[QUOTE=Calix;631344]Joy, I'd appreciate you making some notes overnight for tomorrow so that we can see your thoughts :)[/QUOTE]
that is my intentions. the end time unfortunately clashes with my availability time rendering me to be around right close to the end.
i was hoping to get here earlier to at the least do some vca but i can not change the past.
Originally Posted by Calix
Joy, I'd appreciate you making some notes overnight for tomorrow so that we can see your thoughts
that is my intentions. the end time unfortunately clashes with my availability time rendering me to be around right close to the end.
i was hoping to get here earlier to at the least do some vca but i can not change the past.
question, to which person only thinks they are "probably town" if they have a town rolecard?
[QUOTE=MiniZed;631059]How is this even close to game-throwing? I've made my case, Nobody listened. I've accepted that town do not agree with me, and[COLOR="#FF0000"] I am probably town[/COLOR]. I see no incentive to vote someone I do not find scummy, and frankly the only people that I do are Simple Joy and Calix. You will die, and given I cannot confirm your alignment, only assume, and Spruance has the kill, and the neutral could kill a scum, I don't think this is anywhere near a misguided plan.[/QUOTE]
question, to which person only thinks they are "probably town" if they have a town rolecard?
Originally Posted by MiniZed
How is this even close to game-throwing? I've made my case, Nobody listened. I've accepted that town do not agree with me, and I am probably town. I see no incentive to vote someone I do not find scummy, and frankly the only people that I do are Simple Joy and Calix. You will die, and given I cannot confirm your alignment, only assume, and Spruance has the kill, and the neutral could kill a scum, I don't think this is anywhere near a misguided plan.
much of this day has been wasted. seriously did two full ISO on me is just stupid.
if you didn't find me scum the first time, and there has been no new information from/about me. what makes you think doing it a second time will wield any results without forcing them.
iv'e skimmed a lot of the day, i do know the general storyline but no i have not divulged into analytical detail yet.
my vote remains the same.
much of this day has been wasted. seriously did two full ISO on me is just stupid.
if you didn't find me scum the first time, and there has been no new information from/about me. what makes you think doing it a second time will wield any results without forcing them.
iv'e skimmed a lot of the day, i do know the general storyline but no i have not divulged into analytical detail yet.
oh this setup. that solo killing role makes the game incredibly difficult. it enables that player to scumhunt, removes collaboration during the day.
so yes any of the town reads can also be neutral.
Spruance: comfirmed down
darkness: dead
me: n/a (town)
calix: town. given that she has been targeted by the majority of people, chance of being the nightkill target and generally trying to push the day away from poor choices.
unlucky: townish. seems to be acting like a rookie depeding on replacement mechanics and lurking excuses to scum hunt.
[U]target pool[/U]
eggy
kovath
mattzed
MiniZed
the above players i need to investigate more. i also need to analyze the vca. that is tomorrows job.
so for now i will work with one of my town reads going against one of my target pool.
[vote]minized[/vote]
oh this setup. that solo killing role makes the game incredibly difficult. it enables that player to scumhunt, removes collaboration during the day.
so yes any of the town reads can also be neutral.
Spruance: comfirmed down
darkness: dead
me: n/a (town)
calix: town. given that she has been targeted by the majority of people, chance of being the nightkill target and generally trying to push the day away from poor choices.
unlucky: townish. seems to be acting like a rookie depeding on replacement mechanics and lurking excuses to scum hunt.
target pool
eggy
kovath
mattzed
MiniZed
the above players i need to investigate more. i also need to analyze the vca. that is tomorrows job.
so for now i will work with one of my town reads going against one of my target pool.
[QUOTE=Eggy;630696]Werent you the one saying "simple.is 100% scum, if he doesnt flip scum lynch me tommorow"? and now you are saying you dont mind switching that vote? Do you think mattZ is also 100% scum? So is that 2/3 scum right there?[/QUOTE]
unlucky has been calling both me and matt scum all day. you have been here why do you not know this?
