals I see arguments for both sides. I believe in many cases the specific RP is less important than the names but in those other cases it'll be even more revealing than the name could ever be, revealing this readily might be heavily anti-town. This I say while thinking back to how Cryptonic's last setup went down.

Thus I'm choosing to reveal my name atleast. Milford Pusser, pleased to make your acquaintance.

I believe that Starbucks vs Dairy Queen is a TvT matchup at the moment despite the way they seem to accuse eachother. I believe atleast one party has views that are actually different from the surface views that they are offering up. I will not be pursuing either of those today.

Who I do find a bit suspicious is Chipotle who readily hardclaimed citizen, or so he says. We'll see about the honesty of his claim at a later date but currently this is a little bit of an anti-town move in my books.

Regarding the RP and name reveals I see arguments for both sides. I believe in many cases the specific RP is less important than the names but in those other cases it'll be even more revealing than the name could ever be, revealing this readily might be heavily anti-town. This I say while thinking back to how Cryptonic's last setup went down.

Thus I'm choosing to reveal my name atleast. Milford Pusser, pleased to make your acquaintance.

[QUOTE=KFC;784435]Surely it is merely some social anxiety that has the poor Starbucks a bit nervous. I believe he'll warm up to us as the party gets rolling.[/QUOTE]

There's no reason for you to say this about a stranger, Mr. KFC. Is there reason to believe you two might have made prior acquaintance?

Originally Posted by KFC

Surely it is merely some social anxiety that has the poor Starbucks a bit nervous. I believe he'll warm up to us as the party gets rolling.

There's no reason for you to say this about a stranger, Mr. KFC. Is there reason to believe you two might have made prior acquaintance?

[QUOTE=Dairy Queen;784433]Hmmm, It says he has 1 votes. VOTES...? Pardon my bad eeengrish but shouldn't it be 1 VOTE? Somethings not right here...[/QUOTE]

It seems to me as if this party's host does not possess an appropriate amount of brain cells. This will reflect poorly on his character for years to come.

Originally Posted by Dairy Queen

Hmmm, It says he has 1 votes. VOTES...? Pardon my bad eeengrish but shouldn't it be 1 VOTE? Somethings not right here...

It seems to me as if this party's host does not possess an appropriate amount of brain cells. This will reflect poorly on his character for years to come.

[QUOTE=Starbucks;784419]I am a very important role, doc on me pls[/QUOTE]

Don't copy Cryptonic's meta damnit!

Originally Posted by Starbucks

I am a very important role, doc on me pls

Don't copy Cryptonic's meta damnit!

Don't worry, everyone. Papa is here to save this game.

Also what the hell is up with the 1-vote-mayor? Broken game.

Don't worry, everyone. Papa is here to save this game.

Also what the hell is up with the 1-vote-mayor? Broken game.