Originally Posted by Eggy
Werent you the one saying "simple.is 100% scum, if he doesnt flip scum lynch me tommorow"? and now you are saying you dont mind switching that vote? Do you think mattZ is also 100% scum? So is that 2/3 scum right there?
unlucky has been calling both me and matt scum all day. you have been here why do you not know this?
[QUOTE=DarknessB;630669]I thought the Simple Joy train was stupid especially as he was AFK and people were trying to push a pre-flip association with Calix. If they truly believed that was the scum pair, I would have preferred to see them put their votes where their mouth was and vote Calix. I was also troubled by the aggressiveness that Never Unlucky was employing in trying to get Simple Joy lynched. Almost felt like he was trying too hard / mod play with the LYNCH SIMPLE JOY type messages.[/QUOTE]
but you voted me.
Originally Posted by DarknessB
I thought the Simple Joy train was stupid especially as he was AFK and people were trying to push a pre-flip association with Calix. If they truly believed that was the scum pair, I would have preferred to see them put their votes where their mouth was and vote Calix. I was also troubled by the aggressiveness that Never Unlucky was employing in trying to get Simple Joy lynched. Almost felt like he was trying too hard / mod play with the LYNCH SIMPLE JOY type messages.
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;630397]I scum-read both MattZ and SJoy, I'll settle with any of these two lynches.
Serious vote this time, no "lel's"
[vote]Simple Joy[/vote][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;630354][vote]MattZed[/vote]
he is scum confirmed kek
Seriously, after Eggy asked me what the difference between SJoy and MattZ was, I did an ISO of MattZed's posts and I came to the conclusion that he is scum, lel.
Starts with questioning MiniZed for a summary. I thought it was suspicious that he asked MiniZed specifically but thought nothing more of it.
Throws shade on DB.
Talks about setup specs. Apparently it's a bad thing, and that's the only thing he's done.
Then he fights DB.
This is strange as fuck. It does not feel like a TvT debate, it feels way too forced. MZ admits he's in the process of skimming D1, so he can't have a good read on DB yet... How does he assume he's town?
AH-HA!
My theory is that MattZed is a GW and that he controlled DB to kill Mesko. That's how they both know who they are, and that's why they agree to cease their fight, seeing as they both need each other to get rid of town, lel.
VOTE MATTZED![/QUOTE]
why me over mattzed?
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
I scum-read both MattZ and SJoy, I'll settle with any of these two lynches.
Serious vote this time, no "lel's"
-vote Simple Joy
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
-vote MattZed
he is scum confirmed kek
Seriously, after Eggy asked me what the difference between SJoy and MattZ was, I did an ISO of MattZed's posts and I came to the conclusion that he is scum, lel.
Starts with questioning MiniZed for a summary. I thought it was suspicious that he asked MiniZed specifically but thought nothing more of it.
Throws shade on DB.
Talks about setup specs. Apparently it's a bad thing, and that's the only thing he's done.
Then he fights DB.
This is strange as fuck. It does not feel like a TvT debate, it feels way too forced. MZ admits he's in the process of skimming D1, so he can't have a good read on DB yet... How does he assume he's town?
AH-HA!
My theory is that MattZed is a GW and that he controlled DB to kill Mesko. That's how they both know who they are, and that's why they agree to cease their fight, seeing as they both need each other to get rid of town, lel.
[QUOTE=DarknessB;630638]How are you confirmed Town again?[/QUOTE]
why do you think I placed the word myself within the markings?
its to exclude that from other people.
to me, i -am- confirmed town and can include that information on any VCA I do.
to any other town player, they can do the same.
Originally Posted by DarknessB
How are you confirmed Town again?
why do you think I placed the word myself within the markings?
its to exclude that from other people.
to me, i -am- confirmed town and can include that information on any VCA I do.
to any other town player, they can do the same.
Also, I'm at L-2. Voting me isn't even that worthwhile as pressure because I've already given my comprehensive reads list, so any further votes are pretty much just intent to lynch I guess.[/QUOTE]
re-reading this and i am vary curious. to why did you choose me over the other one?
Originally Posted by Kovath
-vote SimpleJoy
Need more from the two lurking slots.
Also, I'm at L-2. Voting me isn't even that worthwhile as pressure because I've already given my comprehensive reads list, so any further votes are pretty much just intent to lynch I guess.
re-reading this and i am vary curious. to why did you choose me over the other one?
I don't like that you're townreading me for these two posts. They're the last thing I'd expect someone to bring up when giving a read of me.[/QUOTE]
deal with it. WWSD
scum are highly unlikely to attempt to use replacement mechanics as a tool too scum-hunt.
you acted like a rookie townie jumping up and down at such a possibility.
this tells me you are town. some simple analysis like this is much easier than digging and nitpicking though hundreds of posts, as making a case upon someone is easily manipulated that way.
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
~21 hours.
I don't like that you're townreading me for these two posts. They're the last thing I'd expect someone to bring up when giving a read of me.
deal with it. WWSD
scum are highly unlikely to attempt to use replacement mechanics as a tool too scum-hunt.
you acted like a rookie townie jumping up and down at such a possibility.
this tells me you are town. some simple analysis like this is much easier than digging and nitpicking though hundreds of posts, as making a case upon someone is easily manipulated that way.
did i call them scum?
[QUOTE=DarknessB;630585]Okay, so the crux of your analysis is that two spontaneous votes and a policy vote makes someone scum?[/QUOTE]
did i call them scum?
Originally Posted by DarknessB
Okay, so the crux of your analysis is that two spontaneous votes and a policy vote makes someone scum?
[QUOTE=DarknessB;630575]Simple, quotes are fine, but we also need your analysis of them more so. It's not helpful to fish out quotes with providing context on them. That's what I hate about some peoples' read walls honestly. I don't really care about reading some quotes you fished out -- I care about your thoughts on those quotes.
Again: Disclaimer about not coaching, will be dead tonight and flip Town, no panties in bunch.[/QUOTE]
i already explained each of them dare you not to waste my precious time on here.
Originally Posted by DarknessB
Simple, quotes are fine, but we also need your analysis of them more so. It's not helpful to fish out quotes with providing context on them. That's what I hate about some peoples' read walls honestly. I don't really care about reading some quotes you fished out -- I care about your thoughts on those quotes.
Again: Disclaimer about not coaching, will be dead tonight and flip Town, no panties in bunch.
i already explained each of them dare you not to waste my precious time on here.
Never Unlucky & Eggy > Simple must be scum, because of....> hold on let me excavate for a reason. >
Kovath > does not know the difference between lurking and not being here. <-.-<
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;630397]I scum-read both MattZ and SJoy, I'll settle with any of these two lynches.
Serious vote this time, no "lel's"
[vote]Simple Joy[/vote][/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Eggy;630538]Fuck this I find this way to fishy
[vote]Simple Joy[/vote] I was going to vote matrzed because calix town read simple but now I am not at all sure if that is a good thing. It is very possible that her and simple are a scum team.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Kovath;630311][vote]SimpleJoy[/vote]
Need more from the two lurking slots.
Also, I'm at L-2. Voting me isn't even that worthwhile as pressure because I've already given my comprehensive reads list, so any further votes are pretty much just intent to lynch I guess.[/QUOTE]
Never Unlucky & Eggy > Simple must be scum, because of....> hold on let me excavate for a reason. >
Kovath > does not know the difference between lurking and not being here. <-.-<
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
I scum-read both MattZ and SJoy, I'll settle with any of these two lynches.
Serious vote this time, no "lel's"
-vote Simple Joy
Originally Posted by Eggy
Fuck this I find this way to fishy
-vote Simple Joy
I was going to vote matrzed because calix town read simple but now I am not at all sure if that is a good thing. It is very possible that her and simple are a scum team.
Originally Posted by Kovath
-vote SimpleJoy
Need more from the two lurking slots.
Also, I'm at L-2. Voting me isn't even that worthwhile as pressure because I've already given my comprehensive reads list, so any further votes are pretty much just intent to lynch I guess.
Are we just going to sit and wait for them to get online or something...? (if ever)[/QUOTE]
reads are given if and when i have them.
i was given the reason for my requested presence. the predecessor apparently notified the host that he was unable to meet the post quota due to R.L. but then proceeded to post in multiple other threads generously. additionally any posts they did make this game where "shit-posts" so a replacement was due as the host has no tolerance to this behavior, taking swift action to cause less impact towards the game.
i have no idea about RLVG, and the reason was already made clear that it was not Gyrlanders choice to be replaced out.
spruance seems simple, stale, plane. but more tell would require a fundamental stance of actually reading the thread.
[QUOTE=Eggy;630220][MENTION=28408]Simple Joy[/MENTION] [MENTION=10188]MattZed[/MENTION] catch up and give us your reads. Why do you think that you were replacements? What made Gyrlander and RLVG not want to play if you have sny thoughts on that id like to hear them. Also what do you think of spruance?[/QUOTE]
given that I have only lightly skimmed the thread. if you are going to then complain that I am unable to give the amount of time you personally expect me to sacrifice then you shall be dissapointed.
-i seem to already be an improvement on this slot.
-i am used to longer games.
[SPOILER=town tell][QUOTE=Never Unlucky;630060]I noticed something interesting. I could be onto something.
In the Day 2 OP, Iced says this, "@Simple Joy will be replacing Gyrlander as he failed to meet posting requirements, effective immediately."
He does not mention MattZed [Immediately] replacing RLVG. This probably means that RLVG has been replaced by MattZed earlier, during the night, to commit his scum night action.
Interesting...[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;630061]Nevermind. RLVG was replaced because he was more than inactive. RLVG didn't submit a night action. MattZed replaced him and did the night action immediately. Gyrlander probably submitted his night action, then got replaced for not meeting 10 posts. I was wrong.
Feel free to push this idea further if I was onto something.[/QUOTE]
[/SPOILER]
but i must inform you that i do give[COLOR="#008000"] never unlucky a town read[/COLOR] due to his terrible attempt of using the replacement and night mechanics as a tool to scumhunt, only to then dethrone his town thought process.
in other words this is showing a basic attempt of scumhunting. something which less confident players attempt to do.
slowly, i can only be here once each day if i have obligations that day.
Are we just going to sit and wait for them to get online or something...? (if ever)
reads are given if and when i have them.
i was given the reason for my requested presence. the predecessor apparently notified the host that he was unable to meet the post quota due to R.L. but then proceeded to post in multiple other threads generously. additionally any posts they did make this game where "shit-posts" so a replacement was due as the host has no tolerance to this behavior, taking swift action to cause less impact towards the game.
i have no idea about RLVG, and the reason was already made clear that it was not Gyrlanders choice to be replaced out.
spruance seems simple, stale, plane. but more tell would require a fundamental stance of actually reading the thread.
Originally Posted by Eggy
@Simple Joy
@MattZed
catch up and give us your reads. Why do you think that you were replacements? What made Gyrlander and RLVG not want to play if you have sny thoughts on that id like to hear them. Also what do you think of spruance?
given that I have only lightly skimmed the thread. if you are going to then complain that I am unable to give the amount of time you personally expect me to sacrifice then you shall be dissapointed.
-i seem to already be an improvement on this slot.
-i am used to longer games.
Spoiler : town tell :
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
I noticed something interesting. I could be onto something.
In the Day 2 OP, Iced says this, "@Simple Joy will be replacing Gyrlander as he failed to meet posting requirements, effective immediately."
He does not mention MattZed [Immediately] replacing RLVG. This probably means that RLVG has been replaced by MattZed earlier, during the night, to commit his scum night action.
Interesting...
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
Nevermind. RLVG was replaced because he was more than inactive. RLVG didn't submit a night action. MattZed replaced him and did the night action immediately. Gyrlander probably submitted his night action, then got replaced for not meeting 10 posts. I was wrong.
Feel free to push this idea further if I was onto something.
but i must inform you that i do give never unlucky a town read due to his terrible attempt of using the replacement and night mechanics as a tool to scumhunt, only to then dethrone his town thought process.
in other words this is showing a basic attempt of scumhunting. something which less confident players attempt to do.
so, you are jumping to the conclusion that i need to read day one for any post that i comment about on day two to be valid.
pro-tuna-tinned-play here.
[QUOTE=MiniZed;629903]LMAO jumping to conclusions when I assume you haven't even finished reading. Pro-town play here.[/QUOTE]
i voted for minized, that is made clear by the red text that says his name.
tmi=scumtell or do you ignore the point? why do you not consider it a scum slip, some more detail into your thought process is perhaps quite ravenous.
so gylander was trying more to just survive instead of contributing on day one?
was he being attacked? or are we too assume you have the power to feel.
in other words how was gylander exerting survivalist traits rather than contribution.
how in what way was gylander trying more a tell?
honestly you are not even saying this slot is scum, so the vote makes no sense. from what you have explained this slot could also be seen in the light as a tpr, or as faking tpr.
[QUOTE=Never Unlucky;629906]I really don't like this vote. You admit not having read the 33 previous pages, and you then vote Unknown for a post I wouldn't consider a scum slip.
[vote]Simple Joy[/vote]
Your slot seemed shady to me from the start. Gyrlander was trying more than usual which lead me to think that he was trying to survive the day (as a scum would) rather than him trying to contribute. Gyrlander contributing is just not a thing.[/QUOTE]
so, you are jumping to the conclusion that i need to read day one for any post that i comment about on day two to be valid.
pro-tuna-tinned-play here.
Originally Posted by MiniZed
LMAO jumping to conclusions when I assume you haven't even finished reading. Pro-town play here.
i voted for minized, that is made clear by the red text that says his name.
tmi=scumtell or do you ignore the point? why do you not consider it a scum slip, some more detail into your thought process is perhaps quite ravenous.
so gylander was trying more to just survive instead of contributing on day one?
was he being attacked? or are we too assume you have the power to feel.
in other words how was gylander exerting survivalist traits rather than contribution.
how in what way was gylander trying more a tell?
honestly you are not even saying this slot is scum, so the vote makes no sense. from what you have explained this slot could also be seen in the light as a tpr, or as faking tpr.
Originally Posted by Never Unlucky
I really don't like this vote. You admit not having read the 33 previous pages, and you then vote Unknown for a post I wouldn't consider a scum slip.
-vote Simple Joy
Your slot seemed shady to me from the start. Gyrlander was trying more than usual which lead me to think that he was trying to survive the day (as a scum would) rather than him trying to contribute. Gyrlander contributing is just not a thing.
its not all about finding the triad or the mafia or the sk or the mm or the arso or the cult.
you have to trust you [B][U]ns[/U][/B] information also because they are likkly to be town so you know not to vote them and defend them and get them to trut you, for exmlp pm them ur info
(but you remember that could be immune to detec, or a moving roll so dont be a prick and ultra trust ur check]
also check settings cause trolls disable sheriff check
its not all about finding the triad or the mafia or the sk or the mm or the arso or the cult.
you have to trust you ns information also because they are likkly to be town so you know not to vote them and defend them and get them to trut you, for exmlp pm them ur info
(but you remember that could be immune to detec, or a moving roll so dont be a prick and ultra trust ur check]
also check settings cause trolls disable sheriff check
[QUOTE=DarknessB;604048]Simple Joy, I don't have a dog in this fight, but SC2Mafia players tend to dislike unconventional setups. As long as it's pre-game (i.e. not after the game starts, which would be a role quit) and they are not inciting other players to leave (i.e. leave train), every player has the right to vote with his or her feet.
I understand you are perhaps pro-Citizen and trying to bring them back to setups, which I can respect in terms of variety of gameplay. That having been said, putting four of them in your save is very likely to alienate people given the current SC2Mafia meta regarding Citizens (very much against them). You're probably going to need an in-house / private game or players agreeing in advance to get that type of a setup played. It's extremely difficult to get most non 9-3-3 type setups played, especially given somewhat smaller crowd playing Mafia right now.
I don't think it's productive for you to get angry with players who don't want to play your setup. Instead, if you really believe SC2Mafia play would be benefited by having Citizens, you should try to make that case and perhaps start more progressively so that people see that it's not the end of the world. Set roles are also heavily stigmatized in setups -- add four of anything is likely to get you branded as a troll no matter how pure your intentions are. Maybe start with one and see how that goes? Or at the very least, try a softer sell on players vs. getting mad at them for not wanting to play.[/QUOTE]
and why i then said the original topic tital that people who should support my saves should of done so and not ran away.
but dont worry, i just start all games in classic mode now. the reaction has been extraly better than i thought. first game only had 1 leaver
just have to change it to day 1 lynch + extra tome but dont know if i should enable trials
Originally Posted by DarknessB
Simple Joy, I don't have a dog in this fight, but SC2Mafia players tend to dislike unconventional setups. As long as it's pre-game (i.e. not after the game starts, which would be a role quit) and they are not inciting other players to leave (i.e. leave train), every player has the right to vote with his or her feet.
I understand you are perhaps pro-Citizen and trying to bring them back to setups, which I can respect in terms of variety of gameplay. That having been said, putting four of them in your save is very likely to alienate people given the current SC2Mafia meta regarding Citizens (very much against them). You're probably going to need an in-house / private game or players agreeing in advance to get that type of a setup played. It's extremely difficult to get most non 9-3-3 type setups played, especially given somewhat smaller crowd playing Mafia right now.
I don't think it's productive for you to get angry with players who don't want to play your setup. Instead, if you really believe SC2Mafia play would be benefited by having Citizens, you should try to make that case and perhaps start more progressively so that people see that it's not the end of the world. Set roles are also heavily stigmatized in setups -- add four of anything is likely to get you branded as a troll no matter how pure your intentions are. Maybe start with one and see how that goes? Or at the very least, try a softer sell on players vs. getting mad at them for not wanting to play.
and why i then said the original topic tital that people who should support my saves should of done so and not ran away.
but dont worry, i just start all games in classic mode now. the reaction has been extraly better than i thought. first game only had 1 leaver
just have to change it to day 1 lynch + extra tome but dont know if i should enable trials
[QUOTE=mikeu1;603594]I 00:11 SimpleJoy ALL I HAVE A SAVE
I 00:14 SimpleJoy ALL Give it to me
I 00:20 SimpleJoy ALL -repick
I 00:31 SimpleJoy ALL Normal
I 00:44 SimpleJoy ALL Yo
I 00:45 SimpleJoy ALL Mike
I 00:47 SimpleJoy ALL Save
I 00:49 SimpleJoy ALL Hun
I 01:09 SimpleJoy ALL Mike
I 01:10 SimpleJoy ALL U
I 01:12 SimpleJoy ALL Me
I 01:12 SimpleJoy ALL Save
I 01:13 SimpleJoy ALL Now
- I'm not sure who's doing more crying, I believe it was you wanting to put your normal save in. If other people disagree then let them disagree, I left because others left before hand, not a full game. I don't care if their isn't any power roles or any other roles. The other people didn't like your save neither.
-The process takes 10-15 seconds to fill out, if you're not going to fill one out then enjoy playing with the hacker.
You coming here insulting us, doesn't help anything. What is the point of this thread, to bash people that don't like your save. You don't have to tell me what I'm a representative of, I know my duties. Maybe if you wouldn't of lied about your save people would of stayed.
Don't lie about stuff, because I've already caught you lying four times already. Saying I caused the Leave-Train, saying you had a normal save, saying i'm crying than me leaving because no power roles. All you have to do is tell the truth..[/QUOTE]
you left because it's not a full game? so fucking what deal with it. you dont need 15 people to play a game. minimum is 3 if you want -any- discussion. you left because you are just to busy playing with your balls.
and why should i full out that if you are unwilling to play for stupid little excuses reasons. you have to give not just take
leaving causes leave trains, less people leave less the train exists. so yes you are a cause of it. 1)i never stated my save was normal, i just said the word. and if you do look at it, it is normal. just because it isn't used everyday does not reder it not normal.
and yes you are crying because rarther than discuss you feel the need to defend yourself and attack me.
and you dont even know what lying is, go learn it. if someone is wrong does not mean they are lying.
Originally Posted by mikeu1
I 00:11 SimpleJoy ALL I HAVE A SAVE
I 00:14 SimpleJoy ALL Give it to me
I 00:20 SimpleJoy ALL -repick
I 00:31 SimpleJoy ALL Normal
I 00:44 SimpleJoy ALL Yo
I 00:45 SimpleJoy ALL Mike
I 00:47 SimpleJoy ALL Save
I 00:49 SimpleJoy ALL Hun
I 01:09 SimpleJoy ALL Mike
I 01:10 SimpleJoy ALL U
I 01:12 SimpleJoy ALL Me
I 01:12 SimpleJoy ALL Save
I 01:13 SimpleJoy ALL Now
- I'm not sure who's doing more crying, I believe it was you wanting to put your normal save in. If other people disagree then let them disagree, I left because others left before hand, not a full game. I don't care if their isn't any power roles or any other roles. The other people didn't like your save neither.
-The process takes 10-15 seconds to fill out, if you're not going to fill one out then enjoy playing with the hacker.
You coming here insulting us, doesn't help anything. What is the point of this thread, to bash people that don't like your save. You don't have to tell me what I'm a representative of, I know my duties. Maybe if you wouldn't of lied about your save people would of stayed.
Don't lie about stuff, because I've already caught you lying four times already. Saying I caused the Leave-Train, saying you had a normal save, saying i'm crying than me leaving because no power roles. All you have to do is tell the truth..
you left because it's not a full game? so fucking what deal with it. you dont need 15 people to play a game. minimum is 3 if you want -any- discussion. you left because you are just to busy playing with your balls.
and why should i full out that if you are unwilling to play for stupid little excuses reasons. you have to give not just take
leaving causes leave trains, less people leave less the train exists. so yes you are a cause of it. 1)i never stated my save was normal, i just said the word. and if you do look at it, it is normal. just because it isn't used everyday does not reder it not normal.
and yes you are crying because rarther than discuss you feel the need to defend yourself and attack me.
and you dont even know what lying is, go learn it. if someone is wrong does not mean they are lying.
This way we will be able to review it and apply a punishment if it is needed. Thank you![/QUOTE]
the replay is in the first post. i'm not doing any more than that as people quit my game. its up to you if you want a hacker to get away.
[QUOTE=mikeu1;603474]I like to correct Simplejoy for the record.
Replay(1) someone leaves because he had to go in the beginning stages of picking save.
Stormerkr, leaves before I do after save was picked.
Therefore I didn't cause a Leave-train, I'd like you to correct your statement to reflect what really happened, thank!
and btw you lied. You said you had a normal save, that's not a normal save. I don't like liars.[/QUOTE]
still if you are to represent the creators game, then quitting because you are crying cause you cant play without everyone having power roles. i dont call that a good example, like i said show me flaws in the save and i will apologise.
[QUOTE=Yukitaka Oni;603528]Basic standards is 9-3-3 save right?[/QUOTE]
im used to more classical games, wasnt always like this where citizens keep getting excluded.
[QUOTE=Mugy;603531]Are you saying I'm role quitting, after more than half the game already left. Lol[/QUOTE]
you rolled citizen, and you left so yes i guess i am. if it wasn't for me being a great survivor and lynching the wolves each day without fail town would of lost.
Originally Posted by Gyrlander
Hello Simple Joy! If you want to report a player please, post a thread in this forum:
This way we will be able to review it and apply a punishment if it is needed. Thank you!
the replay is in the first post. i'm not doing any more than that as people quit my game. its up to you if you want a hacker to get away.
Originally Posted by mikeu1
I like to correct Simplejoy for the record.
Replay(1) someone leaves because he had to go in the beginning stages of picking save.
Stormerkr, leaves before I do after save was picked.
Therefore I didn't cause a Leave-train, I'd like you to correct your statement to reflect what really happened, thank!
and btw you lied. You said you had a normal save, that's not a normal save. I don't like liars.
still if you are to represent the creators game, then quitting because you are crying cause you cant play without everyone having power roles. i dont call that a good example, like i said show me flaws in the save and i will apologise.
Originally Posted by Yukitaka Oni
Basic standards is 9-3-3 save right?
im used to more classical games, wasnt always like this where citizens keep getting excluded.
Originally Posted by Mugy
Are you saying I'm role quitting, after more than half the game already left. Lol
you rolled citizen, and you left so yes i guess i am. if it wasn't for me being a great survivor and lynching the wolves each day without fail town would of lost.
[QUOTE=Yukitaka Oni;603438]Are you going to report it or not lol?[/QUOTE]
if staff want to review and prove themself they can sort the hacker out from here instead of making me go through some form application tuna-tinned waste of time that they themselves are unwilling to give in my setup
Originally Posted by Yukitaka Oni
Are you going to report it or not lol?
if staff want to review and prove themself they can sort the hacker out from here instead of making me go through some form application tuna-tinned waste of time that they themselves are unwilling to give in my setup
[QUOTE=Yukitaka Oni;603434]Just read it lol. It does allow to report mod. This side is a socialism, not a dictatorship so don't worry about mod abuse you anything, not even mod allowed to break their own rule
[SPOILER=]Shhhhh. Join communism instead ^)O.o)> v(o.o(v[/SPOILER][/QUOTE]
at what point did i claim it was abuse? what i'm stating is that they refused to play a game because they are pricks. which was admitted to.
Originally Posted by Yukitaka Oni
Just read it lol. It does allow to report mod. This side is a socialism, not a dictatorship so don't worry about mod abuse you anything, not even mod allowed to break their own rule
Spoiler : :
Shhhhh. Join communism instead ^)O.o)> v(o.o(v
at what point did i claim it was abuse? what i'm stating is that they refused to play a game because they are pricks. which was admitted to.
To report people properly, go to this link: [url]https://www.sc2mafia.com/forum/forumdisplay.php/6-Mafia-Player-Reports-Rapport-de-joueur-du-jeu-Mafia[/url]
Thank you![/QUOTE]
and why should I report it if staff refuse to play? nothing wrong with the save i use. if it has flaws do point them out. if you watch the game with mugy you will find the game was an enjoyable game with the people that remained.
and why should I report it if staff refuse to play? nothing wrong with the save i use. if it has flaws do point them out. if you watch the game with mugy you will find the game was an enjoyable game with the people that remained.
Two staff have rage quit my games because they are pricks and cannot handle citizen.
[ATTACH]20596[/ATTACH] "Mike causes leave train"
[ATTACH]20595[/ATTACH] "Mugy quits citizen."
And this game has a hacker that correctly names all of my team. Needs banning.
[ATTACH]20597[/ATTACH]
Callout to Spigot if they read this as I have had a few games with them. And DragonAngel.
Two staff have rage quit my games because they are pricks and cannot handle citizen.
"Mike causes leave train"
"Mugy quits citizen."
And this game has a hacker that correctly names all of my team. Needs banning.
Callout to Spigot if they read this as I have had a few games with them. And DragonAngel.